Category: Chauncey Riddle

  • Prayer

    THE ENSIGN, MARCH 1975

    BY CHAUNCEY C. RIDDLE

    Praying is more than “saying prayers.” True prayer is an experience that takes place under the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

    One fundamental distinction between the saint and what the scriptures call the “natural man” is in their use of prayer. The natural man may say prayers, but it is not a spiritual experience for him. He is only reacting to his physical environment as he has been instructed or as he finds prudent. Praying, as distinct from merely saying prayers, has a spiritual dimension. The transformation from a natural man to a saint is marked by the ability to recognize and to respond to spiritual environment.

    The person who is learning to be a saint must learn about the nature of God and man and the world, about the gospel and the Church of Jesus Christ. He must learn to control himself in faith, repentance, fasting, and mighty prayer, and in using the Holy Spirit as his guide. Finally, he must successfully use the understanding he has to bring to pass much righteousness. He then has something of infinite worth: the ability to do good in this world. As an intelligent man could not expect to step into a modern jet aircraft and fly it successfully without much learning and training, so such a man would not think that he could pray successfully without even greater preparation for that more difficult task.

    What is the Purpose of Prayer?

    We live in a universe of order. Law governs and controls all things, both physical, and spiritual. This is another way of saying that there is a regularity of causes and effects apparent everywhere. One application of this principle is that all things act (effects) in relation to their environment (causes). Some things are acted upon; they simply react in a regular way to what is happening in the environment. Water solidifies when the surroundings are cold, boils away when they are hot, and flows freely when the surroundings are at a medium temperature.

    Some people suppose that man is like water, only responding to his natural environment. They observe that men buy what is advertised, shun that which is disgraced, cleave unto that which is pleasurable. These people predict successfully what most men will do by assessing their physical environment. They can do this because the natural man is not free. He is acted upon like water. Since most men are natural, the accuracy of such predictions runs high.

    But, thanks to God, no natural man need remain natural. Though he must respond to his environment under the law of cause and effect, all men who have heard the gospel of Jesus Christ preached with the power of the Holy Ghost have a choice of environments. Having heard, they then can choose between reacting to their physical environment, as does the natural man, or they can react to the spiritual environment of which the gospel makes them aware. As long as the Holy Spirit labors with them, they can choose to respond to either one. This is the agency, the freedom of man: to choose to be natural, governed by the physical environment and their own flesh, or to be spiritual, governed by their own spirit as it yields to the Holy Spirit.

    “Wherefore, men are free according to the flesh; and all things are given them which are expedient unto man.  And they are free to choose liberty and eternal life, through the great Mediator of all men, or to choose captivity and death, according to the captivity and power of the devil; for he seeketh that all men might be miserable like unto himself.

    “And now, my sons, I would that ye should look to the great Mediator, and hearken unto his great commandments; and be faithful unto his words, and choose eternal life, according to the will of his Holy Spirit;

    “And not choose eternal death, according to the will of the flesh and the evil which is therein, which giveth the spirit of the devil power to captivate, to bring you down to hell, that he may reign over you in his own kingdom.” (2 Nephi 2:27-29.)

    Prayer is turning to the spiritual. It is seeking the will and the power of God through the Holy Spirit in order to yield to the spiritual order of reality. It is the key to the companionship of the Holy Spirit. Having that companionship, one need not lapse into the control of the lusts of the flesh and the pressures of the world. It is choosing to be part of the pressures of the world. It is choosing to be part of the realm where God reigns, where his will is done. It is a rejection of the opinions and wisdom of men who know not God. It is the beginning of salvation. Oh how great the goodness of our God, who prepares a way for us to escape from the deadly and desultory causes of the natural, fallen world!

    Prayer is communion with the Almighty. He who finds himself aghast at the evil order of this world will likely seek something better. As he prays he discovers that the power of God reaches down into this fallen realm with a sweet, peaceful, assuring, and comforting influence that gives witness of truth, hope for a better world, and power to withstand evil. Without the opportunity to pray and to receive those precious gifts from the Holy Spirit, man would not be free. He would indeed be the trapped, damned animal he is thought to be by those who do not know God.

    “And now, my beloved brethren, I perceive that ye ponder still in your hearts; and it grieveth me that I must speak concerning this thing.  For if ye would hearken unto the Spirit which teacheth a man to pray ye would know that ye must pray; for the evil spirit teacheth not a man to pray, but teacheth him that he must not pray.

    “But behold, I say unto you that ye must pray always, and not faint; that ye must not perform any thing unto the Lord save in the first place ye shall pray unto the Father in the name of Christ, that he will consecrate thy performance unto thee, that thy performance may be for the welfare of thy soul.” (2 Nephi 32:8-9.)

    How to Pray

    When a person “says prayers” he is doing something stimulated by his physical environment. He is repeating words and phrases appropriate to some time or circumstance such as mealtime or the beginning of a meeting. Saying prayers is not a bad thing to do. But it is insufficient.

    True prayer begins with a yearning in the soul of man, a reaching out for spiritual contact with God. True prayer grows in strength and efficacy as the Holy Spirit enlivens and guides the yearning soul. The ultimate of true prayer comes as a man is able to submit himself completely to the Lord God whom he has come to love; then what he prays for and how he prays are given to him by the Holy Spirit. This prayer is the obedient response of a little child who, with wonder, awe, and gratitude, worships the true and living God. Of himself, the child of God doesn’t know what to ask for. But through spiritual insight he sees the hand of his Father in all things. His bosom swells with gratitude as he glimpses the wondrous work of holiness. As he is given, he asks for those things which are good in the sight of his God and gives praise and thanks in the same manner. The theme of all is the phrase used by the Savior:

    “Thy will, not mine, be done.”

    “And if ye are purified and cleansed from all sin, ye shall ask whatsoever you will in the name of Jesus and it shall be done.

    “But know this, it shall be given you what you shall ask; and as ye are appointed to the head, the spirits shall be subject unto you.” (D&C 50:29,30.)

    It may seem strange that in certain prayers one might simply repeat what he is given to say by the Holy Spirit unless one realizes that true prayer is worship. Its essence is a feeling of the heart. The measure of a prayer is the intensity and the depth of that feeling. Does one hunger to do good in this world? Does that feeling wholly fill his soul? Is he oblivious to everything else but the fact that he is in the presence of his beloved Master? Does he cry out from anguish at the realization of his own nothingness contrasts with the goodness of God? Does he receive the Holy Spirit as a consuming fire to burn out the dross within, almost unto the consuming of his flesh? If these things take place, the child of God is achieving and experiencing what the scriptures call “mighty prayer.” While it is true that this may not happen every day or even often, what poverty of soul entraps one who has never felt the fire of mighty prayer! Having achieved full worship even once would color and heighten every prayer thereafter, for the remainder on one’s life.

    To pray, then, one must understand the nature and attributes of God. He must receive of the Holy Spirit and worship in spirit and truth. The more he can deliver himself, body and spirit, to what the Spirit shows him is good, the more humble is his prayer. The more he can focus all that he is and has, the more mighty that worship.

    Small wonder that prayer at its greatest is private and individual, an thing done with the door shut. How strange to think of being seen by men at the same time as being honored by God. No wonder the life of a faithful saint is a constant communion with the Master, no matter what else is happening.

    “Behold, I went to hunt beasts in the forests; and the words which I had often heard my father speak concerning eternal life, and the joy of the saints, sunk deep into my heart.

    “And my soul hungered; and I kneeled down before my Maker, and I cried unto him in mighty prayer and supplication for mine own soul; and all the day long did I cry unto him; yea, and when the night came I did still raise my voice high that it reached the heavens. (Enos 3-4.)

    Meditation

    The helpmate of mighty prayer is meditation. In meditating, one tries to minimize his involvements with the physical world for a time in order to concentrate on something inner, on ideas and feelings. As a person prays sincerely with the Holy Spirit as his guide, that Spirit will bring to him many thoughts and feelings. This is part of the process of revelation. To take full advantage of this revelation, one would do well to mull over the matter under consideration, piecing together what one already knows with the new insights received.

    It is one thing to have a revelation. It is quite another to understand and obey. Understanding comes in the process of careful, prayerful reflections of meditation upon what one has received. To pray is often like asking for food and then being blessed with a sumptuous meal. What would you think of a person who, when thus honored, merely took a sniff, then put the meal on a shelf and left it? Though greatly blessed, he would not be nourished.

    So it may be with those who pray and do not meditate. They may have much but may be little edified.

    Meditation cannot be taught, because it is something personal and private; it is the venturing of the soul into the unknown. But it can be learned by anyone who has the courage to think for himself. A likely initiation to meditation is to ponder the scriptures, the words of the living and the dead prophets of God. Banish all commentaries for a moment: forget hearsay teaching. What does the Lord actually say? What does the Spirit whisper as to how this passage or that doctrine should be understood? Where two scriptures appear at first reading to be contrary, what is the real intent of each?

    That soul who has bravely ventured into the sea of scriptural interpretation, who humbly seeks the guidance of the Holy Spirit and rejects the opinions of men, soon makes a marvelous discovery. In the midst of the tumult of human interpretation there is a rock! He cannot see it, for it is spiritual, but he can plant his feet firmly upon it. Then the winds and waves of opinion can beat upon him from any direction. He is no longer tossed to and fro by every wind and wave, but rests firmly on that rock, and on his own two feet. He now has a foundation for salvation. He has found the rock of revelation from the Savior.

    In mulling and pondering the scriptures, our venturer has found the Holy Spirit to be an able and willing guide as well as a comfort and a bulwark. Flashes of insight come. Now he sees how God is both just and merciful. He rejoices to learn how God can govern and control all things yet man can be free. He is overcome as he glimpses what the Savior has done for him. Now, having his own light from eternity, he is a new person, a little child born again in the image of the Master.

    Having learned to think, to meditate upon the scriptures, the venturer is now prepared to meditate upon the spiritual gifts that come in connection with his own prayers. Now mighty prayer is so rich an experience that he can hardly contain it. Ideas, hopes, and feelings tumble into his mind, then are carefully fit together under spiritual guidance, into the fabric of his new life. They become part of his robe of righteousness as he prepares to meet the Bridegroom.

    He who learns to meditate on the things of the Holy Spirit need never suffer the rebuke that came to Oliver Cowdery:

    “Behold, you have not understood; you have supposed that I would give it unto you, when you took no thought save it was to ask me.

    “But, behold, I say unto you, that you must study it out in your mind; then you must ask me if it be right, and if it is right I will cause that your bosom shall burn within you; therefore, you shall feel that it is right.

    “But if it be not right you shall have no such feelings, but you shall have a stupor of thought that shall cause you to forget the thing which is wrong; therefore, you cannot write that which is sacred save it be given you from me.

    “Now, if you have known this you could have translated; nevertheless, it is not expedient that you should translate now.

    “Behold, it was expedient when you commenced; but you feared, and the time is past, and it is not expedient now.” (D&C 9:7-11.)

    Consultation

    As a spiritual experience and an access to spiritual life, prayer is like anything of great power is: when misapplied the harm possible is equal to or greater than the good that can be gained from it when correctly applied. The possibility exists in prayer that Satan, who also is a spiritual being and who also delights to give people “revelation,” may attempt to pawn off his own influence as a substitute for the ministrations of the Holy Spirit. The past is full of examples of these devious actions of the adversary beginning with Adam and Eve and extending down to his latest attempts on our own spiritual lives.

    When people pray, and especially when they try to make prayer a spiritual experience, Satan stands ready to counterfeit. Some telltale evidences of his influence are feelings that we should give in to the desired of our flesh, that we should do something contrary to the teachings of the scriptures, that we should do things that will bring us the honors of men or the rewards of this world. But the real test is not that simple, for there are occasions when the Lord would have us do something different from what others have been commanded to do, or he may lead us to have the honors of men and rewards of this world. We must be sure that it is the Lord that whispers to us.

    One learns to discern the voice of the Spirit through experience. In following spiritual guidance, one can learn surly to tell the difference between the enticings of the Holy Spirit and the temptations of the adversary. To be sure in discerning that difference is perhaps the most essential feature of the transformation of the natural man into the saint. Only then can one show in his life that full and heart-felt faith which is the only means of pleasing God.

    It is the heritage of every child in the stakes of Zion to learn from his father and mother how to recognize and live by the still, small voice of the Spirit, thus to know how to worship in mighty prayer. As the children of Zion come to know the voice of the Lord, then can they unite in those mighty prayers that are part of bearing off the Kingdom in triumph.

    “And at that day, when I shall come in my glory, shall the parable be fulfilled which I spake concerning the ten virgins.

    “For they that are wise and have received the truth, and have taken the Holy Spirit for their guide, and have not been deceived–verily I say unto you, they shall not be hewn down and cast into the fire, but shall abide the day.

    “And the earth shall be given unto them for an inheritance; and they shall multiply and wax strong, and their children shall grow up without sin unto salvation. (D&C 45:56-58.)

    The Fruit

    Another great form of worship of God is the consequence of true prayer. True and mighty prayer ought to lead above all to the doing of righteous deeds. As we pray and partake of the power and true order of heaven, we then should seek to translate the spiritual gifts we have received into the physical actions of our lives. Righteousness is blessing others. Our Master, Jesus Christ, is the fountain of all righteousness. As we humbly pray in his name we are filled with wisdom, with his compassion, with his concern for the poor and the needy with his concern for those who sit in darkness. Being filled with his love, we then go and do those things which we have been shown. In so doing, his pure love becomes our pure love for others.

    “Therefore may God grant unto you, my brethren, that ye may begin to exercise your faith unto repentance, that ye begin to call upon his holy name, that he would have mercy upon you;

    “Yea, cry unto him for mercy; for he is mighty to save.

    “Yea, humble yourselves, and continue in prayer unto him.

    “Cry unto him when ye are in your fields, yea, over all your flocks.

    “Cry unto him in your houses, yea, over all your household, both morning, mid-day, and evening.

    “Yea, cry unto him against the power of your enemies.

    “Yea, cry unto him against the devil, who is an enemy to all righteousness.

    “Cry unto him over the crops of your fields, that ye may prosper in them.

    “Cry over the flocks of your fields, that they may increase.

    “But this is not all; ye must pour out your souls in your closets, and your secret places, and in your wilderness.

    “Yea, and when you do not cry unto the Lord, let your hearts be full, drawn out in prayer unto him continually for your welfare, and also for the welfare of those who are around you.

    “And now behold, my beloved brethren, I say unto you, do not suppose that this is all; for after ye have done all these things, if ye turn away the needy, and the naked, and visit not the sick and afflicted, and impart of your substance, if ye have, to those who stand in need–I say unto you, if ye do not any of these things, behold, your prayer is vain, and availeth you nothing, and ye are as hypocrites who do deny the faith.” (Alma 34:17-28.)

    Dr. Chauncey C. Riddle, professor of philosophy and dean of the Graduate School at Brigham Young University, serves as Sunday School teacher in Orem 16th Ward, Orem Utah Sharon Stake.

  • Report from the Bottom, c. 1975

    (Written in about 1975)

    Each of us files a daily report as to how we feel about the Church in our actions. Silently we acclaim or protest through our support or non-support of what we see and hear. This is an unsolicited verbal report filed for any and all who might be interested. As you might guess, what is said below is the perspective of a single individual. You are also a single individual. May we compare notes?

    The first thing I must do to give you my reactions is to separate some things out. The most important of these are the Savior, the Gospel, the Church, and the people of the Church.

    I think of the Savior as my friend and companion. That sounds presumptuous, but I am willing to say it because I think of myself as His friend and servant. And I say it because I know the sweet peace of His spirit.

    Feeling His spirit is the sweetest, most desirable experience in my life. Sometimes it gives me an overwhelming spiritual shock, as when I read Micah 6:8, or D&C 121:45–46, or Matthew 25:40. That shock shakes the very core of my being; I cannot deny what is said, for I know it is true. I know, because of such experiences that the Lord loves righteousness, and, therefore, He loves me. I know also that I love righteousness, and, therefore, I love Him. That’s why I think of Him as my friend. We both desire the same goals, and delight in the same things, especially to do justly, and to have mercy.

    But, to be frank, the Lord scares me at the same time I feel His friendship. He is perfect in righteousness, and I am far from it. Though I think less of myself for it, I do yet yield to the flesh, filling its desires when I should not. Or sometimes anger or pride well up within me to defy the humility of the Holy Spirit. I know well what Nephi was talking about when he lamented because of his flesh in 2 Nephi 4. But Nephi is small comfort on that point. I see clearly that I will go on being scared until I have fully repented. I think that is what it means to work out our salvation in fear and trembling.

    Sometimes I wonder about the whole business. The thought comes to me: You are just telestial material; no matter how hard you try you can never be like the Savior. But as I cry out in desperation to the Lord through hot tears, the sweet peace of the Spirit reaches to me like a cool breath to a fevered brow. It says: God is just, so do not worry about where you will be in eternity. There is much to be done now, for the sheep are scattered. Let the love of the lost sheep cause you to hunger to see them blessed. That hunger will enable you to overcome the flesh through the Savior; then you can do great good in this world.

    So I have this testimony of the Lord. He speaks to me often through His spirit. He shows me the vision of righteousness and of Zion. He tells me how to read the scriptures. He has given me every good idea I have used in my professional and family life for many years. He reproves me when I am wayward, showing me the better way. When I am ill, His spirit heals me when I have learned my lesson, and He always teaches me some precious lesson that way. Do you see why I call Him my friend and companion? I have no mortal friend who compares with Him, save my wife. For Him I would gladly die, anytime, anywhere, even though I have never seen Him. But I also feel that I will die if I can never be faithful enough to see Him.

    I love the Gospel because it teaches me of the Savior. I understand it to be those simple but marvelous ideas expressed in a few verses within 3 Nephi 27. It seems to be a formula for receiving the companionship of the Lord through His Holy Spirit. I know the Gospel is true because I have applied the formula and know that it works.

    It took me a long time to learn the Gospel. The greatest obstacle was unlearning much of what I had been taught as a youngster in the Church. Until I seriously sought to dig out for myself the true meaning and application of faith and repentance, they were baffling because the cliches I heard didn’t fit the scriptures. With the help of some very spiritual people of the Church and the help of the Holy Spirit itself I have learned what I think are the essentials of the Gospel. My hesitation stems from the fact that every now and then I get a new and clearer glimpse of the first principles that makes me wonder if I ever really understood them before.

    The scriptures seem to be the intellectual battleground where one struggles with ideas to get a clear and true idea of the Gospel formula. When we know the formula, our minds and bodies become the battleground for self control so that we might gain the companionship of the Holy Spirit. When one has the Holy Spirit, the world seems to be the battleground where one struggles to do good in the midst of great evil. As one succeeds in doing some good, the mysteries of heaven begin to unfold, a glimpse of celestial order and celestial kingdoms. If one is wise enough not to talk of them, knowledge of the mysteries becomes a great anchor to the soul. But there is no anchor to compare with the more sure word.

    The Church, to me, is the priesthood organization extending from the Savior through the president of the Church down to each member. I like to think of the priesthood as a harness; it gives us a specific place to work, a specific relationship to other workers, a real opportunity to move along the work of God, which is the work of righteousness and salvation. If I can learn to fill my role, to do my priesthood assignments well, the Church can move forward. If we all pull together as the Savior directs, we together can do good things for this suffering world which could not be done by us alone or in any other way. It is both a great thrill and an awesome responsibility to be in the harness.

    There have been times when I have aspired to high office in the Church. I dreamed once of becoming a general authority. I can see the adversary laughing gleefully when he has gotten me to think of desiring high office. The Lord in His kindness has let me have enough office to discover two most precious things. He has taught me first that there is no greater priesthood calling than father and mother; nothing is more challenging or more worthwhile than the firm establishment of a celestial family. Secondly, He has shown me that office in the Church is something I cannot refuse, but I must see Church office as an added burden which may destroy my primary family responsibility. If I am doing well in my family, I will have power to do well in my Church calling, and the better I then do in my Church calling, the more help I will have with my family. But if I am not doing well in my family, I will have little to offer to the Church; as I fail in my Church assignment, I destroy the possibility of ever having an eternal family. There is no way out but up. My love of the Lord must become so consuming that it will burn the dross out of me. Then I can be the father and the high priest that I want to be. Then I am fully on the Savior’s team and can do great eternal good. But oh the deceitfulness of the temptation to desire that which we do not have!

    When I think of the priesthood order of the Church, I think particularly of the General Authorities, my Stake President, and my Bishop. I love to attend conference or any meeting where I am instructed and encouraged by those over me in authority. When any one of my file leaders speak, my soul resonates to the message, and their voice seems like the voice of my Father. Sometimes I am out of tune with them; I still get the message that they are right, but I am jarred by it. When I am most in tune, I can often anticipate what they will say and do. Needless to say, when I am in tune, sustaining them is a joy, for it is the Savior that I and they are unitedly sustaining.

    The Brethren scare me, too, as does the Savior. I feel uncomfortable around them because I know that what they say is right and I am not yet doing all I could do. When, oh when, I keep wondering, will I ever get on the ball so that my confidence will wax strong in the presence of the Lord? Even though they burn me and scare me, I am proud of the Brethren and so grateful to have them to help me find the way of the Savior. I know many of them personally and can testify that they are great and godly men.

    Sometimes I hear people criticize the Brethren. I hurt inside for the criticizer, for I know that he does not enjoy that great and uplifting gift of spiritual unity with them. The Holy Spirit has taught me to listen first to them, out of all the voices in this world, on any and every subject, at any time and place. When I talk with them, I perceive they are highly intelligent men. They have seen more of the world and know more of what is critical and urgent than any other group I have ever read or listened to. I marvel at the power and precision of the programs they bring out; the programs are not always final, but they are marvelously suited to the needs of the Church.

    I see the Correlation work of the Church as the great struggle to convert all members of the Church to become servants of Jesus Christ. Church membership makes us nominal servants; the work of the program of correlation will bring our heart, might, mind and strength under that head, culminating in the establishment of the full patriarchal order. But the patriarchal order is simply the rule of Jesus Christ through His priesthood, the kind of rule that can be established only when people are fully faithful.

    Home teaching (now Ministering) is the key to all Church work, as I see it. If it succeeds, the patriarchal order will be established; if it fails, I presume the Lord will simply wait for a new generation of children or converts who will be faithful. I have never glimpsed a greater organized power to raise souls to perfection than the Home Teaching Program (now the Ministering Program).

    The genealogy program is another facet of the patriarchal system. I understand our greatest responsibility to be to seek after our kindred dead. Living or dead, we cannot serve Christ fully without honoring all our righteous fathers and blessing our children.

     The missionary program is exciting to behold. As the great net sweeps the seas the harvest of souls almost breaks it. What a hope to know that there are kindred spirits in every nation, tongue and people! And what a joy to find them and to bring them unto Christ.

    The welfare program is sort of the “proof of the pudding.” If the other programs “take” on us, then we feel a fierce urgency to do something for the poor. And that something will be to consecrate all we have to the Lord and His work, that His children might not lack blessing. The size of our souls is measured by the size of our ability to help others spiritually and temporally. For the whole Gospel, spiritually and temporally, in time and in eternity, for the saviors and those who save, is one great welfare program.

    How does it look from the bottom? It looks great. The ship is sound and is on course. There are no better shipmates to be found anywhere. The officers know where they are going and are steering a correct course. I know that because my private receiver lets me listen in on their instructions. They are following the Master indeed.

    Are there no troubles, no breaches, no lapses, you say? Indeed, there are problems. False doctrine is taught by some of us. Some of us in authority have little love. Some of us just relax in the harness and let the leaders pull us along. But the problems are the problems of the people of the Church, not problems of the Church, or the Gospel, or the Lord.

    For this is my testimony, too: “Stick to the old ship.”

  • Training For the Ministry, c. 1975

    Written in about 1975

    The traditional training for the ministry in Catholicism, Protestantism and Judaism has been basically sophic. It has been a rational approach which emphasizes scholarship as the basic approach. Scholarship is taken as the key because it is to the basic written sources that each of these religions goes for its direction and justification.

    It is interesting to note, however, that the basic written sources of those religions are not sophic in origin but are mantic. They are the eye-witness accounts of persons who knew God as a person. The sophic or scholarly approach is the basis of those religions only because the mantic element is gone: revelation has admittedly ceased. But revelation is yet venerated in the scholarly investigation of its written remnants.

    Training for the ministry in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is basically mantic and only secondarily sophic. First and foremost the Elder must recognize and live by his own personal revelation from God. By this means he is able to identify those who are truly given presiding authority by God, to make correct interpretations of doctrine, and to order properly the affairs of the Kingdom which are placed in his charge. Only secondarily does he need and use the sophic approach, but he definitely and necessarily needs it. But his interpretations of the written records are always guided by revelation even when maximally enriched by the fruits of sophic scholarship.

    Thus the training of an LDS Elder is of necessity mostly a field training. It involves substantial schooling after the manner of other religions, but depends principally upon the ability of the Elder to discern and live by the personal revelations he receives in the daily course of working within the Church in his assigned stewardship and in his contacts with the world.

  • Becoming a Disciple

    Ensign, September 1974

    By Chauncey C. Riddle

    If we are serious about following Jesus, we must question all that we previously have been and accepted.

    The New Testament account of our Savior’s mortal ministry is a rich treasury of knowledge concerning what one must do to be saved. One insight we may gain concerns what one must do to he a disciple of the Master.

    The word disciple comes from the Latin “discipulus,” a learner. A disciple of Christ is one who is learning to be like Christ–learning to think, to feel, and to act as he does. To be a true disciple, to fulfill that learning task, is the most demanding regimen known to man. No other discipline compares with it in either requirements or rewards. It involves the total transformation of a person from the state of the natural man to that of the saint, one who loves the Lord and serves with all of his heart, might, mind, and strength.

    As part of his instruction to his disciples in judea, the Savior took pains to explain his own ministry, a ministry that was the pattern for all of them and for us. One thing that the Father required of our Savior was the suffering and sacrifice of the Atonement. Matthew records:

    “From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.” (Matt. 16:21.)

    Peter, not understanding that only in these difficult things could Jesus fulfill the will of the Father and make universal salvation possible, remonstrated:

    “Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be [done] unto thee.” (Matt. 16:22.)

    The Savior then administered a severe rebuke to Peter:

    “But he turned and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.” Matt. 16:23.)

    In calling Peter “Satan.” the Savior suggests the plight of all men. Until we savor (understand) the things of God, we are found to be behind the adversary’s programs! But when we learn the glorious truths of the gospel we can get behind Jesus Christ and his work and abandon Satan.

    Within that historical setting is one of the great revelatory insights into the ways of godliness given by the Master. Perceiving Peter’s ignorance and that of the others present, he proceeded to instruct them in the essence of discipleship:

    “Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross and follow me.

    “And now for a man to take up his cross, is to deny himself all ungodliness, and every worldly lust, and keep my commandments.

    “Break not any commandments for to save your lives; for whosoever will save his life in this world, shall lose it in the world to come.

    “And whosoever will lose his life in this world, for my sake, shall find it in the world to come.

    “Therefore, forsake the world, and save your souls….. (Matt. 16:25-29, Inspired Version.)”

    If we take up our own cross we truly become disciples. From the above we learn that discipleship begins with self-denial. Our lives are much like forested land that must be cultivated. Before the word of the Lord can bear fruit in our lives, we must first clear the ground of all that grows wild or naturally. What grows naturally in our lives are the things of the world. As any person comes to spiritual self-consciousness, he will realize that his mind, his desires, his habits, his manners, and his politics have all been shaped by the people in his physical environment. What he hitherto thought to be himself he now sees as the encrustations of the world upon his true self, the newly awakened spirit within. His true self delights in being touched by the Holy Spirit with the witness of the divinity of Jesus Christ and of the urgency of faith and repentance. He finds that to believe in Christ is one thing, but to deliver one’s soul unto Christ as a faithful, obedient servant is quite another thing. That delivery must begin by becoming as a little child.

    To be born again as a little child is to question all that we have formerly been and accepted, and to see the world with different eyes, heart, and mind. As a little child, we walk through the forest with one hand in that of the Holy Spirit and the other in that of the living prophets of God.

    Our mentors, the prophets and the Holy Spirit, literally turn the old world some of us have known topsy-turvy. In that process we are thrilled to see things freshly, as they really are.

    With their help the scriptures become pure, the word of God; the interpolations, the omissions, and interpretations of men no longer cause us to stumble. We learn the joy of seeing the complete harmony between the teachings of the ancient prophets found in canonized scriptures, the teachings of living prophets found in canonized scriptures, the sweet whisperings of the Holy Spirit. To that harmony the promises of God and the necessities of true faith come alive to us, and with hope and faith we begin to become spiritually alive.

    With the help of our new friends, the prophets and the Holy Spirit, we can see in our culture that which is truly virtuous, lovely, of good report, and praise-worthy. These things we treasure and delight in. We are also now able to see what is petty, selfish, and evil in our culture. Carefully we dissociate ourselves from those things, grateful to see plainly that those things we once enjoyed were actually part of our misery.

    Our new friends help us to review what we have learned about the ideas of men. We gladly respond when we see now that some men have taught truth, sometimes against great odds; but we now perceive the absurdity of some of the world’s most cherished theories. As we see anew, the chains of darkness and the lies of Satan become plain to us, and we slip off those chains, thrilled with the freedom and mobility we now have.

    A new perspective, that of eternity, is taught to us by our mentor friends. We now glimpse why it is that family relationships are paramount, why no other success can compensate for failure in our homes. We see why force and compulsion can never be the means of establishing a great and good society. We see that doing good for others is the important thing in life, not just seeking knowledge. We see that the point of repentance is learning to live righteously, so that we can be trusted with the powers of gods. We no longer worry about just being forgiven; we strive to overcome the world.

    Perhaps the greatest thing we learn from living prophets and from the Holy Spirit is the importance of doing the best we know at all times. They show us that what we will really be sorry for later is not having done what we plainly know we should have done.

    With thankful heart the disciple of Christ thus learns the ways and ideas of the world, to be taught anew in all things by God. But even in this his preparation is not complete: he must next cleanse himself of worldly lust. To eliminate the influence of the world is a difficult thing. But to gain mastery over his own desires is another, even more difficult task. It is like hauling off all the rocks and thoroughly tilling the soil once the forest of his mind has been cleared of false ideas.

    What are the rocks of lust in our lives? One is the desire to eat too much, to eat the wrong things, and to eat when we should not. Another is the inability to get to bed on time, to get up on time, or to be where we are supposed to be on time. Rocks of lust are the habits of being absorbed in television or reading when we should be working with our family or doing our home teaching. They are hunger for a new car when the old one would serve as well or better; the desire to have it known to everyone when we have done some good deed; the need to retaliate when someone has hurt us. They are anger, selfishness, loud laughter, and self-indulgence. They are the powers of Satan exercised on us through our own flesh. We can be rid of these things only by yielding to the enticings of the Holy Spirit.

    Then our spirit conquers our own flesh and the flesh becomes a servant instead of the master of our lives.

    Having cleared our forest of worldliness and having tilled the soil of our souls to a state of ready obedience to the Lord, we are then able to receive the word of God as the pure seed; we are ready to keep the Lord’s commandments.

    The first commandment is to love the Lord:

    “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength                                (Mark 12:30.)”

    In nothing can one show forth love for God more surely than in making and keeping the baptismal covenant. Therein we promise that we will take Jesus Christ’s name upon us (to stand as a witness of him at all times and in all places), that we will always remember him (never forgetting that we are to rely solely upon his merits), and that we will keep the commandments he has given us: “If ye love me, keep my commandments.”(John 14:15.)

    It is thus that the crowning act of repentance is to make the covenant of baptism. As Christ laid down his life for us, so we voluntarily put to death our old worldly, lustful self and bury It in the waters of baptism. As the Savior rose from the dead, so we rise up out of the water as little children of our new Father and Savior, to a beginning of eternal life. Without this death, burial, and newness, we cannot fully show that we love him.

    In baptism we gain the privilege of the gift of the Holy Ghost. Only as we live under the influence of that gift can any mortal person love the Lord with all his heart, might, mind, and strength. Only as we continue under the influence of that gift can one keep every commandment.

    Above all the other commandments we might receive as we strive to keep the first and great commandment is the second, the admonition to love one another. The world, not understanding the things of God fancies that the second commandment can be kept when one has not honored the first commandment. But those who understand remember the Savior saying:

    “A new commandment l give unto you, That ye love one another; as l have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.” (John 13:34-35.)

    To love as Christ loves is to have charity, the pure love of Christ. Pure love is a gift of the Holy Spirit reserved for those who love the Lord enough to covenant with him in baptism and wlj.i receive his spirit to be with them:

    “Jesus saith unto him, I am the way the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6.)

    The way of Christ is the way of love. It is to visit the widows and the fatherless in their afflictions; it is to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to visit those in prison, to liberate the captive. But it is to do all this in the Lord’s way, not walking in the ways of the world or following the vain imaginations of our heart as to what is good for others. Pure love is of the Father. Saith our Master:

    “I can of mine own self do nothing . . . because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.” (John 5:30.) “l am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and l in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.” (John 15:5.)

    Are we the disciples of Jesus Christ? Are we learning of his ways, of his discipline? Arc we doing as he commanded? Do we know we have to overcome the world? No man is saved in ignorance of that knowledge. To gauge our progress we might ask ourselves three questions:

    “Have I denied myself all ungodliness?”

    “Have l denied myself every worldly lust?”

    “Do I keep every commandment the Savior gives me?”

    The future of a person who can give an honest affirmative answer to each of these questions is not in doubt. The rest of us should remember that the Lord is mighty to save. Though we cannot overcome the world on our own merits, his are quite sufficient. If we are learning, then we are disciples. May we learn well and be disciples indeed.

    Then, instead of the natural forest of worldliness that smothers out all else in our lives, we shall have created a Garden of Eden. As the earth will be renewed and receive its paradisiacal glory, even so must each individual disciple renew his own personal life in the glory of our God.

    [illustrations] Discipleship begins by becoming as a little child and being born again.

    [illustration] Becoming a disciple, we perceive the absurdity of some of the world’s most cherished theories. The chains of darkness, the lies of Satan, become pain to us. We slip off those chains, thrilled with the freedom and mobility we now have.

    [photo] Becoming a disciple, we yield to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, haul away all the rocks of lust, break habits of being absorbed in television or reading when we should be working with our family or doing our home teaching.

    [photo] Becoming a disciple, we learn a new perspective of eternity, we glimpse why it is that family relationships are paramount, why no other success can compensate for failure in our homes, why force and compulsion can never establish a great society.

    Dr. Chauncey Riddle is a professor of philosophy and dean of the Graduate School at Brigham Young University. He teaches Sunday School in Orem 16th Ward, Orem Utah Sharon West Stake.

  • Graduate School Convocation Address, 1973

    20 April 1973

    Much publicity has been given recently to an alleged “glut” in graduate education. Let us examine this situation for a moment by asking and answering some important questions.

    Question: Why is graduate education valued so highly in our culture?

    Answer: In part the answer is tradition. The ideal man in western civilization has been “a gentleman and a scholar.” To be a scholar enables one to be a “knower.” Knowledge is liberating and exhilarating. Many also seek to engage in intellectual pursuits because they give a person a station in life above the menial. Many persons in our culture think that it is degrading to earn a livelihood in a way that dirties one’s hands.

    Another reason why graduate education is highly valued is that ofttimes it enables a person to achieve a technical competence that is needed by society. Engineers and scientists particularly, including both physical and social engineers and scientists, have been much sought after in recent times. Accountants and information specialists are in demand.

    In sum: Graduate education has great social and often great vocational value.

    Question: Why has there been such a marked increase in persons receiving higher degrees?

    Answer: The reason for the increase is again twofold. Because of the great cultural value placed on graduate degrees, great masses of people see them as their personal key to joining the elite of our society. Every underprivileged (that is to say non-elite) parent would like to see his children join the higher ranks, to become elite. So in this age of social egalitarianism, education has come to be seen as an inherent political “right” by which minorities and repressed persons are to be given their fair share of the civilization’s glory. It is dimly recognized that if everyone had a Ph.D. then the Ph.D. would be of no value to anyone. But since relatively few persons do, there is still great advantage in being called “Doctor” even though the value is diminishing.

    The second main reason for the increase in persons with higher degrees is money. The Federal Government, being persuaded of a national emergency, has poured billions of dollars into degree production.

    In sum: The increase in graduate degrees is due to social and political pressures.

    Question: Is there a real glut?

    Answer: There is an oversupply in some fields. Fields that are directly oriented to vocational needs of society other than teaching are faring much better.

    Question: Will the oversupply continue?

    Answer: The desire for upward social movement with its attendant political pressure will assure continuing oversupply, supposing economic stability. Private universities have cut back but state institutions continue to increase in all fields. Only the lack of funds prevents increasing oversupply.

    Question: What are the results of oversupply?

    Answer: An oversupply creates a buyers’ market, which means that quality of product becomes very important. Business and industry will tend to profit from some oversupply in that they can pick and choose more. But the oversupply is least in the areas needed by business and industry.

    Under the free market, universities would also profit from the oversupply, for it is in the fields that lead to university teaching that we have the greatest oversupply. But we do not have a free market. The system of tenure assures that year of being hired, not competence, is the criterion for continuing university employment. Able graduates in the humanities and social sciences may have to be jobless or under-hired and to be content with their increased social status.

    Question: What is the best strategy for a person to pursue in a buyers’ market?

    Answer: Be good. To be good in your field means mostly to be well-disciplined and hard-working. It is your continuing production, not your past laurels which count.

    Question: Can a “good” person really break into the tight market?

    Answer: The oversupply is strictly in “ordinary” graduates. Extraordinary people are always in demand.

    Every day I see inquiries from search committees, ads in papers, requests from friends for extraordinary people.

    Question: What are the characteristics of this extraordinary type of person?

    Answer: The answer is three-fold:

    1. It is to be good in your field, as mentioned before. Have you published? Have you done an outstanding piece of research? Do you know the frontiers of your field? Do you have a “magnificent obsession” that makes you work on even if you are not being paid for it?
    2. Are you a good person? Are you steady, resilient, resourceful? Do you have your passions and appetites in control? Is your family life happy and stable? Are you cheerful, gracious, grateful?
    3. Are you a good leader? Do you have a keen sense of right and wrong, and do you openly stand for what is right? Do you have vision, so that you are able to plan wisely and fulfill those plans? Are you able to enlist the support of others through persuasion and information? Do you help everyone on your team to achieve every satisfaction you achieve?

    For all of our social and material glory, our great need today is for intelligent, righteous leadership. How sad to see men and women poorly trained, or self-indulgers, or unable to muster backbone, or blind to possibilities, or unable to change, or unwilling to follow, or unable to share; cynics, backbiters, given to lucre, faint of heart.

    Question: Doesn’t all this begin to smack of religion?

    Answer: Indeed it does. Religion is the ordering of life. No man can every rise above the personal religion he espouses. (A person’s personal religion and his church may be two different things.) Every personal and social problem can be shown to be a problem of religion. Poverty, ignorance, war, are all functions of religion as are plenty, intelligence, and peace. The real solution to the world’s problems is in religion. If men could and would repent, that is to say, to exchange their false beliefs for true ones and their evil desires and poor habits for good desires and good habits, then we could solve every problem, including all of yours and mine.

    But how can the world repent? Most people don’t even believe that what we call repentance is possible. The only hope the world has is to see true repentance. Then they will know it is possible. This is where you come in.

    You who graduate from Brigham Young University know of the true and restored Gospel of Jesus Christ. If you live that Gospel, you will come to exemplify every good thing I have mentioned today. Brigham Young University certifies to the world today that you have basic competence in your chosen field. But it is up to you to be and to demonstrate to the world that you are also a good person and a good leader.

    The world has mistakenly thought that academic training was sufficient to provide the leadership the world needs. Operating on that principle has caused us to go round and round, from war to war, from tax to tax, from program to program with little real change in our human situation. What the world needs is not just you, but a repentant you made over in the image of our Lord and master, Jesus Christ.

    In the midst of all else that transpires today, I hope you will remember that today is the occasion set aside annually to commemorate that greatest of all events of history, the atonement of our Savior. In that sacrifice on the cross, our Master fulfilled His perfect example to us. There is nothing fine which we could ever hope to attain wherein He has not set the example of perfection in that already. We say we believe in seeking after those things that are virtuous, lovely, of good report, or praiseworthy. Of all things or persons, Jesus Christ is the most virtuous, lovely, of good report and praiseworthy. We can do no better than to become exactly as He is.

    We send you forth today as graduates, to do good among men. Our Savior sends us all forth as His children, to be the salt of the earth, to bring full and true salvation within the grasp of every nation, kindred, tongue and people. It is our hope that you go forth to serve, not to be served; to love purely, to sacrifice, to establish Zion. May you be giants of strength among fearful companions. May you be islands of righteousness in a sea of instability. May you desire and lay hold of every good thing. May we all honor our Master as He has honored us. This is my hope and prayer for you and for all of us.

  • Learning to Think, 1972

    May 1972 Commencement Remarks

    As many of you have come to the climax of your formal education, it is appropriate to ask what you have learned. Likely you have learned in two areas, acting and thinking. Training is the educational approach which has taught you how to act: how to write a history, how to run a titration, how to conduct a survey, how to analyze a business, how to produce a play. Hopefully each of you is well-trained in the business of your specialty, and that this training will be the basis of a solid contribution which you will now make to society. Knowing the people and the programs under which you have been trained, I have confidence in the future of your contribution.

    But I am more concerned with your thinking than with your acting. Learning to act skillfully in the work of the world is crucial, but it is in thinking well that the real power of man lies. Training is basically the process of stimulating imitation. You have served with and under masters who have led you to emulate themselves and thus to be successful producers. But learning to think is never a matter of imitating. Thinking is a process of challenge, it is the unique assertion of individuality wherein you establish your identity as a person. You cannot really be trained to think, but you can be challenged to think. If you can think, you can better meet any challenge, you thrive on difference, you delight in problems. For if you can think, you can rise to meet the exigencies of new occasions, you can bring unity out of difference, you turn problems into progress.

    Do not confuse thinking and the challenge to think with iconoclasm, for the latter is an oft seen counterfeit of the former. Every person comes to the university with a worldview, a set of values, a heart full of desires, all more or less naïvely held. The iconoclast is the person who cleverly invades that naïvety, demolishes the appertaining mindset of the naïve and substitutes his own prejudices and opinions in place of that which he destroys. Iconoclasm thus does not teach a person to think; it merely trains him to parrot the responses of the current academic vogues.

    The challenge to think, by contrast, is administered effectively only be persons who think. A person who thinks may well have a worldview, values and desires, but each is subject to constant scrutiny and to possible change. He who truly thinks values the freedom and power that thinking brings, knowing that it is his personal access to individuality and increased ability. Treasuring that individuality and power for himself he cannot righteously deny that freedom to another. Thus he will not indulge in iconoclasm, no matter how superior to those of his contemporaries he perceives his ideas to be.

    How then does one person challenge another to think? It is done by throwing a person back into his own naïve mind and asking him to justify what he thinks and says. In other words, it is to challenge the person to substitute his own personal deliberate basis for accepting what he believes in place of the happenstances of upbringing and formal training which have produced his naïve initial approach. Whether a person changes anything he believes, values or desires in this process of thinking is incidental. The change is that what he thinks are now his thoughts, a reflection of his personality, and the emergence of a true individual. He who thinks is no longer the creature of his social environment. In one sense he has now become a threat and a challenge to it, for he is no longer subject to it, and now has the power to change it. Any indication of such independence or move to change makes the non-thinkers, especially the iconoclasts, most uncomfortable. I suppose that discomfort is the source of the fear that drives some men to try to dominate others, classic examples of which we see in the auto da fe

    of the inquisition, the witchcraft trials of Salem, the liquidation and incarceration of political opposition in communist nations, which are in turn but repetitions of the answers of fear administered to Socrates, to John the Baptist, to Jesus the Messiah, and to Joseph the Prophet.

    Let us use an example to show the contrast between the approach to a problem as exhibited by a fearful non-thinker on the one hand and a genuine thinker on the other. I deliberately choose an example which is current.

    It is popular among the iconoclasts of our day to speak sneeringly of the “Protestant work ethic.” For their purposes this is a happy collocation of concepts already on the run, and derogating them in unison makes “rhetorical hay” most efficiently.

    Protestantism is on the run. A hundred years of iconoclastic attack on the Bible has so withered its foundations that to be a believer is virtually synonymous with being non-rational or non-educated. The original protest has sunk from the noble purpose of affirming God’s revealed word to the support of communist aggression in Indo-China. So it is easy and profitable to kick Protestantism.

    “Work” as a concept and an action is similarly on the run. In a day when labor-saving devices are seen by many as the real fruit of scientific endeavor, it is seemingly a mark of progress and intelligence to work as little as possible. Labor unions, whose stock in trade might reasonably seem to be work, are saying, “Workers of the world unite and we will see that you do as little work as possible.” When welfare is perceived as a right, when the criminal is favored over his victim, when men would far prefer to fight than work, it becomes a delightful populist technique to kick work.

    The term “ethic” is another rhetorical pushover. In a day that defies restraints both legal and moral, the connotations of the word “ethic” seem like relics of the dark ages. As permissiveness abounds, so do restraints, rules, regulations, and laws, of any sort, become horrendous. The good life is seen to be as one floating in the sea of impulse, washed by the waves of desire, mindless in a wallow of gratification. “Ethic”?: a thing of derision.

    But we as Latter-day Saints should know better. We should know that for all of its problems, Protestantism has been beneficial to mankind, nurturing in a sustained way both political freedom and scientific thought as no other culture has ever done. And it laid the foundations necessary for the Restoration of the Gospel of Jesus Christ in these latter days. Work we know to be the basis of all good things, both in time and in eternity, a commandment of God to men, and a sanctifying activity to all who know when, where and how to apply their strength. We know that ethics is what makes man more than beast, and that as the world sinks in our day into the miasma of sub-bestial permissive irregularity, we know that it is only by wholehearted adoption of the true ethic, the Gospel of Jesus Christ, that there will be anything saved or worth saving when the cataclysm of the Second Coming comes. Hopefully we as Latter-day Saints and as educated people will not mindlessly sneer against the “Protestant work ethic” with the iconoclasts.

    Perhaps we do perceive, however, that the Protestant work ethic has some defects. What will the thinker then do? Rather than sneer and destroy, he will go to his own mind and will attempt to conceive a cure for the ills of mankind. Relentlessly he will ask himself why? wherefore? Does it work for me? Will it work for others? Out of the best thinking he can muster will come a hypothesis, an idea he is willing to sacrifice to experiment upon, something worth testing. If his test proves affirmative, he will bear witness of his hypothesis and the experiment he has performed, but without any attempt to coerce any hearer. He will patiently hear others who have sacrificed to perform their own experiments, hoping that perhaps someone has come closer to the answers than he. But above all he will respect the sanctity of the individuality of his fellow human beings. Being true to thinking, he will never try to damn the progress of humanity by attempting to prevent or to inhibit their thinking. And in so acting he will serve his God, the greatest good which he knows.

    It is my hope that each of us will think, and think, and think until we become thinkers. Then our education will not have been merely training. Then our lives will not be lived simply as animals. Then we will not mindlessly parrot the cliches of our times. Then we can truly serve our God.

  • Mormonism and the Nature of Man

    CHAUNCEY C. RIDDLE is Dean of the Graduate School at Brigham Young University, where he has been a faculty member since 1952.

    He has earned the reputation of master teacher during his distinguished educational career. He earned the B.S. degree in mathematics and physics at BYU, and then at­tained the M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in philos­ophy at Columbia University in the City of New York.

    He has been an active member of the Church and at present is a high councilor in the Sharon Stake.

    His wife is the former Bertha Janis All­red. and they are the parents of twelve chil­dren, ten of whom are living.

    MORMONISM AND THE NATURE OF MAN

    Chauncey C. Riddle

    Quoted from the book – To the Glory of God – Mormon Essays on Great Issues

    The purpose of this paper is to delineate some of the factors pertinent to a monistic (literally “one thing”) con­ception of man as contrasted with a dualistic conception. In the monistic thinking presently in vogue, man is seen as a material being wholly governed by the laws of the universe as discovered and formulated by science. Some persons grant that man has a spirit, but in their accounts of and treatment of man, the spiritual aspect is nonfunctional; such persons may appear to be dualists but are here classed as functional monists. The dualistic concept entertained in this paper posits mortal man as a spirit, which is the real person, and a body, which is the tabernacle of the spirit person. Though both the spirit and the body are of a material nature, dualism ob­tains because each represents a different order of matter this difference is manifest in that the set of laws and influences governing the spirit aspect of man is different from that which governs the fleshly body. Basic to this whole dis­cussion, of course, is the assumption that law and order gov­ern all things in the universe, that all events are caused, and that there is a regularity or uniformity in the universe.

    The thesis of this paper is that the key concepts of the gospel of Jesus Christ have consistency and significance only when one conceives of mortal man as a dualistic being, these values being lost if a monistic conception is adopted. The key concepts here discussed are the fall of Adam, free agency, spirituality, sin, the atonement of Jesus Christ, salvation, and righteousness.

    The Fall

    Before the fall, Adam and Eve were In a monistic state, we may presume, because they were subject to only one set of laws and influences, those of God. Their whole being was of a spiritual order, with spirit matter being the life-substance of their bodies. In this condition the range of their freedom was limited; they simply responded positively to the commands of the Father.

    The influence of Satan in tempting Eve and Adam in the garden brought a new and opposing set of forces and laws to bear. The Father granted Adam and Eve freedom in the garden in that he allowed the influence of Satan to work upon them. He allowed them to choose between His in­fluence and that of Satan. Eve, having been deceived by Satan, and Adam, choosing to follow her into mortality, the anticipated death came upon our first parents. In this process their bodies were rendered spiritually dead; spirit was re­placed by blood in their veins and their spiritual bodies lost the ability to perceive things in a spiritual order.

    Fallen Adam was a paradigm of dualism in that his body was fully of the order of what we call physical matter, sub­ject to the laws and forces of a fallen realm, while his spirit, though within the physical body, was yet subject to the laws and forces of the spiritual order of the universe. The true person, the spirit, was now set in opposition to the physical body, since each was subject to a different set of laws and forces. The Fall was thus a sundering of man, resulting in a duality. This duality is the basis of both conflict and progress in the individual person.

    What would the Fall mean if man were construed monistically? Under monism, death could only be physical; if literal, the death of the body. But since physical death is explicitly not part of the Fall, a monist must reject a literal interpretation. When the spiritual death of the Fall is con­strued non-literally, it is usually seen either as a change of place. the process of being cast out of the presence of God, or as a change of the nature of man. Change of place (re­moval from the Garden of Eden) did occur, but this change does not exhaust the scriptural teaching concerning the Fall. If man’s monistic nature were considered to change in the Fall, that change could only be accounted for by external forces. Under a monistic system, there is only one set of laws and forces. It follows that there could be no meaningful choice, and thus Adam could not be held responsible for his fall. If Adam is not responsible for his fall, he is likewise not responsible in any way to the opportunity of redemption. This, of course, renders the gospel meaningless.

    Free Agency

    Freedom is the opportunity to choose; agency is power. Man’s free agency is then the freedom to choose and the power to attain what is chosen. Whereas God is completely free, man is but infinitesimally free; but man is free enough to respond to the influence of God, by means of which influence to become like God, or to respond to Satan and by means of that contrary influence to become like Satan.

    The free agency of man, then, is limited, specific. It is a freedom given of God to the spirit in man to become free of the dominating influence of one’s own physical body. It is the freedom and power to respond to the commandments of God through the Holy Spirit, thus bringing the flesh into subjection by overcoming the power and influence of Satan, which operates through the flesh. As father Lehi put it, the agency of man is to be “free according to the flesh.” When that freedom is full and final, the body of man functions only under the powers, forces, and influences of the spiritual order of existence. This is to say that Satan never again has power over that being. He is free forever.

    If man is construed monistically, freedom from the flesh makes no sense, for this man is only flesh. On the mo­nistic view if man feels free, it is either a psychological illu­sion or simply a physical freedom of a physical body to act without external restraint. Under monism, self-discipline is meaningless, for all discipline is a thing that must be superimposed upon a person by outside force. Monistic free­dom is the absence of that dualistic freedom, discipline of the body by the spirit, which the gospel affords.

    Spirituality

    In the gospel, spirituality is the condition of the spirit of a person being responsive to the commandments and influences of God, specifically the influence of the Holy Spirit. Spirituality is manifest in the control wherein the walking, talking, eating, drinking, working, etc., of a person are models of fulfilling the words of words of the prophets of God to the degree to which the person is spiritual. The more spiritual a person is, the more complete and absolute will be the discipline of the spirit over the body.

    It should not be supposed that spirituality enjoins what is often called “asceticism.” While self-denial is a frequent choice of a spiritual person, pleasure of itself is not consid­ered an evil. But pleasure is not sought for its own sake. A spiritual person seeks first the kingdom of God and then to establish in the earth the righteousness of God. In the of duty of serving God and blessing his fellowmen, the spiritual person­ will strive for health, cleanliness, comeliness, strength, and skill. But these arc sought as means, not as ends. They are means by which to glorify God and to build his kingdom, and are an integral part of the control of the appetites and proclivities of the physical tabernacle of the spirit. Further­more, this control, when sought for the glory of God, re­dounds to the blessing of the person spiritually and tempo­rally. One of the blessings will be pleasure that is pure, un­mixed with lust, because it is allowed rather than directly sought. Pleasure that is spiritually pure does not turn to pain, regret, and remorse of conscience as do pleasures sought to gratify the appetites of the flesh.

    Especially noteworthy is that the more splritual a person becomes the less he will depend upon physical evidence (through the flesh) as to what he believes. This does not mean he ignores physical evidence; he accepts the responsi­bility of accounting for it, but he believes and interprets all things as he is instructed by the Holy Spirit. He will not judge on the basis of appearance.

    Under a monistic system, spirituality must be classed with insanity. Since the bodies of men are demonstrably very similar, any person who does not respond “normally” to physical stimulus must be tagged as “abnormal”-insane. The more spiritual one is, the more suspect he would become to persons espousing the monistic view. Persons with great self-control cause those without it to wonder and to feel uncomfortable. To sin a little, to laugh at the possibility of perfection, to justify pleasure sought for its own sake are normal to the monist. Youth, strength, and worldly learning are honored above all else in monistic thinking because they represent the fullest accommodation and power in the realm of the physical, the realm of the flesh.

    The monist also takes a curious stance of omniscience. He will not pretend in theory to know all things, but will assert that he does know all the factors pertinent to a given social problem and can therefore prescribe its solution. Thus he reserves to himself a practicing omniscience. Having de­nied the existence and influence of God, as a naturalist, he finds it necessary to pronounce himself at least a demi-god in order to justify rationally his practical decisions; or his intellectual systems and heroes become his demi-god. Judging by appearance and arrogating to himself sufficiency, the mo­nist has left a trail of blood, slavery, and failure, confronted only occasionally by a John the Baptist or a Socrates who points out that he does not really know what he is doing. But the monist has ways of dealing with John and with Socrates.

    To a monist, spiritual people are indistinguishable from spiritualists-those possessed of evil spirits; both are classed as insane because they do not act “normally.” History shows that what is “normal” changes from age to age. There are vogues as to what is socially acceptable, fostering first one species and degree of carnality, then another. But the gospel is the same in every age: dominion of spirit over body through the gifts of God through Jesus Christ.

    Sin

    Sin in the gospel is breaking a commandment of God; it is acting to yield to the influence of the world upon the flesh rather than responding to the influence of God upon the spirit. Faith is willing obedience to God’s. Holy Spirit, and whatsoever is not of faith is sin. Sin is the triumph of the flesh over the spirit, and is therefore the triumph of Satan over the person.

    In a monistic system there is no meaningful concept of sin. People are said to act strictly according to their heredity and environment, and are not to be blamed for any act. Since they are not free. To change people’s actions means simply to change the influences that touch them. Monists say that it is institutions of society that control men s actions. This is why control of educational programs and information media are crucial to the monist-though he never can quite account for how the governor of the system can himself escape what he is trying to cure in those whom he “benevo­lently” controls. The monist does not fathom the concept of repentance, because it, too, has no gospel meaning in this thought. He will look upon sex sin as “normal” and excuse my offender as if it were a light thing. Should he be a church worker, he may see social control (socialism) as the ultimate panacea, and think that in promoting social control he is doing God a favor.

    The Atonement

    The atonement of Jesus Christ is the central and crown­ing concept of the gospel. In living a perfect life as a dual being, Christ overcame the power of Satan. His life was the great triumph of spirit over flesh, the example and pat­tern for all mankind. In his death, the Savior climaxed that triumph by seizing from Satan the keys of death. Through his suffering in taking the bitter cup, the Savior satisfied the demands of justice, making possible for all men an eternity free from the consequences of sin. Through his sacrifice of his life, the Savior made it possible for all men to be raised again in the resurrection with a spiritual physical body, thereafter to serve God through the spirit in eternity. As in Adam man became dual and fallen, even so in Christ men may be made spiritual and whole again, redeemed to the spiritual order of existence of their own choice.

    In a monistic system, the atonement of Christ can only by the suffering and death of just another person, having efficacy for us only as it might affect us in a physical way. A monist would see the atonement at best as a symbol, as a noteworthy deed, as an ultimate protest. But he will see no connection between the shedding of the Savior’s blood and the forgiveness of our sins, since the physical world affords no such causal connections; in fact, he is likely to be ap­palled by this idea and see it as a barbaric superstition. Thus it is possible that one who in the relative innocence of youth was cleansed and forgiven through the blood of Christ might later in his state of monistic “erudition’ shed the blood of Christ afresh and put him to an open shame, not being able then to see any point in the atonement.

    Salvation

    Salvation in the gospel is to come to be beyond the power of one’s enemies. It is a thing of degree, progress­ing step by step as the spirit of a person triumphs over his own flesh through faith in Jesus Christ. Considered in the aspect of being able to stop sinning, salvation is self­-denial of the lusts of the flesh, and the ultimate demonstra­tion of it is in voluntarily giving up the life of the body. Only in our death is salvation fully manifest and only in willingness to die is it fully attainable. To be free of the control of the flesh, through faith in Christ and through death, is to be forever free from Satan. If through the Savior we also gain a remission of the sins we have committed, we can then go on to inherit all that Christ has.

    But salvation for the monist is quite opposite. It is ease, opulence, pleasure, comfort, and security for the flesh. The greatest of all evils for the monist is pain, though pain is challenged for that position by death. The body is the object of concern, the thing to pamper and perpetuate. Sacrifice of things material is a great misfortune. Indeed, the monist often conceives it the moral obligation of the man who has physical salvation to furnish it to others who do not; thus the monist tends to choose coercive redistributive legislation over freedom of choice and conscience. He does not even comprehend the voluntary charity of a free agent, since he cannot comprehend either charity or agency in the gospel sense.

    Righteousness

    In the gospel, righteousness is the way a man acts toward his neighbor when he has overcome the flesh through Christ. It is the power and authority of a saved being to bless others in leading them to Christ. A righteous man is concerned about both the physical and the spiritual needs of his fellowmen, but has no illusion that the physical needs are greater. He has kept the great law and loves the Savior with all his heart, might, mind, and strength. And because he has kept the commandments of Christ, he is able then to love his fellowmen with the same pure love that he receives from the Savior. His goal is to make a heaven on earth where all who want to be saved can be saved, where Christ and his pure love reign supreme, where spirit has triumphed over the flesh. This involves concern for the temporal, for the material circumstances of Oleo, as well as the spiritual. But the spiritual aspect of things is always seen as the key to progress in the material realm.

    For the monist, righteousness has little meaning because sin has little meaning. To the monist, righteousness could be but conformity to human norms. The problem which the monist ever pursues is how to make a society of pleasure­ seeking people productive enough to give each person all the fleshly freedom and pleasure he wants. Since that goal has never been attained (and obviously, to a dualist, cannot be attained) the substitute is slavery. With slavery, at least some can enjoy fleshly freedom and pleasure even if others have to suffer. The the long series of social arrangements to per­petuate control of one person by another; clergy over lay, nobles over commoners, powerful over weak, educated over uneducated, majority over minority, voters over taxpayers, caste systems, party members over non-party members, etc. –all are bolstered by religious or moralizing theories, and all anti-Christ. Now the real question of the whole matter is simply this: Is the universe monistic or dualistic? If the universe is mo­nistic, then all the attendant ideas so abhorrent to the dualist are true, and the dualist is indeed insane. But if the universe is dualistic, if there is a real Savior Jesus Christ in opposition to and opposed by a real Satan, then man is a dual being, spirit opposed to flesh, and the monist is indeed in sin.

    The answer would seem to lie within the individual. Does he acknowledge the voice of conscience which warns him not to yield to the lusts of the flesh? Has he sought for the influence of God through humble prayer? Has he ex­perimented with the word of God to see if the promises are fulfilled? The testimony of the prophets is plain. They teach us of God. They teach us of dualism. They teach us to ex­periment honestly with our own conscience, to observe the fruits of doing the best which we know. It would seem that only the honest in heart can acknowledge the things of God, and that only those who hunger and thirst after righteousness can fully find the means by which to come unto God.

    The whole purpose of life is to bring under subjection the animal passions, proclivities, and tendencies, that we might rea1ize the companionship always of God’s Holy Spirit.

    -David O. McKay

  • Charge to Graduates, 1971

    28 May 1971

    There are more free people in the world today than ever before. There are also more slaves. Technology has given us historically unprecedented power. We as a race do not know how to use that power responsibly. Pollution threatens to engulf us. Yet never before have we been so little at the mercy of our natural environment. The world seems awfully full of people, especially in some places. But human happiness is bound up in being with and serving people. More people of more nations are educated than ever before. Yet magic, witchcraft, sorcery, priestcraft and astrology are exploding in popularity. We as a world are as materialistic as any previous age. But many grasp for something better.

    It this a bad world? I say no. Is this a good world? I say no. For the world simply is. Whether the world is good or bad is not what matters. What does count is what you and I do about it. We can contribute to its woes or heal its wounds, or both. I believe that you and I think of the world as good or bad depending upon how we act. If we delight to assuage the suffering of others, life will be good. If we are conscious only of our own suffering, we will call it evil.

    Our challenge and opportunity then is to enter into the processes of this world with zest, influencing it for good as much as we can.

    But how shall we know to do good? It is obvious that many persons of sincere intent energetically strive to do good but succeed in making the world demonstrably worse. Can you and I do better?

    Fortunately for us, the way to do good is simple, and it lies in a straight path before us. It is to serve the Lord Jesus Christ with all our heart, might, mind, and strength. But how do we do that? Again, the answer is simple: Follow the Brethren. Our greatest blessing is to have a God who lives and who hears and answers us. Our next greatest blessing is the priesthood authority on this earth which guides us to our God.

    I submit to you my witness that the way to do good in this world is to follow the Brethren in every way. I believe that we should hang on every word they say, making their words our thoughts. What they are concerned about, we can be concerned about. What they like, we can like. We can dress and groom ourselves to be like them. We can serve as they serve, obey as they obey. This is not slavish imitation: it is rather the delighted response of an intelligent child who is grateful to have noble fathers. I know of no better way for us who have the covenants to come unto the Savior.

    Our academic training has given all of us great power in this world. I pray that each of us will see this world as a great opportunity to do good, and that our good will not be self-righteousness, but rather the humble obedience of the servants of Christ. Then our academic training will not have been in vain.

  • A Matter of Life and Death

    JAMES E. TALMAGE LECTURE SERIES

    1970-1971

    by Chauncey C. Riddle

    You have all heard the saying, “Fools rush in. . .” We have selected topics tonight that are interesting but usually discussions of these topics are quite charged with emotion. My hope is that we can discuss these rather dispassionately, looking at them coolly in the light of certain things that we know to be true.

    I propose that we would examine these issues in the light of an LDS frame of reference. I warn you in advance this is my conception of an LDS frame. We have no established creed and therefore each individual must try to find that true frame for himself. l think that one of the glories of the gospel is that no one is required to believe a certain way.

    Because of that, of course, we can all grow and perfect our understanding as we have experiences and opportunities to have spiritual insight.

    The beginning point of our discussion is on a point fundamental to all. We begin with the point that there are absolute moral laws in the universe. I take it that this is a proposition that is even prior to the existence of God. The fact that there is a right and a wrong to every question is fundamental to our existence. My understanding is that God is God because he recognizes, obeys, and sustains those absolute moral laws of the universe. Should he cease to act on and sustain those laws, he himself would cease to be God. His station is contingent upon His recognition of this. Therefore, it is important for us to recognize the importance of these laws in our lives.

    The work of God, who is an exalted man, is to help us to become exalted. As his children, his only purpose is to bless us. This means that God’s work in everything he does–every word, every act–is intended to benefit His children. We speak of curses, of judgments, of the wrath of God, and so forth. My comprehension of these things, however, is that these are not simply vindictive reactions; that they are all intended for the betterment, for the blessing, and for the eventual happiness of the persons to whom they are given. As we see the scriptures in that light, they take on quite a different meaning. The work of God is to bless each of His children as much as each can stand. l take it that in the eternities every person will be as happy as he can possibly be. For some it is not possible to be very happy, but nevertheless they will be as happy as they can be.

    One of the great deliverances of the omniscience and omnipotence of God is the assurance that every person will be as happy as he can be. God’s power is sufficient to that end and thus He can guarantee it. Each of us is an individual personality which was not created by God. God, howùever, took us in to his association and seeks to bless us that we might have the opportunity to become like Him. He has clothed us first in a spirit body like His and now in a physical tabernacle made in His image. The question is, will we come to act after His pattern, to be in His image mentally and morally? If we can do this, he holds out the opportunity of inheriting, of being blessed to receive ALL that He has.

    God, however, cannot bless His children indiscriminately. He can bless them only according to their own righteousness. He is bound by the moral absolute laws of the universe. As we struggle with and overcome temptations that face us, the more we can live by those laws, and the more He can bless us. So His program is one of teaching us, opening the way to righteousness, that we might be able to live by that standard.

    Righteousness, in my definition, is doing good for one’s fellow beings. This is what makes it absolute. Each individual has a certain nature. Each has a certain potential quotient of happiness. It is our work as righteous beings to contribute to the happiness of other beings. If we help every other person we contact to be as happy as they can be, then we are participating in the work of God, which is the work of righteousness. Righteousness, of course, cannot exist except as the act of a free agent. Though I might do something that might help someone be happy–if I don’t do it freely it is not a righteous act on my part, even though it might be done for his good. Free agency, then, becomes a matter of concern to us.

    A free agent is first of all an intelligent being. Secondly- he is a being who has knowledge of the important alternatives. That is to say, he must know both good as well as evil. A person might be said to be somewhat free (that is to say, he could make choices) if he knew several varieties of evil. But the real freedom of choice is the freedom to know the good; to know what is righteous to do in a particular case.

    Man of himself cannot know righteousness. A man can know what he feels is for his own good, but he cannot know what is good for another or for himself. We are simply not that intelligent or perceptive, and therefore we must rely upon God to know what is right. That is why the scriptures say that the Savior is the fountain of ALL righteousness. No person can act righteously apart from Him and from His power. So to become free, a man must come unto Christ.

    The third characteristic of the free agent is the power to carry out his own choice. We know good from evil or right from wrong. We need then the power to act according to choice. Again, this is the gift of God. In God we live and move and have our being. Were it not for His sustaining &power, we could not draw a single breath. The most evil man on the earth perpetrates his evil because of the gift of Cod who has given him his life, his power, his intelligence, his opportunity to act. All men, then, at one stage or another of their probation, are made partially free agents by God. They are given the opportunity to choose, the opportunity to carry out these choices to a sufficient extent that they can establish to themselves, to God, and to everyone else, just how righteous they are. God, then, gives man a limited free agency. No mortal on the earth has all of it, because each of us have a limited knowledge and a limited power.

    We are given the parable of the talents that we might understand that if we do well with this little bit of agency that we have, we shall be given more. As we use that more to the same degree of righteousness, the time will come when we need not be limited in every way as to knowledge or as to power. This state we call exaltation, or the attainment of the office of Godhood.

    We have, then, these two alternatives which face us in our lives. We may act selfishly, which is to choose our own good, or we may act unselfishly, which is to act righteously, to choose the good of others. Basically, this is the dilemma of each choice we face. Do we seek to save our own lives, to promote our own good? Or do we seek to promote the work of others? The work of Godliness is to promote the good of others. But each of us, being individuals and having agency, some people wish simply to promote their own good. This is the reason for the evil in this world, God allows it, but men choose it and carry it out. Therefore, both men and Cod are responsible.

    God has done something about His part. In fact, the Savior has taken upon Himself the sins of the whole world, of every living creature. He did this because He has allowed those sins. He gave men the agency to commit sin, therefore He personally suffers for them. But He does this because He wants to achieve two things: First, He absolves Himself of responsibility for them. Second, He makes possible the forgiveness of sins for those who turn away from selfishness and learn to be righteous beings. Those who will not turn away then have the opportunity to suffer for their own sins, to make their own recompense.

    The basic choice of men is between selfishness and unselfishness. Another way to put it is that our choice is between yielding to the lust of the flesh and yielding to the enticings of the Holy Spirit. It turns out that our problem in this world, having passed our first estate, is to come down here to see if we can cope with the physical body. If we can subdue it, learn to master it and control it, then we need not be limited–that is to say, damned. We can receive an inheritance of all things. But if it turns out that upon achieving this opportunity of a body of flesh and bone like God, that it overwhelms us and Satan continues to the end of our probation to have power over us through our flesh, then we must be limited. We will all be privileged to have a body continue with us into eternity, but the body will have power only to that degree that we learn to be righteous in our probation. We are constantly faced then with this challenge. Do we do what we do because our bodies desire it, or do we do what we do because our spirit desires to do the will of God, to do what is righteous, to bless our fellow man?

    All of this raises the question of the position of pleasure in the framework of the gospel. I understand that righteous men do not seek pleasure for its own sake. They seek to do the Lord’s will. In doing the Lord’s will, they may be called upon to undergo considerable sacrifice, pain, anguish, difficulty. But it turns out that those who seek to do the Lord’s will in blessing others also, in line of their duty in serving God, encounter pleasure. That pleasure they thus encounter is not evil. In fact, they are entitled to enjoy it and usually their enjoyment is heightened. They enjoy pleasure more because of the fact that they are not seeking it for its own sake. They seek righteousness and it is strictly a byproduct. You will find that spiritual people take great delight in certain pleasures. They are very much impressed by the beauties of nature, for instance. They take pleasure in good music, often in good food, especially in good company. These pleasures are good, and servants of the Lord certainly enjoy them, but they do not seek them for their own sake. That is the key.

    We might next ask, what is the place of sex? My understanding of sex is that it is a holy, divine institution. It is an act ordained and commanded of God. He tells us that a man should leave his father and mother and cleave unto his wife and they twain shall be one flesh. I understand God’s prime purpose in allowing this opportunity is to give man an opportunity to participate with Him in the life-forming process. The work and glory of God is to beget children and to bless them. If a man would become like God, then the work and glory of that man will be to beget children and to bless them as God does. He will bless them with knowledge of the opportunities of righteousness, so that they too may obtain the inheritance available to all of us as heirs of Jesus Christ. Sex is a most beautiful, a most sacred, a most wonderful opportunity, a very precious aspect of love. But that love must not be what the world calls love; it must be the pure love of Christ. The pure love of Christ is different from worldly love because it is not self-seeking in any way. It is unmixed with selfishness and therefore it is pure. The word chastity itself means purity. It comes from the Latin word for “pure.”

    A person who is pure, then, and who remains chaste even in marriage is one who does not seek simply pleasure but seeks to do the works of righteousness under the direction of God. There is only one marriage which is recognized by, in the full sense, and ordained of God. This is a marriage between two people who have come unto Christ and have taken upon themselves His name. They have entered upon the straight and narrow way of righteousness that leads to exaltation. They have been forgiven of their sins. They have covenanted to receive the powers of the priesthood and in their marriage they are consecrated in a very special way to do the work of God in begetting children. If their love of the Lord is sufficiently great, their sex life will be for the purpose of begetting children to the glory of Cod. This is not to say that they will not enjoy it. They can and they will. Their joy in righteousness will be much greater than anything that can be had outside the bonds that God has ordained.

    If we see the essence of sex as a life-forming process, then we see how important it is to unite only a righteous person and with the righteous person that God has appointed. This is a stewardship. We do not own our own bodies and therefore we do not have a right to give our bodies to anyone. Only God, who owns our bodies, has that right. It is His stewardship to give us in marriage. We have the quaint custom in the world of the father giving the bride away, That is simply a dim recollection of the day when men knew of the glory of God and recognized that only God gives the bride away. As God does this, He gives a man and a woman to each other who are fit parents, and they are fit because they are covenant servants of Christ. To engage in sexual intercourse in any other circumstance is a defeat of the whole purpose and plan of God because children would then be born to parents who are not worthy to be parents in the full sense, and who will not bring up their children in the nurture of God. Therefore, the plan is frustrated. Our Father knew that many children would be born without a knowledge of the gospel with terrible handicaps go far as righteousness is concerned. Therefore, He organized not only families, but a Church that there might be foster fathers and mothers to teach the Gospel to everyone. Our Father also organized a spirit world so that if someone should have to go through this whole life without hearing the gospel, they would still have the chance to hear it and have the chance to be righteous. But the ideal, nevertheless, is that men should be born into homes of covenant servants of God, to be blessed as the children of God should be.

    Unchastity, then, is a double evil because it seeks pleasure for pleasure’s sake first, and is secondly a life-forming act outside of one’s stewardship. It is a rejection of God’s order. It is on a par with the sin of priestcraft.

    We might note a parallel between the righteous action of a true servant of God contrasted with priestcraft. On one hand the ideal is to be chaste and pure and to be a true representative of God, a true servant of the Lord holding the priesthood. One step removed from this is unchastity or indulging in sexual intercourse outside the bounds the Lord has prescribed. The priesthood correlation of this is being a law unto oneself. Those who have the true priesthood are not laws unto themselves. They function in the order of the priesthood within the kingdom of God. They find their place and serve well in their place. But when people reject the priesthood, they become a law unto themselves. An evil that is worse than unchastity is prostitution, which is unchastity for the sake of gain. Worse than being a law unto oneself is to pretend to be God to someone else for gain. This is priestcraft.

    It is interesting to me how parallel these two sins are in the world. Unchastity and being a law unto oneself go together. Prostitution and priest craft and the problems we are talking about tonight are marvelously promoted by priestcraft in this world.

    I take it then that life-forming under the priesthood of God is the most important activity of adults in this world, which, of course, can only be done correctly by covenant servants of the Lord. This work has two phases. First, temporal or physical aspect which is blessed and made holy by chastity and an eternal or spiritual aspect which is blessed and made possible through priesthood. Life-forming, then, is ultimately God’s power and doing. Without Him we could not do this. But we may participate with Him. I think the closest any being on this earth ever comes to a celestial state of existence is where there is a priesthood home of faith, where children are wanted and are loved.

    The prophets have given us plain and simple counsel on this. They have instructed us that those who love the Lord will not artificially prevent life formation. To put it bluntly, they will not artificially control the size of their families. There is a natural way to do that. If people for some righteous legitimate reason need not to have children at a given time, the simple way to do it is to abstain. But those who live for pleasure find abstinence an unduly great burden. They do various things that break the commandments of God. It is popular in the world we live in both to prevent and to extinguish life in behest of pleasure. These are acts of selfishness, or in other words, sin. They are indications of subjection to Satan. They are thwarting the work of God and worst of all, the usurping of the prerogatives of God.

    Abortion is the deliberate taking of life after participating in giving it. If we wish to associate with the Gods in the giving of life, then we must remember that we have not been given the authority to take it. We don’t have the power to give it solely of ourselves and we should not usurp the power to take it. The taking of life is God’s prerogative except under very special conditions which He has laid down, Abortion then is one form of the shedding of blood, or to put it bluntly, it is a form of murder. Those who indulge in it for whatever purpose, except where there might be a case where this art is commanded by God, are guilty of sin.

    My question to you is this: Can a society which countenances and justifies such action long endure? You can look at nations which have practiced this for a long, long time. Some seem to prosper, but I think there is one group that can never prosper in sin. These are the house of Israel, the servants of the Lord, Wicked people may sometimes inhabit promised lands, but covenant people cannot when they are wicked.

    I believe that if you and l and the membership of this Church were ever to descend into this pit and begin practicing abortion that God would destroy us. It is one thing for people who know not God to do these things. It is quite another thing for people who know God to do it. One point of the gospel is no one need be subjected to Satan. No one need live for pleasure. There are things so much greater than the physical pleasures of this life which come through the gospel. To live a real human life is to partake of the fullness of the ordinances of the gospel and the joy which only God can give and only God does give to the righteous. To prefer immediate physical pleasure to that I take to be a form of insanity.

    Let us turn for a moment to a discussion of capital punishment. In the scriptures we find some rather instructive statements about the nature of capital punishment, beginning in Genesis, Chapter 9. I am reading from the inspired version. You may not find some of these things in the King James’ version:

    Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons’ wives with him. And every beast, every creeping thing, every fowl upon the earth after their kinds went forth out of the ark. And Noah built him an altar unto the Lord and took of every clean beast and every clean fowl and offered burnt offerings upon the altar and gave thanks unto the Lord and rejoiced in his heart.

    Noah did this, of course, because he was commanded. That was his reason for taking the blood of these animals,

    And the Lord blessed Noah and Noah smelled a sweet savor and he said in his heart, l will call upon the name of the Lord that he will not again curse the ground anymore for man’s sake for the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth.

    Just before this in the flood social conditions became so bad that the only thought of men’s hearts was to do evil continually. When that is the case, there is no point in life, so God destroyed man, leaving only those who were committed to his covenants. Noah being the realist that he was knew that as children began to be born again, they would fall into the same pattern and they would again begin to be evil because of the tremendous power of Satan. He was desirous that the Lord would not again destroy life with a flood:

    And that he will not again smite every living thing as he hath done while the earth remaineth and that seed time and harvest and cold and heat and summer and winter and day and night may not cease with man. And God blessed Noah and his sons and said unto them, Be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth and the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth and upon every fowl of the air and upon all that moveth upon the earth. And upon all the fishes of the sea, into your hand are they delivered.

    I wonder what that means: “the fear of you.” I think we might have some interesting thoughts there trying to understand this in terms of as man should fear God so the animals should fear man.

    Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.

    But the blood of all flesh which I have given unto you for meat shall be shed upon the ground which taketh life thereof; and the blood ye shall not eat.

    And surely blood shall not be shed, only for meat to save your life. And the blood of every beast will I require at your hands.

    And whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for man shall not shed the blood of man. For a commandment I give that every man’s brother shall preserve the life of man for in mine own image have I made man. And a commandment I give unto you, be fruitful and multiply and bring forth abundantly upon the earth and multiply therein.

    This is the first reference we have to the principle of capital punishment. We might ask why the principle of capital punishment? Why would God command that if a man shed another’s blood his blood must be taken. Part of the answer to this is given in Exodus 11. I am going to take the liberty to read a good deal of this presuming that not many of you read Exodus 11 very often,

    He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death.

    And if a man lie not in wait, but God deliver him into his hand; then I will appoint thee a place whither he shall flee.

    This verse apparently is a distinction between murder which is pre-meditated, that is to say lying in wait, and manslaughter, which a person might do accidently. They are both killing, but there is a way out for a person who commits unpremeditated murder or manslaughter. There is a place of refuge where he can go. But for the one who murders, the only out is for him to give his own life,

    But if a man come presumptuously upon his neighbor, to slay him with guile; thou shalt take him from mine altar, that he may die.

    And he that smiteth his father, or his mother, shall be surely put to death,

    And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be Put to death. . .

    And if men strive together, and one smite another with a stone, or with his fist, and he die not, but keepeth his bed:

    If he rise again, and walk abroad upon his staff, then shall he that smote him be quit: only he shall pay for the loss of his time, and shall cause him to be thoroughly healed.

    And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall surely be put to death.

    Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two and recover, he shall not put to death for he is his servant.

    If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman’s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.

    And if any mischief follow. then thou shalt give life for life,

    Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.

    Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.

    And if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for his eye’s sake.

    And if he smite out his manservant’s tooth, or his maid- servant’s tooth; he shall let him go free for his tooth’s sake.

    If an ox gore a man or a woman, that they die: then the ox shall surely be stoned, and his flesh shall not be eaten; but the owner of the ox shall be quit.

    But if the ox were wont to push with his horn in time past, and it has been testified to his owner, and he hath not kept him in, but that he hath killed a man or a woman; the ox shall be stoned, and his owner also shall be put to death.

    If there be laid on him a sum of money, then he shall give for the ransom of his life whatsoever is laid upon him.

    Whether he have gored a son, or have gored a daughter, according to his judgment shall it be done unto him.

    If the ox shall push a manservant or a maidservant; he shall give unto their master thirty shekels of silver, and the ox shall be stoned.

    And if a man shall open a pit, or if a man shall dig a pit, and not cover it, and an ox or an ass fall therein;

    The owner of the pit shall make it good, and give money unto the owner of them; and the dead beast shall be his.

    And if one man’s ox hurt another’s, that he die; then they shall sell the live ox, and divide the money of it; and the dead ox also shall they divide.

    The point is this. They didn’t have jails in Israel. What did they have instead? They had justice. What is justice? Justice is the man receiving his rights. When a man injured another, instead of putting people in jail for it, which doesn’t do the injured party any good at all, the injured party had the right to receive recompense–that is to say, he bad the right to be paid, not necessarily an eye for an eye, but the price of an eye for an eye; the price of a tooth for a tooth; or the price of an ox for an ox; and so forth. If a person did wrong, he must pay for it; he must pay for it; he must make recompense. It is a curious thing that in our so-called enlightened civilization, we have rather lost sight of the concept of justice. When a person commits a wrong against another man, we are willing to put him in jail, but we make no demand that he restore, that he benefit the one whom he has injured. Because we have lost the concept of justice in that regard, we seem also to have lost the concept of justice in regard to murder. It is fashionable in our society today to speak against capital punishment, to think that somehow it is an act of mercy or righteousness or goodness to let the murderer go free. I submit to you it is exactly the contrary: that letting the murderer go free shows a complete misunderstanding of humanity and the rights of man. If we let the murderer go free, we are saying in essence, that the life of the one whom he has murdered has no worth. Are we prepared to make that judgment?

    The only person who can legitimately excuse the murderer is either the person himself who was killed or someone who has paid the debt for that murder, which could only be God himself.

    There are only two people, then, who are able to forgive a murderer: the person murdered and God. If man takes it upon himself to forgive a murderer, he is saying then that the life of the person murdered it worth nothing–it needs no recompense. No justice needs to be done. Nothing needs to be satisfied.

    God commanded, then, that if a man sheds another man’s blood and kills him, that his blood must be shed. That is the only way that justice can be satisfied.

    There are some side benefits to that; namely, if a man has no rights in society he can be killed without any recompense. What is there to stop murder? Nothing. Thus, sin and this kind of taking opportunity against a man’s neighbor run rampart. A society cannot be well ordered if there is no justice.

    What do we do then? If we forgive a man for murder, having no right to do so, then we are accountable to God and to the murdered man for it. We become guilty of the murder. This is why the prophets say in the scriptures that if we do not take a man’s blood when he has shed another’s blood, that blood is upon us. The only way injustice can be answered is by justice. So, I submit to you that it is not noble to give a reprieve to a murderer. It is on the contrary a complete despising of human life, or a pretension to the prerogatives of Godhood, which is a species of priestcraft.

    I think it would be valuable now to delineate the frame of mind that justifies abortion and the elimination of capital punishment. It is first of all naturalistic. That is to say, persons of this mind do not believe there is a God in the universe. Because they do not believe there is a Cod, they do not believe there can be such a thing as righteousness. Because there is no God, there is no such thing as justice, because only God can guarantee justice.

    Second, it is monistic in metaphysics. Persons of this mind believe that man is only a body and is a chance evolutionary creation of the ongoing blind processes of the universe. Because this is all that life is, life is cheap. Life is not important. There is no problem in either doing away with it or in dismissing its worth.

    Thirdly, the frame espouses amorality. That is to say that morals don’t count. There is no right or wrong. Persons of this mind say that the so-called standards of right and wrong are simply cultural traditions that reflect the prejudices of some persons and have no basis in the reality of the universe. All three of these principles, you see, are contrary to the teachings of the gospel.

    The purpose of the gospel is to teach man a correct understanding as to who they are and what their existence is. The purpose of Satan is to substitute lies for these truths that men may be confused, and being confused, they step into the paths of evil and wrongdoing very readily, not knowing the landmarks.

    As I came over tonight I was trudging along through the snow and I suddenly noticed that the path I was following led right across the lawn. I happen to be one of those who believe in not walking across the lawn because I know what it does to the lawn. I would rather have a nice, green lawn than a muddy patch. So I felt a little bit chagrined that I had been trapped into just following the path. That happened, of course, because the landmarks had gone. Everything was covered with snow, and I was enticed into doing something that I would not otherwise do by this blindness.

    This is very similar to what happens in the world. As Satan can substitute false ideas for the true concepts, the landmarks are gone in men’s minds and they fall into the evil paths and don’t know that they are in them.

    We live in a day when God has told us that the love of men will wax cold; a day when men will hate one another unreservedly, much like the end of the Nephite nation. I think we are seeing this today in these two moods. Isn’t it curious that the innocent are condemned to die in abortion, and the guilty are allowed to go free as men try to eliminate capital punishment? This is just exactly the opposite of what God would have; but the opposite because men’s minds are damaged, are stultified by the power of the adversary. The force that principally aids and abets both of these causes in the world is priestcraft: men setting themselves up for a light to the world for praise and gain.

    What should be done about these problems? The key to these problems is not in the problems themselves. The point that I am trying to make tonight is that it doesn’t do much good to go out and fight abortion or capital punishment. The place where we can be most effective in bringing about good is in helping men to change their minds. It is their thinking; it is their understanding of the universe that gets them to espouse causes that we can see are evil. The best way to help the world is to convert men to Christ, to help them to come unto him and let Him form the concepts of their minds and set the standards and establish the values. The key to this and every other is the message of salvation — it is to help men to repent. To repent means to change one’s mind.

    It is our great opportunity to take upon ourselves the mind of Christ. We do this not all at once but line upon line, precept upon precepts answer by answer as we seek the mind and will of the Lord through His Holy Spirit. Each of us as members of the Church is commanded to receive the Holy Spirit. If we do receive it and profit from it and are obedient, the Lord will fill our minds with His truth. We will see and know.

    I have dwelt somewhat on negative things. I hope that won’t be what you remember. I hope the thing that you will remember from what I say is that there is a positive side. There is an alternative to abortion, living the gospel of Jesus Christ. There is an alternative to abolishing capital punishment, namely a recognition of justice through God’s will. We can recognize that man lives eternally, and that it just might be that the greatest favor that can be possibly done for that man is to allow him to have his blood shed that he might satisfy the demands of justice and be better off in eternity. But that is not for us to decide. God has set the policy. It is for us to live our lives and do good as we can under Christ. It is a terrible thing to take the life of another man. But he who thinks nothing of taking the life of another in murder, nevertheless, has an opportunity to do something about that sin by having his own life taken.

    It is my hope and prayer that we as Latter-day Saints will be a force for the work of Christ in this world; for the work of goodness and righteousness. As the Adversary spreads his mists of darkness and false doctrine abroad among us, that we might not be taken in by the world; that we might not succumb to the propaganda; that we might tread a steady course, straight along the path of righteousness.

    I don’t think it pays to go out into the world and shout these things. I say these things rather plainly and rather bluntly to you tonight because I presume that you are servants of Christ. If you are not a member of the Church, I don’t expect that you will even understand what I say, much less accept it. If you are a member of the Church, I would expect that you will be enlightened by the Spirit and thus will come to a position in which you can be a servant of Christ, edifying and blessing those around you.

    My only hope is that each of us will do that. I hope that each of us will search our souls to rid ourselves of the selfishness, of the lust that keeps us from doing what we know is right, that we might serve Christ. Our opportunities to build a kingdom where righteousness prevails, where there is justice but also mercy, the justice and mercy of God, not our pretended justice and mercy. I hope for the day when He will reign whose right it is to reign — the only one who knows enough to establish righteousness and justice and truth. I bear witness of Him that He is our only hope, that He lives, that He is a reality, that we can come to Him and know of Him and be of Him. I pray that each of us might know this. I bear this testimony in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.

  • Thy Constant Companion

    Let thy bowels … be full of charity toward all men, and to the household of faith, and lt virtue garnish thy thoughts unceasingly; then shall thy confidence wax strong in the presence of God; and … the Holy Ghost shall be …

    “THY CONSTANT COMPANION”

    Doctrine & Covenants 121:45-46
    The Instructor, December, 1970

    by Chauncey D. Riddle

    Chauncey C. Riddle received his Ph.D. in Philosophy at Columbia University and now serves as dean of the Graduate School at Brigham Young University. A member of the Sharon (Utah) Stake high council, he is married to Bertha Allred. The couple have two children and are members of the Orem 16th Ward.

    This article first appeared in The Instructor December 1970

    This article discusses some practical points on enjoying the constant companionship of the Holy Spirit. It has its focus in the area of religion — the discipline of living the gospel — more than in theology, which is theory or understanding of the gospel. The points here reviewed are the personal conclusions of the writer, who hopes that each reader will enjoy comparing notes with him on this vital topic. In this article the Holy Ghost is referred to as a personage and the Holy Spirit as his influence.

    Recognize the Holy Spirit’s Voice

    1. The first and foremost problem of spirituality is to recognize the influence of the Holy Ghost. One key to this recognition is the knowledge that for some person, the voice of the Holy Spirit is their own conscience bringing word to them from the Savior. President David O. McKay said:

    When that word comes to you — call it conscience, or, if you are in the Church and doing your duty, the whisperings of the Spirit, because you are entitled to be a partaker of it — then be true to that whispering, and some day you will know for yourself that you are in harmony with the universe. (Conference Report, April, 1963, page 95)

    The “honest in heart” are those who are able to admit what the Holy Ghost tells them in their own consciences.

    Manifestations of the Holy Spirit through one’s conscience have two ordinary forms. One is the feeling of the rightness or wrongness of something we plan to do. The feeling of rightness is the burning in the bosom; this “burning” may be faint, but it is plainly warm and positive, assuring us of the correctness of our decision. If we have chosen wrongly. a feeling of sullen sadness warns us that we will be sorry if we proceed.

    Another manifestation of the Spirit is that of hearing actual words. We do not really “hear.” for this voice of conscience makes no noise, but we are enlightened with plain ideas, sometimes occurring as pictures, other times as sentences or words. Usually the burning will accompany these pictures or words.

    A third most important manifestation is the peace brought to us by the Comforter. When we receive insight through revelation from the Holy spirit, plus the burning in the bosom, and are then obedient to the Lord, we receive that great blessing of peace, of knowing, that we are doing what is right and are “in harmony with the universe,” as President McKay said. This is real living. In fact, it is the beginning of eternal life.

    A Demanding Discipline

    The Constant Companion appeared in the December 1970 issue of The Instructor – page 454

    2. It is important to know that living by the Spirit of God involves much labor in thinking, and that learning to live this way completely is as demanding a discipline as any human being can undertake. We must not suppose that the Lord always gives people ready-made answers to their prayers. Rather, he expects us to examine, explore, and attempt to resolve the issue ourselves. We should pray, of course, for his guidance in this process. Prayerful meditation should be most important part of our daily routine and lives, equal in importance to carrying out the Father’s will when we finally know it. When we reach a conclusion, we must not automatically suppose that our conclusion is correct, but must then present our idea to the Lord for his seal of correctness, according to the pattern which he gave to Oliver Cowdery:

    Behold, you have not understood; you have supposed that I would give it unto you, when you took no thought save it was to ask me.

    But, behold, I say unto you, that you must study it out in your mind; then you must ask me if it be right, and if it is right I will cause that your bosom shall burn within you; therefore, you shall feel that it is right.

    But if it be not right you shall have no such feelings, but you shall have a stupor of thought that shall cause you to forget the things which is wrong; therefore, you cannot write that which is sacred save it be given you from me. (Doctrine & Covenants 9:7-9.)

    The Lord will not always require that we search out the answer to a problem at length. Sometimes he will give us the answer even while we are asking him about the problem. But as a kind and all-knowing Father, he knows our needs and abilities and tries to help us grow in ability to think and understand whenever possible.

    The Constant Companion appeared in the December 1970 issue of The Instructor – page 454 & 455

    This is Our Pattern

    We must remember that in this life, no matter how much good practice at thinking the Father gives us, we will never be able to make righteous decisions without his help. Even the Savior, who was already a God during his earthly ministry, never did anything nor said anything save that which his Father commanded him. This must be our pattern too.

    3. There is a definite relationship between spirituality and pleasure. When we partake of pleasures of the flesh or of the mind as part of keeping the Lord’s commandments and of filling our assigned missions in the world, spirituality is heightened, increased; but when we indulge in pleasures merely because our bodies or our minds crave them, we cut ourselves off from spirituality. Alma counseled his son Shiblon as follows:

    … See that ye bridle all your passions, that ye may be filled with love. (Alma 38:12.)

    The bridle on our pleasures and passions is supposed to be the Holy Spirit. If we accept that bridle, we will have forsaken selfishness. Then God can fill our hearts with the pure love of Christ.

    This is why living the Word of Wisdom is such a full aspect of living the gospel. To break the Word of Wisdom is to yield to the craving of the flesh. That yielding keeps us from growing spiritually, which means we cannot do great works of righteousness. The work of a saint, of the latter-days or otherwise, is to serve God by working the works of righteousness under divine direction.

    Satan is Ever Ready

    4. Great care must be taken, when we try to be spiritual, that we do not let ourselves be influenced by evil spirits. Satan is ever ready to give people spiritual manifestations, but he never will lead us to do a righteous act. Generally speaking, Satan’s promptings are permissive. They are whisperings to us that it is all right to get angry or to indulge our cravings or to break or “bend” the commandments of God or the standards of the Church.

    The following are safeguards to prevent our being misled by Satan:

    a. Keep in touch and in tune with those who preside in the priesthood. If we cannot fully support them and abide by their counsel, we are in trouble spiritually.

    b. Stay within the bonds of our own stewardship. Reject supposed revelations which relate to matters which are the priesthood responsibility of someone else.

    c. Know the scriptures. Satan cannot easily deceive us if we know the programs of the Church, what the presiding brethren say in general conferences, and the standard works, If we have not done our homework, Satan can easily slip us a lie.

    Spirituality Begins With Small Issues

    5. What happens when we pray and pray, but do not get an answer? Try a simple experiment in such a case. Stop asking the Lord what you want to know about; instead ask him what he would have you be concerned about and what he should have you do at the moment. Frequently we pray about the wrong problems and therefore do not receive answers. Spirituality begins with small issues and decisions related to the tasks at hand in our daily lives. If we can be faithful in these small matters, we gain the spiritual strength and obedience necessary to be able to enjoy receiving answers to the larger problems of life.

    What a joy to trust in the Lord, to stay ourselves upon the Holy One of Israel, to receive counsel and instructions from the only wise and true God! May we be true, as He is, that Zion might be established in the tops of the mountains, that righteousness and truth might sweep the earth as a flood, that we might prepare a New Jerusalem, worthy of our Master.