Blog

Moroni 7:12-17

12 Wherefore, all things which are good cometh of God; and that which is evil cometh of the devil; for the devil is an enemy unto God, and fighteth against him continually, and inviteth and enticeth to sin, and to do that which is evil continually.
13 But behold, that which is of God inviteth and enticeth to do good continually; wherefore, every thing which inviteth and enticeth to do good, and to love God, and to serve him, is inspired of God.
14 Wherefore, take heed, my beloved brethren, that ye do not judge that which is evil to be of God, or that which is good and of God to be of the devil.
15 For behold, my brethren, it is given unto you to judge, that ye may know good from evil; and the way to judge is as plain, that ye may know with a perfect knowledge, as the daylight is from the dark night.
16 For behold, the Spirit of Christ is given to every man, that he may know good from evil; wherefore, I show unto you the way to judge; for every thing which inviteth to do good, and to persuade to believe in Christ, is sent forth by the power and gift of Christ; wherefore ye may know with a perfect knowledge it is of God.
17 But whatsoever thing persuadeth men to do evil, and believe not in Christ, and deny him, and serve not God, then ye may know with a perfect knowledge it is of the devil; for after this manner doth the devil work, for he persuadeth no man to do good, no, not one; neither do his angels; neither do they who subject themselves unto him.

I would like to approach these verses differently from the previous ones. In our discussions of verses 1-11, I first asked how this applies to high school seminary students, then asked how it applied to Mormon’s mature priesthood audience. I would like to reverse that and begin by discussing how it might have been understood by Mormon’s “beloved brethren.”

Remembering that Mormon and his friends were surrounded by an intense and violent apostasy, and that Mormon’s subject so far in this sermon had been about priesthood legitimacy, it is easy to see that when speaking of that apostasy and those apostates, Mormon was completely accurate in ascribing to the devil the origin and success of those damnable doctrines. (No “woops,” that’s an appropriate word here!)

However, these verses are not so easily applied to the everyday lives of high school seminary students because “all things” in verse 12 seems to be too inclusive to fit comfortably into their complex world. “All things” leaves no place for shades of grey, even though the teen age world is mostly grey. There is little question about right and wrong when they understand what the Church says they should do and not do. But the church does not address “all things” and the young people are bombarded with multiple teachers who give multiple options to multiple unanswerable questions.

Paul’s warning is very apt:

8 For if the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself to the battle?
9 So likewise ye, except ye utter by the tongue words easy to be understood, how shall it be known what is spoken? for ye shall speak into the air (1 Corinthians 14:8-9).

While some teachers may speak with clarion tones, others, including their teenage contemporaries, speak with muddled discourse. That is equally true with adults. King Benjamin was not talking to just the teenagers when he said,

29 And finally, I cannot tell you all the things whereby ye may commit sin; for there are divers ways and means, even so many that I cannot number them (Mosiah 4:29).

Most teenagers live in world of grey, but I suppose most adults do also. As an example, I recall back in the early 1970’s when I attended General Priesthood Conference in a stake house. Several speakers “addressed the youth,” and focused on keeping the word of wisdom and avoiding petting in order to also avoid premarital sex. After the meeting was over I happened to walk out behind a group of boys who looked to be about 16 or 18. One of them said, loud enough that the others could hear, “What a stupid meeting. None of us do those kinds of things, but it almost felt like some of those guys were accusing us. We came to be ‘uplifted’ and we didn’t need to hear that stuff again.” Another boy replied, “Yea, why do they always talk about young men’s sins? Why don’t they ever talk about old men’s sins instead?”

That gave me pause. His question was legitimate, and at least part of the answer is not hard to come by. The young men’s sins the speakers emphasized are easy to catalogue and define. But not so with the old men’s sins: avarice; manipulative dishonesty in business affairs; infidelity; a studied desire to avenge; unfair competitiveness in climbing the social, corporate, or academic ladders of power and prestige. Those sins are so well shrouded in various shades of grey that they give the sinner all the wiggle room he needs for self justification. Such sins are not easily definable until they become unlawful.

In the world, different human cultures and subcultures have their own definitions of what is right and wrong. Each one has its own standards and its own rules about how far people can deviate from those standards without being punished. The upshot is that in a country as large and diverse as the United States there is no universal moral standard of excellence. Some subcultures encourage moral and decent people, but for others the standard is “whatever floats your boat,” or “its OK as long as you don’t get caught.”

In all cultures, there are two kinds of sins. There are the real ones that violate our eternal Self and damage the soul. (Gospel principles and commandments are a sure way of identifying what those are.) And there are cultural sins that are defined by what some people think other people should be and do. In many cases, one is more apt to be socially ostracized or even punished for committing cultural sins than from committing real ones. {1}

All sins, whether the real or cultural, originate in one’s brain (the ancient scriptures would have said “in his heart”). Some stay there. The real ones that do stay in the heart act like a canker to corrode and then destroy one’s Self. Those that become the motives for actions, become more dangerous when they move from the heart to the tongue or to the hands. There, they impact the well-being of others. That is when the culturally unacceptable ones become unlawful.

Even though Mormon was talking to his “beloved brethren” about the differences between their own priesthood authority and the pretended authority of the apostates, his words can apply to our everyday world as well. There is a solution for us, of course, and that solution is the same as it was for them: Listen to the prophet and obey the prompting of the Holy Ghost. A major function of the Holy Ghost is to help us define the real sins, to teach us how to avoid them, and to help us have the strength to live pure lives.
———————–
FOOTNOTE

{1} Two places where I have discussed the nature of evil and the difference between real and cultural sins are:
In this website, “3 Nephi 12:10-12 — persecution and persecuted,”
In Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, chapter “Alma 14: The Origins of Good and Evil”

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Moroni 7:8-11

8 For behold, if a man being evil giveth a gift, he doeth it grudgingly; wherefore it is counted unto him the same as if he had retained the gift; wherefore he is counted evil before God.
9 And likewise also is it counted evil unto a man, if he shall pray and not with real intent of heart; yea, and it profiteth him nothing, for God receiveth none such.
10 Wherefore, a man being evil cannot do that which is good; neither will he give a good gift.
11 For behold, a bitter fountain cannot bring forth good water; neither can a good fountain bring forth bitter water; wherefore, a man being a servant of the devil cannot follow Christ; and if he follow Christ he cannot be a servant of the devil.

This statement is still in the context of Mormon’s discourse about the validity of priesthood ordinances and covenants. As with the previous verses, these words are applicable on one level to the high school seminary student and, in a different way, to the mature priesthood congregation to whom Mormon was speaking.

Not just the seminary student, but each of us who live in this fallen world is forever encountering someone who wants to give us something that entices. Evil gifts are like a succulent worm attached to a hook, attached to a line, attached to a rod, attached to the arm of a hungry man who will consume the fish that expected to eat rather than to be eaten. Our world is full of such hungry men and women who hide hooks within pleasurable barbs. “Beware of Greeks bearing gifts” is a warning that has been echoed by wise men for more than 2,000 years. The generosity of an enemy is a dangerous thing. As recently as 500 years ago Ophelia returned Hamlet’s gifts with this timeless lament, “to the noble mind, rich gifts wax poor when givers prove unkind. {1} In a somewhat different context Hamlet described his most bitter enemy in these vivid terms, “O villain, villain, smiling, damned villain! … one may smile, and smile, and be a villain.” {2}

Even prophets have a long history of being offered gifts by their enemies. Alma and Peter were offered money; Mormon was offered a military command; many have been threatened with imprisonment or offered freedom if they will only abandon their integrity. Their enemies seem to judge the prophet’s integrity by their own lack of it.

It is a simple truth that one cannot bribe someone by offering what the person does not value, nor can one bully someone by threatening to take away what does not matter.

One is not permitted to help a prophet who does not have the prophet’s best interests at heart. That is true of prophets but is equally true of everyone who is wise.

Those are principles that apply to just living in this world, but Mormon was talking to his “beloved brethren” about Melchizedek Priesthood covenants and ordinances. In that context, Mormon’s observations are especially accurate. In terms of priesthood gifts, whether it is a blessing, an ordinance, or a prophecy, an evil man cannot give a good gift. The LDS Church policy is that if a man is later found to have been unworthy, the ordinances he performed prior to that finding are still valid and do not have to be repeated. However, in Mormon’s world, he is talking about apostates who claim to have authority they do not have, “and did administer that which was sacred unto him to whom it had been forbidden because of unworthiness (4 Nephi 1:27).”

Mormon also observes that an evil man cannot even pray effectually. That is because his prayer cannot be directed by the Holy Ghost, and therefore cannot be binding upon the Lord.

In terms of priesthood covenants, good gifts are given according to one’s ability to give and according to the recipient’s needs. That is equally true with material gifts as it is with spiritual blessings. For one who has charity and lives the law of consecration, giving in is as natural as breathing. Receiving such gifts with thanks and appreciation should be equally natural when one is aware that love rather than some hidden hook is the motive behind the gift.

But if the gift is a hook, hidden within the pretense of charity, the giver is evil and so is his gift. As Mormon warned, “Wherefore, a man being evil cannot do that which is good; neither will he give a good gift.”

One of my favorite stories in church history is about how Martin Harris’s wife Lucy tried to bribe young Joseph Smith into letting her see the plates, apparently so she could invest in them and get a share of whatever the gold was worth. Her’s is the perfect example of what happens when someone tries to bribe a prophet. The story, as it is told in a chapter of my book called Joseph and Moroni, is as follows: {3}

—————————–
Trouble with Lucy Harris

Mrs. Harris is an important part of the story of the relationship between Joseph and the angel Moroni for three reasons. First, she was the cause of much of the friction between the Prophet and the angel. Second, her being an obstacle to Joseph’s work contributed to a number of important events relating to the translation of the Book of Mormon. And third, because she created such trauma for Joseph and for his family and friends (and perhaps for Moroni too, if angels can experience trauma), it is instructive to see how Joseph and the angel dealt with her.

At the time when Joseph and Emma were getting ready to move to Pennsylvania, Joseph owed debts totaling about $50. He did not have the money but did not want the people he owed to think he was leaving town to avoid paying them. He decided he would try to borrow that amount from a friend and then use it to pay everyone else. With this in mind, Joseph asked his mother to ask Martin if he would lend him the money.

When Mother Smith arrived at the Harris farm, she asked Mrs. Harris if she could talk with Mr. Harris. Mrs. Harris wanted to know all the reasons for the visit, so Lucy Smith told Lucy Harris why she had come. To Mother Smith’s surprise, Lucy Harris declared that she would give Joseph the money. When Joseph’s mother declined the offer, Mrs. Harris announced, “I am coming to your place to see him, too, and I will be there on Tuesday afternoon, and will stop over night.”

When Tuesday came, so did Mrs. Harris. Joseph’s mother told the story of her visit in some detail, and in doing so, made no attempt to disguise her disdain for the visitor. Mother Smith recounted that after Mrs. Harris was “well seated,” she began to quiz Joseph about the plates. She said if he was telling the truth about having them, he must show them to her; then, she said, “she was determined to help him publish them.”

He explained he could not show them to anyone. Relative to her offer of assistance, he told her he would prefer to deal with her husband.

That was not the response Mrs. Harris wanted, for, as Mother Smith observed, “she considered herself altogether superior to her husband,” and she continued to tease Joseph about seeing the plates.

“Now, Joseph, are you not telling me a lie? Can you look full in my eye and say before God that you have in reality found a record, as you pretend?”

To this Joseph replied, rather indifferently, “Why, yes, Mrs. Harris, I would as soon look you in the face and say so as not, if that will be any gratification to you.”

Then said she, “Joseph, I will tell you what I will do, if I can get a witness that you speak the truth, I will believe all you say about the matter and I shall want to do something about the translation—I mean to help you any way.”{A}

With this statement about her wanting a “witness” the conversation ended for the evening.

The next morning, Mrs. Harris reported she had received her witness. She said she had a dream in which “a personage appeared to her” and told her that her attitude toward Joseph and her insistence upon seeing the plates were “not right in the sight of God.” The personage then showed her the plates of the Book of Mormon and said to her, “Behold, here are the plates, look upon them and believe.” The dream was so vivid to her that she was able to describe the plates “very minutely” to the Smiths.{B}

The dream had satisfied Mrs. Harris’s curiosity but not her determination to control this young man and his gold. She did not trouble Joseph about seeing the plates any more that day, but in all other respects she acted just as she had the night before. She would invest in Joseph’s treasure whether Joseph wanted a partner or not. He finally gave in, but recognizing that she was not as willing to be useful as she was determined to dominate, he refused to accept her money as a gift. He would not be indebted to her in any way that could not be readily defined and entirely repaid. He agreed to accept $28 from her—but only as a loan.

Joseph realized that if he was to remain free to obey God he could not accept constraining help from anyone. He understood, though Mrs. Harris did not, that one may assist a prophet only if one does not use that assistance as a lever with which to try to control the prophet.

A short time later, Martin Harris insisted on giving $50 to Joseph. In contrast to Joseph’s determination to not accept help from Mrs. Harris, he accepted the gift from Martin. He understood it to be an expression of love from Martin, and Joseph’s willingness to receive it is evidence that he trusted his friend. Joseph promptly used Martin’s money to pay his debts, and he returned the $28 to Mrs. Harris. {C}{4}

Later Martin had served as scribe while Joseph translated the plates. Martin was so convinced by what Joseph was doing that he believed if he could show the translation to his wife, she would lso believe. Martin borrowed 116 manuscript pages that Joseph had already translated and took them home to show Mrs. Harris. Joseph never saw those pages again. Joseph’s mother registered her belief that Lucy Harris had stolen them, intending to use them to embarrass Martin and Joseph. {5}

——————————–

FOOTNOTES FOR ESSAY

{1} William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1.

{2} William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 1, Scene 5.

{3} Joseph and Moroni, The 7 Principles Moroni taught Joseph Smith is one of the books in this website under “published books.”

{4} LeGrand L. Baker, Joseph and Moroni, The 7 Principles Moroni taught Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City, Eborn Books, 2006), pages 54-57

{5} Lucy Smith, History, 131-32.  This story is told in Joseph and Moroni, chapters “The Loss of the 116 Pages” and “What Happened to the 116 Pages?,” 62-68.

———————————-

FOOTNOTES FROM JOSEPH AND MORONI

{A} This story is reported in Lucy Mack Smith, History of Joseph Smith by His Mother (Salt Lake City, Bookcraft, 1954), 114-117.

{B} Lucy Smith, History, 117.

{C} Lucy Smith, History, 117-18. Joseph Smith, History of the Church, 1:19.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

5 For I remember the word of God which saith by their works ye shall know them; for if their works be good, then they are good also.
6 For behold, God hath said a man being evil cannot do that which is good; for if he offereth a gift, or prayeth unto God, except he shall do it with real intent it profiteth him nothing.
7 For behold, it is not counted unto him for righteousness (Moroni 7:5-7) .

As was true with the first verses of this sermon, so it is here: there are different ways that we may read what Mormon said, and that difference is our perception of his audience. When discussing the first verses, I drew a distinction between an audience of high school seminary students, and the priesthood body to whom Mormon was speaking. That distinction is still important.

In these verses the differences in interpretation hangs on the definition of “works.” In the world of the teenager, works can mean taking warm bread to a neighbor or keeping the commandments as the Church teaches; being part of church activities, accepting church assignments, and just being nice to other people.

To teenagers, Mormon’s warning is easily translated into Church teachings. From the time we are little we are taught what God’s commandments are and that we should not only live those commandments but that we should also avoid being in the company of people who do not.

Mormon gives a stern reminder that evil men can produce attractive enticements, either by their actions or in the products they sell, and that those enticements can do real physical or spiritual harm. The Church reenforces those teachings by spelling out what many of those dangerous enticements are. Mormon’s words are a clear warning, insisting that we must not only look to the actions of an individual, but we must also examine his motives. If he hides his motives behind protestations of his own goodness, then we must look to the consequences of his actions, and their effects on others.

That is a helpful and perfectly legitimate way to understand this scripture.

However, if we read it as an address to a mature priesthood audience, then the interpretation is different, but no less scarey. Again, the understanding hangs on the meaning of “works.”

Probably the best place to begin looking for a priesthood definition of “works” is in Alma’s review of the Nephite temple drama. He says, “God conversed with men, and made known unto them the plan of redemption, which had been prepared from the foundation of the world; and this he made known unto them according to their faith and repentance and their holy works.(Alma 12:30).” In this context “faith” must surely be pistis–the covenants. And “holy works” are the ordinances that instruct the participant and validate his covenants. “Repentance” validates both. {1}

There are other scriptures where “works” clearly refer to the ordinances. One of the most straightforward is in Alma’s Zarahemla conference address. Before we read it, a quick review: Righteousness is zedek — the same as zedek in Melchizedek, which means “King of Righteousness” or “My king is righteous.” Right or righteous is a perfect translation. Zedek means correctness in priesthood and temple things. To be done in zedek (righteousness), ordinances must be performed in the right place, at an appropriate time, with the right authority, dressed the right way, using the right words, and with the right hand or arm gestures. If all of these things are not in place, the ordinance is not valid. Baptism, for example. They go down into the water, dressed the right way, he holds his arm the right way, he speaks the right words with the right authority and he dunks the other person, then brings him up out of the water. If any of those things are lacking, or if anything is added, the ordinance is not valid. The word zedek/righteousness represents the correctness of that baptismal ordinance.

At Zarahemla, Alma invited the people to be baptized, and in preparation for that invitation he quoted God as saying,

35 Yea, come unto me and bring forth works of righteousness [zedek], and ye shall not be hewn down and cast into the fire—
36 For behold, the time is at hand that whosoever bringeth forth not good fruit, or whosoever doeth not the works of righteousness, the same have cause to wail and mourn (Alma 5:35-36).

In this context, “works of righteousness” is clearly a reference to correct priesthood ordinances.

In a similar context Ammon rejoices with his brethren because of their success with the Lamanites. Here he uses almost the same wording that Alma used in his review of the Nephite temple drama (Alma 12 quoted above). First, another quick review: “Mystery” in the New Testament means “the idea of silence imposed by initiation into religious rites”{2} It is a reference to the New Testament Christian temple rites. If, as I believe, the Book of Mormon and New Testament meanings are the same, then Ammon’s promise, “unto such it is given to know the mysteries of God,” is a reference to the Nephite temple rites. The difference between what Alma said and what Ammon said is that where Alma says “holy works,” Ammon says “good works.”

22 Yea, he that repenteth and exerciseth faith [pistis, keeping the covenants], and bringeth forth good works [ordinances], and prayeth continually without ceasing—unto such it is given to know the mysteries of God [Nephite temple drama]; yea, unto such it shall be given to reveal things which never have been revealed; yea, and it shall be given unto such to bring thousands of souls to repentance, even as it has been given unto us to bring these our brethren to repentance (Alma 26:22).

Alma used the same sequence, “faith and good works,” (pistis = covenants, and ordinances) when he described premortal priesthood callings.

3 And this is the manner after which they were ordained—being called and prepared from the foundation of the world according to the foreknowledge of God, on account of their exceeding faith and good works; in the first place being left to choose good or evil; therefore they having chosen good, and exercising exceedingly great faith, are called with a holy calling, yea, with that holy calling which was prepared with, and according to, a preparatory redemption for such (Alma 13:3).

The ultimate importance of correct priesthood ordinances is emphasized by the sequence culminating in the final judgement.

The Book of Mormon repeatedly tells us that the final judgement comes AFTER the resurrection. In other words, when we stand before the Savior to be judged, we will already have received our resurrected body. Celestial persons will already have been judged to merit a celestial glory. So the question might be asked, “Then why do they need a “final judgement?” The answer is zedek — all things must not only be correct, but legally correct — we must be judged by our works according to the validity of the ordinances we have received and honored.

As I understand it, the judgement that could enable one to receive a celestial body was based on keeping his covenants. For example, the object of the perfection to which we strive is defined in the Book of Mormon as charity, just as that object in the Doctrine and Covenants is keeping the law of consecration. They are two sides of the same coin. When charity is what we are, the law of consecration is what we do.

Those characteristics (the ones that are discussed at length by Mormon in his sermon in Moroni 7) are the criteria used to determine whether we will receive a celestial body in the resurrection. The Lord explained that more succinctly to the Prophet Joseph.

28 They who are of a celestial spirit shall receive the same body which was a natural body; even ye shall receive your bodies, and your glory shall be that glory by which your bodies are quickened.
29 Ye who are [present tense] quickened by a portion of the celestial glory shall then receive of the same, even a fulness.
30 And they who are quickened by a portion of the terrestrial glory shall then receive of the same, even a fulness [etc.] (D&C 88:28-30).

Alma says that after we have received our resurrected bodies we will be judged “according to our works.” Here are two examples:

21 But whether it be at his resurrection or after, I do not say; but this much I say, that there is a space between death and the resurrection of the body, and a state of the soul in happiness or in misery until the time which is appointed of God that the dead shall come forth, and be reunited, both soul and body, and be brought to stand before God, and be judged according to their works (Alma 40:21).

23 But God ceaseth not to be God, and mercy claimeth the penitent, and mercy cometh because of the atonement; and the atonement bringeth to pass the resurrection of the dead; and the resurrection of the dead bringeth back men into the presence of God; and thus they are restored into his presence, to be judged according to their works, according to the law and justice (Alma 42:23).

Alma says we “are restored into his presence, to be judged according to their works, according to the law and justice.”

The Lord explained to the Prophet Joseph why that final judgement must be “according to the law and justice.” D&C 132 says that not only must things done correctly, but that they must also be “sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise.” That sealing is the final and necessary validation. Then he adds:

8 Behold, mine house is a house of order, saith the Lord God, and not a house of confusion.
9 Will I accept of an offering, saith the Lord, that is not made in my name?
10 Or will I receive at your hands that which I have not appointed?
11 And will I appoint unto you, saith the Lord, except it be by law, even as I and my Father ordained unto you, before the world was?
12 I am the Lord thy God; and I give unto you this commandment—that no man shall come unto the Father but by me or by my word, which is my law, saith the Lord.
13 And everything that is in the world, whether it be ordained of men, by thrones, or principalities, or powers, or things of name, whatsoever they may be, that are not by me or by my word, saith the Lord, shall be thrown down, and shall not remain after men are dead, neither in nor after the resurrection, saith the Lord your God.
14 For whatsoever things remain are by me; and whatsoever things are not by me shall be shaken and destroyed (D&C 132:8-14).

The final judgement is when one stands before the Savior to be judged by him. If that judgement is an ordinance (Perhaps something like the Israelite king going through the Great veil in Solomon’s temple, as is described in Psalm 21), then it is reasonable to suppose that, like every other ordinance, it will have to be done according to set rules — in zedek, following a precise, even legalistic formula. If that is so, then it is also reasonable to suppose that one would be expected to give evidence that he had received ALL of the necessary ordinances. I suppose that is what the Savior meant when he told the Prophet Joseph, “my house is a house of order.”

This brings us full circle back to the three verses in Moroni 7 where we started. The question of the validity of priesthood ordinances was a major issue in Mormon’s day. There were false churches that were performing counterfeit ordinances. He tells us,

27 And it came to pass that when two hundred and ten years had passed away there were many churches in the land; yea, there were many churches which professed to know the Christ, and yet they did deny the more parts of his gospel, insomuch that they did receive all manner of wickedness, and did administer that which was sacred unto him to whom it had been forbidden because of unworthiness.
28 And this church did multiply exceedingly because of iniquity, and because of the power of Satan who did get hold upon their hearts. (4 Nephi 1:27-28)

Understanding that Mormon was speaking to his “beloved brethren” who were surrounded by murderous apostates, corrupt doctrines, and fraudulent ordinances, one can hear the ring of urgency in Mormon’s words:

5 For I remember the word of God which saith by their works [the validity of their priesthood ordinances] ye shall know them; for if their works be good, then they are good also.
6 For behold, God hath said a man being evil cannot do that which is good; for if he offereth a gift, or prayeth unto God, except he shall do it with real intent it profiteth him nothing.
7 For behold, it is not counted unto him for righteousness (Moroni 7:5-7) .
————————-

FOOTNOTES

{1} See the chapter called “Alma 12, Review of the Feast of Tabernacles Drama” in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, first edition, 651-55, paperback edition, 556-58.

{2} That definition is in Strong, 1894 edition, # 3466. For a more complete discussion of the meaning of “mystery” in the New Testament and in the Book of Mormon see footnote # 737 on page 463 of the paperback edition of Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, and also the chapter called “Sode Experience—Returning to the Council in Heaven,” pages 139-47. In the first edition, the footnote is # 726 on page 650 and the chapter is on pages 195-207.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Moroni 7:2-4 
2 And now I, Mormon, speak unto you, my beloved brethren; and it is by the grace of God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, and his holy will, because of the gift of his calling unto me, that I am permitted to speak unto you at this time.
3 Wherefore, I would speak unto you that are of the church, that are the peaceable followers of Christ, and that have obtained a sufficient hope by which ye can enter into the rest of the Lord, from this time henceforth until ye shall rest with him in heaven.
4 And now my brethren, I judge these things of you because of your peaceable walk with the children of men.

Mormon begins this sermon by addressing his “beloved brethren” and declaring the authority by which he is “permitted to speak.”

2 And now I, Mormon, speak unto you, my beloved brethren; and it is by the grace of God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, and his holy will, because of the gift of his calling unto me, that I am permitted to speak unto you at this time.

Mormon is the prophet and president of the church. If he needed permission to give this sermon, the only persons from whom he could have received that permission were, as he said, “it is by the grace of God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, and his holy will, because of the gift of his calling unto me, that I am permitted to speak unto you at this time.”

This asks a very important question: what is there about this speech that the prophet had to get permission to deliver it. The answer, I think, is in the combination of the content of the speech and the audience to whom he addressed it.

The speech is brilliant. On one level it is most appealing to persons who have read the Book of Mormon for the first time. Seminary students and new converts love it because it speaks to their souls. And as we grow in the gospel it continues to speak to us. However, it takes a great reach on my part to begin to understand what it would have meant to the audience to whom it was first given.

The sermon begins by acknowledging his audience as those who “are the peaceable followers of Christ.”

3 Wherefore, I would speak unto you that are of the church, that are the peaceable followers of Christ, and that have obtained a sufficient hope by which ye can enter into the rest of the Lord, from this time henceforth until ye shall rest with him in heaven.

That brings us to some of the Savior’s most fundamental teachings. Many of the Beatitudes are quotes or paraphrases from the Psalms or from Isaiah. They move in a sequence from the first principles, through the temple rites and priesthood responsibilities until we come to verse 8 which says Zion shall see God, and then verse 9 which reads:

9 And blessed are all the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God (3 Nephi 12:9).

The group to whom Mormon addressed his sermon were remarkable because of their “peaceable walk with the children of men.” But they were more than that. It is a simple truth that to understand any quote, part of that understanding must be to know why and to whom it was spoken. Part of the context of any sermon is to know who the audience was. In this case it is a priesthood meeting. We know that because he addresses only “my beloved brethren,” and he did it nine times in these few pages.

Whether he intended to or not (and I believe it was very intentional), his sermon followed the pattern of, and was a perfect commentary on the Beatitude: “blessed are all the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God.” Because I believe he intended to do that, I also believe that a meaningful context into which to fit that sermon is the sequence of the Beatitudes. Here, I give only their barest outline. I realize that it contains no justifications for the conclusions it draws, however, these apparent leaps of logic are carefully discussed and documented in detail in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, {1}

Outline of the Beatitudes in the Book of Mormon, 3 Nephi 12:

v. 1 – Jesus gave authority to Twelve –

v. 1b – Follow the Brethren
v. 2 – First Principles – “visited by the Holy Ghost”
v. 3 – Poor in Spirit – endowment for the living – may become kings and priests
v. 4 – Comfort all that mourn – endowment for the dead (Isaiah 61)
v. 5 – Meek – the meek are those who keep their eternal covenants (Psalm 25)
v. 6 – “hunger and thirst after righteousness” – “filled with the Holy Ghost”
v. 7 – Merciful – how to be a king and a priest (Psalm 18:25)

v. 8 – Pure in Heart – Zion shall see God (D&C 97:16-21, 101:16-18)
v. 9 – Peacemakers – called [new name] “children of God” (Moroni 73-4 & 48)

v. 10 – “for my name’s sake” – do become kings and priests
v. 11-12 – “when men shall revile” – endure to the end
v. 13 – “salt of the earth” – missionary work
v. 14-16 – “light of this people” – to be a blessing to the Saints

It takes only a quick look at that sequence to realize that everything one needs to know and do in a whole lifetime is in those verses.

If Moroni 7 is a commentary on verse 9, then its placement in the sequence of the Beatitudes tells us a great deal about its meaning and significance. Then verse 8 may be seen as not only a prelude or introduction to verse 9 but also to Mormon’s sermon. Verse 8 reads simply, “And blessed are all the pure in heart, for they shall see God.”

Psalm 24 promises the pure in heart will be welcomed into the temple to “receive the blessing from the Lord.”

3 Who shall ascend into the hill of the Lord? or who shall stand in his holy place?
4 He that hath clean hands, and a pure heart; who hath not lifted up his soul unto vanity, nor sworn deceitfully.
5 He shall receive the blessing from the Lord, and righteousness from the God of his salvation (Psalms 24:3-5).

Similarly, speaking of Zion, the Lord told the Prophet Joseph, “and all the pure in heart that shall come into it shall see God,” then he declared, “for this is Zion—THE PURE IN HEART” (D&C 97:16, 21).

The Beatitude that reads, “And blessed are all the pure in heart, for they shall see God.” is a perfect introduction to Moroni 7.

Mormon began his sermon by addressing his audience in those same terms. He spoke to those who “have obtained [past tense] a sufficient hope by which ye can enter into the rest of the Lord, from this time henceforth until ye shall rest with him in heaven. [then he added] … I judge these things of you because of your peaceable walk with the children of men.”

If I have understood Mormon’s introduction correctly, and the members of his audience really had “obtained a sufficient hope by which ye can enter into the rest of the Lord,” then they were not only in a very wonderful, but also in a very dangerous situation. Mormon understood that first hand. In his generation, many of the once faithful Nephites had not only denied the Savior, but had done so with violent furor. However, Mormon’s sermon also testifies to us that even in that environment there were some people who remained faithful, and that their prophet was concerned for their well-being. His message to them was that they must do more than try to avoid evil, but that must also keep their covenants, live as though those covenants were already fulfilled, and love each other and their God. Love—charity—was their ultimate defense against both evil and apostasy, just as it is ours.

The reason this sermon is so dearly beloved by Latter-day Saints in every stage of our spiritual development is because the Spirit testifies to each of us that the love that we give and that we accept from the Savior and from others (hesed) is the ultimate power that brings us back to the Savior and to our Heavenly Father. In this world, as Mormon observed, the fruit of love is peace, and the blessing to those who exude peace is that they may give peace to others—that they are peacemakers. Peace is a product of reciprocated love—hesed. {2}

The Beatitudes do not end with verse 9, but continue until they reach a new height—the “salt of the earth” is sharing the gospel; “light of this people” –is to be a blessing to the Saints—to be a personification of charity. Similarly, Peter’s sequence showing the attributes one must have in order to “make your calling and election sure” concludes with charity, (2 Peter 1:10) as does Mormon’s teachings in Moroni 7. I am convinced that while the priesthood ordinance and covenants are absolutely necessary to secure salvation, the ultimate sealing power (the power that validates the ordinances) is our own ability to give and to receive love.

Our Beatitude promises the peacemakers “shall be called [receive the new covenant-name] the children of God.” Mormon concludes his sermon with the same promise except he is speaking to only men, whereas the Savior was speaking to entire families.

48 Wherefore, my beloved brethren, pray unto the Father with all the energy of heart, that ye may be filled with this love, which he hath bestowed upon all who are true followers of his Son, Jesus Christ; that ye may become the sons of God; that when he shall appear we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is; that we may have this hope; that we may be purified even as he is pure. Amen (Moroni 7:48).

————————-

FOOTNOTES

{1} Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, pages 646-96 in the edition in this website; and also check the “scriptures” section. The two are not exactly the same. The latter was written after the book was published and so contains a few ideas not in the former. That is especially true with verse 7.

{2} Hesed means “unfailing love based on a prior covenant.” Use the search engine to find more detailed discussions.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Moroni 6:4 
4 And after they had been received unto baptism, and were wrought upon and cleansed by the power of the Holy Ghost, they were numbered among the people of the church of Christ;

The words “cleansed by the power of the Holy Ghost,” are unique to this passage of scripture. Nevertheless, they are very helpful in understanding how we are blessed by the Holy Ghost. There are four scriptures that teach we must be “sanctified by the Holy Ghost” The message of each of these scriptures is the same, but because the contexts are different, they combine to teach us a great deal.

The first is Paul’s statement about his own missionary purpose:

16 That I should be the minister of Jesus Christ to the Gentiles, ministering the gospel of God, that the offering up of the Gentiles might be acceptable, being sanctified by the Holy Ghost (Romans 15:16).

The second is Alma’s description of the faithful who lived in Zarahemla:

54 Yea, will ye persist in supposing that ye are better one than another; yea, will ye persist in the persecution of your brethren, who humble themselves and do walk after the holy order of God, wherewith they have been brought into this church, having been sanctified by the Holy Spirit, and they do bring forth works which are meet for repentance (Alma 5:54).

The third is Alma’s description of the faithful who “were called after this holy order” of the priesthood:

11 Therefore they were called after this holy order, and were sanctified, and their garments were washed white through the blood of the Lamb.
12 Now they, after being sanctified by the Holy Ghost, having their garments made white, being pure and spotless before God, could not look upon sin save it were with abhorrence; and there were many, exceedingly great many, who were made pure and entered into the rest of the Lord their God.
13 And now, my brethren, I would that ye should humble yourselves before God, and bring forth fruit meet for repentance, that ye may also enter into that rest (Alma 13:11-13).

The fourth is part of the Savior’s injunction to the Twelve in 3 Nephi 27. He began that part of his instructions by saying:

13 Behold I have given unto you my gospel, and this is the gospel which I have given unto you—that I came into the world to do the will of my Father, because my Father sent me.

He then amplified the definition of the gospel by teaching about his Atonement. In connection with the gospel, he defined “the word” and then “the commandment,” then he concluded with: “this is my gospel; and ye know the things that ye must do in my church; for the works which ye have seen me do that shall ye also do; for that which ye have seen me do even that shall ye do (v.21)” So, between the two definitions of “gospel” are two instructions about being clean and sanctified:

18-19 And this is the word …. no unclean thing can enter into his kingdom; therefore nothing entereth into his rest save it be those who have washed their garments in my blood, because of their faith, and the repentance of all their sins, and their faithfulness unto the end.
20 Now this is the commandment: Repent, all ye ends of the earth, and come unto me and be baptized in my name, that ye may be sanctified by the reception of the Holy Ghost, that ye may stand spotless before me at the last day (3 Nephi 27:13, 18-20).

We usually understand “sanctify” to mean to make sacred or holy, and we have difficulty attaching a concrete meaning to the idea that the Holy Ghost will make us holy. However, Moroni’s statement that they were “cleansed by the power of the Holy Ghost” gives us the key to know what it means to be sanctified. My Strong says the Hebrew word (# 6942) translated as “sanctify” means “to make clean” or “to purify.” The Greek word (# 37) translated as “sanctify” means “to purify,” or to “make holy.” The notion that the Holy Ghost makes us clean explains what the other scriptures mean by “sanctify.”

Parley P. Pratt penned what is probably the most beautiful and comprehensive description of what it means to be cleansed by the Holy Ghost:

The gift of the Holy Spirit adapts itself to all these organs or attributes, It quickens all the intellectual faculties, increases, enlarges, expands and purifies all the natural passions and affections, and adapts them, by the gift of wisdom, to their lawful use. It inspires, develops, cultivates and matures all the fine toned sympathies, joys, tastes, kindred feelings and affections of our nature. It inspires virtue, kindness, goodness, tenderness, gentleness and charity. It develops beauty of person, form and features. It tends to health, vigor, animation and social feeling. It develops and invigorates all the faculties of the physical and intellectual man. It strengthens, invigorates and gives tone to the nerves. In short, it is, as it were, marrow to the bone, joy to the heart, light to the eyes, music to the ears, and life to the whole being.

In the presence of such persons one feels to enjoy the light of their countenances, as the genial rays of a sunbeam. Their very atmosphere diffuses a thrill, a warm glow of pure gladness and sympathy, to the heart and nerves of others who have kindred feelings, or sympathy of spirit. No matter if the parties are strangers, entirely unknown to each other in person or character; no matter if they have never spoken to each other, each will be apt to remark in his own mind, and perhaps exclaim, when referring to the interview, “O what an atmosphere encircles that stranger! How my heart thrilled with pure and holy feelings in his presence! What confidence and sympathy he inspired! His countenance and spirit gave me more assurance than a thousand written recommendations or introductory letters.” Such is the gift of the Holy Spirit, and such are its operations when received through the lawful channel, the divine, eternal Priesthood.{1}

I think I am safe in asserting that every person who has been baptized and received the Gift of the Holy Ghost has experienced to a greater or lesser degree the sense that he is clean from one or more sins that used to really bother him. After baptism we still have to work a long time to get to the state of “being made sacred,” because the cleansing is an ongoing process. Nevertheless, it is very real, and very comforting.

Baptism places our sins in remission, that is, it makes them inoperative in the way that cancer stops growing when it is “in remission.” Our sins remain in remission as we persist in making them a dormant and ineffectual part of our past. It is by the power of the Atonement and the workings of the Holy Ghost that those sins can cease altogether to be a part of our real Self. Then the sin no longer has claim upon our desires and we can live our lives as though it has no part in our eternal Self.

As in Alma 13 (which we read above in conjunction with the priesthood), the scriptures sometimes make no practical distinction between being cleansed by the Holy Ghost and by the Savior’s Atonement. The first part of that quote reads: they “were sanctified, and their garments were washed white through the blood of the Lamb….[then] after being sanctified by the Holy Ghost, having their garments made white, being pure and spotless before God ….” (Alma 13:11-13).

For us, the ultimate product of that cleansing is Peace — not a passive peace, but the power within us to transcend hurt, disappointment, and sorrow. In John 14, the name-titles that describes the sources of that kind of peace is translated “Comforter.” The key to the word’s meaning is in the Savior’s paraphrase of Isaiah’s prophecy about salvation for the dead.{2}

The word “comfort” in Isaiah 61:2 means the personal power to transcend sorrow. That power creates the ultimate “peace.” That verse in Isaiah 61 is paraphrased in the Beatitudes v. 4 as, “Blessed are all those who mourn for they shall be comforted.” The Greek word translated “comforted” in the New Testament Beatitudes (Strong # 3870) is a different form, but otherwise the same word as the word translated “Comforter” in John 14. (Strong 3875). So a reasonable way to understand “Comforter” would be “the ultimate source of the power to transcend sorrow” — the “Empowerer.” And “peace” is the fruit of that empowerment. {3}

As the Prophet Joseph explained, the Savior talked about two different Comforters in John 14. The Prophet said:

There are two Comforters spoken of. One is the Holy Ghost, the same as given on the day of Pentecost, and that all Saints receive after faith, repentance, and baptism. This first Comforter or Holy Ghost has no other effect than pure intelligence.
. …
Now what is this other Comforter? It is no more nor less than the Lord Jesus Christ Himself; {4}

The words of the Savior’s promise about that “other Comforter” in John are:

15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.
16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you (John 14:15-27).

That “Other Comforter” is described more fully in Doctrine and Covenants 88:

3 Wherefore, I now send upon you another Comforter, even upon you my friends, that it may abide in your hearts, even the Holy Spirit of promise; which other Comforter is the same that I promised unto my disciples, as is recorded in the testimony of John.
4 This Comforter is the promise which I give unto you of eternal life, even the glory of the celestial kingdom;
5 Which glory is that of the church of the Firstborn, even of God, the holiest of all, through Jesus Christ his Son — (D&C 88:3-5).

As Joseph Smith said, John also describes the Holy Ghost as a Comforter:

26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
27 Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid. (John 14:15-27)

That last verse describes the “peace” which is both the purpose and power of each of the two Comforters. John also tells us about the time when the Savior bestowed the “peace” of that first Comforter upon the Apostles.

21 Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you.
22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost (John 20:21-22).

There is a relationship between our being given the command to “receive the Holy Ghost,” being visited by the Holy Ghost, being filled with the Holy Ghost, being baptized with fire and the Holy Ghost, and the Holy Ghost as a Comforter. But I don’t know how to define each of those concepts in terms of each of the others.

Sometimes it is as important to know what we don’t know as it is to know what we do know. The reason is that when we are aware of the limits of our understanding, knowing those limits opens wonderful questions. We may not have the answers, but even being able to express the questions has value. So here are some of the things I don’t know.

As far as I can tell, being given the command to “receive the Holy Ghost,” and being “visited by the Holy Ghost” represent the same ideas. If that is so, it is probable that the other concepts (being filled by the Holy Ghost, being baptized with fire and the Holy Ghost, and the Holy Ghost as a Comforter) may represent a different set of ideas. Since I don’t know, I think I will just show you some key scriptures so you can decide what you think the relationships are.

Some of those phrases I mentioned are given context by the Savior’s Beatitudes in 3 Nephi.

1 … after that ye are baptized with water, behold, I will baptize you with fire and with the Holy Ghost….
2 … Yea, blessed are they who shall believe in your words, and come down into the depths of humility and be baptized, for they shall be visited with fire and with the Holy Ghost, and shall receive a remission of their sins.
….
6 And blessed are all they who do hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled with the Holy Ghost.
….
9 And blessed are all the peacemakers, for they shall be called [new name] the children of God (3 Nephi 12:1-9). {5}

The Doctrine and Covenants gives others a context by putting “baptism of fire and the Holy Ghost,” “the Comforter,” and “the peaceable things of the kingdom” all in a single sentence:

6 And this is my gospel—repentance and baptism by water, and then cometh the baptism of fire and the Holy Ghost, even the Comforter, which showeth all things, and teacheth the peaceable things of the kingdom (D&C 39:5). {6}

Peter said that when the Savior was baptized he was also anointed “with the Holy Ghost and with power.” His words are:

37 That word, I say, ye know, which was published throughout all Judaea, and began from Galilee, after the baptism which John preached;
38 How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him (Acts 10:37-38).

I have wondered if the Savior’s being anointed by his Father “with the Holy Ghost and with power” may be something like the Savior’s promise to the Nephites: “after that ye are baptized with water, behold, I will baptize you with fire and with the Holy Ghost (3 Nephi 12:1).”

Some scriptures are especially helpful in understanding the meanings of those relationships. For example, Moroni’s last words are important, not only because they teach us how we can be cleansed and made holy by the Savior’s Atonement, but they also teach the relationship between ourselves, the Savior, and “the covenant of the Father.” However, in this passage he does not mention the Holy Ghost.

32 Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness, and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his grace sufficient for you, that by his grace ye may be perfect in Christ; and if by the grace of God ye are perfect in Christ, ye can in nowise deny the power of God.
33 And again, if ye by the grace of God are perfect in Christ, and deny not his power, then are ye sanctified in Christ by the grace of God, through the shedding of the blood of Christ, which is in the covenant of the Father unto the remission of your sins, that ye become holy, without spot (Moroni 10:32-33).

And finally there are the instructions given by God to Adam. They tie many of these principles into a very nice package. He establishes the relationships between baptism, the Spirit, justified, cleansed, sanctified, the Comforter, and “the peaceable things of immortal glory.”

58 Therefore I give unto you a commandment, to teach these things freely unto your children, saying:
59 That by reason of transgression cometh the fall, which fall bringeth death, and inasmuch as ye were born into the world by water, and blood, and the spirit, which I have made, and so became of dust a living soul, even so ye must be born again into the kingdom of heaven, of water, and of the Spirit, and be cleansed by blood, even the blood of mine Only Begotten; that ye might be sanctified from all sin, and enjoy the words of eternal life in this world, and eternal life in the world to come, even immortal glory;
60 For by the water ye keep the commandment; by the Spirit ye are justified, and by the blood ye are sanctified;
61 Therefore it is given to abide in you; the record of heaven; the Comforter; the peaceable things of immortal glory; the truth of all things; that which quickeneth all things, which maketh alive all things; that which knoweth all things, and hath all power according to wisdom, mercy, truth, justice, and judgment.
62 And now, behold, I say unto you: This is the plan of salvation unto all men, through the blood of mine Only Begotten, who shall come in the meridian of time (Moses 6:58-62).

Even though I don’t understand HOW it works, I do know THAT it works. Through the power of the Atonement we can be made clean by the workings Holy Ghost. The ultimate promise is found at the end of verse 59: “that ye might … enjoy the words of eternal life in this world, and eternal life in the world to come, even immortal glory.”

————————
FOOTNOTES

{1} Parley P. Pratt, Key to the Science of Theology (Liverpool, F. D. Richards, 1855), 98-99.

{2} See Isaiah 61 under in the Scriptures section of this website.

{3} Also in Isaiah 61:2 and the Beatitudes 3 Nephi 12:4, and Matthew 5:4. For a discussion of the meaning of “comfort” see Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, first edition pages 467-71; paperback edition (that one found in this website), pages 340-42.

{4} Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, selected and arranged by Joseph Fielding Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1976), 149-50.

{5} You can find a discussion of these Beatitudes in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord (check table of contents) and in the scripture section of this website (search by chapter and verse)

{6} Lecture 5 in the Lectures on Faith has some useful information about relationships.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Our covenants are validated by the ordinances and the ordinances are validated by our keeping the covenants. The sacrament is a renewal and affirmation of both.

Even though the words of the two sacrament blessings are similar, their intent is quite different. The blessing on the bread is a three part covenant. The blessing on the water is an affirmation that we are keeping those covenants.

“Witness” can mean to make a covenant or to take an oath, and the context of the two prayers suggests the word is intended to mean different things in the different prayers.  “That” is a powerful conjunction that creates a dependent sequence of ideas.
————————

The blessing on the bread reads:

O God, the Eternal Father, we ask thee in the name of thy Son, Jesus Christ, to bless and sanctify this bread to the souls of all those who partake of it; that they may eat in remembrance of the body of thy Son,
And witness [to covenant] unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father,
.     [1] that they are willing to take upon them the name of thy Son,
.     [2]  and [ that they are willing to] always remember him
.     [3]  and [ that they are willing to] keep his commandments which he has given them;
that they may always have his Spirit to be with them. Amen

————————

The blessing on the water reads:

O God, the Eternal Father, we ask thee, in the name of thy Son, Jesus Christ, to bless and sanctify this wine to the souls of all those who drink of it, that they may do it in remembrance of the blood of thy Son, which was shed for them;
.       that they may witness [to take an oath] unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father,
.        that they DO always remember him,
that they may have his Spirit to be with them. Amen.

————————–

In 3 Nephi 18 the resurrected Savior administers the sacrament to the Nephites, and in conjunction with that he also instituted a formal covenant with them. There are two correspond scriptures in the Book of Mormon that discuss this. One is Mosiah 5 where King Benjamin officiates as the people make a similar covenant. The other is Moroni 4 and 5 where the sacrament prayers are given verbatim. The covenants made by the people of King Benjamin and the ones in 3 Nephi are incorporated as an integral part of those prayers.

The Lord’s instructions to the Nephites includes the terms and objectives of the covenant. He said:

7 And this shall ye do in remembrance of my body, which I have shown unto you. And it shall be a testimony unto the Father that ye do always remember me. And if ye do always remember me ye shall have my Spirit to be with you.
8 And it came to pass that when he said these words, he commanded his disciples that they should take of the wine of the cup and drink of it, and that they should also give unto the multitude that they might drink of it.
9 And it came to pass that they did so, and did drink of it and were filled; and they gave unto the multitude, and they did drink, and they were filled.
10 And when the disciples had done this, Jesus said unto them: Blessed are ye for this thing which ye have done, for this is fulfilling my commandments, and this doth witness unto the Father that ye are willing to do that which I have commanded you.
11 And this shall ye always do to those who repent and are baptized in my name; and ye shall do it in remembrance of my blood, which I have shed for you, that ye may witness unto the Father that ye do always remember me. And if ye do always remember me ye shall have my Spirit to be with you (3 Nephi 18:7-11).

In Mosiah 5 the people spoke in unison and said:

5 And we are willing to enter into a covenant with our God to do his will, and to be obedient to his commandments in all things that he shall command us, all the remainder of our days, that we may not bring upon ourselves a never-ending torment, as has been spoken by the angel, that we may not drink out of the cup of the wrath of God.

To which the king responded:

6 And now, these are the words which king Benjamin desired of them; and therefore he said unto them: Ye have spoken the words that I desired; and the covenant which ye have made is a righteous covenant.
7 And now, because of the covenant which ye have made ye shall be called the children of Christ, his sons, and his daughters; for behold, this day he hath spiritually begotten you; for ye say that your hearts are changed through faith on his name; therefore, ye are born of him and have become his sons and his daughters.
8 And under this head ye are made free, and there is no other head whereby ye can be made free. There is no other name given whereby salvation cometh; therefore, I would that ye should take upon you the name of Christ, all you that have entered into the covenant with God that ye should be obedient unto the end of your lives.
9 And it shall come to pass that whosoever doeth this shall be found at the right hand of God, for he shall know the name by which he is called; for he shall be called by the name of Christ.
10 And now it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall not take upon him the name of Christ must be called by some other name; therefore, he findeth himself on the left hand of God.
11 And I would that ye should remember also, that this is the name that I said I should give unto you that never should be blotted out, except it be through transgression; therefore, take heed that ye do not transgress, that the name be not blotted out of your hearts.
12 I say unto you, I would that ye should remember to retain the name written always in your hearts, that ye are not found on the left hand of God, but that ye hear and know the voice by which ye shall be called, and also, the name by which he shall call you (Mosiah 5:5-12).

As King Benjamin explains, to take upon oneself the name of Christ is to “become his sons and his daughters.” When we are adopted into a new family we take the family name as our own. But the terms of the adoption covenant mean more than that. An adopted child has the full rights of inheritance. So to take upon us the name of Christ is to lay claim to all the blessings implied by the family relationship.

The blessing on the bread is a reiteration of that covenant. Like all covenants it has two parts: the promises of the first party and the promises of the second.

For our part, we—

“witness unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father, that they are willing [that is the operative word] to take upon them the name of thy Son, and [that they are willing to] always remember him, and [that they are willing to] keep his commandments which he hath given them,”

For God’s part, his promise is

“that they may always have his Spirit to be with them (Moroni 4:3).

The blessing on the water is different from that. It is an assertion and an evidence that we are actually keeping the covenants we just made:

that they may do it in remembrance of the blood of thy Son, which was shed for them; that they may witness … that they do [“do” is the operative word here] always remember him,

Through that assertion we lay claim to the fulfillment of the Father’s part of the covenant:

“that they may have his Spirit to be with them” (Moroni 5:2).

Notwithstanding the fact that we take the sacrament weekly, and that many, especially the children, do not understand what the words say, there is noting trivial suggested in its frequent repetition. When the words of the covenants in the blessing on the bread are understood to represent a renewing of all of the covenants we have made, including the temple covenants; and the words of the blessing on the water asserts that we are keeping all of those covenants, then we begin to understand power represented in those ordinances.

It is little wonder the Savior warned:

28 And now behold, this is the commandment which I give unto you, that ye shall not suffer any one knowingly to partake of my flesh and blood unworthily, when ye shall minister it;
29 For whoso eateth and drinketh my flesh and blood unworthily eateth and drinketh damnation to his soul….(3 Nephi 18:28-29).

 <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>