Category: Sec 89-93

  • John 1:15-17 & D&C 93:11-23 — Grace for Grace — LeGrand Baker

    The phrase “grace for grace” is about the maturation of reciprocal, unfailing, covenant love. It is used only once in the New Testament, once by Mormon, and twice in D&C 93. The latter also contains the phrase “grace to grace”

    The context in which John places it is this:

    15 John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me.
    16 And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace.
    17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.(John 1:15-17).

    Grace is translated from the Greek word charis. It is an expression or act of kindness, a favor with the intent of doing good (Strong # 5485). So, the simplest understanding of “grace for grace” would be an exchange of kindnesses. However, its Hebrew equivelent suggests much more than that, as C.L. Mitton wrote,

    Indeed, if this fuller meaning [of grace] is to be represented at all by a Hebrew word, it is the word hesed. This word is, however, usually translated in the LXX by the Greek word [meaning] ‘mercy’. {1}

    As I shall point out below, it appears that hesed is translated as both “mercy” and “grace” in the Book of Mormon.

    A new version of Strong’s Concordance defines hesed as “unfailing love, loyal love, devotion. kindness, often based on a prior relationship, especially a covenant relationship.” {2}

    That definition is probably based on the work of Katherine Doob Sakenfeld who emphasized that hesed is about keeping covenants. She wrote that hesed meant “to do what is expected of one.” With regard to the covenant, God does what is expected (keeps his covenant promises), therefore, man should also maintain “hesed” (keep their covenant promises). {3}

    Hesed is more than making and keeping a legal contract, rather it is about keeping sacred covenants. Botterweck and Ringgren write that this reciprocal relationship is fundamental to the meaning of hesed. “because we are dealing with the closest of human bonds.”{4}

    It is an act that preserves or promotes life. It is intervention on behalf of someone suffering misfortune or distress. It is demonstration of friendship or piety. It pursues what is good and not what is evil. Thus the most appropriate translation of hesed is “goodness,” “grace,” or “kindness.” {5}

    God’s kindness towards an individual places that individual in a relationship with his neighbor, a relationship based on Yahweh’s kindness; in his daily contacts with others he must keep the kindness he has experienced, he must practice righteousness and justice, kindness and mercy. Thus hesed shapes not only the relationship of Yahweh with human beings, but also that of human beings among themselves. {6}

    It is often stated expressly that the one who receives an act of hesed responds with a similar act of hesed, or at least that the one who demonstrates hesed is justified in expecting an equivalent act in return. {7}

    That idea is expressed very clearly by the Savior in the Beatitudes where he said,

    7 And blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy. (3 Nephi 12:7).

    There he is paraphrasing Psalm 18:25 which says,

    25 With the merciful thou wilt shew thyself merciful.

    The key words in that statement are each different forms of hesed.

    25 With the merciful [ Strong # 2623 adjective form of hesed. Faithful, kind ] thou wilt shew thyself merciful [ Strong #2616 verb form of hesed. To be good, be kind ].

    It appears that Mormon was citing the same psalm when he wrote,

    24 And may God grant, in his great fulness, that men might be brought unto repentance and good works, that they might be restored unto grace for grace, according to their works (Helaman 12:24).

    If he was referring to Psalm 18, then that affirms that in the Book of Mormon, hesed can be translated either “grace” as in Helaman, or “mercy” as in 3 Nephi.

    Cohen understood the sweeping consequences of that concept, and defined hesed as “covenant love; i.e. the love relationship between parties whose actions express their mutual feelings and are not merely prescribed by the terms of their contract.”{8}

    The most beautiful example of the meaning of hesed that I know is in Psalm 25. It is spoken by the king, but the references are to his personal premortal covenants. Hesed is used three times in that short psalm. The first is translated as “lovingkindnesses.” The other two are translated as “mercy.” Psalm 25 is my favorite because it shows that the covenants we made at the Council in Heaven are an important part of the experiences we have in this life.{9}

    Another word with which we are familiar and that carries the same connotation of reciprocal love is pistis, translated as “faith” in the New Testament. Pistis is about covenants and friendships. In the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament we find this definition:

    Stress is often laid on the fact that this [pistis] is a higher endowment than wealth. … Concretely pistis means the ‘guarantee’ which creates the possibility of trust, that which may be relied on, or the assurance of reliability, ‘assurance’. … pistis is the ‘oath of fidelity,’ ‘the pledge of faithfulness,’ ‘security.’ This leads on the one side to the sense of ‘certainty,’ ‘trustworthiness,’ on the other to that of ‘means of proof,’ ‘proof.’ In particular pistis denotes the reliability of persons, ‘faithfulness.’ It belongs especially to friendship. {10}

    Primarily, then, pistis is an attitude of man to himself, not to others. As man’s faithfulness to himself, however, pistis makes possible the right relation to others, He who is “faithful to himself” can also be “faithful” to others; he alone is capable of genuine friendship. {11}

    A similar word to hesed is the Greek word philadelphia, which is usually translated as “brotherly love,” but is “brotherly kindness” in 2 Peter. It means “fraternal affection: brotherly love (kindness).” {12}

    In the story told in 1 Samuel 20 of the devotion shared by David and Jonathan, the word hesed is central to the covenants they made. It is easy to discover in that use of hesed that it is about the same devoted friendship that is conveyed by philadelphia.

    David had fled from Saul’s house and asked Jonathan to help him preserve his life. David said to Jonathan,

    8 Therefore thou shalt deal kindly [hesed] with thy servant; for thou hast brought thy servant into a covenant of the Lord with thee: …

    After David had affirmed the terms of his covenant Jonathan responded,

    14 And thou shalt not only while yet I live shew me the kindness [hesed] of the Lord, that I die not:
    15 But also thou shalt not cut off thy kindness [hesed] from my house for ever: no, not when the Lord hath cut off the enemies of David every one from the face of the earth.
    16 So Jonathan made a covenant with the house of David, saying, Let the Lord even require it at the hand of David’s enemies.
    17 And Jonathan caused David to swear again, because he loved him: for he loved him as he loved his own soul (1 Samuel 20:8, 14-17).

    In the first four verses of 2 Peter, he uses the word pistis (“faith”) to mean the entire ancient Christian temple service, concluding with: “Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature.” (2 Peter 1:4) Then Peter lists in sequence eight things we must be in order to make our “calling and election sure.” (2 Peter 1:1-10) In Peter’s sequence, philadelphia and charity are the final necessary qualities that will bring one to the fruition of his promise:

    11 For so an entrance shall be ministered unto you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ (2 Peter 1:11).

    That ordering is necessary. One cannot have charity (love for everyone) if one does not first have philadelphia (one-on-one love between individuals). In this sequence Peter has taken the key triumvirate of pistis, philadelphia (hesed), and charity (grace), and shown us how those actions and the attitudes create a unity of relationships that is “everlasting.” All are about keeping covenants that sustain and validate eternal family and eternal friendships.

    The Prophet Joseph had reached that same conclusion when he wrote: “Friendship is the grand fundamental principle of Mormonism.” {13}

    That understanding of the covenants gives us a different and beautiful way by which we may examine what John meant when he said, “And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace.” It calls to mind that Jesus referred to not just his apostles, but also to Lazarus, as his friends. Friends are persons who give love and receive love.

    When you and I read the definition of hesed as “unfailing love based on a prior covenant,” our minds find no conflict in finding two sources for the love and the covenants. The first is our premortal covenants and the second is the covenants we make in this world.

    The premortal covenant relationships were reciprocal both between each other and between us and God. I believe that the friendships and the sacred covenants we make in this world are affirmations of the ones we made before.

    As we consider these principles it becomes obvious that none of the relationships discussed here are limited to, or even focused on this life’s fleeting experiences. Rather, we are glimpsing the true nature of our eternal covenants with God and with each other. The phrase “grace for grace” denotes our ever maturing friendships. The infinite quality of those friendships is evinced in the Doctrine and Covenants where the Lord explains John’s testimony:

    11 And I, John, bear record that I beheld his glory, as the glory of the Only Begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth, even the Spirit of truth, which came and dwelt in the flesh, and dwelt among us.
    12 And I, John, saw that he received not of the fulness at the first, but received grace for grace;
    13 And he received not of the fulness at first, but continued from grace to grace, until he received a fulness;
    14 And thus he was called the Son of God, because he received not of the fulness at the first.
    15 And I, John, bear record, and lo, the heavens were opened, and the Holy Ghost descended upon him in the form of a dove, and sat upon him, and there came a voice out of heaven saying: This is my beloved Son.
    16 And I, John, bear record that he received a fulness of the glory of the Father;
    17 And he received all power, both in heaven and on earth, and the glory of the Father was with him, for he dwelt in him.
    18 And it shall come to pass, that if you are faithful you shall receive the fulness of the record of John.
    19 I give unto you these sayings that you may understand and know how to worship, and know what you worship, that you may come unto the Father in my name, and in due time receive of his fulness.
    20 For if you keep my commandments you shall receive of his fulness, and be glorified in me as I am in the Father; therefore, I say unto you, you shall receive grace for grace.
    21 And now, verily I say unto you, I was in the beginning with the Father, and am the Firstborn;
    22 And all those who are begotten through me are partakers of the glory of the same, and are the church of the Firstborn.
    23 Ye were also in the beginning with the Father; that which is Spirit, even the Spirit of truth (D &C 93:11-23).

    It is appropriate that I conclude this discussion by citing the testimony of John, Jesus’s Beloved friend and apostle:

    4 John to the seven churches which are in Asia: Grace be unto you, and peace, from him which is, and which was, and which is to come; and from the seven Spirits which are before his throne;
    5 And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,
    6 And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen. (Revelation 1:4-6).

    11 Beloved, if God so loved us, we ought also to love one another.
    12 No man hath seen God at any time [except them who believe — JST] If we love one another, God dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us.
    13 Hereby know we that we dwell in him, and he in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit.
    14 And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world.
    15 Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God.
    16 And we have known and believed the love that God hath to us. God is love; and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him.
    17 Herein is our love made perfect, that we may have boldness in the day of judgment: because as he is, so are we in this world.
    18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.
    19 We love him, because he first loved us.
    20 If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?
    21 And this commandment have we from him, That he who loveth God love his brother also (1 John 4:11-21).
    ——————————-
    FOOTNOTES

    {1} C.L. Mitton’s article on “grace” in The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible (Nashville, Abingdon Press, 1991), 2: 464. The quote includes Greek and Hebrew words that are omitted here.

    {2} John R. Kohlenberger III and James A. Swanson, The Strongest Strong’s, Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2001), Hebrew dictionary # 2617.

    {3} Katherine Doob Sakenfeld, The Meaning of Hesed in the Hebrew Bible: A New Inquiry (Missoula, Montana; Scholars Press for the Harvard Semitic Museum, 1978).

    {4} G. Johannes Botterweck and Helmer Ringgren, eds., trans. Davod E. Green, Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, 15 vols. (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1986), article about hesed, 5:45-48).

    {5} Ibid, 5:51.

    {6}Ibid, 5:63.

    {7} Ibid, 5:47.

    {8}Stuart A. Cohen, “Kings, Priests and Prophets, Patterns of Constitutional Discourse and Constitutional Conflict in Ancient Israel.” In The Quest for Utopia, Jewish Political Ideas and Institutions through the Ages, edited by Zvi Gitelman. 17-40. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe, 1992, page 21.

    {9} For a discussion of Psalm 25 see Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, chapters, “Meaning of ‘Meek’ in Psalm 25: Keeping One’s Eternal Covenants” and “The Meek in Psalm 25.” First edition, pages, 525-43; paperback edition, pages 378-90. However, for a discussion of the psalm, the paperback edition is better and it is available on this website.

    {10} Gerhard, Friedrich, ed. Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, 10 vols. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1964-76), 6: 177. Italics added.

    {11} Ibid, 6:182.  In these texts pistis is written in Greek letters. I have replaced them with pistis written in italics.

    {12} Strong # 5360 [first edition, 1894] Emphasis is in original.

    {13} Joseph Smith, The Words of Joseph Smith: The Contemporary Accounts of the Nauvoo Discourses of the Prophet Joseph, compiled and edited by Andrew F. Ehat and Lyndon W. Cook (Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1980), 234.

    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

  • John 1:1-4 & D&C 93 — (part 1) ‘In the beginning was the gospel preached through the Son’ — LeGrand Baker

    There are words which the prophets equate with the Savior. The Savior uses those same words to describe himself. They are truth, light, and love. Their products are joy and life. The words carry enormous meanings — so big that we tend to read over them rather than ask what they are really telling us. I would like to analyze those descriptions of the Savior within their scriptural context, with the understanding that the results of that analysis will only be my opinions.

    The first is “truth.,” which John calls “ the Word” and the Prophet Joseph calls “the gospel.”

    John personifies the Savior as “the Word” which can be understood as both knowing and teaching truth. {1}

    1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
    2 The same was in the beginning with God.
    3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
    4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men (John 1:1-4).

    The Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible says it differently.

    1 In the beginning was the gospel preached through the Son. And the gospel was the word, and the word was with the Son, and the Son was with God, and the Son was of God.
    2 The same was in the beginning with God.
    3 All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made which was made.
    4 In him was the gospel, and the gospel was the life, and the life was the light of men (JST John 1:1-4.).

    There is no discord between John’s “In him was life; and the life was the light of men ” and the Prophet’s “In him was the gospel, and the gospel was the life, and the life was the light of men.” The reason is that the gospel is truth. Truth, light, and love are cosmic equivalents and their product is joy which equates to a fulness of life.

    I would like to discuss the relationships of truth, light, and love. I hope to show that they are simply different ways the scriptures have of describing the Savior’s power and glory. The high point of that triumvirate is love. That is also the greatest commandment. It is also the key to our eternal exaltation. Since that triumvirate of truth/light/love also represents what we must become, it behooves us to try to understand its meaning. The Prophet Joseph said,

    It is the first principle of the Gospel to know for a certainty the Character of God,
    If men do not comprehend the character of God, they do not comprehend themselves. {2}

    The testimony in the Doctrine and Covenants ties those ideas together. However, rather than saying the Savior is the personification of the gospel, it gives us his name-title; he is “the Spirit of Truth.”

    6 And John saw and bore record of the fulness of my glory, and the fulness of John’s record is hereafter to be revealed.
    7 And he bore record, saying: I saw his glory, that he was in the beginning, before the world was;
    8 Therefore, in the beginning the Word was, for he was the Word, even the messenger of salvation—
    9 The light and the Redeemer of the world; the Spirit of truth, who came into the world, because the world was made by him, and in him was the life of men and the light of men.
    10 The worlds were made by him; men were made by him; all things were made by him, and through him, and of him (D&C 93:6-10).

    Much of the 93rd section of the Doctrine and Covenants is a discussion of the relationship between truth, light, and joy, with its focus on truth. In addition to the verses just quoted it says,

    21 And now, verily I say unto you, I was in the beginning with the Father, and am the Firstborn;
    22 And all those who are begotten through me are partakers of the glory of the same, and are the church of the Firstborn.
    23 Ye were also in the beginning with the Father; that which is Spirit, even the Spirit of truth;
    24 And truth is knowledge of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come;
    25 And whatsoever is more or less than this is the spirit of that wicked one who was a liar from the beginning.
    26 The Spirit of truth is of God. I am the Spirit of truth, and John bore record of me, saying: He received a fulness of truth, yea, even of all truth;
    27 And no man receiveth a fulness unless he keepeth his commandments.
    28 He that keepeth his commandments receiveth truth and light, until he is glorified in truth and knoweth all things.
    29 Man was also in the beginning with God. Intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created or made, neither indeed can be.
    30 All truth is independent in that sphere in which God has placed it, to act for itself, as all intelligence also; otherwise there is no existence.
    31 Behold, here is the agency of man, and here is the condemnation of man; because that which was from the beginning is plainly manifest unto them, and they receive not the light.
    32 And every man whose spirit receiveth not the light is under condemnation.
    33 For man is spirit. The elements are eternal, and spirit and element, inseparably connected, receive a fulness of joy;
    34 And when separated, man cannot receive a fulness of joy.
    35 The elements are the tabernacle of God; yea, man is the tabernacle of God, even temples; and whatsoever temple is defiled, God shall destroy that temple.
    36 The glory of God is intelligence, or, in other words, light and truth.
    37 Light and truth forsake that evil one (D&C 93:21-37).

    Let us begin our analysis with the definitions, first of truth, then of the Savior’s name-title.

    24 And truth is knowledge of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come;

    26 The Spirit of truth is of God. I am the Spirit of truth, and John bore record of me, saying: He received a fulness of truth, yea, even of all truth;

    Truth is knowledge of reality in sacred time. The Savior knows all truth and therefore is the personification of ALL truth.

    There are two other definitions to consider. An intelligence is “the light of truth,” but the glory of God is “light and truth.” The phrase “light of truth” says light is a product of the truth, while “light and truth” emphasizes the fulness of each. John says very much the same thing:

    14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth (John 1:14).

    Now, with that I have come to the very edge of my understand and am about to tumble over that cliff. This is the way I see it.

    Just as scientists say visible light has properties of both waves and particles, something like seems to be true of “truth.” We just read that truth is information. Information does not shine, however, when truth is assimilated by an intelligent entity, that entity emits light. So truth seems also to have the properties of energy that produces light. We have also learned that an intelligence is “the light of truth,” suggesting that truth is the source of the light with which an intelligence shines.

    Section 88 explains that in terms that are not too big to contemplate, but much too big to understand. It says that the Savior “ascended up on high, as also he descended below all things, in that he comprehended all things, that he might be in all and through all things, the light of truth; Which truth shineth. This is the light of Christ. … The light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed, even the power of God who sitteth upon his throne, who is in the bosom of eternity, who is in the midst of all things.” The full statement reads as follows:

    1 Verily, thus saith the Lord unto you who have assembled yourselves together to receive his will concerning you:
    2 Behold, this is pleasing unto your Lord, and the angels rejoice over you; the alms of your prayers have come up into the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth, and are recorded in the book of the names of the sanctified, even them of the celestial world.
    3 Wherefore, I now send upon you another Comforter, even upon you my friends, that it may abide in your hearts, even the Holy Spirit of promise; which other Comforter is the same that I promised unto my disciples, as is recorded in the testimony of John.
    4 This Comforter is the promise which I give unto you of eternal life, even the glory of the celestial kingdom;
    5 Which glory is that of the church of the Firstborn, even of God, the holiest of all, through Jesus Christ his Son—
    6 He that ascended up on high, as also he descended below all things, in that he comprehended all things, that he might be in all and through all things, the light of truth;
    7 Which truth shineth. This is the light of Christ. As also he is in the sun, and the light of the sun, and the power thereof by which it was made.
    8 As also he is in the moon, and is the light of the moon, and the power thereof by which it was made;
    9 As also the light of the stars, and the power thereof by which they were made;
    10 And the earth also, and the power thereof, even the earth upon which you stand.
    11 And the light which shineth, which giveth you light, is through him who enlighteneth your eyes, which is the same light that quickeneth your understandings;
    12 Which light proceedeth forth from the presence of God to fill the immensity of space
    13 The light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed, even the power of God who sitteth upon his throne, who is in the bosom of eternity, who is in the midst of all things (D&C 88:1-13).

    That explanation may have arisen from questions generated from a previous revelation where the word of God is equated with truth, which is equated with light, which is equated with Spirit, which is equated with our having the necessary knowledge and power to fulfill our eternal covenants.

    44 For you shall live by every word that proceedeth forth from the mouth of God.
    45 For the word of the Lord is truth, and whatsoever is truth is light, and whatsoever is light is Spirit, even the Spirit of Jesus Christ.
    46 And the Spirit giveth light to every man that cometh into the world; and the Spirit enlighteneth every man through the world, that hearkeneth to the voice of the Spirit.
    47 And every one that hearkeneth to the voice of the Spirit cometh unto God, even the Father.
    48 And the Father teacheth him of the covenant which he has renewed and confirmed upon you, which is confirmed upon you for your sakes, and not for your sakes only, but for the sake of the whole world (D&C 84:44-48).

    I understand that an intelligence is an entity that assimilates truth and shines. If that is correct then it follows that the more truth it assimilates, the more it shines. The Savior “received a fulness of truth, yea, even of all truth.” His truth shines to produce the aura of light that surrounds his person and fills the immensity of space. It is the power by which all things are made and gives life to all things. This aura is “light and truth” which is the glory of God. Therefore, the Savior’s truth and his light are different expressions of the same power.

    So it is with us. As intelligences we were the personification of the truth we assimilated and we expressed that truth by the light we radiated. We still are that way. President David O. McKay taught that the light we radiate is an integral part of our very beings. We cannot hide it from discerning persons. It (or the darkness that is the lack of it) is the very essence of who and what we are. {3}

    That is the nature of truth as I understand it. Next we must examine the nature of light and ask how it can be the power by which all things are made and by which we have life.

    Exploring the depths of such gospel principles is great fun for me, and I recognize that one of its most important values is that the opinions it generates are only a work in progress. At best it asks questions but does not presume to answer all of them. That’s OK because the asking is the most stimulating part.

    We have only begun to explore the meanings of the triumvirate of truth/ light/ love and its relationship with joy and life, so that has to continue next week.
    ————————————

    FOOTNOTES

    {1} See my discussion of logos, in last week’s post: “John 1:1-2 — ‘In the beginning was the Word’ — LeGrand Baker”

    {2} The quotes are from different parts of the King Follett discourse. Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, selected and arranged by Joseph Fielding Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1976), 345 and 343.

    {3} President Mckay’s essay, “Radiation of the Individual” can be found under “favorite quotes” in this website.

    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>