Because we are blessed with knowing the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ, we understand that there are five basic irreducible purposes of our mortal existence. Only the first is absolutely essential. To fulfill the others makes a fulness of blessing. The five are as follows:
To gain a mortal tabernacle for our spirit. This is the necessary prelude to immortal life in a tabernacle of flesh and bone, which is the heritage of all human beings.
To develop a Christ-like character. To learn to act righteously, responding to the spiritual influences from the Savior and learning not to be controlled by the physical forces around us is our goal. Every human situation is rich with opportunity to learn to be honest, true, chaste, benevolent, and to do good to all men. Either sex, any race, any age, any educational level, any economic level, affords an almost overwhelming opportunity to add good habit to good habit, correct preference to correct preference, true idea to true idea, all done following the Savior. Each soul is given the light of Christ to guide him or her in this quest for perfect character. But one cannot finish the task except one receives the fulness of the Restored Gospel and the ordinances of the new and everlasting covenant.
To relieve suffering. The world is full of sorrow and suffering because of the sins of men. But that sorrow and suffering becomes an opportunity to those who have learned the unselfishness of the Savior. With heart, might, mind, and strength, they labor to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to heal the sick, to comfort the tormented, to assure the bereaved, to plead for the unjustly accused, to teach the unlearned. All of this is done under the Savior’s direction, never by using their own or any other man’s wisdom. Their goal is to be sure that they produce more good in this world than that which they consume, and that they share their surplus.
To pass on the seed. To marry in the Lord’s covenant and to bring the souls of men and women to this world is the fourth task. To forebear having children by artificial means subverts both character and the plan. “Children are an heritage of the Lord. Blessed is he who has his quiver full.”
To pass on the gospel. To bring up our children in the nurture of the Lord, transmitting the faith which is precious above all other ideas or messages in this world, constitutes the fifth great opportunity. We are not limited to sharing with our children, but sharing our faith fully with them is essential.
When our lives are finished, only these five things will be important for eternity:
We gained a mortal tabernacle, and therefore can be resurrected to immortality, becoming just and true in all things.
We gained a Christ-like character, and therefore can be trusted with the same glory the Savior has.
We relieved suffering. We showed that as with our Master, we lived to serve and to help, not to “lord” it over anyone.
We sacrificed to bring others into mortality and therefore we can be trusted to continue to bear souls in eternity.
We taught and showed the way of the Savior in all things to all who would listen.
Because we will have done these five things faithfully, we can be trusted with stewardship over all that the Father has, becoming joint heirs with our Savior.
The name of 2, 3, 4, and 5 is “charity,” the pure love of Christ.
Wherefore, my beloved brethren, if ye have not charity, ye are nothing, for charity never faileth, Wherefore, cleave unto charity, which is the greatest of all, for all things must fail—(Moroni 7:46)
Chauncey R. Riddle Preliminary draft 14 January 1983
Table of Contents
Part I Introduction
Part II Models of the Nature and Action of Gods and Man
Part III Religion
Part IV Education and Communication
Part V The Conversion Model
Part VI The Kingdom of God
Part VII Proselyting
Part VIII Obstacles to Conversion
Part IX Summary
Part I: Introduction
The purpose of this work is to construct a model of the religious conversion of human beings in a frame of thought which arises from the scriptures of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It is intended that this model should be sufficiently detailed that it will provide many practical hypotheses which are susceptible of empirical validation or refutation. It is here assumed that conversion is a real process in a real world, and that intelligence applied to the process can make a significant difference in the efficacy and efficiency of any proselyting program.
Of necessity, such a model must be built within a context of an understanding of the reality of God, man, nature, and their dynamic interactions, which understanding must be at least as detailed as the model. That is a way of saying that this model must be true in-detail and be based on truth to be valuable. Since truth is primarily the domain of the gods and their prophets, a careful attempt is made here to interpret and construct only in accord with the mind and will of our God. Needless to say, the assertions made here will conflict with the received opinions of the world. But it is hoped that thoughtful Latter-day Saints, servants of Jesus Christ, will read it with interest and profit and perhaps add their own increments of light and truth where it is lacking, that all of us who pray day and night for Zion to come again upon the earth may be one step closer to seeing eye-to-eye.
A final reality important to note in this introduction is that you, the reader, are entering into a personal conversation with me, the writer. This writing is undertaken as a gift of my esteem for you, whoever you are. It is my hope to write truly, but I know that I can only express my heart and my mind. You will read this with your heart and mind and thus, in the process, will judge my heart and mind and my love for you. I have two regrets already. One, that I am sure my model is not final or definitive, for my heart and mind are not yet what they could be. I have learned so much in the last year, and especially in the last month, that while I exult in the goodness of our God, I have a sense of the greater treasures that lie yet beyond the veil. Secondly, I regret that I probably will not learn from you those things which you clearly see which I do not yet see, this because of the difficulties and proprieties of communication. But if you and I serve God so that His purposes prevail, all of our regrets are swallowed in His love.
(Because this is yet a preliminary draft, much of it is written in outline form to expedite (1) exposure of the ideas, and (2) your opportunity to skip over parts which might not interest you.)
Part II: Models of the Nature and Action of Gods and Men
A. A god is:
1. An independent being (self-existing).
2. An intelligent being (makes choices which are not externally controlled).
3. A righteous being (righteousness: acting only for the welfare of others).
4. A holy being (wholly dedicated to the work of righteousness).
5. A possessor of a body (having a personal material nature through which to work).
6. A gendered being (male and female).
7. A social being (dwells with and works with other gods and other intelligent beings).
8. An omniscient being (knows and understands everything, everywhere, past, present and future).
9. An omnipotent being (having power to do anything that can be done).
10. A united being (acts in perfect harmony with every other god).
11. A family being (has a father and a mother).
12. An obedient being (does only that which his father tells him to do).
13. A permanent being (not subject to dissolution, death or retrogression).
B. A God is:
1. A god who is a father to another being.
2. A group of gods who preside over other beings.
C. There are two kinds of gods:
1. Those who have only spirit bodies.
2. Those who have also bodies of flesh and bone (male and female), who beget children.
D. Man is:
1. An independent being (self-existing).
2. An intelligent being (able to make choices which are not externally controlled).
3. A spirit being (begotten in a spirit body by the gods).
4. A physical being (begotten in flesh and bone by the gods)
5. A temporary being (subject to change: death, progression, or retrogression).
6. A being presided over by a God (the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost).
E. The natural man (fallen man) is:
1. A man who knows not or who has rejected his God.
2. Subject to a pretended god (Satan) who:
a. Fills his mind with lies.
b. Entices him to do his or her own will if that choice opposes God’s will.
c. Brings distress and disease upon him.
d. Brings death upon him.
3. Touched by the light of Christ (which guides him to know the best of his options of choice).
F. The first man and woman, Adam and Eve:
1. Were created by God to populate this earth and to work out their own probation.
2. Were created spiritually alive (the sensory organs of their spirit bodies were fully functional to perceive spirit beings).
3. Were placed in a paradisiacal (terrestrial) environment which also contained Satan.
4. Were free agents in one thing: to partake, or not, of the forbidden fruit.
5. They partook of the forbidden fruit, which resulted in their becoming natural, involving:
a. Immediate spiritual death.
b. Change of their environment from a terrestrial to a telestial state.
c. Satan gaining power over them (See E 2, above).
6. Their becoming natural gave them the opportunity to have mortal children, who are all born innocent but also spiritually dead.
7. As God does (sooner or later) for all natural men, He gave Adam and Eve the Gospel of Jesus Christ that they might regain their spiritual life.
8. They accepted and lived the Gospel to the end and were restored to Eternal Life.
G. The essential parts of every man are:
1. His mind, which is part of his spiritual body and which allows him to:
a. Perceive his natural surroundings.
b. Conceive of possible understandings of himself and his surroundings.
c. Conceive of possible objects of desire and possible means by which to attain those desires.
d. Receive falsehoods and misunderstandings from Satan. Receive the light of Christ and the Holy Spirit.
e. Communicate with other men and other beings.
2. His heart, which is part of his spirit body and which allows him to:
a. Entertain the desires and emotions of his own flesh (intensified by Satan).
b. Entertain the directions and emotions of the light of Christ and/or the Holy Spirit (the influence of God).
c. Choose whether to seek the desires of his flesh, or to follow the influence of God.
d. Select a means by which to try to attain a particular choice.
3. His strength, which is the powers of his physical body, including:
a. His muscle power by which to transport and dispose himself and to alter his environment.
b. His brain, which enables him to learn physical skills.
c. His memory, which records all of his feelings, understandings, decisions, and actions.
d. His powers of procreation, by which to beget children.
e. His power of speech and other forms of communication.
4. His might, which includes all of his influence in the world which is past the surface of his physical body, including:
a. His influence on other people through communication.
b. The accumulation of his physical efforts in time and space, the fruit of his skills (wealth).
c. His influence on the physical world, especially including that impact he makes through tools, machines, devices.
d. His influence on the world through supernatural (priesthood) power, be it good or evil.
H. Every man acts in this world in the following pattern:
1. His mind perceives the physical (and sometimes spiritual) environment of his own body and the state and relationship of his body relative to that perceived environment.
2. His mind understands something of the potentials of what he perceives for satisfying his desires (positively and/or negatively).
3. His mind conceives of many courses of action, things he might choose to do in and to his environment.
4. The light of Christ (his conscience), if he still has it, shows him a best goal to seek and one or more good means to that goal for his given environment.
5. The power of Satan tells him to seek what he, the chooser, personally desires rather than to do what he feels is best, and may enlarge to his mind evil goals and means to these goals which he, the chooser, has not hitherto considered.
6. If the chooser chooses what is best (goal and means), he acts as a little child does, simply and delightedly choosing what is obviously good to do. So choosing, the implementation is direct and always a good learning experience even if the means fails to attain the goal.
7. If the chooser chooses to accede to his own personal desires (which choice is abetted and commended by Satan) in opposition to his feeling as to what is best, he will be bothered by going against his conscience. He then may consider the matter further, arguing with his conscience, rationalizing “good” reasons for acceding to his personal desires (the flesh). This continues until his mind is cloudy, cluttered with many reasons and options, so that which is best is no longer plain. At that point, what he personally desires has no real rival, so he proceeds to implement his plan to fulfill his own desire, thinking to himself that it remains the only reasonable thing to do.
8. If enough choices against conscience are made by a person, his conscience becomes seared, and bothers him less. But it almost never gives up completely; its influence remains to remind the person that he is not doing the best he knows. Recognition of that contrariness brings a self-torment, divides the person, to cause him to struggle against himself, and may result in “neurosis”, “psychosis” or “psychosomatic” illness.
9. As a person chooses, repeated choices form habits. Habits make it possible for choice of goals, choice of means, and skills of implementation to be mastered so well that reactions to an environment can become almost instantaneous and without conscious thought. Every habit has been established in connection with choices. “Accountability” is to be old enough and mature enough to have an even opportunity to choose between conscience and the flesh (Satan) in a new area of choice and action.
10. Novel choices cannot be made by habit. Ordinary situations reveal a person’s habits. It is often the case that extraordinary situations allow a person little choice.
Part III: Religion
A. Personal religion. Personal religion is the habits a person has acquired for making and executing choices. A person’s personal religion and his character are identical. The more habits one has, the more even novel situations are reacted to by habitual choice patterns. The four basic areas of habit are:
The habits of mind:
a. The concept patterns with which one perceives and conceives the world, especially one’s concepts of self, man, and God.
b. The understanding one has of the interactions and interrelationships of the things one perceives and conceives to exist.
c. The possible goals one conceives relative to given perceived environments.
d. The possible means to possible goals one conceives relative to given perceived environment.
e. The mental skills one uses in thinking.
2. The habits of heart:
a. The esteem or value and emotions one has relative to things he perceives and conceives.
b. The habit of preferring conscience over the flesh or vice versa in a typical choosing opportunity.
c. The habit pattern one employs to confuse choosing situation when one does not choose to follow conscience.
3. The habits of body:
a. Habits of hygiene, nourishment, posture, sleeping, etc.
b. Habits of speaking, communicating, manners.
c. Habits of pleasure seeking.
d. Work habits.
e. Physical skills mastered.
f. Habits of pain seeking/avoidance/suffering.
4. The patterns of might:
A person’s habits of mind, heart, and body are reflected in the patterns of his might, such as:
a. The happiness of his spouse and children and the order in their lives.
b. The range and character of his friends and cooperators.
c. The treasures which he does or does not lay up.
d. What he does with his surplus.
e. The order or disorder found in his home and personal property.
It is to be emphasized that every choosing, accountable human being has a religion. His own religion, his character is his primary stewardship (dominion) in this life.
B. Institutional Religion. Institutional religions are social organizations (groups of people) which act to influence the personal religion (personal habits) of themselves and/or other persons. There are always four basic elements or devices by which institutional religions attempt to influence individuals:
1. Leadership: Someone must direct the group functions and transmit that religion to the young.
2. Theology: A theology is an understanding of men, society, the universe: all things that exist. Central to every theology is a god. The god in every theology is the greatest good, the final decision-maker, the being most esteemed. A god is necessary in every theology so that there can be an ultimate arbiter of all decisions which must be made (practical decisions; many traditional theological issues are not related to practical decisions, which has tended to devalue theology in many people’s eyes). The name for theology in philosophy is “metaphysics;” in science it is “theory.”
3. Moral prescriptions: Moral directives are the do’s and don’ts for individual personal choice which the institution (the leader of the institution) enjoins upon its members. The moral directives are the “heart” of every religion. Theology is basically the rationale for the do’s and don’ts. If the moral directives change, the theology must change to properly rationalize that change. Institutional religions which fail to affect the conduct of individual members, which fail to gain obedience to the prescribed moral directives, are failures; they die.
4. Ritual: Rituals are the physical and social patterns of action which are constantly repeated to initiate and intensify habit patterns of thought, feeling, and action in the individual adherents of a religion. The staying power of a religion, which enables it to endure from one generation to the next, is in its rituals, not in its theology. The hoped for result of ritual is belief in the theology and conformance to the moral directives of the religion, though sometimes orthodoxy in theology is (unwisely) taken as a token of moral compliance.
C. Types of institutional religion. The three basic types of institutional religions are churches, cultures, and governments. (Every social organization has a religious purpose.) An example of each will be given:
1. Example of a church: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
a. Leadership: Our Church is an example of a social organization wherein the presiding authorities attempt to influence the choices of members and non-members by encouraging them to accept particular ritual observances and certain theological views ultimately to help them live godly lives. The older members try to influence the younger members in the same manner to the same end.
b. Theology: The LDS view of God and man (see Part II, above).
c. Moral prescriptions:
1) Of the heart: Love the Lord with all of one’s heart, might, mind, and strength and love one’s neighbor as oneself.
2) Of the mind: Counsel with the Lord in all thy doings and lean not to thine own understanding and He will lead thee in the paths of righteousness.
3) Of strength: Be ye clean that bear the vessels of the Lord.
4) Of might: Thou shalt offer an acceptable offering unto the Lord: tithing, consecration, beneficence.
d. Rituals:
1) Private Rituals (worship):
a) Prayer: Speaking to our God very personally.
b) Scripture study: Seeking out an understanding of the Lord’s law and ways.
c) Meditation: Receiving the whisperings of the Holy Spirit and pondering upon them to achieve understanding and to discern the path of action before us.
d) Beneficence (alms): Searching out the poor (the hands that hang down, the feeble knees) and ministering to them according to the Lord’s instructions.
2) Public rituals (worship):
a) The ordinances of the priesthood.
b) Family prayer, family scripture reading, family home evening, family council.
c) Ward meetings, stake and general conferences.
d) Proselyting.
Note: It is plain that the strength of the LDS religion lies in the private rituals, for unless they are faithfully executed all else will be empty forms.
2. Example of a culture-type institutional religion: New York City Judaism.
(A culture is distinct from a church in that the culture has a widely dispersed, almost accidental leadership, whereas a church has a centralized hierarchy.)
a. Leadership: Basic leadership in cultural Judaism is provided by the mothers who instill in the young the fundamental values and habits of the religion. (The rule: a person is Jewish if his mother was Jewish.)
b. Theology:
1) No belief in the God of the Old Testament; human “intellect” has become god.
2) Veneration of Einstein, Freud and Marx.
3) Science as the key to knowledge.
4) Success in becoming intellectual, cultured and wealthy greatly valued.
5) Value placed in blood line.
c. Moral prescriptions:
1) Intellectual contribution to society is the greatest good.
2) Marry within the culture and blood.
3) Within the culture, share money, cooperate, but no usury.
4) Make lots of money, spend carefully.
5) Frankness, courage, persistence, aggressiveness, and problem solving are highly valued.
6) Lie if necessary.
7) Chastity less valued once a person leaves home, divorce looked down upon.
d. Ritual:
1) Private rituals:
a) Study (do well in school).
b) Think (figure out how to get what you want).
2) Public rituals:
a) Family discussion: setting of goals and values.
b) Bar Mitzvah (cash given by friends to a boy upon coming of age).
c) Weddings (very social occasions; expensive presents and cash given).
d) Hebrew school (special language training sets people apart).
3. Example of a Government institutional religion:
[Note: All governments tend to have an “established” religion because no government can endure which does not rest upon a common cultural tradition (religion). This is because not all matters can be legislated and there must be some cultural commonality for the success of matters which are legislated. The established religion in the United States of America originally was the Protestant cultural religion; that nation’s established religion today is the cultural religion of Humanism. This change was wrought in the main by gaining control of the school system (making it “public”) and then requiring compulsory attendance at the lower levels.]
Example of a government religion: Soviet Russia.
a. Leadership: The leadership in practical matters is provided by members of the Communist Party (which is a church within the government), who hold the principle offices in the government. Leadership in theoretical matters is provided by the university professors (the universities are another church within the government).
b. Theology (straight Humanism):
1) The leader of the government is the god. The intelligentsia are his priesthood.
2) There is no supernatural.
3) Science is the means to all knowledge; technology is the means to all accomplishment.
4) Man evolved from lower forms of life.
5) The group is more important than the individual.
c. Moral prescriptions:
1) Loyalty to the government (the collective) is the greatest good.
2) Traditional religions, especially churches, are to be stamped out.
3) Traditional “church” morality has no meaning. Lying, stealing, fornication are legitimate means by which to achieve the government’s goals.
d. Ritual:
1) Private rituals
a) Study of Communist theory.
b) Hard work to achieve the government’s goals.
2) Public rituals
a) Mass indoctrination (all media, schools, cultural events).
b) Parades featuring military power, giant pictures of leaders.
c) Graduation from universities and schools as an ordination to the approved state priesthood.
Part IV: Education and Communication
A. Education
1. Education is the process of acquiring a religion.
a. Acquiring habits of heart: Values
b. Acquiring habits of mind: Beliefs, thinking
c. Acquiring habits of body: Strength, skills
2. There is no education which does not involve values, beliefs, thinking patterns, and skills.
3. In all education the educator is communicating his values, beliefs, and thinking patterns to the young.
4. Therefore, there is no such thing as secular education. All education is religious education.
B. Communication
1. Communication is the process whereby one person influences the feelings, beliefs, and thinking patterns of another person.
2. Every person has a religion. A person’s religion is always the basis and is usually the substance of any communication he sends or receives (interpretations he makes).
3. Therefore, all communication is religious communication. There are no such things as objectivity, unbiasedness, neutrality, or pure information.
4. All educational processes are communication.
5. Communication is the basic public ritual of every institutional religion.
C. Schools
1. All schools are forms of institutional religion wherein either a cultural religion or the personal religions of the instructors are communicated to and enjoined upon the students by the teachers.
2. Ordinarily, schools are the second most powerful form of institutional ritual (the family communications are first, peer communication and media vie for third/fourth).
3. To control the religion of a people, those in power find it most effective to:
a. Destroy family communication as much as possible.
b. Have mandatory attendance at controlled schools.
c. Control the media communications.
d. Disallow non-government meetings.
The factor hardest for governments or other institutions to control is peer communication.
D. Training
1. Training is education which maximizes teacher control and minimizes student initiative in the acquisition of habits of mind, heart, and body.
2. Emphasis on training in education tends to destroy creativity unless there is a studied rewarding of student initiative.
3. Repressive religions (persons, churches, cultures, and governments) tend to emphasize training in education and tend to reward creativity negatively.
4. Repressive religions survive only as long as they have physical power superior to all rivals, for only then can they control the training of the young.
5. The most enduring institutional religions in free situations are the ones which successfully foster private (personal) ritual. This fostering is achieved only through training (public ritual).
Examples of institutional religions which have endured in politically free or adverse situations are Buddhism and Judaism.
Part V: The Conversion Model
A. Definition of Conversion. Conversion is the process wherein an individual person breaches his own present habit patterns by choosing to believe, feel, say, and do things differently than he previously has done, repeating those new choices until they are firmly established as new habit patterns. Another way of saying this is that the person by deliberate effort has reformed his own character. This change can be an improvement (to become more like our God), a degradation (to become more like Satan) or simply an exchange (one good or bad habit replaced by another good or bad habit).
1. Strength of character is the number and strength of one’s habits. A person of strong habits is said to do what he does “very religiously.” A person of strong character tends to shape his own environment (for good or evil), whereas a person of weak character (few and weak habits) tends to be controlled by his environment.
2. The counterfeit of conversion is conformity. Conformity is the acquiring and manifesting of outward habits of strength and might (body and stewardship) which are not the result of changes of mind and of heart. Conformity is resistive response to strong environmental pressure and thus will endure only as long as the environmental pressure is maintained. Conversion and conformity are easily distinguished if one can observe a person in a situation where that person feels free to do anything he desires to do with no human penalty attached. The Savior has told us to judge men by their fruits.
3. Persons most susceptible to environmental pressures are little children. Children naturally and easily acquire the habits of their parents. As they learn language they also learn values (how their parents feel about things), a theology (what the parents believe about the universe), habits of body (how they walk, talk, sit, dress, etc.), and patterns of might (order, disorder, etc.). When evil parents fix falsehood, bad emotional patterns, bad body and might patterns on their children, these are the “chains of hell.” Though Satan cannot tempt little children directly, he can impose the shackles of evil character on them very efficiently through evil parents.
Example: Parents who say “I will not impose religion upon my children. When they are of age they may choose for themselves.” are actually imposing their own personal religion, their feelings, ideas, words, and action patterns on their own children. They are teaching their children to dislike churches and to like iconoclasm, among other things.
4. Training is a means of gaining conformity in adults. It is effective to the degree which rewards and punishments are great and swift. In little children, training usually is accepted in mind and heart as well as body, since there are no previous habits of mind and heart to cause resistance.
B. Causation in conversion. Since true conversion must always be self-conversion of mind and heart, what causes conversion? The cause can never, by definition, be a factor of the person’s external environment. Crucial to this model is the following understanding:
1. The cause of conversion is always the uncovering of a latent desire within the heart of an individual. The desire has been latent because the individual did not previously understand that a certain option even existed, or, because he previously did not think it possible or wise to choose that option even though it was known and desired.
2. The occasion of conversion is always a new understanding of the world wherein a person perceives (learns of) a new option for choice and a means to implement that choice or simply a new and possible means to implement a choice previously desired.
Example: It always troubled the heart of Person X when a little child of his group was exposed to the elements to die; but he could not resist because this was the long established practice of his culture and was supported by seemingly incontrovertible reasoning. But upon hearing the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ, he found new strength for his feeling that exposing children was wrong because he now had a new source of ideas, comfort, and revelation from God through the Holy Ghost, to help him to know how to implement a change within his own stewardship.
Note: The net result of this aspect of the model is that converts are discovered, never made. The process of uncovering latent hope and desire is to bring to people new options for believing, feeling, speaking, and acting.
C. Stages of conversion. Assuming the natural man as the reference stage, we may postulate both positive and negative changes from that level. The levels are arbitrary, for the range of conversion in life is a continuum, the increments of which are discernible changes of habit in mind, heart and strength and might. Change of mind may lag while changes of heart and strength progress, for instance. But the positing of typical stages can be convenient guide posts just as mile markers note the accumulation of many increments of distance on a highway.
1. The natural man is taken to be a person who alternates almost randomly between doing what he knows is best and what he personally desires to do. He exhibits benevolence or malice alternately.
2. Stages of positive conversion. These are the result of choices to yield to the divine influence in one’s life which enable one to respond to become more like God. Each one of these stages is a measuring point of the divine spiritual continuum which begins with the light of Christ, develops into the gift of the Holy Ghost and culminates in the open vision of the seer.
a. Conversion to morality. Change of the mind to accept the witness of one’s own conscience and thus to recognize that there is a right and a wrong discernable in most situations. That change must be accompanied by a change of the heart to prize the right, therefore to desire it and choose it consistently. This is taken to be the most important of all conversion steps for it is the instrumentality by which each succeeding positive step is taken. The necessary requisite for this change is to be honest in heart.
b. Conversion to social responsibility. Change of the mind to recognize the existence of God and the importance of acting to honor God and other men. Change of the heart to choose responsible action consistently is the prerequisite for this new level, which is to keep the standards of the Ten Commandments.
c. Conversion to The Church of Jesus Christ (of Latter-day Saints, in this dispensation). Change of the mind to recognize the authority of God in the priesthood authority of the Church. Change of the heart to prize and identify with the Church. Change of the body to keep the word of wisdom and become a participant in Church meetings and functions. To keep the Ten Commandments is the prerequisite to change to this stage of conversion.
d. Conversion to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Change of the mind to understand the Gospel pattern of faith, repentance, baptism, receiving the Holy Ghost and endurance to the end as the pattern for making every decision in life. Change of the heart to rely alone upon the merits of Christ. Change of the body to give strength only to those causes which are good. This stage is marked by the adoption and daily practice of the private rituals (prayer, scripture study, meditation, beneficence) of the Savior’s religion. Conversion to the Church is prerequisite to conversion to the Gospel.
e. Conversion to godliness. The mind has changed to a rather complete understanding of the ways of God and of one’s own stewardship before him. The heart has changed to become pure, to have no selfish prizing of any kind. The body has changed to reflect the countenance and actions of the Savior because it has been renewed. The might has changed to become a little celestial kingdom.
3. Stages of negative conversion. These steps lead one from the state of the natural man to become more like Satan.
a. Conversion to immorality (selfishness). Changes from the vacillating of the natural man to a studied rejection of one’s conscience and all that is good (hardening of one’s heart) in favor of consistent choosing of one’s own personal desires.
b. Conversion to depravity. Change of mind and heart to study out means to take deliberate advantage of other people to fulfill one’s own personal desires.
c. Conversion to secret combinations. Change of strength and might to make league with other depraved and immoral persons to form social organizations to increase one’s own might in satisfying personal desires.
d. Conversion to Satanic priesthood. Change of mind to foster direct contact with Satan. Change of heart to do whatever evil thing Satan suggests. Receiving of strength and might from Satan, both natural and supernatural, to build an evil dominion.
e. Conversion to perdition. This final stage can be taken only by one who has previously been converted to the Gospel of Jesus Christ and who then deliberately rejects all that is divine as to heart, might, mind and strength. Such an one delivers himself knowingly and totally to become like Satan.
D. Conversion of the mind. To convert one’s own mind is to change one’s beliefs and one’s thinking processes (skills and practices in imagining real and imaginary structures and events). The following items are the important parameters of conversion of the mind.
1. One’s concept of himself is critical: Who he is, where he came from, what his potentials are, what he can and cannot change about himself and his environment; these are the most important concepts of the mind.
2. One’s concepts of other people is the important context factor relative to one’s concept of self.
3. The most important “other” person is one’s god (one’s greatest good). Everyone has one: his god is the person he finally defers to in making crucial decisions. This may be himself, another living human being, the true and living God, or Satan (there are no other possibilities, for a person’s god must communicate with him, answer his questions, to function as his god).
4. The understanding one has of the status, nature, and functioning of plants, animals, the earth, and the cosmos, is important.
5. The thinking habits of conceptualizing, separating reality from fantasy, categorizing, predicting, planning, creating, etc., are each an integral part of each person’s character and the habits that control them are subject to his own will.
6. The care and deliberateness with which a person perceives, conceives, and establishes his arrays of options for action is a matter of chosen habit (the manner of use of his thinking skills).
The following table suggests possible changes in the mind of man as he passes through the different stages of conversion:
Table- Chauncey Riddle – Changes in the mind of a person as they go through conversion – 14 Jan 1983
E. Conversion of the heart: To convert one’s heart is to change what one prizes (one’s treasure). That change will result in change of what one chooses both as to ends and the means to those ends. The following items are important parameters of prizing and choosing.
1. The basic prizing is how one feels about the relative worth of one’s own feelings as to what he wishes to do (the desires of his own flesh supported by Satan’s encouragement) as opposed to his feelings as to what is right to do, what he ought to do in that situation (the influence of the light of Christ/the Holy Ghost as manifest in his own conscience).
2. Next is the prizing one does of other persons around him, as to whether he feels they are holy or not (actually or potentially); beings whom he should respect or not; beings whom he could (should) use as means for his own ends, or not.
3. The prizing of material objects and functions, possessing and using plants, animals, the earth, and the artifacts of man.
4. As the correct prizings take their place, feelings of pure love (charity), can and will grow in the heart both for God and for all of His creatures.
The following table suggests possible changes in the heart of man as he passes through the different stages of conversion:
Table- Chauncey Riddle – Changes in the heart of a person as they go through conversion – 14 Jan 1983
F. Conversion of the physical body (strength). The body can be converted only as the mind and the heart are converted and control it. Important parameters of conversion of the body are:.
1. Change of habits of hygiene (especially cleanliness); eating habits, dress and grooming habits, sleeping habits, etc.
2. Change of habits such as to the ability to focus attention, to do sustained mental and physical labor.
3. Change of skill development in physical skills (walking, talking, foreign languages, athletic skills, work skills).
4. Change of physical strength and endurance.
The following table suggests possible changes in the strength (body actions) of man as he passes through the different stages of conversion:
Table- Chauncey Riddle – Changes in the strength of a person as they go through conversion – 14 Jan 1983
G. Conversion of might. If a person’s (stewardship) dominion includes other persons, animals, plants, etc., he is responsible to train them. As a righteous steward he will train them in the skills necessary to become servants of the Lord (good communication skills, reverence, obedience, industry, cleanliness, etc.) and will encourage them to present their own hearts and minds to the Lord as a living sacrifice, that the Lord might then write His law in their minds and in their hearts. As a brother and son, he will exemplify in these stewardships all he teaches and will attempt to emulate the Savior in every way.
The conversion and/or consecration of a person’s might testifies of the conversion of the steward.
The following table suggests possible changes in the might of man as he passes through the different stages of conversion:
Table- Chauncey Riddle – Changes in the might of a person as they go through conversion – 14 Jan 1983
H. Factors that influence conversion. Though all conversion is a matter of deliberate choice, there are factors outside the heart and mind of the person which affect the choice options of the person and are therefore important to the conversion process. These factors operate to open and close options of choice in both good and evil directions.
1. Factors for good in conversion. This sequence is intended to proceed from weakest to strongest. These are factors outside the body of the individual which provide a second witness in addition to that of the divine influence felt internally in one’s conscience. The internal divine influence consists of the light of Christ and the gift of the Holy Ghost.
a. Nature. The order, symmetry, and beauty of nature are revealed to men by the light of Christ, in their conscience. Nature is part of the might of God and bespeaks His hand, mind, and heart. To open one’s mind and heart to recognize the hand of God in all things is one step towards accepting the divine influence of Christ in one’s life.
b. The words and deeds of godly men and women. Men and women who act morally provide an occasion for the conscience of the observer to register approval both of the act and of the spiritual influence which such people radiate at that moment. Acceptance of that approval of one’s conscience strengthens the power of conscience and makes it easier for the observer to follow conscience, to be moral himself.
c. The Holy Scriptures. Reading the scriptures provides an opportunity for the conscience to witness to the individual of the existence and goodness of God and of His way, the way of righteousness. Thus the mind may be better furnished with essential truth about all things and about the options for righteous action. When the scriptures have been altered by man, these truths and options are clouded or confused, causing men to stumble; but even such altered scriptures contain enough good for the influence of God to become stronger in the life of any reader who is converted to morality.
d. The words and deeds of living prophets and prophetesses. These are persons truly representing the true God because they are commissioned by Him and act under His guidance. Their words and deeds provide an exceptional occasion for the conscience of the individual to learn of the nature and ways of God and to feel His spiritual influence.
e. Angelic messengers. These persons are sent by God when a work is to be done that cannot be done by living prophets. Usually angels are sent to bestow instruction or power; but these can be received only by persons who are already converted to following the Lord. In exceptional cases, they are sent to over whelm the mind and heart of a person because he or she has hardened his heart (rejected his conscience) and has not accepted the living prophets (such as did Saul and Alma the Younger).
f. The appearance of God. There is no stronger witness or evidence of the truth or rightness of conscience than a visitation from God Himself. He appears to a man or woman to provide a strong influence to stabilize the mind and heart of a prophet (Moses, Joseph Smith), or to give a condemning witness to the ungodly (the Second Coming).
2. Factors for evil in conversion. This sequence again is intended to proceed from weakest to strongest. These are factors outside the body of the individual which provide a second impetus to evil in addition to the internal selfish desires as aided and intensified by revelation from Satan (which are collectively called the “lusts of the flesh”).
a. The words and deeds of natural men and women. These persons exhibit a vacillation and double-mindedness which strengthens the selfish urge in the beholder as the beholder sees the deeds and feels the spiritual influence of such persons.
b. The words and deeds of depraved and conspiring men and women. The steady, strong evil aura of these persons and the audacity of their evil words and deeds appeal to the fleshly desires of the person, strengthen the impetus to selfishness, and abets the temptation of Satan within individuals who observe them.
c. The writings of natural and depraved men and women. The satanic “scriptures” portray and commend falsehood and evil in an authoritative and forceful manner, an impetus which further abets the inclinations to selfishness and satanic action in the flesh of the observer. (Classic example: pornography.)
d. The words and deeds of the representatives of Satan’s priesthoods. These who practice priestcraft, often feigning righteousness, perpetrate and amplify evil and incite observers to evil in a powerful, pervasive way, enjoining the chains of hell upon all who will listen to them. They act for power, praise, and gain and offer to share power, praise and gain with those who will make league with them.
e. Demonic messengers. Evil spirits who come at the invitation of the living to do the bidding of Satan to furnish gifts and power to perpetuate evil. These cause fear and awe, cowing the will of those who are not strongly committed to following the divine influence, strengthening the selfish in their carnal desires (encouraging them to lift up their heads in wickedness).
f. The appearance of Satan. Apparently a suave gentleman, the master of deceit, the eternal champion of selfishness, lies, and perversion, who comes to use, then to cast off his admirers who have converted themselves to some degree of immorality (e.g., as he did with Korihor).
I. The key to conversion. The simple key to conversion, the change of one’s habits, is what one chooses to do when one has the alternative of heeding one’s conscience (the divine influence), or of heeding one’s selfish desires (the lusts of the flesh as aided and strengthened by Satan). To choose conscience consistently is to build character towards becoming like God. To choose one’s own desires (selfishness) is to build character towards becoming like Satan. The great and powerful truth in this matter is that no one is tempted by Satan or his own flesh except in and through his own desires. Whatever a person allows his heart to prize, he can and will be tempted by it. Whatever we prize or treasure ultimately controls us. The only prizing which will save a person from evil is to prize only the will of God (to have an eye single to the glory of God), which is the only way to give up selfishness. The narrow path to that end is to listen to one’s own conscience. If followed faithfully, every man’s conscience will lead him unfailingly to accept the influence of God in his life, step by step, until he can finally make that final glorious step wherein he not only says but actually does nothing but the Father’s will. Then truly he has reshaped his own character in the image of Jesus Christ. Another name for that reshaping is “repentance.”
J. Apostasy. Apostasy means to stand away from the group. Whenever an individual changes his personal religion to be more and more different from some (any) institutional religion, he is apostatizing from that institution. An individual cannot apostatize from his own personal religion for whatever he does is his religion. An individual can convert himself from one personal religion to another by forming new habits by using his power to prize and choose differently. But no person can ever escape from himself (from his own character, from his own religion).
K. The eternal consequence of conversion to godliness. Our character which is all of our habits of mind (memory), heart (desires), strength (purity) and might (dedication) is all we take with us through the veil of death, for we are our own personal religion. If our character has become godly during our probation, then we may claim in eternity all those special family relationships which have been dear to us in our probation and wherein we have sought permission that they might become eternal. That is done by seeking and receiving the requisite godly ordinances and then sealing these ordinances with the pure love of Christ.
Part VI: The Kingdom of God
The kingdom of God is the earthly dominion of our God. It includes 1) all of nature, 2) all human beings who are either not accountable (his little ones), or who are accountable and have converted themselves at least to the level of morality, 3) the handiwork created by those who are converted to morality (and which is yet in the stewardship of those who are converted to that stage), and 4) The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
A. Nature. Nature is clean, orderly, powerful, fruitful, and an ideal habitat for man’s probation. Through it God sends His rain on the just and on the unjust, giving the unjust space for repentance. But there is a difference: Nature obeys those who obey God, but is the master of those who defy God.
B. Human beings.
1. Those not accountable. Over the unborn, the young, the ill, and the demented, those who are accountable as stewards hold a godly power, and for the use of that power they are accountable to God. Evil men use that godly dominion to further their own selfish purposes, either to let live or to kill, to help to heal or to leave alone, whichever furthers their selfish purposes. This is what the scriptures call “offending” God’s little ones; unless there is repentance, such evil men can only dwell with Satan, here and hereafter. Godly men and women take special care for those little ones, shielding, nurturing and protecting them under God’s direction until God makes those little ones accountable or takes them into eternity.
2. Those who are accountable and are converted to morality. Every soul on the earth who is accountable receives a probation. No man is left entirely to Satan except at his own insistence. The power of God (the light of Christ) is with every man to give each the opportunity to turn to the light from darkness, to morality from selfishness. Every soul on earth who honestly abides his own conscience is an ally to and servant of God, thus an ally to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
C. The handiwork of honorable men and women. The human artifacts of the world, on all levels, are neither good nor bad in and of themselves, but are instruments to be used for good or ill by good or evil persons. But there is a difference between the handiwork of a good man and that of an evil man.
1. A good man crafts under the influence of the light of Christ. He therefore produces objects and instruments intended for good purposes (to help mankind) and he works to do well in his art, that his artifact may serve well and serve long in the use for which it is intended. The light of Christ urges him to excellence in both function and structure, substance and appearance. If appropriated by an evil man, the handiwork of the good man usually will serve the evil man better for his evil purposes than will the handiwork of an evil man. (A piano made by a good man will serve an evil man longer and better than one made by an evil man.)
2. An evil man crafts under the influence of the spirit of Satan, which means that he produces things with as little effort as possible, more for appearance than for quality, more for immediacy than for future reliability, and seeks a maximum reward for his effort. (The piano made by an evil man shines but has a poor sounding board, will not stay in tune, nor hold together long, either in the hands of a good or an evil man.) Only when he crafts an instrument of evil does an evil man work with sacrifice, care, and diligence for quality.
3. Anyone who works diligently with heart and mind and body to produce high quality artifacts for the peaceful and honorable uses of mankind serves God and builds the kingdom of God. Such persons may not be moral in some ways, but being moral in any way, such as producing honorable work, is an important step in the right direction. The work of such persons can belong to the kingdom of God even if they themselves are sufficiently immoral in another part of their lives that they do not belong to the kingdom of God.
D. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Though there are good men and women in many other churches who are part of the kingdom of God because they are moral persons, there is but one church organization on the earth at the present time which is part of the kingdom of God. The Church of Jesus Christ is those people who are converted far enough that they can be called “saints” or holy ones because they have wholly dedicated themselves to the work of Christ in the earth. They may not be perfect yet, but they are trying, having entered in at the gate. The gateway to this part of the kingdom is baptism, and anyone who wills not to be baptized when the opportunity is available so wills not to pass an impenetrable barrier to further steps of conversion. The essential aspects of the Church are its priesthood structure, the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the ordinances, and church meetings.
1. The priesthood structure. The priesthood is the power and authority to represent God. It’s mission is to open succeeding and appropriate opportunities so that every human being may be able to choose to come unto God, to become as He is. The essential works of the priesthood are to teach, to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ, to judge the conversion of men, to administer the ordinances, and to organize the Church and conduct its affairs.
a. To teach. Teaching the Restored Gospel and all other truths important to the welfare of mankind is a priesthood function. Many outside the priesthood would pretend to this calling. Teaching is to be done only under the immediate direction of the Holy Spirit as to whom what is taught and when. This teaching takes place in the homes of the Saints, in the meetings of the Church, and in the missionary labors of every servant of God, and anywhere else that the work of God can be pursued.
b. To preach. To preach is to bind a witness, by divine commission, of the true and living God, of the Restored Gospel, and of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, upon those who will not willingly be taught about these things.
c. To judge. Judging is a priesthood function enjoined by God in order that ordinances and callings might be administered only to those persons for whom such could be a step forward. A person who is not converted to morality is not a proper candidate for baptism, though repentance can lift him successively to the stage of being converted to morality and then to social responsibility. After that if he can believe in Jesus Christ and receive a sufficient witness of the divinity of the priesthood authority of the Church, being baptized could take him a step forward. When he is truly converted to the Church, then receiving the offices of the priesthood could be a step forward. When he is truly converted to the Gospel, then receiving the temple ordinances could be a step forward. All these judgments must be made by men, holding the priesthood, but not as men. By the gifts of God they must render God’s judgment in each case.
d. To administer the ordinances. Ordinances are occasions of enlarging the mind, the strength, and the might of those who have godly hearts. As such persons thus gain understanding, health, and power, they may more fully and more ably serve the Lord. If the ordinances are properly administered by god-fearing men and women, and are properly received by the recipient, the recipient is always lifted to new options and opportunities.
e. To organize the Church and to conduct it’s affairs. Appointing officers in the Church organization and the conducting of the meetings and other public matters of the Church are essential in order to continue the instructing and motivating of those who have entered in at the gate. Only those who are already instructed and motivated can instruct and motivate others. If there are too many to be helped and too few helpers, the tree begins to produce strange fruit. If there are many to instruct and motivate but few to be instructed and motivated, those branches produce little fruit. The end of all Church organization activity is to help every person in this world to have increased options for becoming more like God, whatever he presently may be.
2. The Gospel of Jesus Christ. The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the information one must believe and accept to be in a position to profit from accepting baptism into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. But to believe the Gospel and to live it are two quite different stages of conversion. Those who are converted to the Church are as newborn infants, spiritually, and must be loved, protected, and nourished. The members of the Church and the Holy Spirit provide the love of God, the Church organization and the priesthood provide the protection of God, and the words of God provide the nourishment.
To be converted to the Gospel one must learn to:
a. Feast upon the words of Christ (through the scriptures and the living prophets) until he can rely alone upon the merits of Christ. This is faith indeed.
b. Eliminate every violation or transgression of his conscience (repent of his sins).
c. Keep the promises of the baptismal covenant which means to:
1) Bear the Savior’s name, gratefully and honorably, always.
2) Always remember Him.
3) Keep all of the commandments which He gives them.
d. Accept and live by every word that cometh out of the mouth of God (to have received the Holy Ghost and be hearkening to its influence always).
e. To live fully all one knows, hoping for and praying for further instruction (enduring to the end).
3. The ordinances:
a. Baptism: To allow the recipient to affirm solemn promises to the Lord, thus to obey the commandment.
b. Laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost: To confirm the person as a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, to entitle the recipient to the constant companionship of the Holy Spirit, and to enjoin initial instruction upon the newly-baptized member.
c. Partaking of the sacrament: To renew our covenants and to receive again the Holy Spirit by partaking of the emblems of the Savior’s flesh and blood.
d. Bestowal of the Aaronic priesthood: To empower the recipient to be an authorized teacher of truth, to be able to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to work, judge, and to preside in temporal matters of the kingdom of God.
e. Bestowal of the Priesthood of Melchizedek: To empower the recipient to fill all of the functions of the Aaronic Priesthood; to be able to labor, judge, and preside in the spiritual affairs of the kingdom of God; to receive the mysteries.
f. Temple ordinances: To strengthen the mind and heart of the individual to enable him to succeed in enduring to the end.
g. Other ordinances: To strengthen mind, heart, and body and might and to be able to endure the opposition of this world in serving our God.
4. Church organizations and meetings. The Church is organized into wards, stakes, regions, areas and missions to facilitate administrative matters. The administrative matters focus upon converting the membership to live the Gospel (the perfecting of the Saints), making possible the ordinance work for the dead, and teaching the Gospel to all the world. The purpose of the meetings:
a. Sacrament meeting: To partake of the sacrament and to feast upon the words of Christ.
b. Sunday School/Primary: To provide opportunity for free discussion concerning understanding and living the Gospel.
c. Priesthood/Mutual/Relief Society: To teach the duties and opportunities of priesthood service and to organize the work of administering to the poor (poor in spirit, in knowledge, in health, in wealth, etc.).
d. Conferences: To check the spiritual harmony of family, ward, stake, and general authorities with each other.
The Church also fulfills many social needs for members. But the social aspect is incidental: the essential purpose is to prepare every member to go forth to do the works of righteousness (beneficence in particular).
5. Conclusion: The function of every aspect of the kingdom of God on the earth is to witness to every human being of the goodness of God and to invite each receiver of that witness to convert himself into the image of God.
Part VII: Proselyting
A. Our commission. We are instructed to preach the Gospel to the ends of the earth, to every nation, kindred, tongue and people. In our day all must hear the Gospel to be prepared for the great (for the righteous) and dreadful (for the wicked) day of the Second Coming of the Lord. As in the days of Noah, every soul who willnot hearken to His voice will be cut off. The world today ripens in iniquity, even as it did in the days of Noah, which process sharpens the contrast between the way of God and the way of Satan, making this a most exciting and fruitful time in which to live and to bear witness.
B. Our witness. We hope to bear witness in every honorable manner possible. The following are our principal opportunities:
1. Our individual personal witness opportunities:
a. To communicate only the truth with our mouths and our writing, in order to touch minds.
b. To radiate the warmth of the Holy Spirit, to touch hearts.
c. To dress, groom, and comport our bodies honorably to show the strength of the Lord.
d. To care for our property, beautify our homes, honor our contracts, and lift up the poor, to show the Lord’s might.
2. Our family witness opportunities:
a. To demonstrate love and fidelity between husband and wife.
b. To demonstrate that children are an heritage of the Lord by hoping for and raising, where possible, large families of loved and well-trained children.
c. To show responsibility as good neighbors, making people glad they live near us.
d. To promote the causes of morality, social responsibility, and righteousness wherever possible and as appropriate in community, business, cultural, educational and civic affairs.
3. Our institutional witness as a church:
a. We satisfy minds by having a “complete” theology which squares with the Bible and offers a greatly expanded horizon of understanding.
b. We offer a corrected version of the Bible, a second ancient witness of Christ, a testament of Father Abraham, and modern and current revelation, all of which is self-consistent, all of which bears witness of God and of his ways.
c. We offer living prophets who teach us the Restored Gospel and who offer specific guidance on many practical problems of our time. They give the general guidance which, if followed, would eventuate in the solution to every human problem.
d. We satisfy body needs by taking care of our own in disasters and extending such aid to many others.
e. We deploy our might to achieve a financially sound and strong base for the operations of the Church, one which practices principles of restraint, responsibility, and conservation. This witness serves as a model for every person, family and institution everywhere.
f. We beautify our buildings and grounds so that all who see or visit are uplifted.
4. Our cultural witness as a people (ideals as much as reality, as yet, for this is our weakest area of witness):
a. We prize education, hard work, and problem solving.
b. We prize art, creativity, and excellence in all skills.
c. We prize everything which is virtuous, lovely, of good report, or praiseworthy.
d. We prize freedom, representative government, individual responsibility, economic self-sufficiency.
e. We prize integrity, modesty, chastity, benevolence, and peace.
C. The essentials of accepting the witness. There are certain steps which must take place for anyone outside the Church to become a member of the Church, and have this change be a positive experience in his or her life. The following steps are taken to be essential in receiving the witness that God lives, that the Restored Gospel is true and that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the only true and living church upon the earth at the present time.
1. His or her attention must be attracted in some honorable way.
2. He or she must pay attention. A witness is always received in time and space. The space must be small enough and the time long enough that two things can happen. There must be:
a. Receiving enough information (the truth about Gospel religious matters) that the recipient can understand the message and out of that message conceive a significant experiment which he or she could perform in a short time with the resources which are available. This experiment will vary according to the present habits, standards, and beliefs of the recipient. Some principal initial possibilities are:
1) To pray about the truthfulness of the Restored Gospel (for one who already lives by prayer).
2) To read the Book of Mormon and pray about it (for one who already cherishes reading the Bible).
3) To have the opportunity to ask theological questions and to pray about the answers (for one who is troubled about death, evil in the world, etc., and who prizes clear and consistent answers to such questions).
4) To search the scriptures and pray about the First Vision of the Prophet Joseph (for one who is already religious but believes that the heavens are closed).
5) To associate with and test the spirit of those who say they have already received and accepted this witness.
Whatever is the crucial test of other important matters in life for that (unique) individual is the test which should be employed initially by that person. This because that is the methodology he or she already trusts. But whatever else is done, he or she must pray about the matter also, for there can be no conversion without prayer. Only personal revelation is rock foundation evidence, a sufficient test; all other tests leave one upon the sand, even though they may be helpful.
b. Receiving a manifestation of the warmth and love of God through the presence of the Holy Spirit. In the end, intellectual matters and tests do not convert; they serve the necessary and important service of getting a person to have enough time with and experience of feeling the Holy Spirit to decide to prize or to reject it. The essence of every conversion to righteousness is prizing of the Spirit of God. The purpose of insisting upon private personal prayer is that the recipient must discover that the Holy Spirit is not unique to the source where first encountered (the missionaries, the message, the meeting, the scriptures), but can be gained also on one’s knees in one’s own closet.
3. He or she must personally perform this experiment which has been conceived. No matter how well-conceived the theory of the experiment might be or how delightful the warmth of the Holy Spirit have been to the recipient, he or she cannot be profited if there is no investment and no further benefit. Each must go and do that thing which they conceive, including praying. If the experiment is performed as conceived, there will always be an immediate consequence.
4. They must evaluate the result of that personal experiment. The results of the experiment are either positive or negative.
The following table shows the basic possibilities:
The possible results of an experiment with interpretation and consequence
Whatever the result, the recipient uses his or her agency to pursue light and truth or to reject light and truth.
5. He or she must conceive, execute, and evaluate a second experiment under the influence of the Holy Spirit, guided by the missionaries or not. The person must heed the guidance of the Lord to do the thing that is plainly best to do next. If they perform the second experiment faithfully and like the result, they are on track to conversion of themselves to be more like God.
6. At some point after a finite number of experiments, the recipient must acknowledge the influence of the Holy Spirit to be the voice of God to them. Then the weak faith of the experiment turns to strong faith as he or she hears further instruction, believes it is of God, and diligently obeys in the name of Jesus Christ. Now he or she is on the rock and can and will go as far in the conversion process as is desired, even unto becoming gods themselves.
D. The essentials of proselyting. The steps of proselyting are simply the complements of those which the investigator must take to convert himself. The work of the proselyter is to bring the freedom to change to the recipient by opening new options of thinking and feeling. It is almost never necessary or desirable for the missionary to destroy. The new avenues will give the recipient his own power to change his own thinking and feeling as is necessary.
1. The missionary must get the attention of the recipient. The space must be small enough (so that they are close enough) and the time must be long enough for the two essential messages to be communicated. Traditional devices for getting attention are:
a. Tracting
b. Street meetings
c. Tracts
d. Referrals
e. Hall meetings
f. Teaching English etc.
Ingenuity and propriety are the great guides to attention getting.
2. The message must be delivered. While the investigator is paying attention the missionaries must:
a. Communicate enough information that the recipient willbe instructed and can conceive of a meaningful first experiment about the truthfulness and/or efficacy of the Restored Gospel.
b. Communicate enough of the Holy Spirit that the recipient will have tasted the spirit and thereby be able to identify it when it returns during his or her experiment.
3. The recipient must be so convinced of the need to perform the experiment, including praying, that he/she actually does perform it. Nothing else can succeed if this step fails. For greatest success, the experiment must be performed by the investigator in private (not in front of the missionary nor in front of his family or friends).
4. The missionary must encourage a candid evaluation by the investigator of the results of the experiment as soon as possible after it is performed. The result is the cue to the missionary as to whether to continue his proselyting effort with this individual or not.
5. The missionary must assist the investigator to conceive, execute, and evaluate a second experiment if the investigator has not already done so. Usually this second experiment willarise naturally out of further discussion of Gospel principles.
6. When the experiments become faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, the person is ready for baptism (previously committed to baptism or not). When faith has taken root in the scriptures, in prayer and in beneficence, the missionaries’ work is done. There are branch presidents, bishops, stake presidents and others in the Church to assist in the perfecting of that faith.
Part VIII: Obstacles to Conversion
A. The world. The world (the kingdom of Satan on the earth, which includes his devotees and their hearts, might, minds, and strength, his governments, his cultures, his church) is not of itself an obstacle to conversion, but rather creates the occasion and opportunity for conversion. That is why we must be in the world (to make converts) but not of it. If we are of (belong to, are converted to) the Lord, He will give us power that the gates of hell (the powers of the kingdom of Satan to take and keep prisoners) will not prevail against us: we will be able to bring the blessings of the Lord, through the priesthood, to Satan’s prisoners. The difficulty in conversion is not the world itself, but it is worldliness in us, as individuals, as we attempt to convert ourselves so that we might represent our God faithfully and well in honoring His priesthood.
B. The world in our minds. The Gospel was restored at the peak strength of the Protestant Worldview in America. The early embers of the Church were firmly based in that tradition and the Restoration in many ways simply built bigger and better things on that foundation. That Protestant World view, which was essentially the foundation used by the founding fathers in the framing of the U. S. Constitution, began its downhill slide from influence in the first half of the 19th Century and has steadily lost ground for 130 years. The LDS Church has emerged as the champion of most of the causes Protestantism once espoused such as the integrity of the U. S. Constitution, hard work, thrift, and self-sufficiency. The demise of Protestantism is being brought by incessant attacks on the two support pillars of Protestantism: the divinity of the Bible (especially the New Testament) and the divinity of the human conscience.
The engines which are battering these pillars down are scholarship and science in the hands of those of the Humanist worldview persuasion. Scholarship has been used (with considerable bias and skill) to destroy the claim that the Bible is an authentic historic document: the Humanist version is that the Bible is a collection of pleasant but sometimes gory myths. (For those founded upon the rock, the Bible still has its integrity and the attacks upon the Bible willeventually be seen to be but the opinions of ungodly men.) Science has been used (with considerable bias and skill) to assert the relativity of conscience to social context: the Humanist prescription is to get rid of conscience wherever and whenever possible, substituting collectivist and rationalist norms. (Again, those founded upon the rock are not swayed by this intellectual dissimulation.)
The rise of Humanism in the United States came as the university system of Europe was imported (the rise of Humanism in Europe was the Renaissance). Today the overwhelming majority of university professors, students and graduates are Humanist in outlook. The Protestant churches have become more and more Humanist, substituting political action as their cause to supplant the old emphasis on personal morality. The Catholic Church has abandoned its Medieval Worldview and now has an essentially Humanist face (the present Pope seems to be holding back the change somewhat). There is a remnant of Protestant strength among the Lutherans, the Methodists, and the Baptists (recently galvanized into the “Moral Majority”) but that waning power cannot last long. The average American youngster does not know who Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are (some Rock group?).
The rise of Humanism in the United States has seen a rise in Humanism within the LDS Church. Before World War II, a solid majority of the people of the Church who took advanced degrees in the Social Sciences and Humanities became at least partly Humanist in their outlook. A turning point came in 1938 with the talk given by President J. Reuben Clark entitled “The Charted Course of the Church in Education.” Since World War II Humanism has not been as powerful an influence on Church members studying for advanced degrees. Since the 1950s, Humanism in the Church has had to go on the defensive side as a resurgence of the Restored Gospel worldview has seen a cessation of the honoring of Humanism in the Church.
The basic problem that all of the above is pertinent to is that faith and intellect have never been fully and successfully yoked together in the Church in this dispensation in very many individuals. Sometimes the artists are more artist than Latter-day Saints; sometimes the educationists, historians, the philosophers, the social scientists, the biologists, and the other natural scientists are likewise afflicted; seemingly least afflicted are the engineers.
A special false idea which plagues our people, educated and uneducated alike, is the “romantic” frame of mind. The romantic notion is that great things can be accomplished with little causes, that one can get something for nothing, or that an insufficient means can bring about a desired result. The fairy tales and cultural traditions of western civilization are shot through with romantic notions which lead to such things as the belief that the public treasury is inexhaustible, that well-being is due to luck, that romantic infatuation without repentance will bring marital bliss etc. Humanism and socialism are both species of the romantic fallacy. One glaring example in the Church is people who think that the temple ordinances will “save” them, make them perfect in the next life, without the necessity of their own painstaking and deliberate repentance to rid their own minds, hearts and flesh of every ungodly habit in this life.
When these problems are solved and the “educated” people of the Church begin to serve the Lord with all of their hearts and minds, then the witness the Church bears to the world will greatly increase. Then we will be as far ahead in science as we are in theology. Then it will be much easier to get the attention of the educated people of the world to show them a better way.
C. The world in our hearts. For the first eight years of this dispensation the Lord sought diligently to get the members of His Church to love Him enough that they would trust in His instruction as to how to gain their temporal well-being. With some notable exceptions the members could not convert themselves that far and that fast; most preferred to gain temporal security by relying on their old stand-by; every-man-for-himself. So the Lord withdrew the active implementation of the law of consecration. A later notable attempt in the West to begin active implementation of consecration had some remarkable and hopeful successes, but each experiment ended in failure and we returned to every-man-for-himself. Hearts and minds failed as the influence of the world welled up among us.
The Depression of the 1930s saw another attempt to get the members to love the Lord with the beginning of the Church Welfare Plan. Augmented by later increased emphasis on fast offering, there is now more caring than there previously appeared to be. The Church has become a model for the world not of real caring for the poor but of a-step-in-the-right-direction of caring for the poor. It is still mostly every-man-for-himself in the Church.
The rival way, the way of the world to care for the poor, is socialism, which is the political and economic arm of Humanism. Socialism is winning hands down in the world because the moral base which made the every-man-for-himself system have a great deal of brotherly kindness has eroded and virtually disappeared with the demise of the Protestant worldview and its (Humanist despised) work ethic.
The step-in-the-right-direction of the Church is good, but it does not bear full witness to the world of the pure love of Christ. In fact, it does not solve the whole problem even in the Church. But should the faithful members of this Church ever unitedly implore the Lord that His full kingdom truly be implemented, because of their love for Him, the full implementation of the law of consecration would bear a witness that would set the world on its ear. That would plainly show socialism for what it is: feeble human theory captured in every practical example for another species of tyranny. But the world will never see a full alternative to tyranny until Latter-day Saints so love the Lord that they implement His full plan. Then the world will have witness indeed, for that would put us as far ahead of the world in economics and politics (and thus, in heart) as we are in theology. Then, too, we would enjoy the abundance of the gifts of the spirit, which would further increase our dissimilarity from the world.
Another malaise of heart which affects our people is worldly feelings about feelings. The world would have everyone believe that we humans are not responsible for what we feel, but are passive objects worked upon by environmental forces that control our moods, values, etc. They tell us that human beings are not free agents and that either God or one’s psychiatrist will have to step in to save one. The LDS perversity along this line is to feel put-upon by Church authorities, to justify anger in “righteous” causes, to justify lust for another and adultery when one’s spouse is not perfect, to be envious of the wealthy, to despise the poor to be forever unsatisfied with one’s lot. All of these sins are manifestations of yielding one’s heart to Satan, even though one may be an active member of the Church. The Lord would have us forgive all men, that the sin of any other person would never become either a mental self-justification for sin nor an emotional occasion for feeling sorry for oneself. The mark of love for God is gratitude, for everything, and fear of nothing. But because we do not forgive and do not love God as we should, the world has great purchase upon us.
D. The world in our strength and in our might. While the leadership of the Church has directed us to be distinctive in our dress and grooming it has never directed us to be drastically different. The missionary look is our standard, but adherence to the standard suffers. Not every member believes in “every member a missionary.”
As a Church we are somewhat distinctive as to our standard of the Word of Wisdom. Adherence to the standard seems to improve with each added generation in families in the Church. The standard is minimal (for the weakest of the Saints), but higher standards fall on hard times because some members want to become the voice of the Lord in announcing higher standards (their own version for everyone). Withal, there remains a serious Word of Wisdom problem among Church members which dilutes our witness of the Lord to the world.
For all of our problems with the Word of Wisdom area, the Church appears to have greater distinctive difference from the world in that area than it does in the most important area of strength, that of chastity. One of the sorrowful burdens of being a judge in Israel is to come to know the enormity of this problem. Our witness falters when our statistics on divorce, abortion, non-temple marriage, and childbirth out of wedlock are reviewed by the world. To be better than most is not really good enough to bear a valid witness of love of the true and living God.
These matters of our strength—dress and grooming, Word of Wisdom, chastity—are parallel to our problems of might. Our problems of might are avarice (we are the swindle capital), slovenliness (some of these barns and fences Brigham Young wanted painted still are not), ostentation (mansions now, not when heaven comes), mediocrity (it’s the thought that counts), procrastination (who needs a garden?), etc. These problems of strength and might which dilute and defeat our witness are symptoms, not causes. When our hearts and minds become pure, these symptoms will disappear. Apparently the Lord expects that half of the Church will become pure. Then that half will bear an unimpeachable witness; to the world that will touch every nation, kindred, tongue, and people.
E. Conclusion. Not only can we have too many chiefs and not enough Indians, we can also have too many Indians and not enough chiefs. It is possible that the success of the missionary program of the Church could actually set the Church back in the future because we might not have enough leadership in the Church which is converted to more than the Church to draw the new converts up to the higher stages of conversion by their love. Attention to every stage of conversion simultaneously might help. At any rate, the Church will do better if the worldliness among us is reduced by further self-conversion through following the authorities of the Church as they lead us step-by-step toward our goal. Heaven is our home, and we must create that heaven here, and (hopefully) now, through the opportunity of self-conversion using the power of God which is among us.
Part IX: Summary
Conversion is a change of habits. It begins in an honest heart which admits that the Spirit of God has prompted it to change, to repent. The mind must begin to understand the way of the Lord. The heart must choose the way of the Lord. The body must act in the way of the Lord. These changes of heart, mind and strength will result in visible changes in the stewardship (dominion, might) of every converted person.
But conversion is not a one-time thing. It is an uphill battle, proceeding in small daily steps each of which must be taken by the deliberate choice of a free agent. There is no “great help” upward. To change from the natural man to become like God is to repent (to change, to convert each step) as the Lord shows us how, line upon line, grace upon grace, until we receive a fulness. There is as much conversion that needs to take place within the Church as there is outside the Church as each person goes to his God and implores Him for permission and direction to take one more step each day. Anyone can begin to repent (to educate, to improve himself) anywhere, at any time, simply by beginning to be fully faithful to what he himself knows is right (by hearkening to his own conscience).
Potential additions to this study.
1. An explanation of the Medieval, Protestant, Humanist, and Restored Gospel worldviews as referred to in Part VIII.
2. A description of the social class structure of the Church and how it helps and impedes the work of conversion in and to the Church.
3. A description of LDS culture, differentiating which parts are Gospel-oriented and which are not.
4. Pattern of institutional religions in addition to the ones given.
5. A section on practical suggestions for proselyting work to reach special populations such as:
Humanists
Artists
Intellectuals
Lower class
Etc.
6. A description of empirical studies which could be conducted to verify and clarify aspects of the conversion process.
Chauncey C. Riddle, “Trusted with Great Knowledge,” Ensign, Feb. 1977, page 86
Morality is another term for faithfulness. To be moral in the restored gospel is to obey the Savior in all things. Why obey him in all things? Because he is a God of righteousness. He does not command by whim, but only by that which is righteous according to a standard that coexists with him.
I understand righteousness is to bless others. Only in Christ do men know how to bless others and only from him can they receive the power to bless others sufficient to the needs of mankind, for the Savior is the sole fountain of righteousness. Those who hunger and thirst after righteousness are his sheep. They hearken to his voice and come unto him, that they might fill them with the Holy Ghost.
Those who obey his commandments are thus moral. Being moral, they can then be trusted with great knowledge, for they will not abuse it. They will only use it to further the cause of righteousness in the earth.
Chauncey C. Riddle Dean of the Graduate School Brigham Young University
Persecution—the word probably makes you think of Rome and Liberty Jail, but what does it mean in the 20th century?
Dear Michael,
Thanks for your letter; it was good to hear that things are going well with you. You said you wonder about persecution. May I give you my thinking on that topic? First, some background.
I believe that the first and foremost thing for us to remember is that our beloved Master is in charge. In him we live and move and have our being. He has placed controls on the course of the heavens, the forces and events of nature, the course of nations, and the life of every human being. He grants each of us on this earth enough agency to show our true nature, but never enough to destroy his own purposes. Because men have agency, there is evil. But that evil always has bounds. Two passages from Paul delight my soul as they drive this point home:
“And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God.”
“For I am persuaded that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
“Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Rom. 8:28, 38–39.)
The acknowledgement that the Savior’s work is only to bless and that his hand is in all things is the foundation of faith. When this eternal perspective is surely planted in our souls by the ministrations of the Holy Spirit, we can have that hope, born of faith, which “maketh an anchor to the souls of men, which would make them sure and steadfast, always abounding in good works.” (Ether 12:4.) We all need that security. Persecution brings insecurity to those who are weak and ungrounded. But the faithful can look on persecution with equanimity, knowing that their security is spiritual. No persecution can rob them of anything essential.
That, of course, raises the question as to what is essential. I count as essential the opportunity to be obedient to my Savior, to have the covenants and the priesthood, to have my dear wife and our wonderful children in eternity. I count as nonessential my job, my reputation, my home, my farm, my friends, my health, my life. Now don’t mistake me. I enjoy and desire all of those things. But if I ever had to choose between my enjoyment of them in this world and partaking of the Savior’s love through the Spirit, I would not hesitate. The Lord has so blessed me and answered my prayers that I trust his promise of the blessings of the next world as being far greater than any temporary enjoyment of this world.
I can hear you say, “Brave words. What about deeds?” I know that it is what one does under stress that really counts. But I also know I can’t guarantee anything about the future. As I look at some of my friends who seem to have thrown in the towel and to have given themselves over to Satan, I can only say, “There, but for the grace of God, go I.” My hope is in that grace. God being willing, I will meet the tests. All I am sure of is that at this moment I have a burning desire to do all that the Savior would have me do. I hunger to bring souls unto him, that they may share my joy in the sweetness of the companionship of his Spirit and in the opportunity to bless others.
But on to persecution!
The word persecute itself means “to pursue.” Thus persecution is pursuit to do harm. Its opposite is to bless, to help. Its contrary is to live and let live. Though this subject does not readily yield itself to neat subdivision, some broad types are obvious. We could mention physical, social, and intellectual persecution.
Last Sunday I saw again the film And Should We Die. That brought vividly to mind the importance of being spiritually ready for physical persecution. Raphael Monroy and his companion Vicente Morales were ready to meet death for their testimony, senseless and fortuitous though the circumstances might have been. President Bentley was able to lead the people of the colony in their narrow escape through fasting and prayer. But while we all hope to escape, we know not all will. Raphael and Vicente had to join the Prophet Joseph, his brother Hyrum, Parley P. Pratt, the Savior, John the Baptist, Abinadi, Abel, and countless others in the death of deliberate persecution. In view of the burning and bombing and the hateful murders of our own time, it may be that some of us or some of the rising generation must face death for our Master. Whether we, as individuals, will face it or not is not the point. I think the point is, we must be ready.
Now if each of us had several days to decide whether or not to die for the Savior, most of us would do well. But is not the real test what we would do under immediate attack? I remember the words of Joseph F. Smith at a campfire in California when challenged by horsemen intent on killing Mormons. I hope I can always reply in his spirit when he was asked if he were a Mormon: “Yes, siree; dyed in the wool; true blue, through and through.” (Joseph F. Smith, Gospel Doctrine, Deseret Book Co., 1939 ed., p. 518.) Many of us might not mind dying gloriously, with much fanfare and publicity. But die for chastity when accosted on a freeway? Die for honesty in a prison camp? Die for belief in God at the hands of a mob? If our testimony means enough to us that we prepare each morning either to live for the Savior or to die for him that day, we will always be prepared.
But perhaps we will not be murdered; just robbed, looted, burned, driven. Kirtland, Independence, Far West, Nauvoo should always be in our minds. Those persecutions are our heritage; we must again be ready should they need to become our legacy. The Lectures on Faith make it clear where we must stand: “An actual knowledge to any person, that the course of life which he pursues is according to the will of God, is essentially necessary to enable him to have that confidence in God without which no person can obtain eternal life. It was this that enabled the ancient saints to endure all their afflictions and persecutions, and to take joyfully the spoiling of their goods, knowing (not believing merely) that they had a more enduring substance.
“Having the assurance that they were pursuing a course which was agreeable to the will of God, they were enabled to take, not only the spoiling of their goods, and the wasting of their substance, joyfully, but also to suffer death in its most horrid forms; knowing (not merely believing) that when this earthly house of their tabernacle was dissolved, they had a building of God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.” (Lectures on Faith, p. 57.)
Only that faith nurtured in the privacy of peace will weather turmoil of trial.
When I think of social persecution, two classic examples come to mind. One is the story of a Welsh family, beautifully told in the article entitled “Persecution, 1924” in the January 1975 Ensign. That remarkable father led his family ten miles to church over mountain and dale, through rain and mud when necessary. And when confrontation was the right thing to do, he had the courage to do it. Persecution for his family was the hammer and anvil by which they all acquired that temper which makes saints out of faint hearts and well-wishers.
The other example is connected with the controversy over the laws of the Utah Territory and federal law in the last century. I honor the memory of George Reynolds, who, loyal both to his people and to his government, stood trial and suffered imprisonment so that the laws could be clarified. This man, secretary to four First Presidencies, General Authority, legislator, businessman, and editor, willingly absorbed the attack of the enemies of the Church so that others might not need to suffer in that way. Then to cap it off, he used his time in prison to produce our concordance to the Book of Mormon. Perhaps you know the brief account of his life and sufferings found in the preface to that work. (A Complete Concordance to the Book of Mormon, Salt Lake City, 1900, pp. 3–4.)
Recent commendation of the Church and some of its members is a pleasant change for our peculiar people. The changed climate has helped us to bear testimony, to gain the ear of some who otherwise would not have heard. But while we rejoice in that change we must remember that it is not universal. Throughout the world there is yet ostracism, discrimination, defamation, and harassment. What a challenge both to be humble under praise and steady under persecution, not really knowing which will come next! Our path is to be constant, in season and out of season, bearing our witness as the Spirit directs, come what may. When I think of the “come what may,” I am comforted by the saying of Elder Boyd K. Packer: “The truth doesn’t make enemies; it uncovers them.” We are sent to perform a task that includes the uncovering of enemies along with the joy of finding the lost sheep of our Master. If we fear his enemies, we are not likely to find his sheep.
Bad as physical and social persecution can be, I think that intellectual persecution is the most devastating. The former are by nature opposition from outside, and as such they may actually serve to strengthen the Church. But the intellectual attack also works within the Church. It divides and dilutes us when it comes from members. Let me give you two examples of ideas for which we are persecuted at various times and places.
The first is personal revelation. To me, one of the great glories of the Restoration is the promise “that every man might speak in the name of God the Lord, even the Savior of the world.” (D&C 1:20.) Personal revelation makes every man a prophet, every woman a prophetess, to know the voice of the Lord and to bear witness of him, not needing to depend upon the arm of flesh. Oh, how personal revelation pulls down intellectual tyranny, priestcraft, and private interpretation of scripture! How it assuages the confused mind, the aching heart, the yearning soul! How it builds faith in our Lord, hope for eternity! How it clothes all with a mantle of charity, the pure love of Christ!
Forgive me; I know I don’t need to sing the praises of personal communication with the Savior to you. But I can’t help being excited when I ponder all the blessings that come to mankind by it. Perhaps its strength is the very reason why it becomes a focus for persecution.
I once heard a professor boast that he had broken more priests, rabbis, and Bible readers than anyone else in the business. With that boast he warned any who wished to continue to believe in revelation to depart. I stayed. Then he lowered the boom and went through all the reasons why belief in revelation was irrational. He showed how the people who claimed revelation were inconsistent, both within their own individual writings and among themselves. He pointed out the great abuses that religion had wrought in the world, from inquisitions to caste systems to human sacrifice. He mocked the Bible, pointing out what he took to be obvious internal contradictions. Then he went on to show how everything good in human progress had consisted in rejection of religious belief in favor of scientific, empirical evidence.
Well, frankly I was devastated by that onslaught. There I was, a graduate student, well schooled in Latter-day Saint theology, happily Mormon all my life, a defender of the faith and successful sufferer under physical and social persecution—but devastated. He had made me realize that I did not have a personal testimony of revelation. All I had was an intellectual awareness of what others said about our religion. That realization shook me, for I realized fully that I might have been wrong.
During the next few weeks I went through an experience for which I can think of only one word as a representation: hell. I was assailed by doubt, by fear, by loneliness; I began to wonder if I were sane. Through this time I kept two promises I had made: I continued to go to Church, and I continued to read ten pages in the scriptures each night; but those things became an agony to me. And I prayed. Oh, how I prayed to know for myself if there were such a thing as personal revelation.
Then—thanks to our good Master—it came. I began to feel something special in my breast. I began to recognize certain ideas that appeared in my mind as being different from my own thoughts. These new ideas told me how to interpret passages of scripture, how to understand things formerly incomprehensible to me, even to know the future. But I could tell the difference. Here was the iron rod. I had hold of it. The restored gospel was true!
Since then I have had stumblings. I have been burned, and through those negative experiences I have learned two things: first, without Him I am nothing, and second, I must be ever so careful not to be confused as to who it is that is speaking. Now a full quarter-century has passed. That slender thread of personal revelation has brought me to everything I now hold dear. It has brought a flood of knowledge and understanding—and a glimpse of how far yet to go. I now know that there is power in the priesthood and that the Lord Jesus Christ is indeed the leader of this Church. Now as I see it touching the lives of others, my heart overflows with gratitude to the Lord for this pearl of great price that each of us can have. My greatest sorrow, except for my own sins, is that some whom I know cannot seem to get it. But I have hope for them. Looking back I know that I must have had much personal revelation before that trial. The problem was that I had not become acute in recognizing it.
So personal revelation becomes a great watershed, in the Church and out. Those who have it are drawn into a unity of faith. Many of those who don’t have it think those who do are deluded or demented. I suspect some fear that it might really exist—so they persecute those who teach and proclaim its reality. They don’t want it for fear they might have to give up some sin. And they don’t want anyone else to have it, for that too convicts them of sin.
So we are persecuted for personal revelation in a world that prides itself on “hard” evidence, on objectivity, on the strength of consensus. As a philosopher of knowledge, I can only shake my head. For now I know and can prove that there is no such thing as evidence apart from a matrix of presuppositions, that objectivity is at best consensus, and that consensus is often but a public relations job. Every scientific system begins with unproved postulates. Every person founds his life on articles of faith. But what a blessing to be able to ground faith on a rock—on personal daily revelation from our Savior.
I promise to be more brief on the next idea. We are also persecuted for our belief in uniqueness, for the idea that there is but one true church, one true priesthood, one narrow path to salvation, one chosen people, one fountain for all righteousness. Many people of my acquaintance are willing to see good in the Church, especially as a social system. But to claim that no one except Mormons can become celestial raises hackles. It does not fit with this permissive, egalitarian, ecumenical age. It is taken to be a sign of snobbery, of racism, of hypocrisy, of almost anything bad. One of the reasons my soul so hungers and yearns to see the full establishment of Zion is that we won’t have to say anything about uniqueness then. We will just be content to be unique. How unique it would be if we could get at least half of the Church to be of one heart and one mind, to dwell in righteousness and have no poor among us. I think that we would then see the fulfillment of that promise and challenge: “That the kingdoms of this world may be constrained to acknowledge that the kingdom of Zion is in very deed the kingdom of our God and his Christ.” (D&C 105:32.)
Meanwhile, we are subject to persecution for our claim to be the true church and are dismissed with others who make the same claim. Is it possible that we deserve persecution on this point? If we claim to be the one and can’t show we are significantly better, perhaps we have earned trouble. Oh for Zion!
Two more observations on persecution.
The first concerns the story of Stephen in Acts 6 and 7. I reread it recently and was forcefully impressed with an idea. Stephen has always come across to me as a good and gentle man, well suited to minister to widows’ needs, “full of the Holy Ghost,” a powerful servant of Christ. But it has always struck me that he spoke to the Sanhedrin rather forthrightly, surely provocatively. His speech would hardly win any Dale Carnegie awards. I have wondered: Did he have a martyr complex? Was he deliberately trying to die?
My feeling now is that he enjoyed life as much as you or I and was doubtless very happy because of the good he was able to do for others. But he had a mission to perform. For some reason the Sanhedrin needed another witness of the great tragedy in which they were principals. The promised Messiah had come and had fulfilled all things while they, who desired to be his servants but would not recognize him, carefully engineered his death. Tragic flaw, damning fate, indeed. His own rejected him as would have done no other nation or people. Could Stephen have supposed that he could convert them when the Savior himself had failed?
But Stephen was true to his mission. He bore testimony of Christ and of their sin. The flood of hate and anger that carried him outside the walls to die, stone by stone, was the necessary consequence of his commission. He sealed his testimony (and probably their reward) with blood. The moral I draw from this story is that we should not be needlessly offensive in this world; we should never seek to be persecuted; we should seek to fill our personal missions, wending our way among the hate and persecutions that will come, but never trying to offend. But should our commission call us to an unsavory task, where we cannot help but offend, then we should bear the task off manfully, yet with great humility, with a firm grasp on the iron rod. I honor Stephen for his great example.
My second thought relates to Saul and Paul, also of Acts. Saul persecuted the Saints with great zeal and ability. Then the Lord’s mercy allowed him to repent to become Paul, and he was persecuted by the Jews and others even as he had persecuted. I think all of us should see ourselves in this story. We should ask ourselves: “Am I yet Saul, or am I now Paul?Am I still persecuting the saints and the Savior, or have I repented of my sins to serve and suffer for the Lord? Do I persecute others in my zeal to do God a favor (as if he needed my hate or scorn to further his cause), or do I humbly and patiently submit to all things that my God seeth fit to inflict upon me, even as a child doth submit to his father?”
My final point concerns again our personal relationship with the Savior. He who knows all things and has created all things has also taken upon himself the suffering required to atone for all sins. When we try to imagine all of the pain resulting from our own sins, our imagination staggers. When we try to imagine the suffering caused by the sins of every human being who has ever lived or will live on earth, it transcends our capacity for comprehension. Yet that is what the Savior took upon himself when he drank of the bitter cup to satisfy the demands of the Father’s justice. In his infinite love and concern for us, he bore the burden of our own sins for us, that we need not suffer and atone personally for our sins. The qualification is, of course, that we repent and become sinless as he is. As long as we go on sinning, there is no way we can be forgiven.
You and I, because we know the gospel is true and because we want to stop sinning, have covenanted with our Savior to obey him in all things. Our obedience brings us to righteousness: we are able to bless others. But suppose that knowing what we do, we choose not to obey his commandments. That would be deliberate sin. We who know better, who know how to do better and be better, would be hurting those around us deliberately, because we would be choosing not to do better. Knowing how to bless our loved ones, we would be persecuting them should we sin. Worse yet, because we have been forgiven of our past sins through the blood of Christ, we would also be persecuting him. Matthew 25 haunts my understanding: “Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.” (Matt. 25:40.)
Now I admit that this is an unusual approach to the idea of persecution. Usually we think about others persecuting us. We need to think especially about the possibility of our own persecution of others, for it is the latter, not the former, that truly destroys us. This approach makes our choice simple: to sin or not to sin, which is to persecute or not to persecute. To choose not to persecute is to choose to repent, to live the gospel, to love others with that same pure love with which our Savior loves us. It is to choose to be willing to be persecuted, but to suffer death before we would persecute. Our Master has shown the way by his complete obedience to his Father and in giving up his own life. How grateful am I to know that he is the Way, the Truth, and the Life!
Michael, you have been kind to wade through all of this. I inflict this on you only in the hope that our souls will so hunger after Him whom we love that we will make every sacrifice necessary to become as he is. That is the greatest thing we can do about persecution. Remember the words of the Prophet Joseph Smith:
“Let us here observe, that a religion that does not require the sacrifice of all things never has power sufficient to produce the faith necessary unto life and salvation; for, from the first existence of man, the faith necessary unto the enjoyment of life and salvation never could be obtained without the sacrifice of all earthly things. It was through this sacrifice, and this only, that God has ordained that men should enjoy eternal life; and it is through the medium of the sacrifice of all earthly things that men do actually know that they are doing the things that are well pleasing in the sight of God. When a man has offered in sacrifice all that he has for the truth’s sake, not even withholding his life, and believing before God that he has been called to make this sacrifice because he seeks to do his will, he does know, most assuredly, that God does and will accept his sacrifice and offering, and that he has not, nor will not seek his face in vain. Under these circumstances, then, he can obtain the faith necessary for him to lay hold on eternal life.” (Lectures on Faith, p. 58.)
[photo] BYU Motion Picture Department
Dr. Chauncey C. Riddle is a professor of philosophy and dean of the graduate school at Brigham Young University. He teaches Sunday School in the Orem 16th Ward, Orem Utah Sharon Stake.
Praying is more than “saying prayers.” True prayer is an experience that takes place under the guidance of the Holy Spirit.
One fundamental distinction between the saint and what the scriptures call the “natural man” is in their use of prayer. The natural man may say prayers, but it is not a spiritual experience for him. He is only reacting to his physical environment as he has been instructed or as he finds prudent. Praying, as distinct from merely saying prayers, has a spiritual dimension. The transformation from a natural man to a saint is marked by the ability to recognize and to respond to spiritual environment.
The person who is learning to be a saint must learn about the nature of God and man and the world, about the gospel and the Church of Jesus Christ. He must learn to control himself in faith, repentance, fasting, and mighty prayer, and in using the Holy Spirit as his guide. Finally, he must successfully use the understanding he has to bring to pass much righteousness. He then has something of infinite worth: the ability to do good in this world. As an intelligent man could not expect to step into a modern jet aircraft and fly it successfully without much learning and training, so such a man would not think that he could pray successfully without even greater preparation for that more difficult task.
What is the Purpose of Prayer?
We live in a universe of order. Law governs and controls all things, both physical, and spiritual. This is another way of saying that there is a regularity of causes and effects apparent everywhere. One application of this principle is that all things act (effects) in relation to their environment (causes). Some things are acted upon; they simply react in a regular way to what is happening in the environment. Water solidifies when the surroundings are cold, boils away when they are hot, and flows freely when the surroundings are at a medium temperature.
Some people suppose that man is like water, only responding to his natural environment. They observe that men buy what is advertised, shun that which is disgraced, cleave unto that which is pleasurable. These people predict successfully what most men will do by assessing their physical environment. They can do this because the natural man is not free. He is acted upon like water. Since most men are natural, the accuracy of such predictions runs high.
But, thanks to God, no natural man need remain natural. Though he must respond to his environment under the law of cause and effect, all men who have heard the gospel of Jesus Christ preached with the power of the Holy Ghost have a choice of environments. Having heard, they then can choose between reacting to their physical environment, as does the natural man, or they can react to the spiritual environment of which the gospel makes them aware. As long as the Holy Spirit labors with them, they can choose to respond to either one. This is the agency, the freedom of man: to choose to be natural, governed by the physical environment and their own flesh, or to be spiritual, governed by their own spirit as it yields to the Holy Spirit.
“Wherefore, men are free according to the flesh; and all things are given them which are expedient unto man. And they are free to choose liberty and eternal life, through the great Mediator of all men, or to choose captivity and death, according to the captivity and power of the devil; for he seeketh that all men might be miserable like unto himself.
“And now, my sons, I would that ye should look to the great Mediator, and hearken unto his great commandments; and be faithful unto his words, and choose eternal life, according to the will of his Holy Spirit;
“And not choose eternal death, according to the will of the flesh and the evil which is therein, which giveth the spirit of the devil power to captivate, to bring you down to hell, that he may reign over you in his own kingdom.” (2 Nephi 2:27-29.)
Prayer is turning to the spiritual. It is seeking the will and the power of God through the Holy Spirit in order to yield to the spiritual order of reality. It is the key to the companionship of the Holy Spirit. Having that companionship, one need not lapse into the control of the lusts of the flesh and the pressures of the world. It is choosing to be part of the pressures of the world. It is choosing to be part of the realm where God reigns, where his will is done. It is a rejection of the opinions and wisdom of men who know not God. It is the beginning of salvation. Oh how great the goodness of our God, who prepares a way for us to escape from the deadly and desultory causes of the natural, fallen world!
Prayer is communion with the Almighty. He who finds himself aghast at the evil order of this world will likely seek something better. As he prays he discovers that the power of God reaches down into this fallen realm with a sweet, peaceful, assuring, and comforting influence that gives witness of truth, hope for a better world, and power to withstand evil. Without the opportunity to pray and to receive those precious gifts from the Holy Spirit, man would not be free. He would indeed be the trapped, damned animal he is thought to be by those who do not know God.
“And now, my beloved brethren, I perceive that ye ponder still in your hearts; and it grieveth me that I must speak concerning this thing. For if ye would hearken unto the Spirit which teacheth a man to pray ye would know that ye must pray; for the evil spirit teacheth not a man to pray, but teacheth him that he must not pray.
“But behold, I say unto you that ye must pray always, and not faint; that ye must not perform any thing unto the Lord save in the first place ye shall pray unto the Father in the name of Christ, that he will consecrate thy performance unto thee, that thy performance may be for the welfare of thy soul.” (2 Nephi 32:8-9.)
How to Pray
When a person “says prayers” he is doing something stimulated by his physical environment. He is repeating words and phrases appropriate to some time or circumstance such as mealtime or the beginning of a meeting. Saying prayers is not a bad thing to do. But it is insufficient.
True prayer begins with a yearning in the soul of man, a reaching out for spiritual contact with God. True prayer grows in strength and efficacy as the Holy Spirit enlivens and guides the yearning soul. The ultimate of true prayer comes as a man is able to submit himself completely to the Lord God whom he has come to love; then what he prays for and how he prays are given to him by the Holy Spirit. This prayer is the obedient response of a little child who, with wonder, awe, and gratitude, worships the true and living God. Of himself, the child of God doesn’t know what to ask for. But through spiritual insight he sees the hand of his Father in all things. His bosom swells with gratitude as he glimpses the wondrous work of holiness. As he is given, he asks for those things which are good in the sight of his God and gives praise and thanks in the same manner. The theme of all is the phrase used by the Savior:
“Thy will, not mine, be done.”
“And if ye are purified and cleansed from all sin, ye shall ask whatsoever you will in the name of Jesus and it shall be done.
“But know this, it shall be given you what you shall ask; and as ye are appointed to the head, the spirits shall be subject unto you.” (D&C 50:29,30.)
It may seem strange that in certain prayers one might simply repeat what he is given to say by the Holy Spirit unless one realizes that true prayer is worship. Its essence is a feeling of the heart. The measure of a prayer is the intensity and the depth of that feeling. Does one hunger to do good in this world? Does that feeling wholly fill his soul? Is he oblivious to everything else but the fact that he is in the presence of his beloved Master? Does he cry out from anguish at the realization of his own nothingness contrasts with the goodness of God? Does he receive the Holy Spirit as a consuming fire to burn out the dross within, almost unto the consuming of his flesh? If these things take place, the child of God is achieving and experiencing what the scriptures call “mighty prayer.” While it is true that this may not happen every day or even often, what poverty of soul entraps one who has never felt the fire of mighty prayer! Having achieved full worship even once would color and heighten every prayer thereafter, for the remainder on one’s life.
To pray, then, one must understand the nature and attributes of God. He must receive of the Holy Spirit and worship in spirit and truth. The more he can deliver himself, body and spirit, to what the Spirit shows him is good, the more humble is his prayer. The more he can focus all that he is and has, the more mighty that worship.
Small wonder that prayer at its greatest is private and individual, an thing done with the door shut. How strange to think of being seen by men at the same time as being honored by God. No wonder the life of a faithful saint is a constant communion with the Master, no matter what else is happening.
“Behold, I went to hunt beasts in the forests; and the words which I had often heard my father speak concerning eternal life, and the joy of the saints, sunk deep into my heart.
“And my soul hungered; and I kneeled down before my Maker, and I cried unto him in mighty prayer and supplication for mine own soul; and all the day long did I cry unto him; yea, and when the night came I did still raise my voice high that it reached the heavens. (Enos 3-4.)
Meditation
The helpmate of mighty prayer is meditation. In meditating, one tries to minimize his involvements with the physical world for a time in order to concentrate on something inner, on ideas and feelings. As a person prays sincerely with the Holy Spirit as his guide, that Spirit will bring to him many thoughts and feelings. This is part of the process of revelation. To take full advantage of this revelation, one would do well to mull over the matter under consideration, piecing together what one already knows with the new insights received.
It is one thing to have a revelation. It is quite another to understand and obey. Understanding comes in the process of careful, prayerful reflections of meditation upon what one has received. To pray is often like asking for food and then being blessed with a sumptuous meal. What would you think of a person who, when thus honored, merely took a sniff, then put the meal on a shelf and left it? Though greatly blessed, he would not be nourished.
So it may be with those who pray and do not meditate. They may have much but may be little edified.
Meditation cannot be taught, because it is something personal and private; it is the venturing of the soul into the unknown. But it can be learned by anyone who has the courage to think for himself. A likely initiation to meditation is to ponder the scriptures, the words of the living and the dead prophets of God. Banish all commentaries for a moment: forget hearsay teaching. What does the Lord actually say? What does the Spirit whisper as to how this passage or that doctrine should be understood? Where two scriptures appear at first reading to be contrary, what is the real intent of each?
That soul who has bravely ventured into the sea of scriptural interpretation, who humbly seeks the guidance of the Holy Spirit and rejects the opinions of men, soon makes a marvelous discovery. In the midst of the tumult of human interpretation there is a rock! He cannot see it, for it is spiritual, but he can plant his feet firmly upon it. Then the winds and waves of opinion can beat upon him from any direction. He is no longer tossed to and fro by every wind and wave, but rests firmly on that rock, and on his own two feet. He now has a foundation for salvation. He has found the rock of revelation from the Savior.
In mulling and pondering the scriptures, our venturer has found the Holy Spirit to be an able and willing guide as well as a comfort and a bulwark. Flashes of insight come. Now he sees how God is both just and merciful. He rejoices to learn how God can govern and control all things yet man can be free. He is overcome as he glimpses what the Savior has done for him. Now, having his own light from eternity, he is a new person, a little child born again in the image of the Master.
Having learned to think, to meditate upon the scriptures, the venturer is now prepared to meditate upon the spiritual gifts that come in connection with his own prayers. Now mighty prayer is so rich an experience that he can hardly contain it. Ideas, hopes, and feelings tumble into his mind, then are carefully fit together under spiritual guidance, into the fabric of his new life. They become part of his robe of righteousness as he prepares to meet the Bridegroom.
He who learns to meditate on the things of the Holy Spirit need never suffer the rebuke that came to Oliver Cowdery:
“Behold, you have not understood; you have supposed that I would give it unto you, when you took no thought save it was to ask me.
“But, behold, I say unto you, that you must study it out in your mind; then you must ask me if it be right, and if it is right I will cause that your bosom shall burn within you; therefore, you shall feel that it is right.
“But if it be not right you shall have no such feelings, but you shall have a stupor of thought that shall cause you to forget the thing which is wrong; therefore, you cannot write that which is sacred save it be given you from me.
“Now, if you have known this you could have translated; nevertheless, it is not expedient that you should translate now.
“Behold, it was expedient when you commenced; but you feared, and the time is past, and it is not expedient now.” (D&C 9:7-11.)
Consultation
As a spiritual experience and an access to spiritual life, prayer is like anything of great power is: when misapplied the harm possible is equal to or greater than the good that can be gained from it when correctly applied. The possibility exists in prayer that Satan, who also is a spiritual being and who also delights to give people “revelation,” may attempt to pawn off his own influence as a substitute for the ministrations of the Holy Spirit. The past is full of examples of these devious actions of the adversary beginning with Adam and Eve and extending down to his latest attempts on our own spiritual lives.
When people pray, and especially when they try to make prayer a spiritual experience, Satan stands ready to counterfeit. Some telltale evidences of his influence are feelings that we should give in to the desired of our flesh, that we should do something contrary to the teachings of the scriptures, that we should do things that will bring us the honors of men or the rewards of this world. But the real test is not that simple, for there are occasions when the Lord would have us do something different from what others have been commanded to do, or he may lead us to have the honors of men and rewards of this world. We must be sure that it is the Lord that whispers to us.
One learns to discern the voice of the Spirit through experience. In following spiritual guidance, one can learn surly to tell the difference between the enticings of the Holy Spirit and the temptations of the adversary. To be sure in discerning that difference is perhaps the most essential feature of the transformation of the natural man into the saint. Only then can one show in his life that full and heart-felt faith which is the only means of pleasing God.
It is the heritage of every child in the stakes of Zion to learn from his father and mother how to recognize and live by the still, small voice of the Spirit, thus to know how to worship in mighty prayer. As the children of Zion come to know the voice of the Lord, then can they unite in those mighty prayers that are part of bearing off the Kingdom in triumph.
“And at that day, when I shall come in my glory, shall the parable be fulfilled which I spake concerning the ten virgins.
“For they that are wise and have received the truth, and have taken the Holy Spirit for their guide, and have not been deceived–verily I say unto you, they shall not be hewn down and cast into the fire, but shall abide the day.
“And the earth shall be given unto them for an inheritance; and they shall multiply and wax strong, and their children shall grow up without sin unto salvation. (D&C 45:56-58.)
The Fruit
Another great form of worship of God is the consequence of true prayer. True and mighty prayer ought to lead above all to the doing of righteous deeds. As we pray and partake of the power and true order of heaven, we then should seek to translate the spiritual gifts we have received into the physical actions of our lives. Righteousness is blessing others. Our Master, Jesus Christ, is the fountain of all righteousness. As we humbly pray in his name we are filled with wisdom, with his compassion, with his concern for the poor and the needy with his concern for those who sit in darkness. Being filled with his love, we then go and do those things which we have been shown. In so doing, his pure love becomes our pure love for others.
“Therefore may God grant unto you, my brethren, that ye may begin to exercise your faith unto repentance, that ye begin to call upon his holy name, that he would have mercy upon you;
“Yea, cry unto him for mercy; for he is mighty to save.
“Yea, humble yourselves, and continue in prayer unto him.
“Cry unto him when ye are in your fields, yea, over all your flocks.
“Cry unto him in your houses, yea, over all your household, both morning, mid-day, and evening.
“Yea, cry unto him against the power of your enemies.
“Yea, cry unto him against the devil, who is an enemy to all righteousness.
“Cry unto him over the crops of your fields, that ye may prosper in them.
“Cry over the flocks of your fields, that they may increase.
“But this is not all; ye must pour out your souls in your closets, and your secret places, and in your wilderness.
“Yea, and when you do not cry unto the Lord, let your hearts be full, drawn out in prayer unto him continually for your welfare, and also for the welfare of those who are around you.
“And now behold, my beloved brethren, I say unto you, do not suppose that this is all; for after ye have done all these things, if ye turn away the needy, and the naked, and visit not the sick and afflicted, and impart of your substance, if ye have, to those who stand in need–I say unto you, if ye do not any of these things, behold, your prayer is vain, and availeth you nothing, and ye are as hypocrites who do deny the faith.” (Alma 34:17-28.)
Dr. Chauncey C. Riddle, professor of philosophy and dean of the Graduate School at Brigham Young University, serves as Sunday School teacher in Orem 16th Ward, Orem Utah Sharon Stake.
If we are serious about following Jesus, we must question all that we previously have been and accepted.
The New Testament account of our Savior’s mortal ministry is a rich treasury of knowledge concerning what one must do to be saved. One insight we may gain concerns what one must do to he a disciple of the Master.
The word disciple comes from the Latin “discipulus,” a learner. A disciple of Christ is one who is learning to be like Christ–learning to think, to feel, and to act as he does. To be a true disciple, to fulfill that learning task, is the most demanding regimen known to man. No other discipline compares with it in either requirements or rewards. It involves the total transformation of a person from the state of the natural man to that of the saint, one who loves the Lord and serves with all of his heart, might, mind, and strength.
As part of his instruction to his disciples in judea, the Savior took pains to explain his own ministry, a ministry that was the pattern for all of them and for us. One thing that the Father required of our Savior was the suffering and sacrifice of the Atonement. Matthew records:
“From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.” (Matt. 16:21.)
Peter, not understanding that only in these difficult things could Jesus fulfill the will of the Father and make universal salvation possible, remonstrated:
“Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be [done] unto thee.” (Matt. 16:22.)
The Savior then administered a severe rebuke to Peter:
“But he turned and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.” Matt. 16:23.)
In calling Peter “Satan.” the Savior suggests the plight of all men. Until we savor (understand) the things of God, we are found to be behind the adversary’s programs! But when we learn the glorious truths of the gospel we can get behind Jesus Christ and his work and abandon Satan.
Within that historical setting is one of the great revelatory insights into the ways of godliness given by the Master. Perceiving Peter’s ignorance and that of the others present, he proceeded to instruct them in the essence of discipleship:
“Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross and follow me.
“And now for a man to take up his cross, is to deny himself all ungodliness, and every worldly lust, and keep my commandments.
“Break not any commandments for to save your lives; for whosoever will save his life in this world, shall lose it in the world to come.
“And whosoever will lose his life in this world, for my sake, shall find it in the world to come.
“Therefore, forsake the world, and save your souls….. (Matt. 16:25-29, Inspired Version.)”
If we take up our own cross we truly become disciples. From the above we learn that discipleship begins with self-denial. Our lives are much like forested land that must be cultivated. Before the word of the Lord can bear fruit in our lives, we must first clear the ground of all that grows wild or naturally. What grows naturally in our lives are the things of the world. As any person comes to spiritual self-consciousness, he will realize that his mind, his desires, his habits, his manners, and his politics have all been shaped by the people in his physical environment. What he hitherto thought to be himself he now sees as the encrustations of the world upon his true self, the newly awakened spirit within. His true self delights in being touched by the Holy Spirit with the witness of the divinity of Jesus Christ and of the urgency of faith and repentance. He finds that to believe in Christ is one thing, but to deliver one’s soul unto Christ as a faithful, obedient servant is quite another thing. That delivery must begin by becoming as a little child.
To be born again as a little child is to question all that we have formerly been and accepted, and to see the world with different eyes, heart, and mind. As a little child, we walk through the forest with one hand in that of the Holy Spirit and the other in that of the living prophets of God.
Our mentors, the prophets and the Holy Spirit, literally turn the old world some of us have known topsy-turvy. In that process we are thrilled to see things freshly, as they really are.
With their help the scriptures become pure, the word of God; the interpolations, the omissions, and interpretations of men no longer cause us to stumble. We learn the joy of seeing the complete harmony between the teachings of the ancient prophets found in canonized scriptures, the teachings of living prophets found in canonized scriptures, the sweet whisperings of the Holy Spirit. To that harmony the promises of God and the necessities of true faith come alive to us, and with hope and faith we begin to become spiritually alive.
With the help of our new friends, the prophets and the Holy Spirit, we can see in our culture that which is truly virtuous, lovely, of good report, and praise-worthy. These things we treasure and delight in. We are also now able to see what is petty, selfish, and evil in our culture. Carefully we dissociate ourselves from those things, grateful to see plainly that those things we once enjoyed were actually part of our misery.
Our new friends help us to review what we have learned about the ideas of men. We gladly respond when we see now that some men have taught truth, sometimes against great odds; but we now perceive the absurdity of some of the world’s most cherished theories. As we see anew, the chains of darkness and the lies of Satan become plain to us, and we slip off those chains, thrilled with the freedom and mobility we now have.
A new perspective, that of eternity, is taught to us by our mentor friends. We now glimpse why it is that family relationships are paramount, why no other success can compensate for failure in our homes. We see why force and compulsion can never be the means of establishing a great and good society. We see that doing good for others is the important thing in life, not just seeking knowledge. We see that the point of repentance is learning to live righteously, so that we can be trusted with the powers of gods. We no longer worry about just being forgiven; we strive to overcome the world.
Perhaps the greatest thing we learn from living prophets and from the Holy Spirit is the importance of doing the best we know at all times. They show us that what we will really be sorry for later is not having done what we plainly know we should have done.
With thankful heart the disciple of Christ thus learns the ways and ideas of the world, to be taught anew in all things by God. But even in this his preparation is not complete: he must next cleanse himself of worldly lust. To eliminate the influence of the world is a difficult thing. But to gain mastery over his own desires is another, even more difficult task. It is like hauling off all the rocks and thoroughly tilling the soil once the forest of his mind has been cleared of false ideas.
What are the rocks of lust in our lives? One is the desire to eat too much, to eat the wrong things, and to eat when we should not. Another is the inability to get to bed on time, to get up on time, or to be where we are supposed to be on time. Rocks of lust are the habits of being absorbed in television or reading when we should be working with our family or doing our home teaching. They are hunger for a new car when the old one would serve as well or better; the desire to have it known to everyone when we have done some good deed; the need to retaliate when someone has hurt us. They are anger, selfishness, loud laughter, and self-indulgence. They are the powers of Satan exercised on us through our own flesh. We can be rid of these things only by yielding to the enticings of the Holy Spirit.
Then our spirit conquers our own flesh and the flesh becomes a servant instead of the master of our lives.
Having cleared our forest of worldliness and having tilled the soil of our souls to a state of ready obedience to the Lord, we are then able to receive the word of God as the pure seed; we are ready to keep the Lord’s commandments.
The first commandment is to love the Lord:
“Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength (Mark 12:30.)”
In nothing can one show forth love for God more surely than in making and keeping the baptismal covenant. Therein we promise that we will take Jesus Christ’s name upon us (to stand as a witness of him at all times and in all places), that we will always remember him (never forgetting that we are to rely solely upon his merits), and that we will keep the commandments he has given us: “If ye love me, keep my commandments.”(John 14:15.)
It is thus that the crowning act of repentance is to make the covenant of baptism. As Christ laid down his life for us, so we voluntarily put to death our old worldly, lustful self and bury It in the waters of baptism. As the Savior rose from the dead, so we rise up out of the water as little children of our new Father and Savior, to a beginning of eternal life. Without this death, burial, and newness, we cannot fully show that we love him.
In baptism we gain the privilege of the gift of the Holy Ghost. Only as we live under the influence of that gift can any mortal person love the Lord with all his heart, might, mind, and strength. Only as we continue under the influence of that gift can one keep every commandment.
Above all the other commandments we might receive as we strive to keep the first and great commandment is the second, the admonition to love one another. The world, not understanding the things of God fancies that the second commandment can be kept when one has not honored the first commandment. But those who understand remember the Savior saying:
“A new commandment l give unto you, That ye love one another; as l have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.” (John 13:34-35.)
To love as Christ loves is to have charity, the pure love of Christ. Pure love is a gift of the Holy Spirit reserved for those who love the Lord enough to covenant with him in baptism and wlj.i receive his spirit to be with them:
“Jesus saith unto him, I am the way the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6.)
The way of Christ is the way of love. It is to visit the widows and the fatherless in their afflictions; it is to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to visit those in prison, to liberate the captive. But it is to do all this in the Lord’s way, not walking in the ways of the world or following the vain imaginations of our heart as to what is good for others. Pure love is of the Father. Saith our Master:
“I can of mine own self do nothing . . . because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.” (John 5:30.) “l am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and l in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.” (John 15:5.)
Are we the disciples of Jesus Christ? Are we learning of his ways, of his discipline? Arc we doing as he commanded? Do we know we have to overcome the world? No man is saved in ignorance of that knowledge. To gauge our progress we might ask ourselves three questions:
“Have I denied myself all ungodliness?”
“Have l denied myself every worldly lust?”
“Do I keep every commandment the Savior gives me?”
The future of a person who can give an honest affirmative answer to each of these questions is not in doubt. The rest of us should remember that the Lord is mighty to save. Though we cannot overcome the world on our own merits, his are quite sufficient. If we are learning, then we are disciples. May we learn well and be disciples indeed.
Then, instead of the natural forest of worldliness that smothers out all else in our lives, we shall have created a Garden of Eden. As the earth will be renewed and receive its paradisiacal glory, even so must each individual disciple renew his own personal life in the glory of our God.
[illustrations] Discipleship begins by becoming as a little child and being born again.
[illustration] Becoming a disciple, we perceive the absurdity of some of the world’s most cherished theories. The chains of darkness, the lies of Satan, become pain to us. We slip off those chains, thrilled with the freedom and mobility we now have.
[photo] Becoming a disciple, we yield to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, haul away all the rocks of lust, break habits of being absorbed in television or reading when we should be working with our family or doing our home teaching.
[photo] Becoming a disciple, we learn a new perspective of eternity, we glimpse why it is that family relationships are paramount, why no other success can compensate for failure in our homes, why force and compulsion can never establish a great society.
Dr. Chauncey Riddle is a professor of philosophy and dean of the Graduate School at Brigham Young University. He teaches Sunday School in Orem 16th Ward, Orem Utah Sharon West Stake.
AN ADDRESS GIVEN TO THE BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY STUDENT BODY
DR. CHAUNCEY C. RIDDLE Dean of the Graduate School June 30, 1970 – Devotional
with an introduction by Dr. Dean A. Peterson Dean of the Summer School
DR. DEAN A. PETERSON
It is our privilege this morning to have as our devotional speaker, Dr. Chauncey C. Riddle, dean of the Graduate School and professor of philosophy. Dean Riddle was named Professor of the Year in 1962 and BYU Honors Professor of the Year in 1967. He also received the Karl G. Maeser Award for Teaching Excellence.
He received his bachelor of science degree from Brigham Young University and his master’s degree and Ph.D. from Columbia University. He is a member of Phi Kappa Phi Honorary Scholastic Society and the American Plains Division of the American Philosophical Society. Since 1965 he has been a member of the high council in the Sharon Stake and has served on high councils since 1958. He is a former bishop of three wards: Provo Eighth Hard, Provo Nineteenth Ward, and the BYU Second Ward.
Chauncey Riddle is a native of Salt Lake City and is married to the former Bertha Alfred. They are the parents of twelve children, ten of whom are living, and their twelfth child, a son, was born this past Sunday. We congratulate Dr. and Sister Riddle. It is now our pleasure to turn the time to Dr. Riddle.
DR. CHAUNCEY C. RIDDLE
Several years ago I was descending the main stairs of the Butler Library at Columbia University in New York City when a fellow student stopped me. He asked if it was true that I had graduated from Brigham Young University. Upon receiving my affirmative reply, he volunteered that he was a graduate of one of our neighboring institutions. But the thing that so delighted him about his university, he went on to explain, was that he had been “liberated.” I took the bait and innocently asked him from what he had been liberated. Then the roof fell in. For the next two hours, as we stood there on the stairs, he explained to me all of the terrible evils of the Mormon Church. He began quite calmly to explain these evils, but as time progressed his explanations became a tirade punctuated by invectives and blasphemies. His face became beet red; his fury was so great that he began to jump up and down in sort of a war dance. l wondered if he would leap upon me to vent his obviously full spleen.
He told how he had once been a “good little Mormon boy.” He had attended all of his meetings faithfully, graduated from Primary, bad become a deacon, teacher, and priest in due order. He was well read in Church literature — was so well informed about doctrine that he was asked to teach a class in one of the auxiliaries of the Church during his freshman year at the university. Then he began to take classes in philosophy.
His professors of philosophy had carefully explained to him the delights of being “an intellectual.” As an intellectual he was given to understand that religion is all subjective, and therefore completely unworthy of any thinking man’s allegiance. They convinced him that the General Authorities of the Church had no such thing as revelation from God since there is no personal God. These authorities, they said, were simply paranoid and had a variety of illusions of grandeur. They were power mad, according to his professors.
Shades of Korihor
My fellow student, of course, wasn’t just quoting his professors. He believed fully in what he was telling me. He went on to explain how the Church was really a system for making money and emphasized how shameful it was that all those Mormons out there in Utah were being slavishly led around by the nose. His attack included the Book of Mormon in particular, which he claimed was gibberish, and the Bible, which to him was a collection of myths and bedtime stories. One by one he decried the major doctrines of the Church showing how, to him, each was ridiculous when compared with modern science.
At first l attempted to counter his statements. As he launched upon the Brethren or certain doctrines, I would point out inconsistencies and untruths in what he was saying. These replies only made him the more angry, and soon I perceived that his attack was completely emotional and not intellectual.
On only one point could we agree. l challenged him with the idea that he had taken this apostate stand because he couldn’t live the standards of the Church. He then vehemently affirmed that such was not the case, that he saw real value in the Word of Wisdom and in the moral standards of the Church. He claimed that he had never broken these standards and never would, for he saw a utilitarian value in these things quite apart from the gospel.
The conclusion to his long outburst was that he intended to get his Ph.D. and then spend the rest of his days bringing light and cheer to Mormons of guilty conscience in order to smash the Church and its authorities wherever and whenever he could. Shades of Korihor!
By the time we parted, l was somewhat numb, drenched with his vituperation, and frustrated too, for I had been unable to help him. l wondered how on earth anyone could help him. l especially wondered how he would fare in New York City in keeping true to the moral standards he claimed he would never violate. My wonder ceased after a few months. The last time I saw him was in a dimly lit corner of a campus restaurant. He was reclining in a booth, obviously drunk, surrounded by empty beer cans, with a cigarette in one hand, and the other hand on a girl whose appearance told the rest of the story.
A Real Testimony
Oh, sad, sad story! I cannot think back on him without wanting to weep. That this could happen to the youth of the noble birthright is appalling. But it did happen and it does happen. And it happens again and again for the same reason. That reason is the lack of a real testimony.
A testimony is that precious gift that enables a person to have enduring faith in These then are the components of testimony. First, an ability to hear the voice of the Lord when he guides us to righteousness; this we called recognition of spiritual experience. Second, knowledge of the work and the ways of God; this we might cull understanding. Third, having in our lives that most precious fruit of the gospel, the quiet inner peace that passeth understanding.
The Parable of the Sower
The Savior gives us a graphic illustration of these three elements in the parable of the sower. He tells us what would happen if we were to lack any one of these elements.
A sower went out to sow his seed.. and as he sowed, some fell by the way side; and it was trodden down, and the fowls of the air devoured it. (Luke 8:5.)
The Savior explained this as follows:
The seed is the word of God.
Those by the way side are they that hear; then cometh the devil, and taketh away the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be saved. (Luke 8:11-12.)
These people of the beaten path are those of the world who are so trodden down by the influences of the world that they do not recognize the word of the Lord when it comes to them. When the word of the Lord comes to any man, it is carried by the Holy Spirit into his heart. But perhaps that man pays little attention to his heart, priding himself on being objective in responding only to “hard, cold physical evidence” which affects his body and which he can demonstrate publicly to others. If so, the precious things in his heart lie undiscriminated, unsorted as time passes, it is easy for the adversary to snatch the precious word of the Lord from his memory. So, for want of attention and honest recognition of admitted worth, the word of the Lord is lost from consciousness and the opportunity to have a testimony and to be saved is gone.
Returning to the Savior’s parable, we see the second error.
And some [seed] fell upon a rock; and as soon as it was sprung up. it withered away, because it locked moisture. (Luke 8.6)
This is interpreted by the Savior as follows:
They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away. (Luke 8:13.)
These are persons who are able to recognize and treasure the word of the Lord. They begin to keep his commandments; yet they do not understand his work. In the face of temptation they wither because they cannot see the purpose and necessity of being different from the world, of keeping themselves pure and unspotted. Lacking the perspective of eternity, they fall easy prey to the desires of the moment, and the joy of the word of the Lord is overwhelmed by the lusts of the flesh. Had they searched in the scriptures and listened carefully to their priesthood leaders, they would have caught the point of sacrifice and they would have had the hope of the rewards of righteousness. This would have nourished their souls in the hot glare of temptation. But lacking root, not understanding what they were doing, they withered.
The third problem is represented in the teaching of our Savior as follows:
And some [seed] fell among thorns: and the thorns sprang up with it, and choked it.
And that which fell among thorns are they, which, when they have heard, go forth and are choked with cares and rich’s and pleasures of this life, and bring no fruit to perfection. (Luke 8:7, 14.)
This is the problem of what it is that satisfies us. Some persons hear the gospel message but are quite content with the world the way it is. They busy themselves with making and preserving their wealth and in living deliciously; they see no reason for a change. This is the problem of the upper economic classes of society especially. The Book of Mormon speaks of them being comforted with carnal security and thus being carefully led away down to hell. If they are ill, they have the best doctors; if they are hungry, they command the finest cuisine; if they are lonely they throw a party; if they are depressed or nervous, they are soothed by drugs, tobacco, alcohol, or whatever suits their fancy. They fancy, of course, that they do not need a Savior. Whatever they need, they can get — they think. These persons seldom gain testimonies until their health and wealth are taken from them. Bereaved of the temporal salvation they have so ignorantly enjoyed, they begin to glimpse the fact that there might be something better to life than just sating the flesh.
The Gospel Produces Good Fruit
Undoubtedly there are some persons who do not have the fruits of the gospel in their lives simply because of not knowing what they are missing. My neighbor has a nectarine tree. He enjoyed its abundant fruit each year until he tasted one of the nectarines on my tree. Now his taste terrible, and he has grafted in many twigs from my tree hoping to convert his into a tree that produces good fruit.
Producing good fruit is the point of the gospel. If we live the gospel, our lives produce love, kindness, charity; we produce righteousness. Righteousness is caring more to see others happy than worrying about our own happiness. This is one of the paradoxes of the gospel. The only way to be really happy is to forget about our own happiness and to labor diligently for the happiness of others. The Savior said:
“He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it. (Matthew 10:39.)”
Pillars of Testimony
Above all, our God is a god of righteousness. Whatever we do for his sake, we do in the cause of righteousness. And, among those who have tasted of the fruits of righteousness which have come through obedience to Christ, there are those who desire this fruit above all else. It is even more important than life itself to them. These are they who have strong, secure testimonies of the gospel, of the Savior. They know the gospel is true because when they heard the word of the Lord they had a spiritual quickening. Through this spiritual experience, they gained insight into the work of the Lord, the work of righteousness. And, when through faith they acted in obedience to that understanding, they tasted the precious fruit of the tree of life and knew of God’s goodness and love. Then they were founded on the rock. Then they had an anchor for their souls. These are they of whom the Savior said:
And other [seed) fell upon good ground and sprang up, and bear fruit an hundredfold.
But that on the good ground are they, which in an honest and good heart, having heard the word, keep it, and bring forth fruit with patience. (Luke 8:8, 15.)
Testimonies and Righteousness
One plain and very important conclusion we may draw from the Savior’s parable is that testimonies are not for everyone. There will come a day when every knee shall bow and every tongue confess, but today only those who have honest and good hearts can be sure of gaining a testimony, and they gain one because they love righteousness. That love of righteousness leads them to the Savior, because only in and through him are they able to bring forth true fruits of righteousness. He is the way, the truth, and the life.
We have seen in the example of the Savior’s parable of the sower what happens when we leave out one of the necessary elements in gaining a testimony. Let us observe the consequence of trying to depend upon only one of these elements.
Spiritual Imitations
Rather frequently there are manifest in our society persons who claim to be spiritual. They have had some unusual experience which has caused them to embark on a crusade or to alter their way of life. With all seeming sincerity they claim to have discovered the truth, which supposed truth they pursue with great zeal. When we see this claim to spiritual manifestation and its attendant zeal, we ought to check carefully for the other two aspects of true testimony. First, does this spirituality this person claims to have bring him understanding? Does it ring true in comparison with What the scriptures tell us? Is it consistent with the advice and counsel of the authorities of the Church? Secondly, does it bring forth in that person’s life the works and fruits of righteousness: love, kindness, joy, peace?
The Savior has given us a measure by which to judge those who claim to be spiritual. “By their fruits ye shall know them.” (Matthew 7:20.) It takes very little experience to separate good fruits from bad fruits if we are doing careful thinking. The reason for bad fruits and for being very wary of those who claim special spiritual experience is that Satan produces his own revelation or experience abundantly in the world. Many, many of those who think they have found the Lord have simply lent an ear to Satan. Undoubtedly, only those who are honest and good in heart can detect all spurious revelation, that is to say, revelation not from God.
Detecting Spurious Revelation
But there are rational means for detecting spurious revelation. Recognizing that a rational formula is no substitute for long experience in any field, we might note the following marks which are associated with people who have had false revelation.
Indiscriminate recounting of the spiritual experience. (The Savior told us not to cast our pearls.)
Insisting that others accept this spiritual experience. (In the Lord’s system each person depends on his own personal revelation.)
Inconsistency of the supposed revelation with scripture and with the words of the living prophets. (The Lord has told us that his house is a house of order.)
Fruits of unhappiness, contention, hate, confusion. (For the Lord’s way is light, truth, simplicity and unity.)
There is no shortage of revelation in this world. The problem is to tell that which is true revelation, given of the Lord, from that which is spurious revelation, given of the adversary.
Knowing or Living
Let’s turn now to an examination of what happens when a person attempts to base his testimony solely on a knowledge or understanding of the gospel. We occasionally see a person who has read all the books and has accumulated a tremendous store of catechistic answers to questions about religious matters. When challenged on a point, the person uses the method of proof-texting; that is, he produces scriptures and quotations which purportedly substantiate his opinion. This person is in the tradition of the scribes and Pharisees whom the Savior so roundly scored because they delighted in knowing the words about the work of God rather than in living by the word of God.
Many times this person who has only great knowledge has correct answers. He will quote scripture and propound the words of the prophets at great length. His problem is that it all comes from his head and not from his heart. It is sometimes said that this person has an intellectual testimony, which is to say, he is fascinated by the rational unity and consistency of the gospel and the scriptures. But this fascination is not a true testimony. It is only an intellectual game which the person is playing. Anyone who is said to be “intellectually” converted to the Church is not founded on the rock. Soon some other intellectual game will fascinate him more and he will be as zealous and catechistic about it as he was about the gospel. Or perhaps the Brethren will ordain certain of the seventy to be high priests, or they might put five counselors in the First Presidency, or perhaps they might even do away with one or more of the auxiliaries of the Church. These persons are then offended because the work of a former president of the Church is being countermanded. They see this as an inconsistency, and their intellectual house of cards is toppled. They forget that the original instruction was given spiritually, by revelation; that the change is given spiritually, by revelation; and that a member of the Church can appropriately sustain either or both only by means of his own personal revelation.
But the person who glories only in knowing about the kingdom of God does not enjoy personal revelation from the Lord. And because he does not live the gospel, which he cannot do without personal revelation, he does not have the special fruits of the Spirit in his life. He will not and cannot endure in the kingdom unless he repents and adds these missing dimensions to his life.
And Signs There Are
Turning now to the third possibility, we see the case of the person who settles for the fruits only, who has no spirituality nor depth of understanding in his life. This is the person who depends upon signs. And signs there are. Signs follow those who believe in Christ. Signs also follow those who knowingly or unknowingly serve Satan. The signs of these two masters are not always the same, but they are not always different. Thus a person who depends on signs alone has no true idea as to what or who might be the cause of the signs on which he depends.
It is not unusual to see in the Church a person who believes the Church is true because he was there when Aunt Annie was administered to by the priesthood and was miraculously healed. He saw them lay on hands; he saw Aunt Annie healed. Is that not proof enough? It is for him. Building his house on the sand, he proceeds as if he had a testimony. But then Aunt Annie becomes ill again. She is administered to again, but this time she passes on. Everyone is grief stricken at losing beloved Aunt Annie. But our friend who based his testimony on her healing is not only grief stricken, he is terrified. He thinks that maybe the gospel is not true; perhaps there is no God; perhaps life is just a monstrous joke of nature. Because be has not accepted into his life the comforts and guidance of the spirit of the Lord, be does not and cannot know why Aunt Annie was restored on the one occasion and released on the other. He does not have the understanding of the gospel to know that death is not a curse but a blessing to the righteous. Bereaved of moorings, our friend is swept with the tide of skepticism and despair now despising the sandy foundation which once supported his unstable house of testimony.
Testimony and Faith
It has been obvious through this discussion that testimony and faith are very closely associated in the gospel of Jesus Christ. What we have here called testimony is very close to what Paul talks about when he discusses faith in the book of Hebrews. The formula we have given sounds very much like Alma’s description of how to gain faith. The connection is that testimony is the necessary prerequisite to sustained faith. Testimony is the basis, the foundation for acting on faith. A testimony is knowing that the gospel is true. Knowing that, one can then exercise great faith.
To exercise faith in Jesus Christ, one must hear the words of Christ. These come to us in the still, small voice of his spirit. If we then believe and obey the Savior, we are showing forth faith in him. But a person cannot go very far acting on faith, not far enough to save his soul, without knowing that the course he is pursuing is the will of God. Without that knowledge it is too risky and expensive to act on faith. The sacrifices demanded are too great. A sandy foundation will not support them. But when we have tried our God and know that he is just and true and righteous, then we can exercise faith in him, unto death if necessary, because we have a testimony.
On the other hand, one may have a testimony and not continue to act in faith. This is the terrible route that apostates of every dispensation have taken. Having known the goodness of the Lord, they chose to stand apart, to forsake the ways of righteousness and to return to the world and to sin. A testimony never impels a person to be righteous; it only enables him so to act. The devils all have testimonies of Christ. They know him and know who he is, but they deliberately choose the way of sin because their hearts are not honest and good.
The scriptures plainly reveal to us that testimony and faith must grow together before either is strong or of great value. The beginning point is always personal revelation for the Lord always takes the first step by extending the arms of mercy towards a man. The man must desire to believe and hope to find righteousness enough to try the Lord, to try the experiment of obeying him and his cords. If a man obeys the Lord, he receives a reward, a spiritual reward. This reward shows him that it is good to obey God. Thus, as a man adds obedience to spirituality, understanding to obedience, and recognizes the result, he has a testimony. As he is further obedient, he gains more understanding and more rewards which increase his testimony. As his testimony grows, he can stand greater and greater spiritual manifestations. As he obeys the instructions from the Lord given in these revelations, his faith becomes greater and greater. Thus these two, faith and testimony, grow together as the saving grace of our Savior until that person has overcome the world.
Perhaps you have watched concrete being poured. In any job that is intended to be strong and lasting, reinforcing steel is placed at strategic intervals. This steel makes the concrete almost indestructible. It may crack and the surface may chip, but the mass remains solid and steadfast. If you have watched somebody trying to destroy reinforced concrete, you know that the simplest thing to do usually is just to pick up the whole mass and cart it off.
Concrete is like faith. A testimony is like reinforcing steel. Satan is the destroyer trying to smash your faith. If you are full of reinforcing steel, Satan cannot smash you. He would like to take you up bodily and cast you away. But our Savior does not give him that power. So Satan hunts for faith without testimony, for good acts, obedient acts, where the person is not sure whom he is obeying, why he is obeying, and if it is worthwhile to obey. When he finds such a person, he puts the pressure on. Not necessarily a great massive pressure – just enough to chip off a corner. And then another corner. Here a piece, there a piece, the person is destroyed all the while trying to do what is right. Trying but not succeeding – because of only half trying. Trying to live the gospel without searching the things of the spirit, without pondering the meaning of the Lord’s message, without keenly observing the fruits of the Spirit. To try to have faith without a testimony is to be thoughtless. But to think, to search, to obey, to experiment, to find that rock upon which to build, that is thinking, the best kind of thinking; it is called repentance. And that kind of thinking is real living; in fact, it is the beginning of eternal life.
Testimony Bearing
A word about the bearing of testimony. In one sense a testimony is a wholly private thing. It is something you know; it is part of your life, your conscience, your experience, but you cannot show it to anyone else because it is part of your inner life and experience, your spiritual life. That, of course, is why it is so valuable to you. It is your personal comfort and warrant for your faith. No matter what happens to anyone else, you have something you know for sure about spiritual matters. You and the Lord have a functioning, ongoing relationship and companionship.
The privacy of your testimony is another witness to your personal free agency. Because it is private, other persons cannot judge you nor assist you in your thinking. You must think through the evidence for yourself. It is your own personal evidence. Others may check your reasoning, but they cannot check either your data or your desires. So you remain free of men because of your privacy, and free from the flesh because these data are spiritual. This is the freedom which the gospel offers to all who seek the truth.
But though your testimony is private, the Lord does nt always want you to keep hidden the fact tat you have one. Under his guidance you are to bear your testimony. When he prompts you, he wants you to express to others the fact that you have one, as Paul says, to give account to men of the hope that is within you. You can never give another person your testimony, or even a testimony. But there are times when you must stand up to be counted.
For when you bear your testimony, you declare yourself to be on the side of the Savior. You express to men that you have tried the Lord and found him to be good, and you stand as a personal witness to that truth. As you speak, truly the Holy Ghost is your companion. He, the Holy Ghost, also bears his witness to the souls of your bearers. He is a God; his witness is divine. His witness is the beginning of spiritual life, the basis of testimony, the opportunity for faith. While your witness is nothing so grand and mighty as that of the Holy Ghost, nevertheless your witness is the occasion and opportunity for his witness. Thus you are an important and even indispensable part of the Savior’s plan to save mankind. If no man bore true witness of God, the occasions for revelation from God would be so sharply diminished as to throw the world into another black night of apostasy. So we are sent into the world to be witnesses of the light. We are not the light. But we know him and bear testimony of him; he is Jesus Christ.
There is also a responsibility upon those who receive a testimony, a witness of Christ. Like it or not, they must judge. When a man declares himself to be of Christ all of his hearers who claim to be servants of Christ also must react. If a man bears a true witness and his hearers who are members of the Church accept it, the speaker and bearers strengthen one another and draw closer to each other in the bonds of fellowship and unity that characterize the perfected kingdom of God. But if these members reject a true witness, they have opted in behalf of Satan. If a man bears a false witness and members of the Church accept it as true, they have likewise declared themselves against the Savior and for Satan. If members reject a false witness, then they know to labor with this man as an unbeliever. If they try not to accept or reject, then they are pretending that the occasion is unimportant. But a testimony of Christ is never unimportant; it is a matter of spiritual life or death for both hearers and bearers. When we attend sacrament meeting and especially testimony meeting we are all accountable. We add or detract from the meeting and we will have to answer for what we do. Sometimes it is fashionable for people to express boredom with a testimony meeting. But, for those who have and understand testimonies, a testimony is always a spiritual feast, a rich opportunity for discernment, an occasion to know how to act toward our brothers and sisters.
Many times a point is made of the fact that we bear testimony in our deeds as well as in our words. And indeed we do. Whenever we who are covenant servants of Christ make a decision or perform a deed, we are bearing our testimony. If we seek and yield to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, we declare ourselves to be servants of Christ. Whenever we avoid him or act contrary to what we know to be right, we are plainly bearing witness to ourselves and to any who see our acts that we do not really believe in Christ. We are saying that though he may exist and he may be all right in his place he is not good enough to be worshipped with all of our heart, might, mind, and strength. And thus do we reject him.
But thank the Lord for those few stalwart souls sprinkled through our midst who unpretentiously and steadily opt for the Savior. They can discern the Spirit of the Lord and they love it. They understand the gospel and have their eye on eternity, whose name is Jesus. They bear the fruits of faith in their lives, for they strengthen the weak knees, they lift up the hands that hang down. They build the kingdom of God day and night, summer and winter, by showing forth in purity of life the love of God towards men.
In conclusion, may l give you my witness. l testify with all my heart and soul that I know that the gospel of Jesus Christ is true. I know because I have tried it. I know that it works. I know that the Holy Ghost is a sweet and a pure companion that leads to righteousness. I know that the gospel is profound, consistent. I know that to learn about the mysteries is a great and overwhelming blessing even though we may not speak of them. I know that God reigns in power in his priesthood, for I have seen lives change under the ordinances of the gospel and I have seen miracles performed. I witness to you that the authorities of the Church are men of God. They have his power; they have his authority; they are filled with his love; and they are working tirelessly to bring salvation to us and to all men. Above all I know that our God is god of righteousness and truth. I give glory to the name of our Savior, and I witness unto you that I know him to be true, to be good. And I know that all that I know that is good and true and virtuous I know though him.
I pray that each of us may inventory his testimony, and then do whatever is necessary that we will never falter in our faith. I pray that we might love the Lord enough to become pure in heart, to establish Zion. That we might show forth the glory, honor, and majesty, and righteousness of the true and living God, I pray in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen
(Talk given by Chauncey C. Riddle at Education Week, 1968.)
Once a person understands the basics of the gospel and decides to embark on a life of service to the Lord, Jesus Christ, that is to say that person has entered in at the straight gate, he/she must go along that narrow way and endure to the end. I believe the next big challenge is to learn to live in the order of the priesthood. This is an almost overwhelming challenge when we begin to contemplate its greatness. As we understand the importance and magnitude of the task, we might comprehend briefly the notion of learning to live in the priesthood order in the doctrine of stewardship, which is our topic for today.
Stewardship is being given a responsibility by someone where we do not have ownership or right to absolute dominion in our own right, but where we receive it as a charge from someone else who does. It is the nature of our existence that we are stewards. For instance, we do not own the bodies that we inhabit. They are given to us as a stewardship — as a charge. We have been loaned them for the purpose of executing the will of the owner; nevertheless, it is given to us to have agency to defy the owner if we will. But then, if that is the case, he will not give us a body in exactly the same form in the resurrection as the one which we have now. We are given our minds as stewardships. The mind we have is a mind somewhat like the mind of God except it is very small; nevertheless, we have intelligence given to us that enables us to think, act, create, rule, and accomplish; also destroy and hurt (the evil things), according to our own will. We are given specific instruction by our Maker as to how to use this mind: what to take into it, what to believe, and on what basis we should make our decisions. The talents we have (whatever they might be), the money we have, the property we have — everything which the world counts as being in our discretionary power — is really not ours. It is only a stewardship from the Lord.
Most of the people of this world, of course, do not believe in this stewardship nor accept it. When people are baptized members of this Church, they accept the Lord as the owner and governor of all things and acknowledge themselves as stewards, they take upon themselves the name of Christ not only to be known by themselves, but as the name of their Master, Jesus Christ. They promise that henceforth they will not do their own will but do His will and keep all the commandments He gives unto them. They promise that from henceforth they will not neglect this stewardship but will remember the Master always, that they might receive His instructions constantly and be faithful and wise stewards in executing their charge.
Let us read a little bit in Section 104 of the Doctrine and Covenants, which further explains this idea. Beginning with verse 11, the Lord says,
“It is wisdom in me; therefore a commandment I give unto you, that ye shall organize yourselves and appoint every man his stewardship; that every man may give an account unto me of the stewardship which is appointed unto him.”
This, or course, is a very necessary and important part of being given a stewardship; namely, that we may be called at any moment to account for that stewardship. If we have served faithfully and well, according to the instructions given by the Master, there will be no regret. If we have been slothful or procrastinated keeping his commandments, if we have been doing our own will instead, then there is considerable reason to fear the presence of the Master. The scripture commends to us that if we keep the commandments of the gospel our countenance shall wax strong in the presence of the Lord, which is simply another way of saying we will be delighted to see His coming anytime and give an account of our stewardship. But if we are not ready to give an account of our stewardship, if we cannot say, Lord, I have faithfully fulfilled thy will in all things, it simply means we have not yet fully applied the gospel in our lives. One of the tests as to whether the gospel is our way of life is if we are ready to go to our Master at any time. Every day is sufficient to its own problems, and if we live each day as the Lord would have us do, there would never be a moment of any day that we would not be ready to make that accounting.
Continuing with verse 13,
“For it is expedient that I, the Lord, should make every man accountable as a steward over earthly blessings, which I have made and prepared for my creatures, I the Lord stretched out the heavens, and built the earth, my very handiwork; and all things therein are mine.”
All things in heaven and earth.
“But it must needs be done in mine own way; and behold this is the way that I the Lord have decreed to provide for my saints, that the poor shall be exalted, in that the rich are made low”
–not by force, but by the doctrine of stewardship.
“For the earth is full, and there is enough and to spare; yea, I have prepared all things, and given unto the children of men to be agents unto themselves.”
We keep hearing that there is a terrible famine imminent, that the world is overpopulated. But these statements are all made by people who know not God. If we understand the nature and the work of God, He has plenty and to spare for each of his children. The only reason there ever has been famine on the earth, or difficulties or troubles among the children of God, is because (1) they have rejected their Maker, (2) they have not been willing to account to Him who is the owner and Master of all things, and (3) they have not been willing to be stewards. Had they been willing there would have been abundance for all.
“Therefore, if any man shall take of the abundance which I have made, and impart not his portion according to the law of my gospel, unto the poor and the needy, he shall, with the wicked, lift up his eyes in hell being in torment.”
Now this particular section relates specifically to the law of consecration practiced in the Church in the early days, but the general principle is also there.
“Let’s read on a little bit in the last part of this section, beginning with verse 54. ”
“And again a commandment I give to you concerning your stewardship which I have appointed unto you. Behold all these properties are mine or else your faith is vain.”
If there is anything we think ye own which does not belong to the Lord, Jesus Christ, it simply means that we do not have faith in Him. He is not our Master, we have not really made a covenant with Him, or, in other words, our faith is vain.
“And ye are found hypocrites, and the covenants which ye have made unto me are broken; and if the properties are mine, then ye are stewards; otherwise ye are no stewards. But verily I say unto you, I have appointed unto you to be stewards over mine house even stewards indeed.”
This is the challenge, to see all things that you have and are as a stewardship from the Lord, Jesus Christ. One of the great blessings of being a steward before Christ is that we are responsible only for the stewardship; we are not responsible for things that lie outside the boundaries. For instance, supposing we think of our stewardship as a plot of ground. We are not responsible for what goes on anywhere in the world except within the limits of that plot which the Lord as designated as our stewardship. If we are faithful in that stewardship, the Lord might give us a supervisory stewardship not only over our plot but over some of our neighbors and over their plots too. It would then be our great opportunity to be in the chain that blesses these stewards; that is to Say, to help them be good stewards in their own areas. So we never have to worry about anything except exactly that which the Lord has designated as the boundary of our responsibility. It is not necessary for us to go out dashing throughout the world solving all the world’s problems. We can1t do it anyway. But we can solve the problems of our own stewardship.
Satan of course, is actively trying to get people to neglect the matters of their own stewardships and go about solving the problems of other people1s steward- ships, because by that means he can thoroughly mess up the works. If we have weaknesses, sometimes we can have difficulty in getting revelation for our own stewardships, but almost always we think we see clearly what our neighbor should do about his. But it is important to realize that if we don1t see clearly what we ought to do about our own problems, it will be because we lack the Spirit of the Lord. Right? And if we lack the Spirit of the Lord for our own stewardship, will the Lord ever give us revelation for our neighbor’s stewardship? Obviously not. If we think we see clearly how to solve our neighbors’ problems, yet we can’t solve our own, who is telling us how to solve our neighbors1 problems? That obviously is Satan, and he delights in doing this. Thus he goes around fouling up the lines of stewardship- – changing the markers so that people won1t know where they belong and will stray out of bounds.
One of the most misinterpreted circumstances in scripture is a classic example of this. This is the story of Cain. Cain killed Abel, and then the Lord came to him and said,
“Where is Abel thy brother?”
and Cain retorted,
“I know not, am I my brother’s keeper?”
Ordinarily the correct answer to Cain’s question would be,
“What? No!”
The truth is Cain was never given to be Abel’s keeper (brother is never a keeper). Nevertheless, by taking Abel’s life, Cain had stepped out of his stewardship and had usurped the stewardship of God Himself. By doing this Cain arrogated to himself the responsibility for Abel’s life. So it was quite appropriate that the Lord should come to ask Cain where Abel was. When Cain tried to get out of it by feigning ignorance of the situation by going back to the standard law that he was not Abel’s keeper, the Lord reminded him that He knew all things:
“Thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground.”
Then Cain tried vainly to excuse his usurpation of the Lord’s stewardship.
It is interesting that Satan has used this little story ever since to convince most Christians that they ought to be their brother’s keeper. It was never intended that way. By this technique more damage has been done in the world than by any other device. People take this story as their example and say,
“Well, I need to be my brother’s keeper.”
So they leave their stewardships to start fixing up their brother’s problems not by the revelation of God, but by the revelation of Satan.
Every tyrant since the world began has been his brother’s keeper. He’s been solving problems for his brother that his brother wasn’t allowed to solve for himself. If you look in the history books, almost every ruler who has taken great power for himself has done it under the guise of blessing his brothers who didn’t know how to take care of themselves. He had some special insight and was going to bless and take care of them because they were not wise enough. And 1938 is no different from the time of Napoleon, the time of Caesar, or the time of Cain, who was the first tyrant of them all. It has been the same story ever since the beginning: stepping out of our stewardship and trying to solve another’s problems and fix things. If every man would learn to worry about his own problems and not try to mess up someone else’s life and stewardship, this would greatly free humanity. But we haven’t learned yet. Throughout the world we have continuing attempts by people who think they know better how to enlighten the minds of others.
“QUESTION: What is a keeper?”
I’m glad you brought that question up; that shows I haven’t made my point. What is a keeper? If you lived in the zoo and had a keeper, what would you have? Somebody who fed you, closed the gates on you, and opened the gates when he wanted. He would be your master. A keeper is a master. He is the one who calls the shots, who gives the orders, who says what goes on. It was never given in this world for a one man to be another man’s master. It is given to some to be masters. Now the proper relationship of brother to brother is to live together and to bear one another’s burdens. This is what Alma says: when my brother suffers, I have to go suffer with him; when he rejoices, I should rejoice with him. But I’m not to tell him what to do. I am not to instruct him or to chastise him or tell him where to get off. Now there will be people who will be sent to do that and they will be masters or keepers, but each will have a specifically appointed stewardship to do so given by the Lord Himself. It was never appointed that any brother go around pointing out his brother’s faults. Does this help explain the matter?
“QUESTION: If your brother has an obvious problem, shouldn’t you go talk to him about it and try to help him?”
That’s exactly the temptation I’m talking about. If the Lord won’t give you revelations for your own stewardship, will He for someone else’s stewardship?
“QUESTION: But sometimes we are able to see someone else’s problems more objectively and thus be in a position to help.”
All right, supposing you go to a friend of yours and say, “I’ve got a problem. Will you help me with this?” What are you doing in that circumstance? You are letting them be your keeper temporarily. You are yielding to them-a stewardship to counsel you. And in that circumstance, if they are wise, they might be able to help you a great deal. If someone asks you for help, then indeed it might be perfectly appropriate to give it. But supposing they don’t ask, would you then have the right to give counsel? If you did, you see, you would be overstepping the bounds of your stewardship.
I don’t expect that this is going to sit well in one sixty-minute period- – simply because all of my life I have heard that we are supposed to be our brother’s keeper, until I began thinking about this scripture and found it just didn’t fit. And, as far as I am concerned, there is no justification for it. Who are keepers? Well, fathers and mothers are keepers; bishops, stake presidents, General Authorities, they are keepers. They have specifically appointed responsibilities and authority over the people over whom they preside. But they can’t go outside that stewardship and do any good. If a stake president goes from one stake into another and tries to preside, he does nothing but create havoc. This is how the Lord orders His kingdom.
One of the reasons I’m talking about this is because we need to learn the order of the priesthood. And until we learn the order of the priesthood above us, to respect the stewardship we have below us, and to faithfully execute our duties, we cannot be Zion. It is not enough for us to be a good person individually. We also have to learn to live together in a harmonious arrangement, and the only way this arrangement can be harmonious is if it is a God-ordered arrangement. That’s the purpose of Priesthood and stewardship: that every person will know what his lines of authority are, what his area of responsibility is, and then don’t get all mixed up
by doing things that are not appropriate. The Lord’s kingdom is a kingdom of order and this is the order that we are talking about. Now let’s get down to a lesson that is a little more ticklish.
I suppose that more unhappiness has come out of the problems of stewardship between husbands and wives, even with people who are trying to live the gospel, than from any other thing. I would like to make some suggestions which I hope will be helpful.
Basically, there are three stewardship relationships; we will have one of these with any human being in the world.
“We are either their father or their mother, “
“we are their brother or their sister, “
“or we are their son or their daughter. “
These are the basic interpersonal relationships that exist between people. Can you think of any relationship that does not fit one of these three? Which of these is the husband-wife relationship? Is it a brother-sister relationship? The answer is no. It never was and was never intended to be a brother-sister relationship. What relationship is it? It is a father-daughter relationship. (Long Pause) Now what I am saying is that the husband presides over the wife and the wife does not preside over the husband. The husband’s stewardship includes the wife, but the wife’s does not include the husband; therefore it is a father-daughter relationship in the priesthood. Because this is not understood, a great deal of difficulty arises when people try to relate to each other. If people would listen when they take their temple covenants, they would already know this. But many do not, and, therefore, they do not understand how this relationship works.
Let us talk about the responsibilities and duties of husband and wife in this respect. Anytime we have a father or mother relationship to someone, we preside over them in the authority of the priesthood. Our priesthood responsibility is to bless them. Blessing them means to help them develop and grow as strong, righteous individuals — that is the responsibility of one who presides in the priesthood. It is not to dominate. It is not to govern in the usual sense, but to be a source of information, of strength, of power, of courage. Whatever is needed that the person cannot bring to himself, he should be able to receive from the person over him. And, if he can’t get it from that person, he will have to go higher. God is not slack. God will deliver. We all know that we will get what we need if we go high enough. But, you see, the people in between will lose their blessings if they do not give us what we need. Each of us works out his own salvation in part by learning to be a good steward and in part by administering good things.
Do you remember the scripture that says when the Lord comes in His second coming He finds His stewards giving meet in due season and that his a wise and faithful steward? What does that mean? It simply means this steward is measuring out the blessings and gives to his stewardship what they need, when they need it, as they need it. That is the due season. This is so that they can grow, so they can be nourished spiritually, physically, socially — whatever it takes. The power of God is sufficient for all the needs of human beings, and if we would live under the order of God we would need nothing but the government of God for the perfection of our souls. It would suffice for every need that we have.
So, the role of a husband is to bless his wife, to be a reservoir to her, to be a source of everything she would need that she cannot herself supply to fulfill her stewardship. What is her stewardship? Her stewardship is to be a reservoir, a source, to help her children. It is the role of the wife to bring children into this world, to bear the souls of man, and to teach them and to nurture them. And whatever she needs that she cannot provide herself, she should go to her husband and get it. If her children are sick and she cannot heal them, she should go to her husband and request that his priesthood be invoked to heal these children. If she needs knowledge as to how to handle them in difficult, psychological circumstances, she has the right to go to him and seek counsel as to what she should do. He can fulfill his role only if he is a man of God, only if he is on good enough terms with the Lord that he in turn can go to the Lord and say, “Lord, I need power to give this blessing.” If he is a righteous man, the Lord is not slack. He will give power, and the blessing will be delivered and the mother will be satisfied that her stewardship is in good order. Likewise, children have a right to go to their mother or to their father.
I am not sure I understand exactly how all the relationships fit. I just observe from my own family that the children, when they are very little, are almost completely in the stewardship of the mother, but as they get older they begin to come back into the covenant, shall we say, into the stewardship of the father and the father must take over some direct relationships, especially with the boys. I don’t think that, except in the case of a widow who would then receive special dispensation from the Lord, when the father is living a mother raises up righteous men. It seems to take a man to do that.
“QUESTION: Sister Emma Mcffay, talking to the BYU women, suggested that a man cannot function in the office of his stewardship unless he is encouraged by a good woman. Do you agree?”
I agree. I see no conflict whatsoever. What I am saying is very drastic, so I hope you will try to be sympathetic. I can see that, before we can be perfect ourselves in these relationships, we must become so strong in the power of the Lord in righteousness that we will never need anything from anybody beneath us in our stewardship. If we have needs we always go up the line to be fulfilled. Let me be specific. This is the ideal; there aren’t many people who are this way. We are all working in that direction. I don’t think that a man, when he becomes what he ought to be as a man of God, will ever be in a position of needing the support of his wife. This does not mean he would not enjoy it if he had it, but if she chooses not to support him, not to comfort him, not to sustain him, he can get along without it. He has to be that strong. It can be a great blessing to him to have that comfort, but he must not need it. You see, the Lord is in that relationship to us. The Lord cannot afford to need you and me. If he did, then we would be boss. We would be Lord if He needed us. He is grateful when we are obedient to Him, and when we do the work we are supposed to do we build His kingdom — but he does not need us. If we choose to go our way and defy Him, He can get along quite nicely without us. He may not have as much glory, He may not be as happy, but He will never have to come begging to us for anything. He is not in that position.
Similarly we need to be in that position in the priesthood authority: to delight in receiving from beneath, but never to need it. For instance, have you seen mothers who so desperately needed their children to approve that they would give their children whatever they wanted and thereby destroy their children? But if the mother does not need those children, then she is in a position to do the very best possible job raising them. If the children choose to defy her, she does not have to get on her knees and beg them to be obedient. She then deals from a position of strength and can deal with them in love, disciplining them in a way she never could if she had to have their support.
We are this way in relation to food, as well. If I need food, I am not a servant of Christ. If I can get along without food, if I am willing to starve to death if necessary, then I can be a servant of Christ — and not until. This is the same thing exactly. Because, if I need food and I have to have it, then whoever controls my food controls me and I am not a servant of Christ; I am a servant of whoever controls my food. But I see that food is a small thing, and if I am a servant of Christ I could care less if I should die tomorrow. What a great blessing and relief that would be. Therefore, there is nothing in this world that I can afford to need as a servant of Christ except to obey my Lord, and He will see to it that I always have power to do that. There is no one in this universe who can stop me from doing that except Him. And He won’t. Therefore, I need not fear. I would be able to fulfill my mission and do what I need to do. If it is my lot to die tomorrow because nobody will give me food anymore, that’s fine–I don’t mind; and the same with any other need. He can’t afford to need anything that comes from beneath us in our stewardship.
Does that help make the concept clear? It is pretty strong medicine, I know, but I hope you will be sympathetic in your thinking and try to understand what I am saying because I honestly believe I am saying what is right. On the other hand, you cannot afford to merely believe; you have to find out for yourself whether it is right or not.
QUESTION: Weren’t there times in the Prophet Joseph Smith’s life when Emma did not support him?
Certainly there were times in the Prophet’s life when he did not get the support of his wife, yet that did not stop him from fulfilling his mission. If it had stopped him from fulfilling his mission he would not have been a servant of Christ. It is that simple.
QUESTION: (Not able to transcribe from the tape.)
I am glad you mentioned that. First of all, you have to have the foundation. The foundation is what we talked about yesterday. We have to be servants of Christ; we have to be responsible to Him in the spirit. Then one of the gifts of the spirit we will receive is the gift of love. And, if these relationships are worked out and perfected in a pure, self-sacrificing, long-suffering love, we have the pure charity that Paul talks about. It will work! If you try to work this out with some kind of hardnosed, puritanistic, businesslike arrangement, it will never work. It has to be done in love. I appreciate the question because this is certainly what I intended to convey.
QUESTION: When you say the gift of love, can you develop it or do you have to receive it as a gift?
The pure love that I am talking about is strictly a gift of the spirit. Nobody has it naturally. There are some people who are very kind and loving, but their love is not pure until they become servants of Christ and receive that pure gift.
What would you do when someone over you in authority is not a very good steward? They are abusing their stewardship. This becomes a real test because it is trying. And I have a very simple formula of what to do about it. This again is a little drastic so I hope you will bear with me.
Let me use an analogy. Supposing you had some books that were very valuable to you and you had them in a ten-cent cardboard box and the box was falling apart? What would you do? You would replace the box, so you could take care of the books, wouldn’t you? Supposing the box was filled with just excelsior and you didn’t care whether you had the excelsior or not, what would you do? Would you replace the box? I suppose you would let it stay as it is.
Let’s try a different example. Supposing there was a ward where the bishop was doing a very poor job. He was not a servant of the Lord; he was just riding high and mighty with his authority and powers, exercising unrighteous dominion. But supposing the people of the ward were very faithful members and tried to follow his leadership. What do you suppose the Lord would do with that bishop? Replace him! All right supposing the people of the ward under that same bishop were slothful and did not care what the bishop said; they would not do what he said anyway. What would the Lord do about that bishop? Probably nothing. Do you see why? If you have a bishop you think is wrong, what should you do? The best thing you can do is support him. Do everything he says to do as faithfully as you can. Now when you do that, if you and other members of that ward become faithful to that bishop and honor him in his priesthood, something powerful would happen to that bishop. Do you know what that would be? The Lord would begin to work upon that bishop and He would harrow up the soul of that man until he got into line, or he would be dismissed. That is the way it works.
I can bear you solemn testimony from my own experience as a bishop that when the people support you, if you aren’t doing what is right the Lord will allow you to go through hell. You will either shape up or He will get rid of you. It is that simple. But if the people aren’t doing what you say, you just go bungling along, you and the people, and it doesn’t matter, does it?
“QUESTION: What if you are told to do something you feel strongly against?”
I was once told by my bishop to stand by the door of the Church and physically throw out somebody if they came. That was hard for me to take. But I prayed about it and got confirmation that that was what I had to do. Fortunately they didn’t show up.
I guess I have been in that circumstance at least a dozen times where I was told by the presiding authority over me to do something important that I did not think was right. And in every case, when I have gone to the Lord, the Lord has said to do it. I admit there might be a circumstance where the Lord would say not to do it. But if that time every came I would immediately check with the authority over the person speaking to me and find if I were out of line or if they were out of line. I have surely wondered sometimes, but as I have sought the will of the Lord it has always been to support that man. So I believe that if a wife has a husband and she does not think he is a very good servant of the Lord, the best thing she can do is obey him implicitly as if he were perfect. Now that is pretty strong medicine, isn’t it? You see, that is her stewardship, and if she does that the Lord will get busy on him. When the Lord begins to work on him, He has marvelous ways to bring husbands around. But if the wife isn’t paying any attention to the husband anyway, and the husband isn’t very faithful and the wife wants the husband to get faithful so that she will have some point in being faithful, it will never come to pass. Well, I shouldn’t say that. She might implore the Lord to do something about it, but until she is faithful, her prayers will not be answered. That is the point.
“QUESTION: What about marriage outside the temple?”
They have no stewardship in marriage. Their marriage is not appointed of God and is not, strictly speaking in the Lord, a marriage. I am talking about temple marriage. When a woman accepts a man as her husband, she must be willing to accept him as the Lord. Now if she does not think enough of him, if he is not good ù enough, she had not better marry him. If he is not that grown up yet, if he is not a servant of God and able to speak for the Lord to her, and to be the blessing that she needs to fill her role as a wife and mother, she is jumping off a cliff to marry him. So, if young people would marry righteously most of this problem would be eliminated. If a woman doesn’t know this when she gets married, then what should she do? The solution generally is not to kick over the traces. The solution generally is to honor the covenants that have been made and to serve righteously and faithfully, as sweetly and as humbly as is possible. If the point comes where the Lord tells her that she ought to depart from him, she ought to go to her bishop, and if it is right he will get the same counsel. There again, she is going to the person who has stewardship in the matter. When she gets married in the first place, she ought to counsel vith him who has stewardship over her, namely her father. And, if a girl has a righteous father and can counsel with him and be assured both through the Spirit of the Lord and through her father that she is marrying a man of God who will lead her to exaltation, blessed is she. But I’m afraid some marriages are not made that way.
QUESTION: (Not heard)
As long as the Lord directs her to stay with him she ought to stay with him and be as faithful to him as she can be. Her own salvation rests not on what he does but on how faithful she is in fulfilling her stewardship. As I have looked in the Church, I have found one of the biggest problems active LDS couples are having is that the wife does not think the husband is very righteous and therefore won’t do what he says. This is a source of endless misery and grief. I simply believe that as long as the wife is bound by that covenant she will do the very best thing by herself, by the Lord, and by righteousness to faithfully obey her husband. This may be difficult, but nevertheless this is the kind of trial and faithfulness in stewardship by which we show we are worthy of exaltation. If a woman can serve faithfully under an evil man, some day she will be given a righteous man to be her head and her guide, if her husband rejects the opportunity. But I have seen marvelous transformations in brethren when their wives have been faithful, because then they have seen that there is really some point in being a servant of the Lord, then they have responsibility. When this man’s wife does everything he says, he gets a little bit scared lest he tell her the wrong thing to do. When he gets a little scared he gets on his knees and asks the Lord for help and becomes mighty and powerful. When his wife comes to him for blessings in the priesthood, he gets shaken up a bit and so repents of his sins and tries to be righteous. It is marvelous what can happen.
Remember, Lehi got a little out of line in the Book of Mormon. He began to rail against the Lord for the terrible afflictions they were having. What did his son Nephi do? He went to him and demanded that he act as a father. He said, “Father tell me where to go that we might have food.” Lehi was in no shape at all to get revelation from the Lord because he had been railing against Him. But he had to humble himself and pray to the Lord, and he got the revelation and fold Nephi where to go; and Nephi went and got the meat and they were saved.
This is a marvelous principle the principle of obedience in stewardship. If we can learn to live it, it is one of the great keys in establishing Zion. It is one thing we have not as a Church come to yet, but, if we will, it will move us a great stride forward to that goal.
QUESTION: (Not heard)
I would think that very clearly when the boys reach twelve years of age, they ought to come directly under their father’s stewardship and as priesthood bearers they ought to serve under him. This does not mean they won’t receive instruction from their mother, especially if the father is absent. And the father ought to teach the boys to have complete respect and reverence for their mother. Nevertheless, she needs to be careful and begin to treat them not as children anymore. She does not preside over them in exactly the same sense she did when they were little children.
QUESTION: (Not heard)
When a young man marries, his stewardship relationship to his father does not change one bit. When a young lady marries her stewardship relationship changes drastically. That is to say, she passes from the stewardship of her father to the stewardship of her husband. And that is why there should be agreement by all parties concerned with the stewardship — the Church, the father, and the groom — that this transfer is right.
Only through perfecting ourselves in these stewardship relationships in marriage can we ever have a faint hope for exaltation, because that is what exaltation is. It is the perfection of the marriage relationship. We are to become one in Christ — not two, but one. Christ is the head; we are the hands and the feet. We take our direction from Him. We are members of His body. In exactly the same sense as that relationship, the husband and wife must be one; the husband is the head and the wife the body, I suppose. And then they should function in perfect harmony of unity and love to accomplish the purposes of the family. The purpose of the family is the begetting and the rearing of children unto the Lord. And, if they by the Lord. Then they can act as one.
President McKay in this last conference instructed us as Latter-day Saints to see what we could do to get Section 121 operative in every stewardship in the world, not just Church stewardship, but civil stewardship as well, so that they operate on the basis not of force, but of persuasion and love.
Many people when they get a stewardship, as the scripture says, exert unrighteous dominion. They forget that the powers of the priesthood are inseparably connected with the powers of heaven. The powers of heaven through which the power of the priesthood becomes operative is the Holy Ghost, and, when any man or woman becomes unrighteous and exercises unrighteous dominion to gratify their pride and vain ambitions, the Spirit of the Lord is grieved and is withdrawn from them. Amen to their priesthood. They have lost their priesthood and authority. They may be able to get it back, but anything they do without it, they do so exercising unrighteous dominion. They are outside their stewardship. This is another very important principle we want to remember. We can act as stewards only under the direction of the Lord. If we try to do this of our own selves, of our own wisdom, we are only serving the adversary.
In conclusion, let me simply request you to please not take anything I have said as the final word. I am here to throw out some suggestions worthy of thought, worthy of prayer, and hope you will find them valuable in sensing a correct understanding of the relationship the Lord would have us come to. I bear you my testimony of the truth of the gospel of Jesus Christ, and I feel with all my soul the importance and necessity of our making these relationships right in the Spirit of the Lord and in the power of the pure love of Christ; and I bear you this testimony in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.
Chauncey C. Riddle Campus Education Week Lectures 12 June 1968
Note: This is the version that Chauncey Riddle handed out in his BYU class.
The basis of establishing Zion is the perfecting of the souls of individuals. As individuals accept the gospel and live it, they become sanctified, which is to say, they are forgiven of their sins, or they are made holy, pure, and spotless. The two basic characteristics of such a person, I would take it, are:
(1) the fact that a person who comes to this state finds that prayer is his greatest asset and resource in his life. He lives by prayer, because through prayer, he gains the strength and help he needs to govern and direct his life according to the will of the Lord;
(2) this person is blessed by the abundance of the spirit of the Lord that is manifest in the gifts of the spirit.
Now there are many spirits and there are people who pray and get the wrong spirit. But as a person takes the time and the opportunity to make sure that he is following the right spirit this will not be a problem.
One of the important ways that we can know that we are not on the track, or have the wrong spirit, is that there is such a thing on the earth as priesthood. When we square in our views, our revelations, with the priesthood authority over us, then we have a right to believe that we are on the right track. Experience will bear this out.
But when a person finds himself going contrary to those who preside over him because of supposed revelation and he insists on believing it is from the Lord, he will go on to his sorrow to discover it is not so, because this is one of the plain, appointed checks the Lord has given that people need not be misled by the wiles of the adversary.
Once a person has understood the basis of the gospel, and has decided to embark on a life of service to the Lord Jesus Christ, a life of righteousness—that is to say, if a person has entered into a strait gate—then they must go along that narrow way and endure to the end. I believe the next big challenge they must face in their lives is to learn to live in the order of the priesthood. Now this is an almost overwhelming challenge. I say almost overwhelming because when we contemplate the greatness of this challenge, it begins to be overwhelming as we understand the importance and magnitude of the task.
We might approach the notion of learning to live in the priesthood order through the doctrine of stewardship.
Stewardship is being given a responsibility by someone where we do not have ownership or right to absolute dominion in our own right, but where we receive it as a charge from someone else who does. It is the nature of our existence that we are stewards. For instance, we do not own the bodies we inhabit. They are not ours. We did not create them; they were created by God and given to us as a stewardship, as a charge. We have been loaned them for the purpose of executing the will of the owner. Nevertheless, it is given unto us to have agency to defy the owner if we will. But, if that is the case, we must reap the consequences of that defiance.
We are given our minds as stewardships. The mind we have is a mind somewhat like the mind of God, except that it is very small, infantile, compared to the adult. Nevertheless, we have intelligence given to us that we can think and act and create and move and accomplish; and also destroy, hurt do evil things according to our own will. But we are given specific instructions by our Maker as to how to use this mind—what to take into it, what to believe, on what basis we should make our decisions.
The talents we might have, whatever they might be, the money we have, the property we might have—everything which the world counts as being in our discretionary power is really not ours. It is only a stewardship from the Lord.
Many people of this world, of course, do not believe in this stewardship, nor accept it. When a person is baptized as a member of this Church, however, this is one thing that they accomplish. They accept the Lord as the owner and governor of all things, and acknowledge themselves as stewards. They take upon themselves the name of Christ, not willing to be known simply as themselves. The important name they bear henceforth is not their own name but the name of their Master, Jesus Christ. They promise that henceforth they will not do their own will, but do His will to keep all of the commandments which He gives unto them. They promise from henceforth that they will not neglect this stewardship, but will remember the Master always, that they might receive His instruction constantly, and be faithful and wise stewards in executing their charge.
Doctrine and Covenants, Section 104, elaborates on this idea. Beginning with verse 11, the Lord says:
It is wisdom in me; therefore, a commandment I give unto you, that ye shall organize yourselves and appoint every man his stewardship; That every man may give an account unto me of the stewardship which is appointed unto him, (DC 104:11–12.)
This, of course, is a very necessary and important part of having been given a stewardship; namely, that we may be called at any moment to account for the stewardship. If we have been doing faithfully and well according to the instructions given by the Master, there will be no regrets. If we have been slothful, if we have procrastinated obedience to the commandments, or if we have been doing our own will instead, then there is considerable reason to fear the presence of the Master.
The scriptures commend to us that if we keep the commandments of the gospel, our confidence shall wax strong in the presence of the Lord, which is simply another way of saying we will be delighted to see Him come at any time to receive accounting of our stewardship. But if we are not ready to give an account of our stewardship, if we cannot say, “Lord, I have faithfully fulfilled Thy will in all things,” it simply means we have not yet fully applied the gospel in our lives.
One of the tests, then, as to whether the gospel is our way of life is if we are ready to account to our Master at any time. Each day is sufficient to its own problems and if we live each day as the Lord would have us do, there would never be a moment of any day when we would not be ready to make that accounting.
For it is expedient that I, the Lord, should make every man accountable, as a steward over earthly blessings, which I have made and prepared for my creatures. I, the Lord, stretched out the heavens, and built the earth, my very handiwork; and all things therein are mine. And it is my purpose to provide for my saints, for all things are mine.
I, the Lord, stretched out the heavens, and built the earth, my very handiwork; and all things therein are mine.
And it is my purpose to provide for my saints, for all things are mine, [All things,in heaven and in earth.]
But it must needs be done in mine own way; and behold this is the way that I, the Lord, have decreed to provide for my saints, that the poor shall be exalted, in that the rich are made low. [Not by force, but by the doctrine of stewardship,]
For the earth is full, and there is enough and to spare; yea, I prepared all things, and have given unto the children of men to be agents unto themselves.
We keep hearing about the fact that there is a terrible famine imminent, that the world is about to be overpopulated, or perhaps is now. But these statements are all made by people who know not God. If we understand the nature and the work of God, He has plenty to spare for each of His children. The only reason there ever has been famine on the earth or difficulty or trouble for the children of God is the fact that they have rejected their Maker. They have not been willing to account to Him who is the owner and master of all things. They have not been willing to be stewards. Had they been willing there would have been abundance for all.
Therefore, if any man shall take of the abundance which I have made, and impart not his portion, according to the law of my gospel, unto the poor and the needy, he shall, with the wicked, lift up his eyes in hell, being in torment, (DC 104:13–18, Italics added.)
Now this particular section relates specifically to the law of consecration practiced in the Church in the early days, but the general principle of stewardship is also there. Let’s read on a little bit in the last part of this section, beginning with verse 54:
And again, a commandment I give unto you concerning your stewardship which I have appointed unto you, Behold all these properties are mine, or else your faith is vain [if there is anything we think we own that does not belong to the Lord Jesus Christ, that simply means that we do not have faith in Him, that He is not our Master, we have not really made the covenant with Him], and ye are found hypocrites, and the covenants which ye have made unto me are broken; And if the properties are mine, then ye are stewards; otherwise ye are not stewards, But, verily I say unto you, I have appointed unto you to be stewards over mine house, even stewards indeed, (DC 104:54–57, Italics added,)
There are some wonderful things about a stewardship. One of the greatest blessings of being a steward for Christ is that we are responsible only for our stewardship. We are not responsible for things that lie outside the boundaries. For instance, supposing we think of our stewardship as a plot of ground. We are not responsible for what goes on anywhere in the world except within the limits of that plot which the Lord has designated as our stewardship. If we are faithful in that stewardship, the Lord might give us a supervisory stewardship not only over our plot but over some of our neighbor’s and their plots, too. And then it will be our great opportunity to be in the chain that blesses these stewards; that is to say, to help them be good stewards in their own area, but we never have to worry about anything except exactly that which the Lord has designated as the boundary of our responsibility. It is not necessary for us to go off dashing throughout the world solving all the world’s problems. We can’t do it anyway. But we can solve the problems of our own stewardship.
Satan, of course, is active in this situation, trying to get people to neglect the matters of their own stewardships and to try to go about solving the problems of other people’s stewardships. By that means he can thoroughly mess up the world. Sometimes we have difficulty getting revelation for our own stewardship, but almost always we think we see clearly what our neighbor should do about his stewardship. But it is important to pause. If we don’t see clearly what we ought to do about our own problem, that will be because we lack the spirit of the Lord, right? And if we lack the spirit of the Lord for our own stewardship, would the Lord ever give us revelation for our neighbor’s stewardship? Obviously not. So if we think we see clearly how to solve our neighbor’s problems and we can’t solve our own, who is telling us how to solve our neighbor’s problems? It obviously is Satan. And he delights to do this. So he goes around fouling up the lines of stewardship changing the markers so that people don’t know where they belong. And so they get out of bounds.
There is a very classic example of this that has influenced people’s thinking and is one of the most misinterpreted circumstances in scripture; this relates to the story of Cain. Cain killed Abel and then the Lord came to Cain and said, “Where is Abel, thy brother?” Cain retorted. “How should I know? Am I my brother’s keeper?” Ordinarily the correct answer to Cain’s question is what? No. The plain answer is that Cain was never given to be Abel’s keeper. A brother is never a keeper. But nevertheless, by taking Abel’s life, Cain had stepped out of his stewardship and had usurped the stewardship of God Himself. He arrogated to himself to be Abel’s keeper. So it is quite appropriate the Lord should come and ask Cain, where Abel was, because Cain had taken it upon himself to become Abel’s keeper, but wrongfully. Cain tried to get out of it by pleading innocence and ignorance of the situation by going back to the standard law that he was not Abel’s keeper. Then the Lord, of course, reminded him that He knew all things by saying, “Thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground.” And then Cain started to make lame excuses as to why he had usurped this stewardship.
But you see, it is an interesting thing that Satan has been able to take this little story and ever since then most Christians, most people who read the Bible, have thought they ought to be their brother’s keeper when it was never given it to be that way. Possibly by this little technique more damage has been done in the world than by any other device, because people take this story and say, “Well, I need to be my brother’s keeper,” so they go out of their stewardship and over to their brother’s yard and start fixing up his problems—not by the revelation of God, but by the revelation of Satan.
Every tyrant since the world began has simply been his brother’s keeper. He has been solving problems for his brother that his brother couldn’t solve for himself. If you look in the history books, almost every ruler who has taken great power to himself has done it under the guise of blessing his brothers, whom (he thought) knew not how to take care of themselves. He who had some special gift or insight and was going to bless them and take care of them because they were not wise enough. And 1968 is no different from the time of Stalin or the time of Caesar, or going back to the first tyrant, who was Cain.
You see, it is the same story ever since the beginning of stepping out of the stewardship and trying to solve problems and fix things. If humanity could learn this one lesson, it would go a great way toward solving the problems of humanity. If every man would learn to worry about his own problems and not try to mess up someone else’s life and stewardship, it would greatly free humanity. But apparently we haven’t learned that yet. And so throughout the world we have a continuing series of attempts on the part of people who think they know best how to enlighten the minds of others and to “save” them.
What is a “keeper”? If you lived in a zoo and you had a keeper, what would you have? Somebody who fed you, who closed the gates on you and opened the gates when he wanted to. He would be your master. A keeper is a master. He is the one who calls the shots, who gives the orders, who says what goes on. It was never given in this world that any man should be his brother’s master. Now it is given to some to be masters. But brothers are supposed to treat brothers as brothers and not as masters. A proper relationship of brother to brother is to live together and bear one another’s burdens, which is what Alma says: When my brother suffers, I should go suffer with him. When he rejoices, I should rejoice with him. (Mosiah 18:8–9.)
But I am not to tell him what to do. I am not to instruct him or to chastise him or tell him where to get off. There will be people who will be sent to do that. And they will be masters or keepers. But they will have a specifically appointed stewardship to do that given by the Lord Himself. But it was never appointed that any brother should go around pointing out his brother’s faults to him.
If your brother has a problem, do you go talk to him about it and try to tell him what to do? That is exactly the temptation I am talking about! If the Lord won’t give you revelation for your stewardship, will He for someone else’s stewardship? Now suppose yougo to a friend of yours and say, “I have a problem. Will you help me with this?” What are you doing in that circumstance? You are letting that person be your keeper, temporarily.You are yielding to them a stewardship to counsel you, and in that circumstance, if they are wise they might be able to help you a great deal. If someone asks you for help, then, indeed, it might be perfectly appropriate for you to help. But suppose they don’t ask? Would you, then—nevertheless—give your counsel? If you did, you see, you would be overstepping the bounds of your stewardship.
Who are keepers? Fathers and mothers are keepers. Bishops, stake presidents, general authorities—they are keepers. They have specifically appointed responsibilities and authority over the people over whom they preside. But they cannot get outside that stewardship and do any good! If a stake president goes from one stake into another stake and tries to preside, he does nothing but create havoc!
This is how the Lord orders his kingdom. This is one of the reasons I am talking about this subject. We need to learn the order of priesthood. And until we learn the order of priesthood and learn to live in it—both up and down the line—to honor those who are above us, to respect the stewardship we have below us and faithfully execute our duties, we cannot be Zion. It is not enough for us to be a good person by ourselves. We have to learn to live together in an harmonious arrangement, but the only way that the arrangements can be harmonious is if it is a God-ordered arrangement. This is the purpose of priesthood and stewardship; that everybody will know what his lines of authority are and what his area of responsibility is. Then we don’t get all messed up by doing things that are not appropriate. The Lord’s kingdom is a kingdom of order, and this is the order that we are talking about.
I suppose that much unhappiness and misery has come out of the problem of stewardship between husband and wife with people who are trying to live the gospel as with any other one things. And so I would like to make some suggestions on this which I hope will be helpful in living this relationship.
Basically, there are three stewardship relationships that we have to any human being in the world. For any human being we are either their father or their mother, we are their brother or their sister, or we are their son or their daughter. These are the basic interpersonal relationships that exist between people. Can you think of any relationship that does not fit one of those three?
Now the question: which one of these relationships is the husband-wife relationship? Is it a brother-sister relationship? The answer is no. It never was and never will be intended to be a brother-sister relationship. What relationship is it? It is a father-daughter relationship. All that I am saying is that it is a father-daughter relationship in that the husband presides over the wife and the wife does not preside over the husband. The husband’s stewardship includes the wife, but the wife’s stewardship does not include the husband. Therefore it is a father-daughter relationship in the priesthood.
Because this stewardship relationship is not understood, a great deal of difficulty arises when people try to relate to each other. If people would listen when they take their temple covenants, they would perhaps understand more. But many do not listen and therefore they do not understand how this relationship works.
Any time we have a father or mother relationship with someone, that is, if we preside over them in the authority of the priest hood, our priesthood responsibility is to be instruments in the hands of the Lord to administer His blessings to them. This means to help them to develop as strong, righteous individuals. Whatever it takes to help them develop and grow as strong, righteous individuals—that is the responsibility of one who presides in the priesthood. It is not to dominate, it is not to govern in the usual sense!’ but it is to be a resource of information, of strength, of power, of courage. Whatever is needed that the person cannot furnish himself, he should be able to go to the person over him and get because that person has gone to the Lord and has received. If he cannot get it from that person than he will have to go higher.
God is not slack. God is good, and therefore we all know that we will get what we need if we go higher. But, you see, the people in between will lose their blessings if they don’t give us what we need. And therefore, each of us works at our salvation in part by learning to be a good steward and to be an administrator of good things.
When the Lord comes in the second coming and He finds His steward giving meat in due season, He has found a wise and faithful steward. What does that mean? It simply means this steward is measuring out the blessings of the Lord and giving those in his stewardship what they need when they need it as they need it. That’s the due season—so they can grow, so that they can be nourished spiritually, physically, socially—whatever it takes.
Now the power of God is sufficient for all the needs of human beings, and if we would live under the order of God we would need nothing but the government of God for the perfection of our souls. It would suffice for every need that we have.
The role of the husband, then, is to be a reservoir of God’s goodness, a source of everything that she would need that she cannot herself supply to fulfill her stewardship.
What is her stewardship? Her stewardship is to be a reservoir of God’s goodness, a source, a help, to bless her children. It is the role of the wife to bring children into this world, to bear the souls of men, and to teach them and nurture them. And whatever she needs that she cannot supply herself she should go to her husband to get it. If her children are sick and she cannot heal them with herbs or whatever knowledge and power she has, she should go to her husband and ask of him that his priesthood might be invoked to heal these children. If she needs knowledge as to how to handle them in difficult psychological circumstances, she has the right to go to him and seek counsel as to what she ought to do.
He can fulfill his role only if he is a man of God, only if he is on good enough terms with the Lord so that he, in turn, can go to the Lord and say, “Lord, please tell me what to tell my wife.” Or if he can go to the Lord and say, “Lord, I need power to give this blessing.” If he is a righteous man, the Lord is not slack. He will give the power and the blessing will be delivered, and the mother will be satisfied that her stewardship, then, is in good order. Likewise, the children have a right to go to their mother and to their father to receive the blessings they need. It seems that before we can perfect ourselves in these relationships we must become so strong in the power of the Lord in righteousness that we will never need anything from anybody beneath us in our stewardship. If we have need of something, we always go up the line to get the need fulfilled.
Now let me be specific. When a man becomes what he ought to be as a man of God, he will never need the support of his wife. This doesn’t mean he wouldn’t enjoy it if he had it. But if she chooses not to support him, not to comfort him, not to sustain him, he needs to be able to get along without it. He has to be that strong. It can be a great blessing to him to have that comfort, but he must not need it. The Lord is in that relationship to us. The Lord cannot afford to need you and me. If He did, then we would be boss. We would be lord, if He needed us. Now He is grateful when we are obedient, and when we do the work we are supposed to do we build His kingdom. But He does not need us. If we choose to go on our way and defy Him, He can get along quite nicely without us. He may not have as much glory; He may not be as happy. But He will never have to come begging to us something. He is not in that position.
Similarly, we need to be in that position in the priesthood authority—to delight in receiving support from the meek but never needing it. Again, have you seen others who so desperately needed their children that they will give their children whatever their children want and thereby destroy their children? But if the mother does not need those children, if the mother is secure enough in her relationship with her husband, and on up the line with the Lord, that she doesn’t need the children, then she is in the position to do the very best job with the children that is possible. If the children defy her, she doesn’t have to get on her knees and plead with them to do something. Then she deals from a position of strength. She can deal with them and bless them and discipline them in a way she never could if she had to have their help or their support.
A servant of God is this way in relation to food, for instance. If I need food, then I am not a servant of Christ. If I can get along without food, if I am willing to starve to death, if necessary, then I can be a servant of Christ, but not until then. Because if I need food and I have to have it, then whoever controls my food controls me. And I am not a servant of Christ. I am a servant of whoever controls my food.
Food is a small thing. If I am a servant of Christ, I could care less if I should die tomorrow. What a great blessing and relief that would be. There is nothing in this world that I can afford to need as a servant of Christ except to obey my Lord. And He will see to it that I always have power to do that. There is no one in this universe that can stop me from doing that except Him, and He won’t. Therefore, I need not fear. I will be able to fill my mission and do what I need to do. And if it is my calling to die tomorrow because nobody would give me food anymore, that’s fine. I must not mind.
The same with any other need. We cannot afford to need anything that comes from beneath us in our stewardship. Now, that is pretty strong medicine, I know. But I hope you will, as I said, be sympathetic: in taking it, and you will try to understand what I am saying, because I honestly believe what I am saying is right. On the other hand, you can’t afford to believe me. You have to find out for yourself whether it is right or not.
There were times in the Prophet’s life [Joseph Smith] when he didn’t get the support of his wife. And yet that didn’t stop him from fulfilling his mission. If it had stopped him from fulfilling his mission, he would not have been a servant of Christ. It is that simple.
How can we gain the strength to do this? First of all we must obtain the foundation for being servants of Christ. We have to be servants of Christ: we have to be responsive to Him in the spirit. Then, one of the gifts of the spirit that we will receive is the gift of love. And if these relationships are worked out and perfected in a pure, self-sacrificing, long-suffering love—the pure charity that Paul talks about—it will work. If you try to work this on a hardnosed, puritanistic, business-like arrangement, it will never work. It has to be done in love.
The pure love that I am talking about is strictly a gift of the spirit. Nobody has it naturally. There are some people who are very kind and loving, but their love is not pure until they become servants of Christ and receive that pure gift.
What would you do when somebody over you in authority is not a very good steward? Suppose they are abusing their stewardship. This becomes a real test; this becomes a trial. And I have a very simple formula as to what to do about it. This again is a little drastic: so I hope you will bear with me.
Let me use an analogy. Suppose you had some books that were very valuable to you. You had them in a ten cent box and the box was falling apart. What would you do? You would replace the box wouldn’t you so that you could take care of the books? Suppose that the box was just filled with excelsior—and you didn’t care whether you had the excelsior or not—what would you do? Would you replace the box? Probably not. You would probably let it stay as it is.
All right, now let’s try a different level. Suppose there was a ward where there was a bishop and the bishop was doing a very poor job. He wasn’t a servant of the Lord; he was just riding high and mighty in his authority and power exercising unrighteous dominion. But, suppose the people of the ward were very faithful people and they tried to follow his leadership. What do you suppose the Lord would do to that bishop? He would replace him. On the other hand suppose that the people under the same bishop were slothful and didn’t care what the bishop said; they didn’t do what the bishop said anyway. What would the Lord do about that bishop? Probably nothing. Do you see why?
If you have a bishop you think is wrong, what is the best thing you can do to help that bishop? The best thing you can do is to support him. Do everything he says to do as faithfully as you can. Now, when you do that, if you and the other members of the ward became faithful to that bishop and honored him in his priesthood something powerful would happen to that bishop. Do you have any idea what it would be? The Lord would begin to work upon that bishop, and he would harrow up the soul of that man until he either got in line or He (the Lord) would get rid of him. That is the way it works. But remember there are limits. No person has to follow any bishop to hell. It is within the stewardship of each ward member to be able to inquire of the Lord to find out how and how far to follow that bishop.
But if the people aren’t doing what you say, as the bishop you just go on bumbling along—you, and the people, all the same. It doesn’t then matter, does it?
What is your conscience? It is the spirit of the Lord. I was told by my bishop once to stand at the door of the church and physically throw out a certain person if that person came. That was hard for me to take. But I prayed about it and I got confirmation. Yes, that is what I ought to do. Fortunately, the person didn’t show up.
I have been in that circumstance at least a dozen times, where there was something very important that I was told to do by the presiding authority over me that I didn’t think was right. In every case, when I have gone to the Lord, the Lord has said to do it. Now, I admit, there might be a circumstance where He might say don’t do it. But, if that ever came I would immediately check with the authority over the person speaking to me to find out if I was out of line or if the one I was questioning was out of line. I never yet have been told to go against an authority in the Church, although I have surely wondered sometimes. But as I have sought the will of the Lord the always has been to support that man.
So I believe if a wife has a husband and she doesn’t think he is a very good servant of the Lord, the best thing she can do is to go to the Lord. The Lord will probably say for her to obey him as if he were perfect. That is pretty strong medicine. But that is her stewardship. And if she does that, the Lord is going to get busy on him. The Lord will begin to work on him. The Lord has marvelous ways to bring husbands around. But if the wife isn’t paying any attention to the husband anyway, and the husband isn’t very faithful, and the wife wants the husband to get faithful so that she will have some point in being faithful, it probably will never come to pass.
All of this, of course, pertains to people married in the temple. I am not talking about any other circumstance, because unless people are married in the temple they have no stewardship in marriage. That is to say, their marriage is not appointed of God and is not, strictly speaking in the eyes of the Lord, a marriage.
No woman has to follow any man to hell. You see, the crux of the matter is this. When a girl accepts a man as her husband, she must be willing to accept him as the lord. Now, if she doesn’t think enough of him, if he isn’t that good, she hadn’t better marry him. If he isn’t that grown up yet that he is a servant of God and able to speak for the Lord to her and to be the source of blessing that she needs to fill her role as a wife and mother, she is jumping off the cliff to marry him. If young people would get married right, you see, most of this problem would be eliminated.
Supposing they are already married and she didn’t know this before she got married. Then, what does she do? The solution, generally, is to honor the covenant that has been made, and to serve as righteously and as faithfully, as sweetly and as humbly, as is possible.
If the point comes where the Lord tells her that she ought to depart from him, she can go to her bishop, and if that is right, he will get the same counsel. And there again she is going to those who have stewardship over the matter.
When she gets married in the first place, she ought to counsel with those who have stewardship over her, namely her father and mother. And if a girl has a righteous father and mother and can counsel with them and be assured, both through the spirit of the Lord and through her parents, that she is marrying a man of God who will lead her to exaltation, blessed is she. But I am afraid some marriages aren’t made that way.
How long should a wife endure an unhappy marriage? As long as the Lord directs her to stay with him. She ought to stay with him and be as faithful to him as she can be. Her own salvation rests not on what he does but on how faithful she is in fulfilling her stewardship.
As I have watched couples recently in the Church, I find that one of the biggest problems that active LDS couples are having is that the wife doesn’t think the husband is very righteous and therefore she won’t do what he says. This is the source of endless misery and grief. I believe that as long as the wife is bound by the temple covenant she will do the very best thing by the Lord and by righteousness to obey her husband faithfully. This may be difficult. But, nevertheless, this is the kind of trial and faithfulness in stewardship by which we show that we are worthy of exaltation. If a woman can serve faithfully under an evil man, she surely has demonstrated she can serve faithfully under a righteous man, and some day she will be given a righteous man to be her head and her guide if her husband rejects the opportunity. But I have seen marvelous transformations in brethren when their wives have been faithful. The brethren have seen that there is really some point in being a servant of the Lord, because they have responsibility. When their wife does everything they say, they get a little bit scared lest they tell their wife the wrong thing to do. And being a little bit scared, they get on their knees and ask the Lord, and then they try to become righteous, then mighty and powerful. When their wives come to them for blessings in the priesthood they get shaken up a little bit. So they repent of their sins and try to be righteous. It is marvelous what can happen.
Lehi got a little out of line in the Book of Mormon, and he began to rear up against the Lord for the terrible afflictions they were having. So what did Nephi do? He went to Lehi and asked that he act as the father. He said, “Father, tell me where to go that we might have food?”
Lehi was in no shape to get revelation at all because he had been railing against the Lord, but he had to humble himself and pray to the Lord. He received revelation and he told Nephi where to go and Nephi went and got the meat and they were saved.
Now this is a marvelous principle; the principle of obedience in stewardship. If we can learn to live it, it is one of the great keys in the establishment of Zion.
When a young man marries, his stewardship relationship to his father doesn’t change one bit. When a young lady marries, her stewardship relationship changes drastically. That is to say, she passes from the stewardship of her father to the stewardship of her husband. And that is why there should be agreement by all parties concerned in the stewardship—by the Church, by the father and mother, by the groom, and, of course, on the part of the girl, herself—that this transfer is all right.
The more I learn about marriage the more I see the importance of knowing what we are getting into. Only through perfecting ourselves in these stewardship relationships in marriage can we ever have a faint hope for exaltation. Exaltation is the perfection of the marriage relationship.
We are to become one with Christ—not two, but one. But Christ is the head. We are the hands and the feet. We take our direction from him. We are members of His body. In exactly the same sense as that relationship, the husband and the wife must be one—the husband the head and the wife the body, as it were—but they should function in perfect harmony and unity and love to accomplish the purposes of the family.
Now the purpose of the family is the begetting and rearing of children unto the Lord. If the parents are together, if they are completely united in that particular goal, then they will be greatly blessed by the Lord in executing that task, and they can act as one.
There are also stewardships in political matters. If we have political stewardship, then we become bound as servants of Christ to do His will in that stewardship. President McKay has instructed us as Latter-day Saints to do what we could do to get the principles of Section 121 operative in every stewardship in the world, not just the Church stewardships but the civil stewardships as well. The point is not to operate on the basis of force, but on the basis of persuasion and kindness and love.
When many people get a stewardship, they assume unrighteous dominion; they forget that the powers of the priesthood are inseparably connected with the powers of heaven. The power of heaven through which the power of the priesthood becomes operative is the Holy Ghost, and when any man becomes unrighteous or any woman becomes unrighteous and exercises unrighteous dominion and if they seek to cover their sins and gratify their pride and their vain ambitions, the spirit of the Lord is grieved. And when it is withdrawn from them, amen to their priesthood. They have lost their priesthood and authority. They might be able to get it back, but in anything they do without it, they are exercising unrighteous dominion, they are outside their stewardship, which is another very important thing we want to remember. We can act as stewards only under the direction of the Lord. If we try to do this by ourselves, through our own wisdom, we are simply serving the adversary, which is to say, we have broken the lines of stewardship.
In conclusion, let me simply say, will you please not take anything I have said as the final word. I am here to throw out suggestions to you, but I hope you will find the suggestions worthy of thought and prayer. I hope you will find them valuable in the sense of correct understanding of the relationship the Lord would have us come into.
I bear you my testimony of the truthfulness of the gospel of Jesus Christ. And I feel with all my soul the importance and necessity of our making these relationships right in the spirit of the Lord, in the power of the pure love of Christ. And I bear you this testimony in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.
ADDRESS TO SEMINARY AND INSTITUTE FACULTY BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY, PROVO, UTAH
One important truth known to Latter-day Saints is the idea that man is saved no faster than he gains knowledge. That is to say, no man attains the special supernatural blessings bestowed by the Lord upon the faithful except as he learns and then implements the formula upon which the receiving of a given blessing is predicated. The attainment of true ideas as keys to success in spiritual matters is then a challenge and an opportunity which faces each of God’s children.
But it is notable that the majority of the peoples of the earth and even a significant portion of the members of the LDS Church find their lives devoid of the special blessings and rewards promised to the followers of the Savior. Probably these persons have not been blessed because they lack the knowledge—the formulas, the true ideas—as to how to qualify for those blessings. Not that they lack teachers. The world and the Church abound with persons eager to lead others. But upon observing that those leading and those led generally fall into the ditch, a wise man will want to know by what means he can gain for himself a sure knowledge of the correct formula for spiritual success. It is our purpose to examine how we might as individuals solve our religious problems to attain true and effective ideas, thereby to reap the joy of the saints.
It is important to begin by defining the word “knowledge,” and the best method would be to portray the way the Lord himself uses the term in speaking to us. We note in the scriptures that the Lord uses the term “know” in situations of direct observation of the object known—as in Doctrine and Covenants 93:1, wherein the Lord promises the faithful that eventually they all will see his face and know that he is, suggesting that now they do not, even though they might have had ever so powerful a witness from the Holy Spirit. Upon receiving the Spirit, we know that we have had a spiritual manifestation, but the message conveyed by the Spirit itself may not strictly be said to be known to be true. Through the Spirit, then, we learn true ideas, but we know these ideas to be true only after we have subjected them to the tests of application and experience,
This distinction between knowledge and having true ideas is no mere play on words or idle philosophic nicety. It is, rather, fundamental to our spiritual success. For the essence of success in spiritual matters is faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. But faith is not to have a perfect knowledge or to know of a surety at first. Rather is faith a trust in the true ideas vouchsafed to us by the divine power of the Spirit.
Having received true ideas from the Holy Spirit, by acting upon them we come to know by direct experience that these beliefs are true. Belief is the basis of faith.
But belief is not only the basis of faith in God, but of all human action. When an engineer designs a bridge, does he act on belief or knowledge? Obviously he acts on both. He knows that certain kinds of structures have accomplished their intended function in the past. But he cannot know that if he duplicates that type of structure for his present problem that it will succeed. That he knows only after the bridge is built and has successfully withstood the test of experience. Thus he uses known formulas in a way he believes and hopes will be successful.
We may observe that we mortals never know the future. We know the past but do not act and make decisions in the past. We act and decide in the pre sent for the sake of a future we believe in, believing and hoping that the ideas we have will work. Life is thus really a series of trial-and-error attempts to find ideas which work. But we are limited in our knowledge to the past and must act on belief for the present and future.
These commonplaces of everyday life lead us to a conclusion which is rather uncommon, however, and which cuts deeply into the ingrained prejudice of our proud and scientific age. This conclusion is the idea that what a man believes is really more important than what he knows, for the basis of all human action is belief rather than knowledge. There are many other arguments to support this conclusion which make the case overwhelming if one is not already convinced. If one is not convinced, he should examine those additional evidences. This is important because of the widely-touted false notion that when a man acts on the basis of science, he knows what he is doing, whereas in religious matters he acts only on faith. This insidious bit of intellectual hypocrisy needs to be exposed and the mind of every intelligent person disabused of it. Let us again re-emphasize: the basis of all human action is a hope that the intellectual tools we believe in will enable us to anticipate the future correctly and to be able to accomplish the fulfillment of our desires.
What then are the possible sources of ideas worthy of our belief, sources which will give us with reasonable assurance ideas that we will later come to know to be true? We will examine the principal contestants for the honor of being the best source of true beliefs.
1. Tradition: Most men get their beliefs from other men. Historically we note that almost overwhelmingly tradition, and especially religious tradition, has had the practical result of fettering men rather than of freeing them to be spiritually successful. It is hard enough to have to depend on our own minds and motives, let alone to depend upon the limitations of other men. Let us exclude tradition as a final test of truth, simply because we want to know for ourselves. We will certainly not exclude all ideas from other men. We may find their ideas to be very useful hypotheses; but we will want to test those ideas for ourselves.
2. Reason: The mind of man is a powerful tool, but it has certain limitations. It can only reason when supplied with premises, and those premises control the conclusion. Since the initial premises can never be attained by the use of reason, the conclusions, though in accord with the premises, are just as unreasoned as the premises, even though we congratulate ourselves for having become psychologically aware through logical deduction of what we really started with in the premises. He who thinks that reason is the test of true ideas is forever trapped by his premises, or, to put it more bluntly, by his prejudices. If a thing doesn’t seem reasonable to him and he therefore rejects it, he is simply manifesting contentment with whatever values the accidental vagaries of his youth instilled in him. To make a long story short, reason is a good test to detect certain kinds of errors, and for this reason ought to be vigorously employed at all times. But reason is never a sufficient test of truth, and therefore cannot be a basis for achieving a spiritually successful life. Note the sentiments of President McKay expressed in the 1961 semi-annual conference: “He who walks by the light of his own reason walks as by starlight, rejecting the brightness of the sun.”
3, Science: Science has become a bandwagon in modern times. In ancient times the failure of the apostate religions of the world stimulated the rise of philosophy, and in particular rationalism, or the supposition that human reason is a sufficient test of truth. Because of its obvious superiority over the ancient apostate religions, philosophy became a bandwagon to which all would-be-successful intellectualists flocked. As the panacea for all human ills, philosophy became, in the eyes of most people, the source of salvation. It is no accident that apostate Christianity turned to philosophy and produced the magnificent spectacle of the insufficiency of human reason which we call scholasticism.
The gradual realization of the limitations of pure reason forced men to look again at reality and to combine experience and experiment with reason, thus creating modern science. Because of the obvious superiority of science over scholasticism, science has become the current bandwagon and thus the modern cure-all, the modern supposed source of human salvation, to which the present would-be “intellectuals” flock. But powerful and good as it is, science can never be a panacea. Science can never make any but probable statements about the future. It is limited to a description of what exists in the physical world and can never tell men what they ought to become. To run a society by making scientists the leaders is to inflict with the full might of scientific technology the non-scientific prejudices of those scientists upon the whole population. To act and make decisions, these scientists must use not only the scientific evidence they have of the past, but they will decide on the additional basis of what they believe about the future and on what they think will be good for the future. But remember: No statement of what is good can be justified scientifically. Science is at its best in highly-controlled manufactured opportunities; it is at its worst when it hypocritically tries to make so-called “objective” statements about what men ought to do. Clearly, for the problems of our personal or community lives, science can never provide the answers.
4. Imagination: If we reject tradition, reason, and science as bases of true ideas for successful human life, what have we left? In and of themselves, men have left only one way of attaining ideas: imagination. Men capitalize upon this opportunity by creating all kinds and varieties of theologies and proffer them to their fellowmen as “truth.” Because of the hunger most people have for truth, a new idea will almost always have takers, no matter how absurd or ridiculous the idea might be. Once accepted, such ideas begin to acquire the weight of tradition, and as the theology is worked out, to become “reasonable.” From this source has come the vast and almost amusing (were it not pathetic) array of religious sects, all having at least a grain of truth, but none leading to the fulness of human happiness. Thus the Lord said of them, that they have imagined up to themselves gods of their own making in the image of the world. When these monstrosities of fancy are believed by only a single individual, he is called mentally unbalanced. When the same sort of monstrosity is believed by many, it is called a theology.
Thus we have completed the gamut of the human resources for attaining true ideas by which to become extraordinarily successful in attaining human happiness. We must conclude that human resources fail, because we see that each has large and glaring weaknesses, making it impossible for any or all of them to satisfy man’s need for true ideas. If there is a way to joy and happiness, it must come from a non-natural source.
Let us suppose, for a moment, that there is a god in heaven who is the literal father of all men, who loves each of his children, who sees and knows all, is perfect, and able to guide his children, to give them true ideas so that their righteous purposes will not fail. Is it not plain that if human beings are to be successful spiritually, to attain true happiness, that some such possibility must be available? What a delight and a comfort it is to have the assurance that our supposition is not an empty hypothesis, but is a functional reality, awaiting only our acceptance. For there is a solution for and a salvation from all human problems. But sure knowledge of the solution to every human problem, secular or religious, can come, if from anywhere, from one unique source: personal revelation from a super-human being who knows what we should do and is pleased to share those ideas with us.
Thus it is that those who are Latter-day Saints have the greatest potential source of true ideas known to or imagined by man. If they will qualify for it, through the Holy Spirit they can come to know of the unseen spiritual realities that fill the universe; of the past and its significance for our present situation; of the future and the great potential every child of God has. Besides these true ideas, we can gain direction that will enable us to make correct decisions at every juncture of our lives, for we are promised that this constant companion, when honored, will show us “all things that we should do.” Indeed, we are told that there is no mystery in heaven or earth which will not be made known to us if we will qualify. Having access to such divine omniscience, sharing through the power of the Priesthood in an operative omnipotence, being transformed in mind and body under the tender enticement of Godly benevolence, is there any height of happiness, or joy, or blessing to which a human being could not aspire, even a fulness?
This then is the genius of the Latter-day Saint religion: personal divine revelation is the potential answer to all of our collective and individual problems. But unfortunately, few there be who successfully seek this pearl of great price, even within the Church. If any sizeable group of Latter-day Saints were to begin to live by this Spirit, the results would be so remarkable that the world would quickly acknowledge, if not accept.
If then this is the genius of our religion, should not each individual make it his first order of business to seek after the Spirit? Should not those who teach humble themselves in mighty prayer and obtain the personal daily and momentary guidance of the Spirit in all they say or do? Should it not be the first and foremost objective of every teacher of the Gospel to bring those whom he instructs to a personal, functional living by the Spirit in their everyday lives? Then would Zion be a reality in this dispensation as it has been in many ages past.
Like any other successful act, obtaining the guidance of the Spirit necessitates using true ideas. These ideas are not complex, but are the simple grand message of Peter: if we believe in Jesus Christ and His atonement, if we will truly repent of our sins and take the covenant of baptism at the hands of authorized administrators, we shall receive the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands. There is a simple experiment. Any person who will try it can know for himself of the truth of this pattern.
But what about those who are already members of the Church and lack the Spirit? If the Spirit is not operative in our lives, it is because we have failed somewhere in the above formula. Perhaps we are unwilling to believe in the message about Jesus Christ. Perhaps we have some sins we enjoy and therefore have not repented. Perhaps we break the covenant of baptism by being ashamed to bear the name of Christ, or by deliberately rejecting some commandment, or by not remembering him always. Perhaps we have been misled and we have put our trust in tradition, or reason, or science, or imagination, and have thereby excluded the Spirit. Whatever the fault is, there will be one way to find out what it is. When our conscience pricks us on a certain point, that’s where we need to go to work.
In fact, it is my opinion that the conscience of a Latter-day Saint is continuous with the still small voice of the Spirit. No matter how we rationalize, if we have a spark of righteousness left in us, we know when and what our conscience says. If we will live by the voice of our conscience, it will become the indispensable key to every prospect of success in our lives and will someday lead us to hear words, “Well done, thou true and faithful servant.”
Brethren and sisters, let us be in the world but not be of it. To not be of the world is to humble ourselves as little children before our Savior and to be willing to be led by Him through the voices of the Spirit in all things. Then we will have those true ideas which will enable us to know the joy of the Saints and to enter into the rest of the Lord. May this be our happy lot I pray in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.