Blog

  • Concept Clarification Template

    Concept Formulation/Clarification/Definition

    Chauncey C. Riddle, 1983
    Blank Template

    Click to see example: Wisdom

    1. Symbols: (Symbols associated with concept in its variant forms.)
    2. Base: (language/culture/time frame of inquiry)
    3. Etymology:
    4. Dictionary definition:
    5. Examples: (Examples in base on other side.)
    6. Correlations (see graphic below)
    7. Key questions: (Questions and answers to illuminate the concept. Use other side.)
    8. Definition:
    9. Examples: (Positive/negative examples to demonstrate or test concept.)
    10. Relevance: (The difference this concept should make in my life: heart, mind, strength, might.)
    Actual Concept Clarification Template from Chauncey’s Course Outline – 1983
  • Concept Clarification Example: Wisdom

    Concept Formulation/Clarification/Definition

    Chauncey C. Riddle,
    1983 Class handout

    Example: Wisdom

    Click to see blank template

    1. Symbols: (Symbols associated with concept in its variant forms.) wise, wisdom
    2. Base: (language/culture/time frame of inquiry) Gospel/scriptural
    3. Etymology: AS, wis=discerning + dom=judgment
    4. Dictionary definition:

    Webster’s Collegiate: “Quality of being wise; ability to judge soundly and deal sagaciously with facts, esp. as they relate to life and conduct; discernment and judgment; discretion; sagacity.”

    Oxford English: “Capacity of judging rightly in matters relating to life and conduct; soundness of judgment in the choice of means and ends. …”

    5. Examples: (Examples in base on other side.)

    ’Tis a wise man who knows his own father.
    Wisdom is justified of her children.

    6. Correlations

    Genus: ThinkingLevels
    Similar: Ethics, morality, copingCelestial
    Perfection: All wiseAll wisdom comes from God
    Pre-requisite (s)Comple-ment:Counter-feit(s)Terrestrial
    AgencyFoolishnessSophistry, being learnedLiving by rules
    Concept:Telestial
    WisdomLiving by impulse
    Opposite: InsanePerdition
    Contrary: Stupidity, innocence,
    unable
    Living to use others while feigning good
    Necessary Constituents

    (table above can scroll side to side)

    7. Key questions: (Questions and answers to illuminate the concept. Use other side.)

    1. What is the connection between wisdom and ethics?
      Ethics is the study of the different approaches to wisdom in the world.
    2. How many kinds of wisdom are there?
      Nearly as many as there are individuals.

    8. Definition: Wisdom is the ability to achieve one’s goal at a tolerable price and never to have to look back and be sorry.

    9. Examples: (Positive/negative examples to demonstrate or test concept.)

    1. Examples: The man who built upon a rock. The man who works hard and saves.
    2. Non-examples: The man who built upon sand. The man who is lazy and a spendthrift.

    10. Relevance: (The difference this concept should make in my life: heart, mind, strength, might.)

    There seem to be many short-run wisdoms, but only one long-term wisdom.

  • Language, Communication, and Morality – Deseret Language and Linguistics Society Symposium – April 1983

    Chauncey C. Riddle
    Brigham Young University

    This paper is an attempt to clarify the spiritual functions of language, communication, and morality as seen in the framework of the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ. The hope is that you who receive this message will be able to say about it both “How correct” and “How obvious.” We shall proceed by stating a series of these ideas, demonstrating each as we go.

    Thesis 1.   All human action is the expression of the desires of a spiritual self. Each human being is a self, a spirit body, which spirit body has a physical tabernacle. The heart and mind of each person are functions of his spirit body. The heart is the seat of desire and the decision-maker. The mind is the power to perceive, to understand, to plan. A person’s strength is the ability of the physical tabernacle to respond to the desires and plans of the heart and mind. Strength involves health, physical stamina, skills, and procreative power.

    The paradigm for human action seems to follow this pattern:

                a. The mind perceives the self in some spiritual and physical relationship with the external universe.

                b. The heart desires a satisfaction, either of the flesh or of the spirit, which the mind has   envisioned in the relationship of the self to the universe.

                c. The desire of the heart triggers the mind to invent a course of action to attempt to satisfy the desire.                                                                                                                                                
                d. The mind creates a course of action and implements it, largely through its control of the physical tabernacle.

                e. The mind perceives the result of the action taken and reports satisfaction or non-satisfaction of the desire to the heart.

                            (Step e is the beginning of the second cycle, recapitulating step a.)

    Thus all human action is the attempt of the spirit of the person to gain some satisfaction.

    Thesis 2.   The actions of a person are his spiritual language. All human action is the attempt to change the perceived relationship between the spirit of the person, the self, and the external universe, which external universe includes his or her own physical body.

    There are two basic ways of doing that. One is for the heart to ignore the perceptions of the universe which the mind presents to the heart and to instruct the mind to create a more desirable universe out of imagination. That is what we call insanity. The other way to change the relationship between the spiritual self and the universe is for the heart and mind to seek to change the external universe so that perception of the universe will later reveal the desired change. For example, if my stomach reports hunger and my heart chooses to satisfy that hunger, it instructs my brain to plan and execute an action through my physical body which will eventually cause perception of gustatory satisfaction as a replacement for the present perception of hunger.

    We now stipulate that every human action, every attempt to change the perceived relationship between the self and the universe, is an example of the person’s language. Action is language as language is action. Part of that action may be verbal, but it need not be. Language is the expression of self, the revealing of the desires of the self as it struggles with the universe for satisfaction. Taken as a totality, the actions of a person become a total revelation of the nature and desires of the self. If we are not able to perceive the nature of a self directly, another way to form a correct idea of what a person is is to observe his or her total expression of desires as revealed in the totality of action, his or her language. All human action is communication of a self with the universe, the attempt to make the universe a more satisfying place for the self. Non-verbal action is classed as language along with verbal functions because both kinds of action have identical origin and goal, differing only partly in the form of the means to the goal.

    Thesis 3.   Communication is to affect and/or to be affected by another being by interlocking with that being. All action is for the sake of effect. All action is language. One cannot correctly interpret the verbal expressions of another person apart from the totality of that person’s actions, which are the totality of his language. Language expression is the communication of the desire of the actor to affect the universe in the hope that the universe will change to in turn affect the actor in such a way as to fulfill his desire. A man plants a tree, which communicates his desire for shade and beauty, in the hope that later the tree will communicate back to him shade and beauty.

    Communication between two beings is thus the totality of all the effects they have upon each other. Communication is not the transfer of ideas. It is simply affect. That affect may have many dimensions. What one person does may affect the feelings and desires of another, or the perceptions, understandings, plans, and concepts of another; or the pain, pleasure location or disposition of the physical body of another being. The first may affect something that in turn affects the body and/or spirit of the second being.

    Communication must have an effect to exist. The effect need not be consciously intended or consciously received. If nothing is sent when there is an expectation of something being sent, that too is a communication, a message, for that lack can affect the non-recipient. One message may be intended and quite another received, but that is still communication as long as there is an effect. Communication is the creation of change and therefore must exist in time as well as space. If there is no space there is no being, but if there is no time, there can be no communication.

    Communication is an interlock of one being with another being, a form and degree of union. That interlock may be physical, or spiritual, or both. The interlock increases with space shared, time spent, increase of number of avenues of affect, number of contacts and degree of change created by affect. Perhaps the ultimate communication is between husband and wife who share and affect each other in all things, physical and spiritual. But spiritual affect is always more important, more profound, than physical affect.

    Thesis 4.   All communication is translation. For the sender, communication is the encoding or translation of desire into action which affects the universe. That desire has at least three dimensions in normal communication. First is the meaning or the intention of the sender; this may be seen as the result the sender desires to have on the universe. Second is the truth of the message, the correctness of its representation. Third is the rightness or morality of the message. For example, suppose I say to you, “Provo will experience a severe flood in the next twenty-four hours.” I say it because I desire to affect you; I speak either truly or falsely; and I speak either in righteousness or not. When I speak or act, I translate at least these three aspects of my spiritual self out into the universe.

    You as the receiver of my message must translate whatever spiritual and physical impact my action of sending you a message has upon you. You must create a meaning for what I say, guessing at my intention; you must assign some degree of truth-value or credibility to that meaning, and you must decide whether I was right or wrong to say it. You translate whatever effect I have on you, inventing this three-fold impact on your own spirit.

    Translation, sending and receiving, is a spiritual phenomenon. For one has intentions, relates to truth, and is moral or righteous or not according to the desires of his or her own spirit at the moment. It is not uncommon for a hearer to receive one meaning, truth and rightness translation for a message, then shortly afterward ascribe a quite contrary meaning, truth-value and rightness translation because his or her own spirit has changed during the interim and now ascribes other meaning-values to the affect of the sender.

    Thesis 5.   There are two kinds of human spirits revealed in communication. One kind of spirit perceives the universe as being filled with other beings at least as important as himself, having desires of their own which are as important in his own eyes as are his own desires in his own eyes. Esteeming the desires of others to be as important as his own, he does not insist on the total satisfaction of all of his own desires, but hopes rather that all can be satisfied, others as well as himself. To that end he is willing to be only partly satisfied himself if such sacrifice will help others to gain some of their basic desires. He hopes to find a way to communicate with others and with the universe so that everything and everyone will be fully satisfied; or failing that, to achieve a situation wherein everything and everyone will have as much basic satisfaction as possible. This kind of being perceives himself as holy, as special, but also perceives other beings to be at least as holy and special in their own being as he perceives himself to be.

    The other kind of spirit revealed in communication is the being who sees himself and his own personal desires as being preeminently important above all else in the universe. He sees other people and other things as beings which exist for his own personal satisfaction only. He may acknowledge that they have their own personal desires as he does, but he will not accord the satisfaction of their desires as having any necessary value relative to his own satisfaction. Thus he sees the satisfaction of his own desires as the only really good thing in the universe. He takes account of others’ desires only as data which may affect as means or deterrents the fulfilling of his own desires. He uses other beings as means, to his own end, helping them to the satisfaction of their own desires only as means to achieving his own desires, sacrificing their satisfaction wherever expedient to the fulfilling of his own desires. This kind of being perceives only himself and his own desires to be holy or special.

    The first kind of spirit communicates to make the universe a better place for everyone. In an LDS frme, this is to be moral. If this action is done in willing obedience to Jesus Christ, it is righteousness. The second kind of spirit communicates to make the universe a better place only for himself. In an LDS frame, this is selfishness, sin.

    Thesis 6.   Communication with God assists those who esteem others. Our being, verbal and non-verbal, essential and unfolding, is fully perceived by our God and Father. We are interlocked nearly fully with him in that everything we are, feel, think, do, and say, is translated fully and immediately to him, directly through our actions as they affect his other sons and daughters and creatures. He, of course, perceives our being, directly, as well as our actions. The extent of that interlock is unbeknownst to most of us, however, for we do not perceive him to the same degree that he perceives us.. We are told that in him we live, move, and have our being, but the consciousness of what that means comes to few and is believed by yet fewer. If our eyes and understandings were opened, we would see that we are in his arms, enfolded in his love and being, already.

    But generally we humans do not perceive that interlock because he, God, has left part of the interlock incomplete. He is in full communication with each of us, with our heart, might, mind, and strength. But he treats as holy, as special, our hearts and minds. He is the first kind of spirit. Though he perceives all, he does not attempt to control our hearts and minds. Rather, he lets us become aware of his heart and mind in our hearts and minds only at times, only by degrees, only on special topics. The fact that he does let us know his heart and mind somewhat makes us free to become as he is. The fact that we do not always have that influence with us unless we seek and cultivate it makes us free to become something unlike God. Because he loves and esteems us, holds us as being holy, he sets us free, to become as he is or not to become as he is.

    If we esteem him as holy and respect his heart and mind when it comes to us, we learn a most remarkable thing: when we yield our hearts and minds to God, he affects us to be able to desire, to think, and to act in such a way that we are then able to assist all others around us to have more opportunity and power to fulfill the desires of their own hearts. We find further that the more we communicate with God and seek to interlock our heart and mind fully with his, the more we can help others. We soon realize that the ideal is a full, explicit conscious interlock of our being with his being. That full communication makes us one with him. Then we have all of his heart, might, mind, and strength at our disposal to assist us to help others to fulfill their desires, even as he has then all of our heart, might, mind, and strength of each of us at his disposal to help others. Through love, full communication has brought us to become one with him. Then as we communicate with others, it is the love of God which we communicate, which shines out of us to all others, inviting them also to share in the goodness of God.

    Communication with God poses a problem for those who see only themselves as holy. He is an affront to them. He tells them that what they are doing is wrong, and that unless they change they will be very sorry about themselves in the long run. If they do not desire to change, they scrupulously avoid discussion or thinking of the long run and try to see how they can turn the influence of God—his words, his priesthood, his church—to the present satisfaction of their own personal desires, regardless of what happens to anyone else in the process, including God himself.

    Thesis 7.   Communication with Satan assists in this life those who esteem only themselves. Satan is not in full communication with anyone, for he would need to cooperate fully with them to do that. But he has been given by God the freedom to communicate something of his mind and will to every accountable human being. His net message to them is to encourage them to be selfish, to esteem only themselves and to use all human beings and other creatures only as instruments to their own personal satisfactions. He treats all humans this same way, using them to achieve his own ends, then discarding them whenever they lose the power to further his own selfishness. Though not full, Satan’s communication is sufficient to entice every human being to evil, to selfishness. Those who accept that enticement are rewarded by heightened feelings of self-desire and the revelation of ingenious means of using and abusing others to fulfill that selfish desire. The more a person interlocks with Satan, the more such a person rejects communication with the Lord. He or she becomes more and more selfish until mortal probation is over. Then, having denied the Lord when he spoke to them, they are delivered to eternal torment to use and be used by the selfish dregs of the universe to all eternity.

    Thesis 8.   Every accountable human being is influenced both by God and by Satan. The point of this thesis is that there is no middle ground. Every accountable person is in communication with God and Satan. The only question is: What is the person’s reaction? Some are strong in the Lord and do great good in the earth. Some are strong in Satan and do great evil in the earth. Many are swayed to and fro, do a little good and do a little bad, but do nothing outstanding.  At any given moment, any accountable person is in communication with Satan or the Lord and acts accordingly. All actions, words and deeds, are the acts of selfishness or of righteousness. The sum of actions may be a mixture, but each specific action is either of the Lord or of Satan.

    Thesis 9.   To communicate with another human being is to interlock either with Satan or with the Lord. To be in the presence of another human being is to interlock, to communicate with him or her to some degree. We carry into that interlock the influence of God or the influence of Satan. The influence, good or bad, of one person is stronger than the influence of the other. The weaker person must reject the interlock and flee unless he or she wishes to be influenced by the stronger, for as time and contiguity increase, communication or the flow of influence increases, flowing from the stronger to the weaker. “Charisma” is the worldly term for the strength of strong people, which can be either good or bad. People like charisma, for they feel strength flow to them in its presence.

    Thus, when we enter into an association, whatever spirit we take into the association retreats if the other person has an opposite and stronger influence. If both enter with the same spirit, that spirit is strengthened in both. The situation need not be another individual, of course. We can enter into communication with a group of people, a book, a TV program, a mountain, etc. The principle of spiritual flow remains constant in all of these situations. Spirit always flows from stronger to weaker whether it be a good or an evil spirit. Whatever spirit possesses us than determines what we do. We always represent and influence others either for the Lord or for Satan. When two people communicate, Satan and/or the Lord are always part of that interlock of being.

    Thesis 10.   To be a moral person one must be strong as well as good. It follows then that to be moral, one must not only have the Spirit of the Lord but have it in sufficient strength that he will not be overwhelmed. Perhaps anyone can be righteous in the presence of the Lord. Who then can be righteous when he leaves the presence of the Lord and enters the presence of great evil? Only he who carries with him the presence and the power of the Lord when he goes into the presence of great evil. The basic ways in which this is done are:

                a. To have incorporated the Lord God into our feelings, thinking, strength, and might, so   that we are one with him. This we do by seeking his presence and his influence, letting that     strength flow into our self, stronger to weaker, until we have built up a great reservoir of his strength. The reservoir is the good deeds we have done and the good words we have said in obedience to him which have strengthened our fiber and changed our being.

                b. To be on his errand at all times. While on his errand we have his continuing presence with us and the promise that we will never be tempted above our ability to withstand. But if we ever depart from his errand and begin to seek our own selfish desires, we lose our protective shield. Should we then encounter an evil influence stronger than that residual good which we retain in our fiber and being, we would then lose our agency to resist Satan. He could then sift us as wheat.

    To be a “good” person, that is, never having done great evil, is a good thing but not the best thing. Much better is the good person in whom the Spirit of the Lord has welled up until he or she is a tower of strength. To be a “good” but weak person and then deliberately to seek our evil influences to “find out what the world is all about” is to commit spiritual suicide. Wisdom would have us seek out the very best in all things and to hold fast to that which is good. Those who seek the Lord and become strong in him, increase thereby their ability to communicate with him, to receive strength from him. Strength thus begets strength. To be moral and righteous one must be good and strong in the Lord.

    Thesis 11.   Communication among humans is good only for those who are in communication with God. We humans need to communicate with each other to solve our problems, to make a better world. What is it that we need to communicate?

    First, we need to discern, to understand one another. To understand a person is to discern both the ideas and intentions of his heart and the kind of spirit which possesses him, either God or Satan. That discernment is a gift of the spirit, fully known to and used by only those who seek and find a full communication or interlock with the Lord.

    We need to communicate about truth. We need to have a common and true understanding of the way things are and were and will be. Since we each can observe directly only a small portion of what is real and not at all what was or will be, we have no direct personal access to enough truth to achieve the common true understanding which we need. We are then thrust back to our spiritual resources. If it is our desire to be selfish, then Satan rules us and he distorts and falsifies the communications we give and receive as to what is, was, and will be. That is why the world of ideas is awash in a sea of falsehood and personal opinion. Only when we deliberately turn to the Lord and deliberately interlock with his being can we gain those true ideas of what is, what was, and what will be to be able to ground our labors in reality. But truth is a stranger, an unwanted interloper, in a world of selfish people. Only the righteous cherish truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

    We need to communicate about what is best to do and how best to do it, that we might gain the advantage of working in concert in making this world a better place. No one of us knows enough about truth or about what is possible, let alone what is best, to become the guide. So the programs of the world must find spiritual resources. Those stimulated by selfish personal interest are abetted by Satan: their promise is false and their glory fades as time passes. Witness all of the political kingdoms of the earth in all of its history. Those leaders stimulated by righteous desires know that they of themselves are not wise, and must turn to God himself who is the fountain of all righteousness. In him, the strong in righteousness find wisdom and success in earthly ventures that build forever and increase in beauty into eternity. Witness the eternal families of those that know and love the Lord.

    Should human beings strive to discern, to find truth and to find wisdom but do not do so in the Lord, then their communication is prospered only in Satan. They may indeed communicate and accomplish things, but their creations will represent degradation and will enthrone selfishness. Such was the situation at the time of the flood, when the thoughts of each heart were only to do evil continually. Such will be the state of the world in these last days. The sum of the matter is that the only intelligent thing to do in this world for any person who desires happiness for anyone other than himself is to seek first to find the true and living God. One must come into full communication with him, then in the strength which flows only from him, to seek to establish his righteousness wherever and whenever possible in this earth. Then the language of such an one will become pure and holy, perhaps even Adamic. Then his communication with all other righteous beings will be full and joyous. Then he will never be overcome nor thwarted by the strength of selfish beings. Then he will speak and do all that is true and right, and in that communication will find that joy which his Creator had in mind as the reason for his existence.

  • A Model of the Conversion Process

    Chauncey R. Riddle
    Preliminary draft
    14 January 1983

    Table of Contents

    Part I          Introduction

    Part II        Models of the Nature and Action of Gods and Man

    Part III       Religion

    Part IV       Education and Communication

    Part V        The Conversion Model

    Part VI       The Kingdom of God

    Part VII      Proselyting

    Part VIII    Obstacles to Conversion

    Part IX       Summary

    Part I: Introduction

    The purpose of this work is to construct a model of the religious conversion of human beings in a frame of thought which arises from the scriptures of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It is intended that this model should be sufficiently detailed that it will provide many practical hypotheses which are susceptible of empirical validation or refutation. It is here assumed that conversion is a real process in a real world, and that intelligence applied to the process can make a significant difference in the efficacy and efficiency of any proselyting program.

    Of necessity, such a model must be built within a context of an understanding of the reality of God, man, nature, and their dynamic interactions, which understanding must be at least as detailed as the model. That is a way of saying that this model must be true in-detail and be based on truth to be valuable. Since truth is primarily the domain of the gods and their prophets, a careful attempt is made here to interpret and construct only in accord with the mind and will of our God. Needless to say, the assertions made here will conflict with the received opinions of the world. But it is hoped that thoughtful Latter-day Saints, servants of Jesus Christ, will read it with interest and profit and perhaps add their own increments of light and truth where it is lacking, that all of us who pray day and night for Zion to come again upon the earth may be one step closer to seeing eye-to-eye.

    A final reality important to note in this introduction is that you, the reader, are entering into a personal conversation with me, the writer. This writing is undertaken as a gift of my esteem for you, whoever you are. It is my hope to write truly, but I know that I can only express my heart and my mind. You will read this with your heart and mind and thus, in the process, will judge my heart and mind and my love for you. I have two regrets already. One, that I am sure my model is not final or definitive, for my heart and mind are not yet what they could be. I have learned so much in the last year, and especially in the last month, that while I exult in the goodness of our God, I have a sense of the greater treasures that lie yet beyond the veil. Secondly, I regret that I probably will not learn from you those things which you clearly see which I do not yet see, this because of the difficulties and proprieties of communication. But if you and I serve God so that His purposes prevail, all of our regrets are swallowed in His love.

    (Because this is yet a preliminary draft, much of it is written in outline form to expedite (1) exposure of the ideas, and (2) your opportunity to skip over parts which might not interest you.)

    Part II: Models of the Nature and Action of Gods and Men

    A.  A god is:

    1.   An independent being (self-existing).

    2.   An intelligent being (makes choices which are not externally controlled).

    3.   A righteous being (righteousness: acting only for the welfare of others).

    4.   A holy being (wholly dedicated to the work of righteousness).

    5.   A possessor of a body (having a personal material nature through which to work).

    6.   A gendered being (male and female).

    7.   A social being (dwells with and works with other gods and other intelligent beings).

    8.   An omniscient being (knows and understands everything, everywhere, past, present and future).

    9.   An omnipotent being (having power to do anything that can be done).

    10. A united being (acts in perfect harmony with every other god).

    11. A family being (has a father and a mother).

    12. An obedient being (does only that which his father tells him to do).

    13. A permanent being (not subject to dissolution, death or retrogression).

    B.  A God is:

    1.   A god who is a father to another being.

    2.   A group of gods who preside over other beings.

    C.  There are two kinds of gods:

    1.   Those who have only spirit bodies.

    2.   Those who have also bodies of flesh and bone (male and female), who beget children.

    D.  Man is:

    1.   An independent being (self-existing).

    2.   An intelligent being (able to make choices which are not externally controlled).

    3.   A spirit being (begotten in a spirit body by the gods).

    4.   A physical being (begotten in flesh and bone by the gods)

    5.   A temporary being (subject to change: death, progression, or retrogression).

    6.   A being presided over by a God (the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost).

    E.  The natural man (fallen man) is:

    1.   A man who knows not or who has rejected his God.

    2.   Subject to a pretended god (Satan) who:

    a.   Fills his mind with lies.

    b.   Entices him to do his or her own will if that choice opposes God’s will.

    c.   Brings distress and disease upon him.

    d.   Brings death upon him.

    3.   Touched by the light of Christ (which guides him to know the best of his options of choice).

    F.   The first man and woman, Adam and Eve:

    1.   Were created by God to populate this earth and to work out their own probation.

    2.   Were created spiritually alive (the sensory organs of their spirit bodies were fully functional to perceive spirit beings).

    3.   Were placed in a paradisiacal (terrestrial) environment which also contained Satan.

    4.   Were free agents in one thing: to partake, or not, of the forbidden fruit.

    5.   They partook of the forbidden fruit, which resulted in their becoming natural, involving:

    a.   Immediate spiritual death.

    b.   Change of their environment from a terrestrial to a telestial state.

    c.   Satan gaining power over them (See E 2, above).

    6.   Their becoming natural gave them the opportunity to have mortal children, who are all born innocent but also spiritually dead.

    7.   As God does (sooner or later) for all natural men, He gave Adam and Eve the Gospel of Jesus Christ that they might regain their spiritual life.

    8.   They accepted and lived the Gospel to the end and were restored to Eternal Life.

    G.  The essential parts of every man are:

    1.   His mind, which is part of his spiritual body and which allows him to:

    a.   Perceive his natural surroundings.

    b.   Conceive of possible understandings of himself and his surroundings.

    c.   Conceive of possible objects of desire and possible means by which to attain those desires.

    d.   Receive falsehoods and misunderstandings from Satan. Receive the light of Christ and the Holy Spirit.

    e.   Communicate with other men and other beings.

    2.   His heart, which is part of his spirit body and which allows him to:

    a.   Entertain the desires and emotions of his own flesh (intensified by Satan).

    b.   Entertain the directions and emotions of the light of Christ and/or the Holy Spirit (the influence of God).

    c.   Choose whether to seek the desires of his flesh, or to follow the influence of God.

    d.   Select a means by which to try to attain a particular choice.

    3.   His strength, which is the powers of his physical body, including:

    a.   His muscle power by which to transport and dispose himself and to alter his environment.

    b.   His brain, which enables him to learn physical skills.

    c.   His memory, which records all of his feelings, understandings, decisions, and actions.

    d.   His powers of procreation, by which to beget children.

    e.   His power of speech and other forms of communication.

    4.   His might, which includes all of his influence in the world which is past the surface of his physical body, including:

    a.   His influence on other people through communication.

    b.   The accumulation of his physical efforts in time and space, the fruit of his skills (wealth).

    c.   His influence on the physical world, especially including that impact he makes through tools, machines, devices.

    d.   His influence on the world through supernatural (priesthood) power, be it good or evil.

    H.  Every man acts in this world in the following pattern:

    1.   His mind perceives the physical (and sometimes spiritual) environment of his own body and the state and relationship of his body relative to that perceived environment.

    2.   His mind understands something of the potentials of what he perceives for satisfying his desires (positively and/or negatively).

    3.   His mind conceives of many courses of action, things he might choose to do in and to his environment.

    4.   The light of Christ (his conscience), if he still has it, shows him a best goal to seek and one or more good means to that goal for his given environment.

    5.   The power of Satan tells him to seek what he, the chooser, personally desires rather than to do what he feels is best, and may enlarge to his mind evil goals and means to these goals which he, the chooser, has not hitherto considered.

    6.   If the chooser chooses what is best (goal and means), he acts as a little child does, simply and delightedly choosing what is obviously good to do. So choosing, the implementation is direct and always a good learning experience even if the means fails to attain the goal.

    7.   If the chooser chooses to accede to his own personal desires (which choice is abetted and commended by Satan) in opposition to his feeling as to what is best, he will be bothered by going against his conscience. He then may consider the matter further, arguing with his conscience, rationalizing “good” reasons for acceding to his personal desires (the flesh). This continues until his mind is cloudy, cluttered with many reasons and options, so that which is best is no longer plain. At that point, what he personally desires has no real rival, so he proceeds to implement his plan to fulfill his own desire, thinking to himself that it remains the only reasonable thing to do.

    8.   If enough choices against conscience are made by a person, his conscience becomes seared, and bothers him less. But it almost never gives up completely; its influence remains to remind the person that he is not doing the best he knows. Recognition of that contrariness brings a self-torment, divides the person, to cause him to struggle against himself, and may result in “neurosis”, “psychosis” or “psychosomatic” illness.

    9.   As a person chooses, repeated choices form habits. Habits make it possible for choice of goals, choice of means, and skills of implementation to be mastered so well that reactions to an environment can become almost instantaneous and without conscious thought. Every habit has been established in connection with choices. “Accountability” is to be old enough and mature enough to have an even opportunity to choose between conscience and the flesh (Satan) in a new area of choice and action.

    10. Novel choices cannot be made by habit. Ordinary situations reveal a person’s habits. It is often the case that extraordinary situations allow a person little choice.

    Part III: Religion

    A.  Personal religion. Personal religion is the habits a person has acquired for making and executing choices. A person’s personal religion and his character are identical. The more habits one has, the more even novel situations are reacted to by habitual choice patterns. The four basic areas of habit are:

    1. The habits of mind:

    a.   The concept patterns with which one perceives and conceives the world, especially one’s concepts of self, man, and God.

    b.   The understanding one has of the interactions and interrelationships of the things one perceives and conceives to exist.

    c.   The possible goals one conceives relative to given perceived environments.

    d.   The possible means to possible goals one conceives relative to given perceived environment.

    e.   The mental skills one uses in thinking.

    2.   The habits of heart:

    a.   The esteem or value and emotions one has relative to things he perceives and conceives.

    b.   The habit of preferring conscience over the flesh or vice versa in a typical choosing opportunity.

    c.   The habit pattern one employs to confuse choosing situation when one does not choose to follow conscience.

    3.   The habits of body:

    a.   Habits of hygiene, nourishment, posture, sleeping, etc.

    b.   Habits of speaking, communicating, manners.

    c.   Habits of pleasure seeking.

    d.   Work habits.

    e.   Physical skills mastered.

    f.    Habits of pain seeking/avoidance/suffering.

    4.   The patterns of might:

    A person’s habits of mind, heart, and body are reflected in the patterns of his might, such as:

    a.   The happiness of his spouse and children and the order in their lives.

    b.   The range and character of his friends and cooperators.

    c.   The treasures which he does or does not lay up.

    d.   What he does with his surplus.

    e.   The order or disorder found in his home and personal property.

    It is to be emphasized that every choosing, accountable human being has a religion. His own religion, his character is his primary stewardship (dominion) in this life.

    B.  Institutional Religion. Institutional religions are social organizations (groups of people) which act to influence the personal religion (personal habits) of themselves and/or other persons. There are always four basic elements or devices by which institutional religions attempt to influence individuals:

    1.   Leadership: Someone must direct the group functions and transmit that religion to the young.

    2.   Theology: A theology is an understanding of men, society, the universe: all things that exist. Central to every theology is a god. The god in every theology is the greatest good, the final decision-maker, the being most esteemed. A god is necessary in every theology so that there can be an ultimate arbiter of all decisions which must be made (practical decisions; many traditional theological issues are not related to practical decisions, which has tended to devalue theology in many people’s eyes). The name for theology in philosophy is “metaphysics;” in science it is “theory.”

    3.   Moral prescriptions: Moral directives are the do’s and don’ts for individual personal choice which the institution (the leader of the institution) enjoins upon its members. The moral directives are the “heart” of every religion. Theology is basically the rationale for the do’s and don’ts. If the moral directives change, the theology must change to properly rationalize that change. Institutional religions which fail to affect the conduct of individual members, which fail to gain obedience to the prescribed moral directives, are failures; they die.

    4.   Ritual: Rituals are the physical and social patterns of action which are constantly repeated to initiate and intensify habit patterns of thought, feeling, and action in the individual adherents of a religion. The staying power of a religion, which enables it to endure from one generation to the next, is in its rituals, not in its theology. The hoped for result of ritual is belief in the theology and conformance to the moral directives of the religion, though sometimes orthodoxy in theology is (unwisely) taken as a token of moral compliance.

    C.  Types of institutional religion. The three basic types of institutional religions are churches, cultures, and governments. (Every social organization has a religious purpose.) An example of each will be given:

    1.   Example of a church: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

    a.   Leadership: Our Church is an example of a social organization wherein the presiding authorities attempt to influence the choices of members and non-members by encouraging them to accept particular ritual observances and certain theological views ultimately to help them live godly lives. The older members try to influence the younger members in the same manner to the same end.

    b.   Theology: The LDS view of God and man (see Part II, above).

    c.   Moral prescriptions:

    1)   Of the heart: Love the Lord with all of one’s heart, might, mind, and strength and love one’s neighbor as oneself.

    2)   Of the mind: Counsel with the Lord in all thy doings and lean not to thine own understanding and He will lead thee in the paths of righteousness.

    3)   Of strength: Be ye clean that bear the vessels of the Lord.

    4)   Of might: Thou shalt offer an acceptable offering unto the Lord: tithing, consecration, beneficence.

    d.   Rituals:

    1)   Private Rituals (worship):

    a)   Prayer: Speaking to our God very personally.

    b)   Scripture study: Seeking out an understanding of the Lord’s law and ways.

    c)   Meditation: Receiving the whisperings of the Holy Spirit and pondering upon them to achieve understanding and to discern the path of action before us.

    d)   Beneficence (alms): Searching out the poor (the hands that hang down, the feeble knees) and ministering to them according to the Lord’s instructions.

    2)   Public rituals (worship):

    a)   The ordinances of the priesthood.

    b)   Family prayer, family scripture reading, family home evening, family council.

    c)   Ward meetings, stake and general conferences.

    d)   Proselyting.

    Note: It is plain that the strength of the LDS religion lies in the private rituals, for unless they are faithfully executed all else will be empty forms.

    2.   Example of a culture-type institutional religion: New York City Judaism.

    (A culture is distinct from a church in that the culture has a widely dispersed, almost accidental leadership, whereas a church has a centralized hierarchy.)

    a.   Leadership: Basic leadership in cultural Judaism is provided by the mothers who instill in the young the fundamental values and habits of the religion. (The rule: a person is Jewish if his mother was Jewish.)

    b.   Theology:

    1)   No belief in the God of the Old Testament; human “intellect” has become god.

    2)   Veneration of Einstein, Freud and Marx.

    3)   Science as the key to knowledge.

    4)   Success in becoming intellectual, cultured and wealthy greatly valued.

    5)   Value placed in blood line.

    c.   Moral prescriptions:

    1)   Intellectual contribution to society is the greatest good.

    2)   Marry within the culture and blood.

    3)   Within the culture, share money, cooperate, but no usury.

    4)   Make lots of money, spend carefully.

    5)   Frankness, courage, persistence, aggressiveness, and problem solving are highly valued.

    6)   Lie if necessary.

    7)   Chastity less valued once a person leaves home, divorce looked down upon.

    d.   Ritual:

    1)   Private rituals:

    a)   Study (do well in school).

    b)   Think (figure out how to get what you want).

    2)   Public rituals:

    a)   Family discussion: setting of goals and values.

    b)   Bar Mitzvah (cash given by friends to a boy upon coming of age).

    c)   Weddings (very social occasions; expensive presents and cash given).

    d)   Hebrew school (special language training sets people apart).

    3.   Example of a Government institutional religion:

    [Note: All governments tend to have an “established” religion because no government can endure which does not rest upon a common cultural tradition (religion). This is because not all matters can be legislated and there must be some cultural commonality for the success of matters which are legislated. The established religion in the United States of America originally was the Protestant cultural religion; that nation’s established religion today is the cultural religion of Humanism. This change was wrought in the main by gaining control of the school system (making it “public”) and then requiring compulsory attendance at the lower levels.]

    Example of a government religion: Soviet Russia.

    a.   Leadership: The leadership in practical matters is provided by members of the Communist Party (which is a church within the government), who hold the principle offices in the government. Leadership in theoretical matters is provided by the university professors (the universities are another church within the government).

    b.   Theology (straight Humanism):

    1)   The leader of the government is the god. The intelligentsia are his priesthood.

    2)   There is no supernatural.

    3)   Science is the means to all knowledge; technology is the means to all accomplishment.

    4)   Man evolved from lower forms of life.

    5)   The group is more important than the individual.

    c.   Moral prescriptions:

    1)   Loyalty to the government (the collective) is the greatest good.

    2)   Traditional religions, especially churches, are to be stamped out.

    3)   Traditional “church” morality has no meaning. Lying, stealing, fornication are legitimate means by which to achieve the government’s goals.

    d.   Ritual:

    1)   Private rituals

    a)   Study of Communist theory.

    b)   Hard work to achieve the government’s goals.

    2)   Public rituals

    a)   Mass indoctrination (all media, schools, cultural events).

    b)   Parades featuring military power, giant pictures of leaders.

    c)   Graduation from universities and schools as an ordination to the approved state priesthood.

    Part IV: Education and Communication

    A.  Education

    1.   Education is the process of acquiring a religion.

    a.   Acquiring habits of heart: Values

    b.   Acquiring habits of mind: Beliefs, thinking

    c.   Acquiring habits of body: Strength, skills

    2.   There is no education which does not involve values, beliefs, thinking patterns, and skills.

    3.   In all education the educator is communicating his values, beliefs, and thinking patterns to the young.

    4.   Therefore, there is no such thing as secular education. All education is religious education.

    B.  Communication

    1.   Communication is the process whereby one person influences the feelings, beliefs, and thinking patterns of another person.

    2.   Every person has a religion. A person’s religion is always the basis and is usually the substance of any communication he sends or receives (interpretations he makes).

    3.   Therefore, all communication is religious communication. There are no such things as objectivity, unbiasedness, neutrality, or pure information.

    4.   All educational processes are communication.

    5.   Communication is the basic public ritual of every institutional religion.

    C.  Schools

    1.   All schools are forms of institutional religion wherein either a cultural religion or the personal religions of the instructors are communicated to and enjoined upon the students by the teachers.

    2.   Ordinarily, schools are the second most powerful form of institutional ritual (the family communications are first, peer communication and media vie for third/fourth).

    3.   To control the religion of a people, those in power find it most effective to:

    a.   Destroy family communication as much as possible.

    b.   Have mandatory attendance at controlled schools.

    c.   Control the media communications.

    d.   Disallow non-government meetings.

    The factor hardest for governments or other institutions to control is peer communication.

    D.  Training

    1.   Training is education which maximizes teacher control and minimizes student initiative in the acquisition of habits of mind, heart, and body.

    2.   Emphasis on training in education tends to destroy creativity unless there is a studied rewarding of student initiative.

    3.   Repressive religions (persons, churches, cultures, and governments) tend to emphasize training in education and tend to reward creativity negatively.

    4.   Repressive religions survive only as long as they have physical power superior to all rivals, for only then can they control the training of the young.

    5.   The most enduring institutional religions in free situations are the ones which successfully foster private (personal) ritual. This fostering is achieved only through training (public ritual).

    Examples of institutional religions which have endured in politically free or adverse situations are Buddhism and Judaism.

    Part V: The Conversion Model

    A.  Definition of Conversion. Conversion is the process wherein an individual person breaches his own present habit patterns by choosing to believe, feel, say, and do things differently than he previously has done, repeating those new choices until they are firmly established as new habit patterns. Another way of saying this is that the person by deliberate effort has reformed his own character. This change can be an improvement (to become more like our God), a degradation (to become more like Satan) or simply an exchange (one good or bad habit replaced by another good or bad habit).

    1.   Strength of character is the number and strength of one’s habits. A person of strong habits is said to do what he does “very religiously.” A person of strong character tends to shape his own environment (for good or evil), whereas a person of weak character (few and weak habits) tends to be controlled by his environment.

    2.   The counterfeit of conversion is conformity. Conformity is the acquiring and manifesting of outward habits of strength and might (body and stewardship) which are not the result of changes of mind and of heart. Conformity is resistive response to strong environmental pressure and thus will endure only as long as the environmental pressure is maintained. Conversion and conformity are easily distinguished if one can observe a person in a situation where that person feels free to do anything he desires to do with no human penalty attached. The Savior has told us to judge men by their fruits.

    3.   Persons most susceptible to environmental pressures are little children. Children naturally and easily acquire the habits of their parents. As they learn language they also learn values (how their parents feel about things), a theology (what the parents believe about the universe), habits of body (how they walk, talk, sit, dress, etc.), and patterns of might (order, disorder, etc.). When evil parents fix falsehood, bad emotional patterns, bad body and might patterns on their children, these are the “chains of hell.” Though Satan cannot tempt little children directly, he can impose the shackles of evil character on them very efficiently through evil parents.

    Example: Parents who say “I will not impose religion upon my children. When they are of age they may choose for themselves.” are actually imposing their own personal religion, their feelings, ideas, words, and action patterns on their own children. They are teaching their children to dislike churches and to like iconoclasm, among other things.

    4.   Training is a means of gaining conformity in adults. It is effective to the degree which rewards and punishments are great and swift. In little children, training usually is accepted in mind and heart as well as body, since there are no previous habits of mind and heart to cause resistance.

    B.  Causation in conversion. Since true conversion must always be self-conversion of mind and heart, what causes conversion? The cause can never, by definition, be a factor of the person’s external environment. Crucial to this model is the following understanding:

    1.   The cause of conversion is always the uncovering of a latent desire within the heart of an individual. The desire has been latent because the individual did not previously understand that a certain option even existed, or, because he previously did not think it possible or wise to choose that option even though it was known and desired.

    2.   The occasion of conversion is always a new understanding of the world wherein a person perceives (learns of) a new option for choice and a means to implement that choice or simply a new and possible means to implement a choice previously desired.

    Example: It always troubled the heart of Person X when a little child of his group was exposed to the elements to die; but he could not resist because this was the long established practice of his culture and was supported by seemingly incontrovertible reasoning. But upon hearing the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ, he found new strength for his feeling that exposing children was wrong because he now had a new source of ideas, comfort, and revelation from God through the Holy Ghost, to help him to know how to implement a change within his own stewardship.

    Note: The net result of this aspect of the model is that converts are discovered, never made. The process of uncovering latent hope and desire is to bring to people new options for believing, feeling, speaking, and acting.

    C.  Stages of conversion. Assuming the natural man as the reference stage, we may postulate both positive and negative changes from that level. The levels are arbitrary, for the range of conversion in life is a continuum, the increments of which are discernible changes of habit in mind, heart and strength and might. Change of mind may lag while changes of heart and strength progress, for instance. But the positing of typical stages can be convenient guide posts just as mile markers note the accumulation of many increments of distance on a highway.

    1.   The natural man is taken to be a person who alternates almost randomly between doing what he knows is best and what he personally desires to do. He exhibits benevolence or malice alternately.

    2.   Stages of positive conversion. These are the result of choices to yield to the divine influence in one’s life which enable one to respond to become more like God. Each one of these stages is a measuring point of the divine spiritual continuum which begins with the light of Christ, develops into the gift of the Holy Ghost and culminates in the open vision of the seer.

    a.   Conversion to morality. Change of the mind to accept the witness of one’s own conscience and thus to recognize that there is a right and a wrong discernable in most situations. That change must be accompanied by a change of the heart to prize the right, therefore to desire it and choose it consistently. This is taken to be the most important of all conversion steps for it is the instrumentality by which each succeeding positive step is taken. The necessary requisite for this change is to be honest in heart.

    b.   Conversion to social responsibility. Change of the mind to recognize the existence of God and the importance of acting to honor God and other men. Change of the heart to choose responsible action consistently is the prerequisite for this new level, which is to keep the standards of the Ten Commandments.

    c.   Conversion to The Church of Jesus Christ (of Latter-day Saints, in this dispensation). Change of the mind to recognize the authority of God in the priesthood authority of the Church. Change of the heart to prize and identify with the Church. Change of the body to keep the word of wisdom and become a participant in Church meetings and functions. To keep the Ten Commandments is the prerequisite to change to this stage of conversion.

    d.   Conversion to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Change of the mind to understand the Gospel pattern of faith, repentance, baptism, receiving the Holy Ghost and endurance to the end as the pattern for making every decision in life. Change of the heart to rely alone upon the merits of Christ. Change of the body to give strength only to those causes which are good. This stage is marked by the adoption and daily practice of the private rituals (prayer, scripture study, meditation, beneficence) of the Savior’s religion. Conversion to the Church is prerequisite to conversion to the Gospel.

    e.   Conversion to godliness. The mind has changed to a rather complete understanding of the ways of God and of one’s own stewardship before him. The heart has changed to become pure, to have no selfish prizing of any kind. The body has changed to reflect the countenance and actions of the Savior because it has been renewed. The might has changed to become a little celestial kingdom.

    3.   Stages of negative conversion. These steps lead one from the state of the natural man to become more like Satan.

    a.   Conversion to immorality (selfishness). Changes from the vacillating of the natural man to a studied rejection of one’s conscience and all that is good (hardening of one’s heart) in favor of consistent choosing of one’s own personal desires.

    b.   Conversion to depravity. Change of mind and heart to study out means to take deliberate advantage of other people to fulfill one’s own personal desires.

    c.   Conversion to secret combinations. Change of strength and might to make league with other depraved and immoral persons to form social organizations to increase one’s own might in satisfying personal desires.

    d.   Conversion to Satanic priesthood. Change of mind to foster direct contact with Satan. Change of heart to do whatever evil thing Satan suggests. Receiving of strength and might from Satan, both natural and supernatural, to build an evil dominion.

    e.   Conversion to perdition. This final stage can be taken only by one who has previously been converted to the Gospel of Jesus Christ and who then deliberately rejects all that is divine as to heart, might, mind and strength. Such an one delivers himself knowingly and totally to become like Satan.

    D.  Conversion of the mind. To convert one’s own mind is to change one’s beliefs and one’s thinking processes (skills and practices in imagining real and imaginary structures and events). The following items are the important parameters of conversion of the mind.

    1.   One’s concept of himself is critical: Who he is, where he came from, what his potentials are, what he can and cannot change about himself and his environment; these are the most important concepts of the mind.

    2.   One’s concepts of other people is the important context factor relative to one’s concept of self.

    3.   The most important “other” person is one’s god (one’s greatest good). Everyone has one: his god is the person he finally defers to in making crucial decisions. This may be himself, another living human being, the true and living God, or Satan (there are no other possibilities, for a person’s god must communicate with him, answer his questions, to function as his god).

    4.   The understanding one has of the status, nature, and functioning of plants, animals, the earth, and the cosmos, is important.

    5.   The thinking habits of conceptualizing, separating reality from fantasy, categorizing, predicting, planning, creating, etc., are each an integral part of each person’s character and the habits that control them are subject to his own will.

    6.   The care and deliberateness with which a person perceives, conceives, and establishes his arrays of options for action is a matter of chosen habit (the manner of use of his thinking skills).

    The following table suggests possible changes in the mind of man as he passes through the different stages of conversion:

    Table- Chauncey Riddle - Changes in the mind of a person as they go through conversion
    Table- Chauncey Riddle – Changes in the mind of a person as they go through conversion – 14 Jan 1983

    E.  Conversion of the heart: To convert one’s heart is to change what one prizes (one’s treasure). That change will result in change of what one chooses both as to ends and the means to those ends. The following items are important parameters of prizing and choosing.

    1.   The basic prizing is how one feels about the relative worth of one’s own feelings as to what he wishes to do (the desires of his own flesh supported by Satan’s encouragement) as opposed to his feelings as to what is right to do, what he ought to do in that situation (the influence of the light of Christ/the Holy Ghost as manifest in his own conscience).

    2.   Next is the prizing one does of other persons around him, as to whether he feels they are holy or not (actually or potentially); beings whom he should respect or not; beings whom he could (should) use as means for his own ends, or not.

    3.   The prizing of material objects and functions, possessing and using plants, animals, the earth, and the artifacts of man.

    4.   As the correct prizings take their place, feelings of pure love (charity), can and will grow in the heart both for God and for all of His creatures.

    The following table suggests possible changes in the heart of man as he passes through the different stages of conversion:

    Table- Chauncey Riddle - Changes in the heart of a person as they go through conversion - 14 Jan 1983
    Table- Chauncey Riddle – Changes in the heart of a person as they go through conversion – 14 Jan 1983

    F.   Conversion of the physical body (strength). The body can be converted only as the mind and the heart are converted and control it. Important parameters of conversion of the body are:.

    1.   Change of habits of hygiene (especially cleanliness); eating habits, dress and grooming habits, sleeping habits, etc.

    2.   Change of habits such as to the ability to focus attention, to do sustained mental and physical labor.

    3.   Change of skill development in physical skills (walking, talking, foreign languages, athletic skills, work skills).

    4.   Change of physical strength and endurance.

    The following table suggests possible changes in the strength (body actions) of man as he passes through the different stages of conversion:

    Table- Chauncey Riddle - Changes in the strength of a person as they go through conversion - 14 Jan 1983
    Table- Chauncey Riddle – Changes in the strength of a person as they go through conversion – 14 Jan 1983

    G.  Conversion of might. If a person’s (stewardship) dominion includes other persons, animals, plants, etc., he is responsible to train them. As a righteous steward he will train them in the skills necessary to become servants of the Lord (good communication skills, reverence, obedience, industry, cleanliness, etc.) and will encourage them to present their own hearts and minds to the Lord as a living sacrifice, that the Lord might then write His law in their minds and in their hearts. As a brother and son, he will exemplify in these stewardships all he teaches and will attempt to emulate the Savior in every way.

    The conversion and/or consecration of a person’s might testifies of the conversion of the steward.

    The following table suggests possible changes in the might of man as he passes through the different stages of conversion:

    Table- Chauncey Riddle - Changes in the might of a person as they go through conversion - 14 Jan 1983
    Table- Chauncey Riddle – Changes in the might of a person as they go through conversion – 14 Jan 1983

    H.  Factors that influence conversion. Though all conversion is a matter of deliberate choice, there are factors outside the heart and mind of the person which affect the choice options of the person and are therefore important to the conversion process. These factors operate to open and close options of choice in both good and evil directions.

    1.   Factors for good in conversion. This sequence is intended to proceed from weakest to strongest. These are factors outside the body of the individual which provide a second witness in addition to that of the divine influence felt internally in one’s conscience. The internal divine influence consists of the light of Christ and the gift of the Holy Ghost.

    a.   Nature. The order, symmetry, and beauty of nature are revealed to men by the light of Christ, in their conscience. Nature is part of the might of God and bespeaks His hand, mind, and heart. To open one’s mind and heart to recognize the hand of God in all things is one step towards accepting the divine influence of Christ in one’s life.

    b.   The words and deeds of godly men and women. Men and women who act morally provide an occasion for the conscience of the observer to register approval both of the act and of the spiritual influence which such people radiate at that moment. Acceptance of that approval of one’s conscience strengthens the power of conscience and makes it easier for the observer to follow conscience, to be moral himself.

    c.   The Holy Scriptures. Reading the scriptures provides an opportunity for the conscience to witness to the individual of the existence and goodness of God and of His way, the way of righteousness. Thus the mind may be better furnished with essential truth about all things and about the options for righteous action. When the scriptures have been altered by man, these truths and options are clouded or confused, causing men to stumble; but even such altered scriptures contain enough good for the influence of God to become stronger in the life of any reader who is converted to morality.

    d.   The words and deeds of living prophets and prophetesses. These are persons truly representing the true God because they are commissioned by Him and act under His guidance. Their words and deeds provide an exceptional occasion for the conscience of the individual to learn of the nature and ways of God and to feel His spiritual influence.

    e.   Angelic messengers. These persons are sent by God when a work is to be done that cannot be done by living prophets. Usually angels are sent to bestow instruction or power; but these can be received only by persons who are already converted to following the Lord. In exceptional cases, they are sent to over whelm the mind and heart of a person because he or she has hardened his heart (rejected his conscience) and has not accepted the living prophets (such as did Saul and Alma the Younger).

    f.    The appearance of God. There is no stronger witness or evidence of the truth or rightness of conscience than a visitation from God Himself. He appears to a man or woman to provide a strong influence to stabilize the mind and heart of a prophet (Moses, Joseph Smith), or to give a condemning witness to the ungodly (the Second Coming).

    2.   Factors for evil in conversion. This sequence again is intended to proceed from weakest to strongest. These are factors outside the body of the individual which provide a second impetus to evil in addition to the internal selfish desires as aided and intensified by revelation from Satan (which are collectively called the “lusts of the flesh”).

    a.   The words and deeds of natural men and women. These persons exhibit a vacillation and double-mindedness which strengthens the selfish urge in the beholder as the beholder sees the deeds and feels the spiritual influence of such persons.

    b.   The words and deeds of depraved and conspiring men and women. The steady, strong evil aura of these persons and the audacity of their evil words and deeds appeal to the fleshly desires of the person, strengthen the impetus to selfishness, and abets the temptation of Satan within individuals who observe them.

    c.   The writings of natural and depraved men and women. The satanic “scriptures” portray and commend falsehood and evil in an authoritative and forceful manner, an impetus which further abets the inclinations to selfishness and satanic action in the flesh of the observer. (Classic example: pornography.)

    d.   The words and deeds of the representatives of Satan’s priesthoods. These who practice priestcraft, often feigning righteousness, perpetrate and amplify evil and incite observers to evil in a powerful, pervasive way, enjoining the chains of hell upon all who will listen to them. They act for power, praise, and gain and offer to share power, praise and gain with those who will make league with them.

    e.   Demonic messengers. Evil spirits who come at the invitation of the living to do the bidding of Satan to furnish gifts and power to perpetuate evil. These cause fear and awe, cowing the will of those who are not strongly committed to following the divine influence, strengthening the selfish in their carnal desires (encouraging them to lift up their heads in wickedness).

    f.    The appearance of Satan. Apparently a suave gentleman, the master of deceit, the eternal champion of selfishness, lies, and perversion, who comes to use, then to cast off his admirers who have converted themselves to some degree of immorality (e.g., as he did with Korihor).

    I.   The key to conversion. The simple key to conversion, the change of one’s habits, is what one chooses to do when one has the alternative of heeding one’s conscience (the divine influence), or of heeding one’s selfish desires (the lusts of the flesh as aided and strengthened by Satan). To choose conscience consistently is to build character towards becoming like God. To choose one’s own desires (selfishness) is to build character towards becoming like Satan. The great and powerful truth in this matter is that no one is tempted by Satan or his own flesh except in and through his own desires. Whatever a person allows his heart to prize, he can and will be tempted by it. Whatever we prize or treasure ultimately controls us. The only prizing which will save a person from evil is to prize only the will of God (to have an eye single to the glory of God), which is the only way to give up selfishness. The narrow path to that end is to listen to one’s own conscience. If followed faithfully, every man’s conscience will lead him unfailingly to accept the influence of God in his life, step by step, until he can finally make that final glorious step wherein he not only says but actually does nothing but the Father’s will. Then truly he has reshaped his own character in the image of Jesus Christ. Another name for that reshaping is “repentance.”

    J.   Apostasy. Apostasy means to stand away from the group. Whenever an individual changes his personal religion to be more and more different from some (any) institutional religion, he is apostatizing from that institution. An individual cannot apostatize from his own personal religion for whatever he does is his religion. An individual can convert himself from one personal religion to another by forming new habits by using his power to prize and choose differently. But no person can ever escape from himself (from his own character, from his own religion).

    K.  The eternal consequence of conversion to godliness. Our character which is all of our habits of mind (memory), heart (desires), strength (purity) and might (dedication) is all we take with us through the veil of death, for we are our own personal religion. If our character has become godly during our probation, then we may claim in eternity all those special family relationships which have been dear to us in our probation and wherein we have sought permission that they might become eternal. That is done by seeking and receiving the requisite godly ordinances and then sealing these ordinances with the pure love of Christ.

    Part VI: The Kingdom of God

    The kingdom of God is the earthly dominion of our God. It includes 1) all of nature, 2) all human beings who are either not accountable (his little ones), or who are accountable and have converted themselves at least to the level of morality, 3) the handiwork created by those who are converted to morality (and which is yet in the stewardship of those who are converted to that stage), and 4) The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

    A.  Nature. Nature is clean, orderly, powerful, fruitful, and an ideal habitat for man’s probation. Through it God sends His rain on the just and on the unjust, giving the unjust space for repentance. But there is a difference: Nature obeys those who obey God, but is the master of those who defy God.

    B.  Human beings.

    1.   Those not accountable. Over the unborn, the young, the ill, and the demented, those who are accountable as stewards hold a godly power, and for the use of that power they are accountable to God. Evil men use that godly dominion to further their own selfish purposes, either to let live or to kill, to help to heal or to leave alone, whichever furthers their selfish purposes. This is what the scriptures call “offending” God’s little ones; unless there is repentance, such evil men can only dwell with Satan, here and hereafter. Godly men and women take special care for those little ones, shielding, nurturing and protecting them under God’s direction until God makes those little ones accountable or takes them into eternity.

    2.   Those who are accountable and are converted to morality. Every soul on the earth who is accountable receives a probation. No man is left entirely to Satan except at his own insistence. The power of God (the light of Christ) is with every man to give each the opportunity to turn to the light from darkness, to morality from selfishness. Every soul on earth who honestly abides his own conscience is an ally to and servant of God, thus an ally to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

    C.  The handiwork of honorable men and women. The human artifacts of the world, on all levels, are neither good nor bad in and of themselves, but are instruments to be used for good or ill by good or evil persons. But there is a difference between the handiwork of a good man and that of an evil man.

    1.   A good man crafts under the influence of the light of Christ. He therefore produces objects and instruments intended for good purposes (to help mankind) and he works to do well in his art, that his artifact may serve well and serve long in the use for which it is intended. The light of Christ urges him to excellence in both function and structure, substance and appearance. If appropriated by an evil man, the handiwork of the good man usually will serve the evil man better for his evil purposes than will the handiwork of an evil man. (A piano made by a good man will serve an evil man longer and better than one made by an evil man.)

    2.   An evil man crafts under the influence of the spirit of Satan, which means that he produces things with as little effort as possible, more for appearance than for quality, more for immediacy than for future reliability, and seeks a maximum reward for his effort. (The piano made by an evil man shines but has a poor sounding board, will not stay in tune, nor hold together long, either in the hands of a good or an evil man.) Only when he crafts an instrument of evil does an evil man work with sacrifice, care, and diligence for quality.

    3.   Anyone who works diligently with heart and mind and body to produce high quality artifacts for the peaceful and honorable uses of mankind serves God and builds the kingdom of God. Such persons may not be moral in some ways, but being moral in any way, such as producing honorable work, is an important step in the right direction. The work of such persons can belong to the kingdom of God even if they themselves are sufficiently immoral in another part of their lives that they do not belong to the kingdom of God.

    D.  The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Though there are good men and women in many other churches who are part of the kingdom of God because they are moral persons, there is but one church organization on the earth at the present time which is part of the kingdom of God. The Church of Jesus Christ is those people who are converted far enough that they can be called “saints” or holy ones because they have wholly dedicated themselves to the work of Christ in the earth. They may not be perfect yet, but they are trying, having entered in at the gate. The gateway to this part of the kingdom is baptism, and anyone who wills not to be baptized when the opportunity is available so wills not to pass an impenetrable barrier to further steps of conversion. The essential aspects of the Church are its priesthood structure, the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the ordinances, and church meetings.

    1.   The priesthood structure. The priesthood is the power and authority to represent God. It’s mission is to open succeeding and appropriate opportunities so that every human being may be able to choose to come unto God, to become as He is. The essential works of the priesthood are to teach, to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ, to judge the conversion of men, to administer the ordinances, and to organize the Church and conduct its affairs.

    a.   To teach. Teaching the Restored Gospel and all other truths important to the welfare of mankind is a priesthood function. Many outside the priesthood would pretend to this calling. Teaching is to be done only under the immediate direction of the Holy Spirit as to whom what is taught and when. This teaching takes place in the homes of the Saints, in the meetings of the Church, and in the missionary labors of every servant of God, and anywhere else that the work of God can be pursued.

    b.   To preach. To preach is to bind a witness, by divine commission, of the true and living God, of the Restored Gospel, and of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, upon those who will not willingly be taught about these things.

    c.   To judge. Judging is a priesthood function enjoined by God in order that ordinances and callings might be administered only to those persons for whom such could be a step forward. A person who is not converted to morality is not a proper candidate for baptism, though repentance can lift him successively to the stage of being converted to morality and then to social responsibility. After that if he can believe in Jesus Christ and receive a sufficient witness of the divinity of the priesthood authority of the Church, being baptized could take him a step forward. When he is truly converted to the Church, then receiving the offices of the priesthood could be a step forward. When he is truly converted to the Gospel, then receiving the temple ordinances could be a step forward. All these judgments must be made by men, holding the priesthood, but not as men. By the gifts of God they must render God’s judgment in each case.

    d.   To administer the ordinances. Ordinances are occasions of enlarging the mind, the strength, and the might of those who have godly hearts. As such persons thus gain understanding, health, and power, they may more fully and more ably serve the Lord. If the ordinances are properly administered by god-fearing men and women, and are properly received by the recipient, the recipient is always lifted to new options and opportunities.

    e.   To organize the Church and to conduct it’s affairs. Appointing officers in the Church organization and the conducting of the meetings and other public matters of the Church are essential in order to continue the instructing and motivating of those who have entered in at the gate. Only those who are already instructed and motivated can instruct and motivate others. If there are too many to be helped and too few helpers, the tree begins to produce strange fruit. If there are many to instruct and motivate but few to be instructed and motivated, those branches produce little fruit. The end of all Church organization activity is to help every person in this world to have increased options for becoming more like God, whatever he presently may be.

    2.   The Gospel of Jesus Christ. The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the information one must believe and accept to be in a position to profit from accepting baptism into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. But to believe the Gospel and to live it are two quite different stages of conversion. Those who are converted to the Church are as newborn infants, spiritually, and must be loved, protected, and nourished. The members of the Church and the Holy Spirit provide the love of God, the Church organization and the priesthood provide the protection of God, and the words of God provide the nourishment.

    To be converted to the Gospel one must learn to:

    a.   Feast upon the words of Christ (through the scriptures and the living prophets) until he can rely alone upon the merits of Christ. This is faith indeed.

    b.   Eliminate every violation or transgression of his conscience (repent of his sins).

    c.   Keep the promises of the baptismal covenant which means to:

    1)   Bear the Savior’s name, gratefully and honorably, always.

    2)   Always remember Him.

    3)   Keep all of the commandments which He gives them.

    d.   Accept and live by every word that cometh out of the mouth of God (to have received the Holy Ghost and be hearkening to its influence always).

    e.   To live fully all one knows, hoping for and praying for further instruction (enduring to the end).

    3.   The ordinances:

    a.   Baptism: To allow the recipient to affirm solemn promises to the Lord, thus to obey the commandment.

    b.   Laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost: To confirm the person as a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, to entitle the recipient to the constant companionship of the Holy Spirit, and to enjoin initial instruction upon the newly-baptized member.

    c.   Partaking of the sacrament: To renew our covenants and to receive again the Holy Spirit by partaking of the emblems of the Savior’s flesh and blood.

    d.   Bestowal of the Aaronic priesthood: To empower the recipient to be an authorized teacher of truth, to be able to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to work, judge, and to preside in temporal matters of the kingdom of God.

    e.   Bestowal of the Priesthood of Melchizedek: To empower the recipient to fill all of the functions of the Aaronic Priesthood; to be able to labor, judge, and preside in the spiritual affairs of the kingdom of God; to receive the mysteries.

    f.    Temple ordinances: To strengthen the mind and heart of the individual to enable him to succeed in enduring to the end.

    g.   Other ordinances: To strengthen mind, heart, and body and might and to be able to endure the opposition of this world in serving our God.

    4.   Church organizations and meetings. The Church is organized into wards, stakes, regions, areas and missions to facilitate administrative matters. The administrative matters focus upon converting the membership to live the Gospel (the perfecting of the Saints), making possible the ordinance work for the dead, and teaching the Gospel to all the world. The purpose of the meetings:

    a.   Sacrament meeting: To partake of the sacrament and to feast upon the words of Christ.

    b.   Sunday School/Primary: To provide opportunity for free discussion concerning understanding and living the Gospel.

    c.   Priesthood/Mutual/Relief Society: To teach the duties and opportunities of priesthood service and to organize the work of administering to the poor (poor in spirit, in knowledge, in health, in wealth, etc.).

    d.   Conferences: To check the spiritual harmony of family, ward, stake, and general authorities with each other.

    The Church also fulfills many social needs for members. But the social aspect is incidental: the essential purpose is to prepare every member to go forth to do the works of righteousness (beneficence in particular).

    5.   Conclusion: The function of every aspect of the kingdom of God on the earth is to witness to every human being of the goodness of God and to invite each receiver of that witness to convert himself into the image of God.

    Part VII: Proselyting

    A.  Our commission. We are instructed to preach the Gospel to the ends of the earth, to every nation, kindred, tongue and people. In our day all must hear the Gospel to be prepared for the great (for the righteous) and dreadful (for the wicked) day of the Second Coming of the Lord. As in the days of Noah, every soul who willnot hearken to His voice will be cut off. The world today ripens in iniquity, even as it did in the days of Noah, which process sharpens the contrast between the way of God and the way of Satan, making this a most exciting and fruitful time in which to live and to bear witness.

    B.  Our witness. We hope to bear witness in every honorable manner possible. The following are our principal opportunities:

    1.   Our individual personal witness opportunities:

    a.   To communicate only the truth with our mouths and our writing, in order to touch minds.

    b.   To radiate the warmth of the Holy Spirit, to touch hearts.

    c.   To dress, groom, and comport our bodies honorably to show the strength of the Lord.

    d.   To care for our property, beautify our homes, honor our contracts, and lift up the poor, to show the Lord’s might.

    2.   Our family witness opportunities:

    a.   To demonstrate love and fidelity between husband and wife.

    b.   To demonstrate that children are an heritage of the Lord by hoping for and raising, where possible, large families of loved and well-trained children.

    c.   To show responsibility as good neighbors, making people glad they live near us.

    d.   To promote the causes of morality, social responsibility, and righteousness wherever possible and as appropriate in community, business, cultural, educational and civic affairs.

    3.   Our institutional witness as a church:

    a.   We satisfy minds by having a “complete” theology which squares with the Bible and offers a greatly expanded horizon of understanding.

    b.   We offer a corrected version of the Bible, a second ancient witness of Christ, a testament of Father Abraham, and modern and current revelation, all of which is self-consistent, all of which bears witness of God and of his ways.

    c.   We offer living prophets who teach us the Restored Gospel and who offer specific guidance on many practical problems of our time. They give the general guidance which, if followed, would eventuate in the solution to every human problem.

    d.   We satisfy body needs by taking care of our own in disasters and extending such aid to many others.

    e.   We deploy our might to achieve a financially sound and strong base for the operations of the Church, one which practices principles of restraint, responsibility, and conservation. This witness serves as a model for every person, family and institution everywhere.

    f.    We beautify our buildings and grounds so that all who see or visit are uplifted.

    4.   Our cultural witness as a people (ideals as much as reality, as yet, for this is our weakest area of witness):

    a.   We prize education, hard work, and problem solving.

    b.   We prize art, creativity, and excellence in all skills.

    c.   We prize everything which is virtuous, lovely, of good report, or praiseworthy.

    d.   We prize freedom, representative government, individual responsibility, economic self-sufficiency.

    e.   We prize integrity, modesty, chastity, benevolence, and peace.

    C.  The essentials of accepting the witness. There are certain steps which must take place for anyone outside the Church to become a member of the Church, and have this change be a positive experience in his or her life. The following steps are taken to be essential in receiving the witness that God lives, that the Restored Gospel is true and that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the only true and living church upon the earth at the present time.

    1.   His or her attention must be attracted in some honorable way.

    2.   He or she must pay attention. A witness is always received in time and space. The space must be small enough and the time long enough that two things can happen. There must be:

    a.   Receiving enough information (the truth about Gospel religious matters) that the recipient can understand the message and out of that message conceive a significant experiment which he or she could perform in a short time with the resources which are available. This experiment will vary according to the present habits, standards, and beliefs of the recipient. Some principal initial possibilities are:

    1)   To pray about the truthfulness of the Restored Gospel (for one who already lives by prayer).

    2)   To read the Book of Mormon and pray about it (for one who already cherishes reading the Bible).

    3)   To have the opportunity to ask theological questions and to pray about the answers (for one who is troubled about death, evil in the world, etc., and who prizes clear and consistent answers to such questions).

    4)   To search the scriptures and pray about the First Vision of the Prophet Joseph (for one who is already religious but believes that the heavens are closed).

    5)   To associate with and test the spirit of those who say they have already received and accepted this witness.

    Whatever is the crucial test of other important matters in life for that (unique) individual is the test which should be employed initially by that person. This because that is the methodology he or she already trusts. But whatever else is done, he or she must pray about the matter also, for there can be no conversion without prayer. Only personal revelation is rock foundation evidence, a sufficient test; all other tests leave one upon the sand, even though they may be helpful.

    b.   Receiving a manifestation of the warmth and love of God through the presence of the Holy Spirit. In the end, intellectual matters and tests do not convert; they serve the necessary and important service of getting a person to have enough time with and experience of feeling the Holy Spirit to decide to prize or to reject it. The essence of every conversion to righteousness is prizing of the Spirit of God. The purpose of insisting upon private personal prayer is that the recipient must discover that the Holy Spirit is not unique to the source where first encountered (the missionaries, the message, the meeting, the scriptures), but can be gained also on one’s knees in one’s own closet.

    3.   He or she must personally perform this experiment which has been conceived. No matter how well-conceived the theory of the experiment might be or how delightful the warmth of the Holy Spirit have been to the recipient, he or she cannot be profited if there is no investment and no further benefit. Each must go and do that thing which they conceive, including praying. If the experiment is performed as conceived, there will always be an immediate consequence.

    4.   They must evaluate the result of that personal experiment. The results of the experiment are either positive or negative.

    The following table shows the basic possibilities:

    The possible results of an experiment with interpretation and consequence
    The possible results of an experiment with interpretation and consequence

    Whatever the result, the recipient uses his or her agency to pursue light and truth or to reject light and truth.

    5.   He or she must conceive, execute, and evaluate a second experiment under the influence of the Holy Spirit, guided by the missionaries or not. The person must heed the guidance of the Lord to do the thing that is plainly best to do next. If they perform the second experiment faithfully and like the result, they are on track to conversion of themselves to be more like God.

    6.   At some point after a finite number of experiments, the recipient must acknowledge the influence of the Holy Spirit to be the voice of God to them. Then the weak faith of the experiment turns to strong faith as he or she hears further instruction, believes it is of God, and diligently obeys in the name of Jesus Christ. Now he or she is on the rock and can and will go as far in the conversion process as is desired, even unto becoming gods themselves.

    D.  The essentials of proselyting. The steps of proselyting are simply the complements of those which the investigator must take to convert himself. The work of the proselyter is to bring the freedom to change to the recipient by opening new options of thinking and feeling. It is almost never necessary or desirable for the missionary to destroy. The new avenues will give the recipient his own power to change his own thinking and feeling as is necessary.

    1.   The missionary must get the attention of the recipient. The space must be small enough (so that they are close enough) and the time must be long enough for the two essential messages to be communicated. Traditional devices for getting attention are:

    a.   Tracting

    b.   Street meetings

    c.   Tracts

    d.   Referrals

    e.   Hall meetings

    f.    Teaching English etc.

    Ingenuity and propriety are the great guides to attention getting.

    2.   The message must be delivered. While the investigator is paying attention the missionaries must:

    a.   Communicate enough information that the recipient willbe instructed and can conceive of a meaningful first experiment about the truthfulness and/or efficacy of the Restored Gospel.

    b.   Communicate enough of the Holy Spirit that the recipient will have tasted the spirit and thereby be able to identify it when it returns during his or her experiment.

    3.   The recipient must be so convinced of the need to perform the experiment, including praying, that he/she actually does perform it. Nothing else can succeed if this step fails. For greatest success, the experiment must be performed by the investigator in private (not in front of the missionary nor in front of his family or friends).

    4.   The missionary must encourage a candid evaluation by the investigator of the results of the experiment as soon as possible after it is performed. The result is the cue to the missionary as to whether to continue his proselyting effort with this individual or not.

    5.   The missionary must assist the investigator to conceive, execute, and evaluate a second experiment if the investigator has not already done so. Usually this second experiment willarise naturally out of further discussion of Gospel principles.

    6.   When the experiments become faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, the person is ready for baptism (previously committed to baptism or not). When faith has taken root in the scriptures, in prayer and in beneficence, the missionaries’ work is done. There are branch presidents, bishops, stake presidents and others in the Church to assist in the perfecting of that faith.

    Part VIII: Obstacles to Conversion

    A.  The world. The world (the kingdom of Satan on the earth, which includes his devotees and their hearts, might, minds, and strength, his governments, his cultures, his church) is not of itself an obstacle to conversion, but rather creates the occasion and opportunity for conversion. That is why we must be in the world (to make converts) but not of it. If we are of (belong to, are converted to) the Lord, He will give us power that the gates of hell (the powers of the kingdom of Satan to take and keep prisoners) will not prevail against us: we will be able to bring the blessings of the Lord, through the priesthood, to Satan’s prisoners. The difficulty in conversion is not the world itself, but it is worldliness in us, as individuals, as we attempt to convert ourselves so that we might represent our God faithfully and well in honoring His priesthood.

    B.  The world in our minds. The Gospel was restored at the peak strength of the Protestant Worldview in America. The early embers of the Church were firmly based in that tradition and the Restoration in many ways simply built bigger and better things on that foundation. That Protestant World view, which was essentially the foundation used by the founding fathers in the framing of the U. S. Constitution, began its downhill slide from influence in the first half of the 19th Century and has steadily lost ground for 130 years. The LDS Church has emerged as the champion of most of the causes Protestantism once espoused such as the integrity of the U. S. Constitution, hard work, thrift, and self-sufficiency. The demise of Protestantism is being brought by incessant attacks on the two support pillars of Protestantism: the divinity of the Bible (especially the New Testament) and the divinity of the human conscience.

    The engines which are battering these pillars down are scholarship and science in the hands of those of the Humanist worldview persuasion. Scholarship has been used (with considerable bias and skill) to destroy the claim that the Bible is an authentic historic document: the Humanist version is that the Bible is a collection of pleasant but sometimes gory myths. (For those founded upon the rock, the Bible still has its integrity and the attacks upon the Bible willeventually be seen to be but the opinions of ungodly men.) Science has been used (with considerable bias and skill) to assert the relativity of conscience to social context: the Humanist prescription is to get rid of conscience wherever and whenever possible, substituting collectivist and rationalist norms. (Again, those founded upon the rock are not swayed by this intellectual dissimulation.)

    The rise of Humanism in the United States came as the university system of Europe was imported (the rise of Humanism in Europe was the Renaissance). Today the overwhelming majority of university professors, students and graduates are Humanist in outlook. The Protestant churches have become more and more Humanist, substituting political action as their cause to supplant the old emphasis on personal morality. The Catholic Church has abandoned its Medieval Worldview and now has an essentially Humanist face (the present Pope seems to be holding back the change somewhat). There is a remnant of Protestant strength among the Lutherans, the Methodists, and the Baptists (recently galvanized into the “Moral Majority”) but that waning power cannot last long. The average American youngster does not know who Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are (some Rock group?).

    The rise of Humanism in the United States has seen a rise in Humanism within the LDS Church. Before World War II, a solid majority of the people of the Church who took advanced degrees in the Social Sciences and Humanities became at least partly Humanist in their outlook. A turning point came in 1938 with the talk given by President J. Reuben Clark entitled “The Charted Course of the Church in Education.” Since World War II Humanism has not been as powerful an influence on Church members studying for advanced degrees. Since the 1950s, Humanism in the Church has had to go on the defensive side as a resurgence of the Restored Gospel worldview has seen a cessation of the honoring of Humanism in the Church.

    The basic problem that all of the above is pertinent to is that faith and intellect have never been fully and successfully yoked together in the Church in this dispensation in very many individuals. Sometimes the artists are more artist than Latter-day Saints; sometimes the educationists, historians, the philosophers, the social scientists, the biologists, and the other natural scientists are likewise afflicted; seemingly least afflicted are the engineers.

    A special false idea which plagues our people, educated and uneducated alike, is the “romantic” frame of mind. The romantic notion is that great things can be accomplished with little causes, that one can get something for nothing, or that an insufficient means can bring about a desired result. The fairy tales and cultural traditions of western civilization are shot through with romantic notions which lead to such things as the belief that the public treasury is inexhaustible, that well-being is due to luck, that romantic infatuation without repentance will bring marital bliss etc. Humanism and socialism are both species of the romantic fallacy. One glaring example in the Church is people who think that the temple ordinances will “save” them, make them perfect in the next life, without the necessity of their own painstaking and deliberate repentance to rid their own minds, hearts and flesh of every ungodly habit in this life.

    When these problems are solved and the “educated” people of the Church begin to serve the Lord with all of their hearts and minds, then the witness the Church bears to the world will greatly increase. Then we will be as far ahead in science as we are in theology. Then it will be much easier to get the attention of the educated people of the world to show them a better way.

    C.  The world in our hearts. For the first eight years of this dispensation the Lord sought diligently to get the members of His Church to love Him enough that they would trust in His instruction as to how to gain their temporal well-being. With some notable exceptions the members could not convert themselves that far and that fast; most preferred to gain temporal security by relying on their old stand-by; every-man-for-himself. So the Lord withdrew the active implementation of the law of consecration. A later notable attempt in the West to begin active implementation of consecration had some remarkable and hopeful successes, but each experiment ended in failure and we returned to every-man-for-himself. Hearts and minds failed as the influence of the world welled up among us.

    The Depression of the 1930s saw another attempt to get the members to love the Lord with the beginning of the Church Welfare Plan. Augmented by later increased emphasis on fast offering, there is now more caring than there previously appeared to be. The Church has become a model for the world not of real caring for the poor but of a-step-in-the-right-direction of caring for the poor. It is still mostly every-man-for-himself in the Church.

    The rival way, the way of the world to care for the poor, is socialism, which is the political and economic arm of Humanism. Socialism is winning hands down in the world because the moral base which made the every-man-for-himself system have a great deal of brotherly kindness has eroded and virtually disappeared with the demise of the Protestant worldview and its (Humanist despised) work ethic.

    The step-in-the-right-direction of the Church is good, but it does not bear full witness to the world of the pure love of Christ. In fact, it does not solve the whole problem even in the Church. But should the faithful members of this Church ever unitedly implore the Lord that His full kingdom truly be implemented, because of their love for Him, the full implementation of the law of consecration would bear a witness that would set the world on its ear. That would plainly show socialism for what it is: feeble human theory captured in every practical example for another species of tyranny. But the world will never see a full alternative to tyranny until Latter-day Saints so love the Lord that they implement His full plan. Then the world will have witness indeed, for that would put us as far ahead of the world in economics and politics (and thus, in heart) as we are in theology. Then, too, we would enjoy the abundance of the gifts of the spirit, which would further increase our dissimilarity from the world.

    Another malaise of heart which affects our people is worldly feelings about feelings. The world would have everyone believe that we humans are not responsible for what we feel, but are passive objects worked upon by environmental forces that control our moods, values, etc. They tell us that human beings are not free agents and that either God or one’s psychiatrist will have to step in to save one. The LDS perversity along this line is to feel put-upon by Church authorities, to justify anger in “righteous” causes, to justify lust for another and adultery when one’s spouse is not perfect, to be envious of the wealthy, to despise the poor to be forever unsatisfied with one’s lot. All of these sins are manifestations of yielding one’s heart to Satan, even though one may be an active member of the Church. The Lord would have us forgive all men, that the sin of any other person would never become either a mental self-justification for sin nor an emotional occasion for feeling sorry for oneself. The mark of love for God is gratitude, for everything, and fear of nothing. But because we do not forgive and do not love God as we should, the world has great purchase upon us.

    D.  The world in our strength and in our might. While the leadership of the Church has directed us to be distinctive in our dress and grooming it has never directed us to be drastically different. The missionary look is our standard, but adherence to the standard suffers. Not every member believes in “every member a missionary.”

    As a Church we are somewhat distinctive as to our standard of the Word of Wisdom. Adherence to the standard seems to improve with each added generation in families in the Church. The standard is minimal (for the weakest of the Saints), but higher standards fall on hard times because some members want to become the voice of the Lord in announcing higher standards (their own version for everyone). Withal, there remains a serious Word of Wisdom problem among Church members which dilutes our witness of the Lord to the world.

    For all of our problems with the Word of Wisdom area, the Church appears to have greater distinctive difference from the world in that area than it does in the most important area of strength, that of chastity. One of the sorrowful burdens of being a judge in Israel is to come to know the enormity of this problem. Our witness falters when our statistics on divorce, abortion, non-temple marriage, and childbirth out of wedlock are reviewed by the world. To be better than most is not really good enough to bear a valid witness of love of the true and living God.

    These matters of our strength—dress and grooming, Word of Wisdom, chastity—are parallel to our problems of might. Our problems of might are avarice (we are the swindle capital), slovenliness (some of these barns and fences Brigham Young wanted painted still are not), ostentation (mansions now, not when heaven comes), mediocrity (it’s the thought that counts), procrastination (who needs a garden?), etc. These problems of strength and might which dilute and defeat our witness are symptoms, not causes. When our hearts and minds become pure, these symptoms will disappear. Apparently the Lord expects that half of the Church will become pure. Then that half will bear an unimpeachable witness; to the world that will touch every nation, kindred, tongue, and people.

    E.   Conclusion. Not only can we have too many chiefs and not enough Indians, we can also have too many Indians and not enough chiefs. It is possible that the success of the missionary program of the Church could actually set the Church back in the future because we might not have enough leadership in the Church which is converted to more than the Church to draw the new converts up to the higher stages of conversion by their love. Attention to every stage of conversion simultaneously might help. At any rate, the Church will do better if the worldliness among us is reduced by further self-conversion through following the authorities of the Church as they lead us step-by-step toward our goal. Heaven is our home, and we must create that heaven here, and (hopefully) now, through the opportunity of self-conversion using the power of God which is among us.

    Part IX: Summary

    Conversion is a change of habits. It begins in an honest heart which admits that the Spirit of God has prompted it to change, to repent. The mind must begin to understand the way of the Lord. The heart must choose the way of the Lord. The body must act in the way of the Lord. These changes of heart, mind and strength will result in visible changes in the stewardship (dominion, might) of every converted person.

    But conversion is not a one-time thing. It is an uphill battle, proceeding in small daily steps each of which must be taken by the deliberate choice of a free agent. There is no “great help” upward. To change from the natural man to become like God is to repent (to change, to convert each step) as the Lord shows us how, line upon line, grace upon grace, until we receive a fulness. There is as much conversion that needs to take place within the Church as there is outside the Church as each person goes to his God and implores Him for permission and direction to take one more step each day. Anyone can begin to repent (to educate, to improve himself) anywhere, at any time, simply by beginning to be fully faithful to what he himself knows is right (by hearkening to his own conscience).

    Potential additions to this study.

    1.   An explanation of the Medieval, Protestant, Humanist, and Restored Gospel worldviews as referred to in Part VIII.

    2.   A description of the social class structure of the Church and how it helps and impedes the work of conversion in and to the Church.

    3.   A description of LDS culture, differentiating which parts are Gospel-oriented and which are not.

    4.   Pattern of institutional religions in addition to the ones given.

    5.   A section on practical suggestions for proselyting work to reach special populations such as:

    Humanists

    Artists

    Intellectuals

    Lower class

    Etc.

    6.   A description of empirical studies which could be conducted to verify and clarify aspects of the conversion process.

    7.   a.         Footnotes

    b.   Sources

    c.   More examples

  • Comparison of Personal Characteristics of Persons on the Gospel Rock and on the Sand, 1982

    (CES Symposium C.C. Riddle, 20 August 1982)

    Comparison of Personal Characteristics of Persons on Rock and Persons on Sand

    On RockOn Sand
    FaithLoves the Lord with allSays he loves the Lord, but
    HeartHas yielded heart to the Lord. Desires nothing for self.Pursues his own desires
    MightTotally consecrated.Perhaps pays minimum basic contributions.
    MindThink in the Lord’s language, concepts, truth and understanding.Thinks about everything, self and gospel included, in worldly understanding.
    StrengthEvery ounce of energy is language, concept, truth and spent in fulfilling each day’s mission. Looks to Jesus Christ alone for truth, guidance and help.Divides strength between pleasure, earning a living, family, church, etc. Looks to the wisdom and learning help of men in most things.
    RepentanceConstantly strives to perfect his love of the Lord in every feeling, action, thought and word.Gave up gross sins long ago.
    CovenantReviews the covenant daily, affirms it by ordinance weekly.Takes the sacrament with mind wandering.
    CompanionshipStrives to be guided in all things by obeying every instruction he has received. Lives by conscience.Desires not to be instructed and guided in all things, only wants revelation when he wants it. Defies his conscience frequently.
    EnduringWill not look on any of his own sins with the least degree of allowance. Without being hard on others, he constantly strives to become perfect in every way.Has met the minimum requirements for a temple recommend and feels he is assured of exaltation.
    RESULTLives Restored Gospel both outwardly and inwardly.Lives Restored Gospel only outwardly.

    Comparison of Reactions of Persons on Rock and Persons on Sand to Korihor’s Arguments.

    KorihorOn RockOn Sand
    Hope in Christ is vain, cannot know the future.Christ is a present reality in his life.Believes in Christ, but no personal contact. Wonders.
    Prophesies are foolish traditions; one knows only what one sees.Has a personal witness of the prophesies. Has prophesied.Wonders if some prophesies are man-made.
    Idea of forgiveness of sins is a derangement.Has experienced the debilitation of sin and the increase of power after forgiveness.Hopes for forgiveness at the day of judgment.
    No atonement for sin. of restitution and forgiveness in action.Has felt the Savior’s power of the Atonement.Doesn’t understand the how or why
    Strong prosper, weak fail.Sees might triumph over right only temporally and only short run. Knows the power of God to succor the righteous.Sees might prevail over right.
    When we die, that is the end; therefore, sin!Sin causes us to die spiritually now, immediately. Does not want to die spiritually; enjoys spiritual life.Hopes we won’t be held accountable for our sins.
    Ordinances are foolish rituals.Has gained great insight and power through the ordinances.Doesn’t understand the ordinances; maybe they are foolish.
    Children not guilty because of Adam.Children not guilty but do sin because of Adam; then they are guilty.Says: Why blame everything on the Fall and Satan.
    Priest glut on labors of the people.Knows priests are the servants of the people.Wonders about these people who tell him to repent.
    Priest pretends to have visions, revelations.Also has visions, revelations which agree with those of priests.Wonders if revelations are just wishful thinking.
    Show me a sign!Knows that Korihor has rejected the Spirit of the Lord.Would like to see some signs, too.
    RESULT:  
    Korihor believed his own lies.Unmoved from the path of righteousness.Swayed to commit sin.

    Conclusions.

    1. We sin because:
    2. we are ignorant of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, or
    3. we are on the sand, not having lived the Gospel yet, or
    4. we desire to sin
      1. Everyone will know the Gospel and have ample opportunity to found their house on a rock. Thus, eventually, the only cause of sin will be the desire to sin.
      2. We can help to decrease the sin in this world by
    5. getting ourselves upon the rock
    6. teaching the Gospel whenever, wherever we can
    7. encouraging those who know the Gospel to get upon the rock
    8. We cannot tell about other persons whether they sin because they are on the sand or because they desire to sin.
    9. We should treat all who know the Gospel and yet sin as if the cause is that they are yet on the sand.
    10. We are sure we ourselves will not fall only after we have lived the Gospel fully (are founded upon the rock).
  • Ten Opportunities of Eternal Marriage, 1982

    Written in the Mesa Temple 12 March 1982

    1. Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all of thy heart, might, mind and strength. Then thou wilt love each other far more than thou couldest in any other way.
    2. Thou shalt use the name of the Lord daily to implore the blessings of heaven upon each other and upon your posterity.
    3. Thou shalt keep thine eye single to the Lord, keeping him in your mind’s eye, that thou mightest constantly worship Him and thus fulfill thy main mission in life, to be husband and wife, father and mother.
    4. Thou shalt remember the sabbath as a holy day, to draw thy family together and to teach them the wonders of eternity.
    5. Thou shalt honor thy parents and establish the patriarchal order as the basis of your life and work.
    6. Thou shalt see life as sacred, and bring life and beauty to all that you touch of the things of this earth.
    7. Thou shalt cleave unto each other in the affection of thine heart, mind and strength, that thy love for each other might extend unto posterity as numerous as the sands of the sea.
    8. Thou shalt work diligently with thine hands, thy heart and thy mind, that thou mightest provide sustenance and blessing for many.
    9. Thou shalt treasure up the words of truth and life, that thou mightest share this treasure with all of thy posterity.
    10. Thou shalt covet the work and love of righteousness and fill thy hands with it day and night, that the freedom to love and to grow might never be shortened unto thee or thy posterity into all eternity.
  • Precis on the Religion of Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1980

    10 November 1980

    No. 1

    The basic message of the Bible is true:

    We have a loving Father in Heaven.

    Jesus Christ is His Son, our Savior.

    Our Savior teaches us right from wrong.

    As our Savior spoke to men through living prophets in ancient times, so he speaks to men today, to teach them right from wrong.

    Right living leads to happiness and success. Wrong living leads to frustration, dissatisfaction, and despair.

    Right living is to keep the commandments of our Savior in order to bless the lives of others and to make this world a better, happier, more beautiful place.

    Wrong living is selfishness, tyranny, and distractiveness.

    Because he clearly shows the way to right living, the living prophet is the most important person now on earth.

    No. 2

    When a man and a woman marry and selflessly love and support one another, the world is richer.

    The family is the basic social, educational and economic unit of society. The strength of any people is measured by the strength of its families.

    Children are a heritage of the Lord. The greatest challenge in life is to be a parent and to raise one’s children to be moral, able pillars of society.

    The pure love of Christ makes it possible for family relationships to be perfected in this life and to continue past death into eternity.

    No. 3

    Church and state should be separate, but religion and politics cannot be separate.

    Religion is how a person treats other people.

    Politics is how people use government to treat other people.

    A person’s politics is a true reflection of what he or she believes about religion.

    Good religion is where people are honest, fair and kindly one to another.

    Good government is where people are protected from those who are not honest, fair and kindly one to another.

    Good religion produces good politics which produces good government.

    No. 4

    It is work which produces and protects the good things human beings need to enjoy life.

    Intelligent, hard work is the best kind of work, for it tends to produce more than the worker needs for himself or herself.

    Every person should work. Every person should work intelligently and hard, to produce and protect good things.

    The ability to work hard and intelligently is a gift from God.

    Those who acknowledge the gift of God are glad to share voluntarily the fruits of their labors with those who are not blessed with the ability to work.

    No. 5

    Every family should work together, play together, and worship together.

    Every family should grow gardens together and store against the day of want.

    Every family should keep records, so they will remember who they are and how the Lord has blessed them.

    Every family should cooperate, so that the burden of one is voluntarily shared by all.

    Every family should live together in the beauty of order, music, flowers and manners.

    Every family should discover that they can become members of the personal family of Jesus Christ.

  • Great Expectations, c. 1980

    (Written about 1980)

    One critical activity which every organization needs to conduct with some regularity is sharing visions of the organization’s goals. Briefly set forth here is a panorama of goals relating to Brigham Young University.

    The university itself, BYU, as a whole, has two main purposes. The first is to be proficient in education, in fact to become the most proficient educational institution in the world. This is a way of saying that an effective combination of great teachers, great teaching, great students and great learning will produce people of intelligence, refinement and attainment such as is not accomplished as well in any other institution. This process will turn free upon this earth alumni who will be effective in establishing and spreading the Savior’s kingdom upon the face of the entire earth, both temporally and spiritually. The second purpose of BYU is to show forth an example to the world of what good things being a servant of Christ can bring to pass. BYU could become a showcase of excellence in the way it is organized and governed, a model of effective educational process, a harmonious community of professional and non-professional people working delightedly together for common ends, a place of beauty, cleanliness and propriety. In its showcase role, BYU would also be a center of creativity in matters of intellect and heart, idea and art—a model of ingenuity successfully applied to pure and practical research to produce creative solutions for both personal and social perplexities. As a light unto the world, BYU would be an unashamed partisan promoter of everything in the world which is virtuous, lovely, of good report or praiseworthy, demonstrating the sanctity of families, the glory of freedom, the intelligence of faithfulness, and the possibility of a pure heart.

    These lofty institutional goals gain both meaning and credibility when associated with comparable visions of what their components would necessarily become were those goals to be attained. Key components are students, faculty, department chairmen and deans. Let us examine the potential and ideal role of each of these in turn.

    The ideal BYU student is a person who is a covenant servant of Jesus Christ, who has dedicated himself wholly to living by every word that proceeds forth out of the mouth of God. While not perfect in attaining that consecration as yet, there is a willingness to obey and a hunger for excellence that turns every exposed deficiency into an opportunity for grateful repentance. Creativity for such a student is not measured in muttering defiance of the dress and grooming code, but in exhilarating discovery of the manifold paths available to insight, understanding, ability and ingenuity that open to energetic searching. Learning is not measured by grades, credit and degrees but in ability to solve problems and to bless others. Education is seen as neither a hurdle nor an attainment, but rather as a process of continuous daily creation of a new self as the soul enlarges in heart and intellect in a life-long endeavor to rise to the opportunity of our human situation. This ideal student would come to BYU with some solid learning and training, but more importantly with willingness to work hard, with the flexibility to reform, with the determination to endure to the end.

    It is obvious that this ideal student is already a paragon. But that is not unthinkable nor impossible. All that is asked is that the majority become like the present best students. That will happen in the same way we have attained the blessing of our present best students. How did they come into this excellence? Some gained this by being born and raised in the homes of faithful Latter-day Saints who themselves had all those virtues.

    But where do these parents come from? Hopefully they are former BYU students, or persons who have enjoyed a similar opportunity. But chickens and eggs notwithstanding, how do we affect this cycle to get it going? That is where the faculty comes in.

    The ideal BYU faculty member is also first and foremost a dedicated Latter-day Saint. He or she has been amply nurtured with the words of Christ, and being a believer, is well on the way to enduring to the end, living constantly in the precious hope that makes that end desirable and in the firm faith that makes that end attainable. Through relying solely upon the merits of the Savior, all good things are at hand or are attainable by such a one.

    Of the good things to lay hold of, the ideal BYU faculty member has, without exception, taken a firm grasp of the learning of this world. Conversational ability in the language of faith and the language of learning has led to a thorough but selective mastery of good things to be found in the realms of intellect, art, science and technology. Being versed in the basics of many subjects, we say that this ideal mentor has an admirable general education, thus being ready for further learning and further thought in an exciting horizon of interests and abilities. Having selected at least one subject for intensive and thorough investigation’ the faculty member tries to become acquainted with all that is good and all that is going on in that subject. This is a continuing mastery, one which is updated, reviewed and renewed constantly through the reading of scholarly journals, talking with knowledgeable people in the field, attending selected conventions, and a lot of pondering of the subject.

    This happy combination of extensive general education and intensive mastery of a major field of interest we denominate as scholarship. A scholar is one who is well-schooled, knowing something about nearly everything and a lot about something. It is difficult to overestimate the importance of being a lively, continuing scholar. This is the sine qua non of the ideal faculty member. His life and mind are a treasure-house of good ideas, good understanding, good skills, and good will which have been broadly sought, carefully selected, intensively prized and masterfully crafted into an intelligible and communicable whole.

    Scholarship is thus the beginning, the necessary foundation of all other good things which the faculty member might do as a teacher. On this foundation three additional attainments of note might be built. These are excellence in teaching, creativity and administration. We will briefly delineate the articulation of each of these scholarships.

    Scholarship is the basis of good teaching. No matter how lovely the landscape, the dry spring and the empty well will not, cannot quench the thirst for knowledge. The copious flow from an ample scholarly mind will bless many an inquiring shrub of reaching tree, moisten and bring to life many a meadow of community, provide sustenance for multitudes of faint souls. The power of a great teacher is renown for the influence of such a one multiplies and spreads from generation to generation. But it seems that the real and principal difference between the great and the not-so-great teacher is in how much they are able to inspire their students to want to learn. It is true that techniques of pedagogy, the ability to teach with examinations, the ordering of iterations, and the mastering of media all enhance the teaching-learning process. But it is also true that the massive enhancement of ability to teach comes with attainment of the stature of a great scholar. Then the other things become important. Without scholarship they are as tinkling brass and a sounding cymbal.

    Though scholarship is fundamental, teaching and the ability to teach well comes next and hard by in the scale of values for the ideal BYU faculty member. We must not forget—nor make apology for the fact that BYU is primarily an undergraduate institution where exemplary teaching is the main mission of the faculty. The quality and quantity of excellent teaching are the accomplishments to be most greatly desired and rewarded at BYU as capable faculty scholars apply themselves to their mission. While it is admitted that this perspective on the importance of good teaching has not been operative in many past administrative decisions, there is now a clear intention to place the importance and worth of such teaching in its proper effective place in the university system.

    What then of creativity and research? Are they to be downgraded? No, they are not. The emphasis on enhancing the creative and research accomplishments of the faculty, taken both individually and collectively, will continue apace. For creative effort has not yet reached its rightful place in the collective faculty repertoire. Many individuals will continue to foster, encourage, guide and stimulate the majority of faculty members who have yet to achieve the exhilaration of genuine contribution to the knowledge and accomplishments of mankind.

    This emphasis will continue because creative effort also has a rightful and necessary place in the institutional life and goals of BYU. This place is vouchsafed by several factors. First, creativity is service to mankind. Thus artistic, scholarly and scientific creativity are ways to bless. Creative drive when based firmly on solid scholarly attainment, motivated by righteous desires and quickened by the divine gift will produce much of value. It is the business of a university and especially of this university to produce beauty, intelligence and solutions to problems that will assist in building up the kingdom of the Savior. It is desirable that every member of the faculty master the discipline, the scholarship, the desire and the faith in Christ which will enable them to make a contribution in a creative way. For this reason: We are trying to teach our students to have discipline, to become scholars, to desire to bless, and to find the faith that will enable them to become righteously creative. There is no better means of teaching righteousness than to demonstrate it, for it is infectious.

    In addition to blessing mankind in being creative, this effort also builds the builder. More than teaching, creativity gives immediate challenge to the scholarship of the would-be creator. Students may suffer silently when the intellectual stream is thin; but matter and nature yield only to sufficiency of effort and attainment. Though flexing intellectual muscles on students is interesting, it seldom is overwhelming. But the creative challenge is always sufficiently overwhelming to cause us to grasp and to grow. And while one can parlay phrases into unrighteous dominion in the classroom, the Holy Spirit transmits the light only to the honest, and more abundantly to the pure. In short, teaching is a mastery which may be counterfeited, whereas genuine creativity cannot. Thus creativity is the hammer, and scholarship is the anvil which shapes and molds a great teacher into the real thing.

    Yet teaching remains paramount. Teaching is the end at BYU, with scholarship and creativity as essential means to that end. The fact that neither scholarship nor teaching and creativity has reached full fruition in the past at BYU does not bind the future. The important thing is that we know where we are going. The ideal teacher at BYU is a continuing solid scholar, a creative contributor to the intellectual and spiritual wealth of this world, and a master-teacher of young Latter-day Saints. All three.

    A word needs to be said about proportion. Proportion and propriety are companions, especially in the gospel framework. While there can be no universal formula because of our individual differences, a pattern may nevertheless be useful. It is suggested that the steady state phenomenon for the paradigm faculty members would be one-fifth of time and energy devoted to the scholarship of keeping up in one’s field and in enhancing one’s general education; one-fifth might also be devoted to the love and labor of creative production; and three-fifths, the solid majority of heart and mind, be attuned to the kindly delivery of students from the prison of ignorance, undisciplinedness and irresponsibility. This outlines the mission of a faculty member at BYU.

    Though the paradigm is complete, yet one more talent commands our attention. Also necessary to our community is the ability to administer. It is a curious twist of our language that this noble word which once meant to serve and to bless now has the connotation of governing or lording it over someone. The phrase “good administrator” does not touch the heartstrings as does the phrase “good shepherd.” For the administrator is now seen as a driver, a demander, an exacter, a worshiper at the idol of efficiency. It is plain however that in the Gospel context “administrator” ought to be first a leader who finds green pastures. Such should nurture, build, bless and encourage. Such a one should protect, reassure and cherish, perhaps these even along with reproving betimes with sharpness but then showing forth an increase of love.

    The LDS administrator is not sent to lord but to love—without guile or hypocrisy, but in pure knowledge, long-suffering, persuasion—and with a clear vision of where the flock is to be led. Such a one is sensitive to what one’s stewardship is and is not. Towards those to whom such a one reports there is loyalty, creative support, and untiring diligence in making the plan a reality. Towards those whom such a one leads there is loyalty, sharing of vision, encouragement to the enlargement of self, tenderness with fearful venturings, commendation for triumphs, and consolation for trials. Ever is kept in mind the image of the Savior, he who is successful and at once faithful Son and faithful Father, he who is a great example, the Way, the Truth, and the End.

    It is also of paramount importance that BYU have good leaders, leaders whose hearts are pure and whose efforts are fruitful. To be such a leader of faculty demands first that unquenchable thirst for righteousness which brings one to the Savior. It demands next that one be a scholar in his own right. These are necessary. But leadership must needs be supported by the full faculty paradigm: Creative contributions and mastery of teaching make the complete fisher of university men and women.

    To all of this must be added that component of administrative effectiveness which relates to personal technique. To control one’s own time, to prioritize projects, to eschew procrastination, to conduct an orderly system of paper flowing and filing, to be wise in counsel, to be fiscally prudent, to be able to communicate effectively, to form thoughtful agendas and to conduct meetings that have desirable velocity—these are the sorts of skills and habits which mow down detail without becoming trapped in trivia. Taking necessary drudgery in stride is the giant step which enables us to address appropriately the substantive issues of our opportunities.

    What is the needed place of administrative skill in the university? It is something that everyone should cultivate and prize, just as everyone should prize grammar and spelling. It is ideas that are important, but bad grammar can dam the flow of ideas. So it is effective programs and communications that make an organization go, but ineptness can slaughter the noblest of causes. Every person associated with the university has something important to administer, beginning with himself and his relationships with others. If everyone would prize and pursue such skills, our real business, education, would flow surely as the water in a concrete canal, quietly delivering a burden that the debris-choked winding stream can never but approximate.

    All of which brings us to the role of department chairman. What is the model to which we might look?

    Historically at BYU, the department chairman has been on average an office manager. He has wrestled budgets, class schedules, catalog and curriculum materials, student complaints and faculty requests. Occasionally turning to matters of paramount importance, he works to find top new faculty and to resuscitate poorly performing professors. His role has been established by precedence, and the pattern often has taken the channel of least resistance. Perhaps it is now time to change that pattern in many cases.

    Consistent with what we have illuminated as the paragon professor is the concept of the department chairman as exemplar and mentor to the faculty of the department. Suppose a department chairman were chosen because that person best exemplified all the fundamental faculty virtues: dedicated servant of the Savior, solid and excited scholar, classic example of the able and caring teacher, creative continuing contributor to the professional field and sure-footed administrator. Would it destroy such person to make them department chairman? Would this be a waste of rare talents? Indeed, this would be a disaster if their mission were construed to be to push papers and make peace.

    But suppose the charge was to continue to be an example of all these good things and then to give personal encouragement and counsel to each member of the faculty to do likewise. Rather than assuming that all faculty members come fixed and formatted to all eternity, why not assume that a faculty appointment is a special opportunity to grow towards perfection under the kindly example and guidance of one who is far ahead in their things and under the rigorous realities of the necessity of professional production in the classroom and in creativity. Without the gospel all of this could be so threatening as to devastate good intentions. But because we have an eternal perspective and a framework of values that is special, all of this becomes possible and desirable.

    In sum, the role of the department chairman would be to do the following things: To assist in the selection of able, new faculty members; to encourage and counsel in effective teaching; to encourage and guide in significant creative contribution; to bring the department faculty together to function as a team, so that the scholarship, teaching and creative work of each fits into a pattern that strengthens every other faculty member and makes possible a community of complementary scholarship, teaching, and creativity wherein the whole is clearly greater than the arithmetic sum of the parts; to give vision and leadership to department curricular programs; and to bring students to appreciate and deeply partake of the special offerings which a united department provides for them.

    Looking past the department chairman, we need to round out these great expectations by contemplating the nature of the office of the college dean. It is plain that paragon professors and charismatic chairmen need special deans.

    The ideal dean would first have been the ideal faculty member, then the ideal department chairman, for the dean is a leader, and one can scarcely lead where he has not been. It takes a good one to tell a good one, but more importantly, only paragons can raise up paragons. The major function or role of the dean is to choose, inspire and lead to greatness the department chairmen of his college. The other parts of his assignment—to coordinate the departments within the college and to coordinate the college with the rest of the university are made infinitely easier if he succeeds at his principal task first.

    Now it is unlikely that any dean will find chairmen who are already perfect faculty members and who cannot improve in their administrative performance. The administrative structure of the college ought to be built then with two main things in mind: opportunities and means for strengthening department chairmen, and opportunities and means for lifting from them unnecessary administrative trivia. One way these two helps might be delivered is as follows.

    The dean might procure the services of a full-time administrative assistant who would facilitate the paper flow of the college. This person might be responsible for preparing and expending budgets, completing necessary reports, filling out forms, meeting deadlines, etc. this person would not be a decision maker. All judgment matters would yet rest with department the department chairman and the dean. While all drudgery work could not be shifted, much of it could be, freeing the dean and the chairmen for the weightier matters.

    The dean might himself serve or appoint someone to serve under his direction to encourage research and creativity in the college. This person, working with the department chairmen, could make regular rounds to visit with each faculty member. In the mouths of two witnesses there could be commendation for work well done, encouragement for new ideas of worth, counsel to avoid pitfalls, help with resources to foster fledgling success, programs to unite people with complementary talents in team challenges. Were this person a master of imagination, laboratory techniques, mathematical and statistical manipulation, research strategy, or whatever else is pertinent to creativity in the field, what a great work might be done in supporting the department chairmen. This person might also be the graduate coordinator for the college.

    Another role which the dean might himself fill or to which he might appoint someone would be a curriculum and teaching specialist for the college. Knowing that good academic programs don’t just happen but are planned, evaluated, revised, evaluated, adequated to need, evaluated, etc., such a person would be constantly engaged to bring all possible intelligence and technique to bear on the adequacy of the courses and programs of the college. Working carefully with each department chairman, there would be a sense of propriety, efficiency, and educational soundness that would guide all deliberations. The professional consensus of faculty and administrators would yield, through time, programs magnificent in concept and execution.

    A most important part of that execution would be the teaching effort of each faculty member. This college administrator, working with the department chairman, both master teachers, could inspire and enthuse individuals to build pedagogical expertise on the foundation of the individual’s scholarship. Fostering caring about students as individuals, planning class and examination sequences into models of value added would be an ongoing delight for all participants. What happens for the student is the pay-off for the existence of the entire university.

    Perhaps there are other special programs and functions to which the dean would address himself or assign someone. These persons together with the department chairman might form a council to transact all of the judgment matters of the college. There is strength in counsel, as there is in coordination. Community of vision and effort foster success if leadership can provide the proper values and the proper persons for such participation.

    It is to be remembered that the picture printed above is an ideal. It is one possible ideal among many. Only as any such ideal is simultaneously correct, wise, and shared, can it be effective as a change agent in our institutional life. It is plain that we need ideals for we are not yet perfect. We need to be united in the cause of our Savior and seek to establish his righteousness. Everyone needs to learn his duty and to act faithfully in that office. We need to be as one in heart and in mind. It is hoped that the consideration of the ideals here portrayed will in some way bring us closer to the reality of those grand goals.

  • Theory of Personal Behavior, 1979

    26 July 1979

    Definition: Role. A recognizable pattern of valuations, actions, and communications which form a cohesive whole.

    Examples:

    SonHusbandFatherGrandfather
    BossAdministratorTeacherCommittee member
    ArtistThinkerActorArchitect
    FriendAdversaryClientBenefactor
    GluttonLazy loutDilettantePrevaricator
    SaintHigh PriestCounselorPresident
    CarpenterPlumberElectricianFarmer

    Postulates:

    1. Every normal human being is playing a role at any given time.
    2. Roles are cultural artifacts.
    3. Roles are principally learned through observation and only incidentally through words.
    4. Agency is the choice of an implementation of a role by a responsible person.
    5. Every normal adult chooses among several roles as to which one will be enacted at any given moment.

    Gospel Applications:

    1. Normal adults who know and live the Gospel of Jesus Christ are free to act as children of Jesus Christ.
    2. Celestial spirits are those who, when they learn the Gospel of Jesus Christ, learn to reject every role except that of a child of Jesus Christ.
    3. Sin is choosing and enacting any role but that of child of Jesus Christ.
  • How to Conduct a Meeting, 1979

    25 July 1979

    Prior to the meeting:

    1.   Prepare a checklist

    • a.   Spiritually discern your objective for the meeting.
    • b.   List each item necessary to attain the objective, e.g.:
    • ·    Place, time, notification of participants, physical facilities
    • ·    Materials, handouts or other preparation
    • ·    Appropriateness of each item, or permission as needed
    • c.   See that each necessary item is in preparation (do or delegate).
    • d.   Prepare conducting notes for the meeting, observing the following:
    • ·    Give the correct name of each participant
    • ·    Acknowledge music and musicians who assist
    • ·    Write out each thing you intend to say along with all the events to transpire (formal meeting); or Write down each item or idea you need to cover (informal meeting)
    • ·    Prepare a time allotment for each aspect of the meeting
    • ·    Prepare a backup procedure for each part of the meeting in case of failure or other emergency

    2.   Immediately prior to the meeting

    • a.   Pray or have a prayer meeting.
    • b.   Double check on all persons and items necessary to the meeting.
    • c.   Be at the meeting site 5 to 10 minutes before the meeting is scheduled to begin.

    Conducting the meeting:

    1.   Begin on time, and begin by announcing who is presiding (if other than the person conducting) and who is conducting (if not known to the participants).

    2.   Speak directly, personally, and warmly to the participants. Do not multiply words or say things you do not mean.

    3.   Keep the meeting objective fully in mind. Do not allow the prepared format for the meeting to be changed unless a clearly superior alternative arises.

    4.   Keep a sense of humor, but keep any humor light.

    5.   Be positive in what you say.

    6.   Express gratitude to all participants in a way that is genuine.

    7.   End on time.

    After the meeting:

    1.   Review the successes and failures (if any) of the meeting. Pay special attention as to whether or not the objective for the meeting was attained.

    2.   Make notes on how you could be more successful and effective in conducting this kind of meeting another time.

    3.   Follow up on any items of business that arose in the meeting.

    4.   Give special private thanks to any persons who especially contributed to the success of the meeting.

    5.   Develop a standard checklist and agenda for any meeting which is held on a regular basis.

    Remember:

    1.   Time in meetings is precious because people are precious.

    2.   Bumbling is unacceptable and is never funny. We should strive for excellence in all that we do.

    3.   Don’t hold meetings for meetings’ sake. Get the job done, whatever the assignment is.