Category: 2026 Essay

  • Temple Gospel Essentials Course, 1986

    July 1986

    Lesson One: People

    1.   A person is a human being: a body and a spirit.

    An individual human person is one who has learned to act independently of other human beings and to act as a unit to do the things human beings do.

    An individual human person has four parts which enable him or her to act as a unit to do the things which human beings do:

    Heart: The ability to make choices among possible alternative actions. (Example: Shall I hit him back or not.)

    Mind: The ability to understand self, the universe, and possible actions. (Example: He hit me because his brother hit him.)

    Strength: Physical ability to act. Strength is time. (Example: I am too tired to hit him. Therefore, I have no strength, no time.)

    Might: The things one can affect by acting. Might is space. (He is up in the tree above me. I cannot reach him. He is out of my space, therefore I have no might to hit him.)

    A person becomes an individual by:

    a.   Gaining control of his heart, mind, strength, and might.

    b.   Unifying his heart, mind, strength and might.

    2.   Some actions of a person are unique. Others are habitual. The habits of a person are his character. An undeveloped character has weak habits; decisions are made by the pressures of the moment. A developed character has strong habits; decisions are made on the basis of principle. The basic parameters of character are as follows:

    Heart:Righteous (unselfish)Unrighteous (selfish)
    Mind:Realistic (deals with reality)Unrealistic (deals with fantasy)
    Strength:Gifted (many talents)Limited (few talents)
    Might:Mighty (affects much)Damned (affects little)

    Effective person: Realistic, gifted, mighty           Ineffective: Unrealistic or limited, damned.

    Saint: a Righteous, effective person.                    Natural Man: An unrighteous person (effective or not).

    The purpose of human mortality is to allow each person to become an individual, and in that process to achieve that character which he or she desires to achieve. Every person’s habits are his or her religion.

    Habits = Character = Religion

    3.   Agency is power to act. A human being is an agent because he or she has power to act. The four essentials of that power to act are:

    a.   The ability to understand reality and possible actions: Mind

    b.   The ability to choose among possible actions: Heart

    c.   The physical ability to act to carry out the choices make: Strength

    d.   The ability to affect something with one’s strength: Might

    Human agency is a gift of God. God controls our mind, our strength, our might, and only he can purify our hearts. As we allow God to purify our hearts, he can give us additional mind, strength, and might. As these increase, our agency increases. As our hearts become completely pure (righteous), God can increase our agency without limit until we have a fulness of all that he has. Receiving that fulness of mind, strength and might added to a pure heart is to be exalted.

    The focal point of human agency is the heart. By the choices we make with our heart, we form our own habits=character=religion. Our agency is the power God has given each of us to form our own habits=character=religion.

    4.   Righteousness is doing what is best in the long run, in eternity, to achieve the greatest possible happiness for all others who will be affected by our personal choices. No human being, by human means, can know exactly who will be affected nor how by any given decision. Therefore, no human being can be righteous without help from outside himself, help from a being who is omniscient and righteous.

    The most important use of agency any person can make is to become a righteous individual.

    5.   There is salvation from unrighteousness (the state of the natural man) only through God, the only being who is omniscient and righteous. God, our Father, has told us to hear his Son, Jesus Christ. He is the means, the way, the truth and the light to us. Only if we hear him can we be saved from unrighteousness.

    A person can become a righteous individual only by hearing, accepting and loving Jesus Christ with all of his or her heart. To thus yield our hearts to God is the key to loving God with all of our heart, might, mind, and strength.

    To become a righteous individual is to be saved. To be saved is to have the habits=character=religion to love God with all of our heart, might, mind and strength.

    6.   Whatever agency a person has received from God, he is responsible for that power and must account for it at the close of his probation. Those who know and enjoy the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ have more agency than those who do not have it, and therefore are more responsible. During his or her probation, every human being is given enough agency to have power to be saved from unrighteousness. Those who use that power to become saved will rejoice; those who do not will weep and wail and gnash their (resurrected) teeth because they didn’t avail themselves of the opportunity. The net result of all this is that no human being can then blame what he or she is in heart, mind, and strength or what he or she has done with might on anyone else. We are free. We do what we desire to do. To blame anyone or anything else for the state of our being or our actions is untruthful and debilitating. Though we are not fully free now, we should act as if we were. Taking the full responsibility is the best way to facilitate repentance and to begin to become what the Restored Gospel makes it possible for us to become: exalted.

    The first step in becoming a righteous individual is to take full responsibility for what one is and does. To blame anyone or anything other than ourselves for what we are or do is to dig a pit for ourselves. (See Deut. 6:5; Matt. 23:36–40; D&C 59:5; 2 Nephi 31:19; Moses 6:52)

    7.   Satan gained increased opportunity to tempt, afflict and torment mankind because Adam and Eve hearkened to him and rejected Father’s counsel. Satan is the destroyer, having power over disease and death, but carefully controlled by Father as to how he will use that power. Satan is the tempter, but his only power to tempt man is to encourage a man to follow after his own desires in disobedience to the commandments of Father. Thus, every man looks at the world and divides it into things desirable (good in his own eyes) and undesirable (evil in his own eyes). Satan simply encourages each person to seek and do that which is good in his (that person’s) own eyes. (James 1:13–15)

    Woe unto that person who calls the Father’s good evil and evil good! (2 Nephi 15:20–21)

    But happy is the person who hungers and thirsts after the Father’s good, which is righteousness. (3 Nephi 12:6)

    8.   Being spiritually dead, no man understands himself or his surroundings truly. Man judges upon appearances only, and thus makes many mistakes. Every person has the experience of choosing to do certain acts because he thinks they are good and will bring satisfaction, but discovers to his sorrow that he was mistaken. But men have enough success in gaining satisfaction that they tolerate a few mistakes rather philosophically, especially when what they seek is simply the pleasures of the flesh. (Isaiah 29:8)

    9.   The natural man is fallen man, selfish man, blinded man. He is without God and Christ in the world. He is able to live quite well as an animal, eating and drinking and procreating, but no individual is sure of success even in that. The more an individual yearns for something more than immediate physical satisfaction, the more he senses he needs help. If he wishes guaranteed physical pleasure, he seeks power. If he desires to know, he seeks to find a knower, usually another human being, or perhaps a book. But if it is the heart of man that yearns for righteousness, no satisfaction will be found in this world. (Ether 12:27–28)

    10. The natural man is an enemy to God. “Enemy” means one who is not loved. Most natural men do not love God because they do not know him. Some do not want to know him and reject his message when it comes. But some men yearn for righteousness and welcome the message of the God of righteousness when they are privileged to receive it. (Mosiah 3:19)

    11. To know good and evil and to be able to choose between them is to become an independent self. Every man is sufficiently instructed in good and evil that he can show his true desires. (2 Nephi 2:5) Only souls who have been given this agency and who then show that they love God enough to keep his commandments can be exalted. Thus the creation of the world focused on giving men this agency so essential to the time and place for making gods. (2 Nephi 2:16)

    12. Though we know little about the creation of the earth, we are given great detail about the creation of the world. We are given a word by word, blow by blow account of that important process, that we might understand it. For our business on earth is to reverse the effects of that fall, to take ourselves out from under the evil influences of this world through the help of our Savior. (2 Nephi 2:24–25)

    Lesson Two: God

    1.   The key to theology: Human beings are of the race of the gods, and may inherit all the gods have. Evidences:

    a.   Adam and Eve were literally begotten as children of the gods.

    b.   Mary, a human being, conceived and bore a child for her husband, Elohim.

    c.   Jesus, the Son of God (Elohim) and son of Mary, appeared to be a normal human being.

    d.   Some human beings were gods in the premortal existence.

    e.   The announced purpose of the Gospel of Jesus Christ is to invite every human being to become one with God, a god.

    2.   A god is a person having all power, to whom the angels are subject (D&C 132:20). Every god is a being who is righteous, omniscient, omnipotent, and coordinates with every other god.

    a.   Righteousness is doing what most contributes to the eternal welfare of every being one affects. Every god has a pure heart (devoid of selfishness) and is fully dedicated to the eternal cause of righteousness. No god takes any vacations or lapses from righteousness, but rather devotes his whole heart, mind, strength and might to that cause.

    b.   Omniscience is knowing all: everything small and large, near and distant, simple and complex, past, present, or future. An omniscient being cannot be surprised. Omniscience helps to make righteousness possible.

    c.   Omnipotence is having all the power that exist, so that anything which can be done may be done by an omnipotent being. That is not to say that an omnipotent being will need to do everything which can be done. A god uses omnipotence only to do the works of righteousness. And omnipotence helps to make righteousness possible.

    d.   To be coordinated with every other god is essential to being a god, for there is but one righteousness, one truth for the omniscient to know, one righteous use of omnipotence in any given situation. Were a god not to coordinate with all other gods there would be confusion as to who would and should do a given work of righteousness. But there is no confusion. As perfect (complete) omniscient beings, all gods are in full communication with each other at each instant, and act as one.

    3.   There is but one God. That one God is the sum total of all gods united in a priesthood structure. Every person in that priesthood structure has a specific place in the priesthood hierarchy and perfectly fills his or her role. Every person (god) has a father in the priesthood order. Every person (god) does only and exactly that which he or she is instructed to do by the person who stands to him or her in the relation of father. Thus, the whole group acts as one; they constitute a single unit. Thus, there is one true God but many true gods.

    4.   There are two kinds of true gods, though all have the four characteristics mentioned above. One kind is a personage of spirit, not having a tabernacle of flesh and bone. The other kind is the personage of spirit who has been through a mortal experience and has acquired a body of flesh and bone. The Savior as Jehovah before his mortal ministry was the first kind, and as that kind he created and governed the heavens and the earth and all things that in them are. As the Only Begotten of the Father, our Savior became the second kind of god, which he will be to the rest of eternity.

    5.   There are two kinds of false gods. Satan would feign claim to be the god of this world, and he indeed tries to become the same by intimidating human beings and conspiring with them. He is one kind of counterfeit God, and his counterfeit “good” is gain and power. The other kind of false god is the individual human beings invent to please themselves and to justify what they wish to do; the counterfeit good here is the selfish desires of the individual person. “For they have strayed from mine ordinance, and have broken mine everlasting covenant; They seek not the Lord to establish his righteousness, but every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own God, whose image is in the likeness of the world, and whose substance is that of an idol, which waxeth old and shall perish I Babylon, even Babylon the great, which shall fall.” (D&C 1:15–16)

    6.   God has said to man:

    “… the fulness of the earth is yours, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the air, and that which climbeth upon the trees and walketh upon the earth;

    Yea, and the herb, and the good things which come of the earth, whether for food or for raiment, or for houses, or for barns, or for orchards, or for gardens, or for vineyards;

    Yea, all things which come of the earth, whether for food or for raiment, or for houses, or for barns, or for orchards, or for gardens, or for vineyards;

    Yea, all things which come of the earth, in the season thereof, are made for the benefit and use of man, both to please the eye and to gladden the heart;

    Yea, for food and for raiment, for taste and for smell, to strengthen the body and to enliven the soul.

    And it pleaseth God that he hath given all these things unto man; for unto this end were they made to be used, with judgment, not to excess, neither by extortion.

    And in nothing doth man offend God, or against none is his wrath kindled, save those who confess not his hand in all things, and obey not his commandments.

    Behold this is according to the law and the prophets; wherefore, trouble me no more concerning this matter.

    But learn that he who doeth the works of righteousness shall receive his reward, even peace in this world, and eternal life in the world to come.” (D&C 59:16–23)

    7. We must know who and what our god and our God is. If the god we worship is a false god, there is no hope for our future. Our great opportunity and responsibility is to search until we find and associate ourselves with the true and living God. Then we can intelligently hope for every good thing. (Moroni: 7)

    Lesson Three: Creation of the Earth

    1.   Compared with what there is to know about it, we know very little about the creation of the earth (either from the scriptures, because they say little about it, or from science, because all scientific accounts of the creation are guesswork).

    2.   When our story begins in Genesis 1, Moses 2, and Abraham 4, the earth was already in existence. At the time it was empty, desolate, without life. How long before had it been created? We do not know, but possibly it was very old even then.

    3.   How long did the creation last? We do not know for sure, but one good guess is that it took 7,000 years. (D&C 77:12)

    4.   Where was the earth reformed in this creation? Why is that important to us? Apparently not in this solar system, but somewhere near the throne of God. (Abraham 5:13)

    5.   Who reformed the earth for Adam and Eve? The council of the gods; or, in other words, God. (Abraham 4)

    6.   Why is it important to know that God created the heavens and the earth? So that we will know that it did not happen by chance or by some “natural” process. God was and is firmly in control of the process. To suppose that the universe operates on its own, without direction, is equivalent to a belief in magic. We have ample testimony to the contrary. To reject those testimonies is to reject God.

    7.   What is the order of the universe in which we live and wherein our earth has its place? The planets and stars of the universe are organized into orders, with each order being governed by a higher order. Each planet rotates at a certain set pace, the more rapid the rotation, the lower the order. At the center and governing all, never changing but pursuing one eternal round, is God. (Abraham 3)

    8.   What is a kingdom? A kingdom is a portion or space, and in every space there is a kingdom. All kingdoms are governed by law, and to every law there are certain bounds and conditions. The bounds and conditions are set by God, who is the king. (D&C 88:34–39)

    9.   How does God govern the universe? By light. The light which causes our eyes to see and the light of truth are the same light, from the same source. They are the light of Christ. This light created and governs the sun, the moon, the earth, and all living things. That light causes one to be intelligent. It fills all space with the influence of God. (D&C 88:6–13)

    10. Some things are created to be acted upon. They are governed by the light of Christ. Other things are created to act. These latter may accept the law of Christ, which is His light, or they may be a law unto themselves. Those who insist on being a law unto themselves severely limit their capacity to grow.

    Lesson Four: The Creation of the World

    1.   The earth is the physical planet upon which we dwell. A world is an extensive time and place for existence and action. A world was created by the fall of Adam, which world ended in the flood. We live in the second world, which will end in the fire at the Second Coming. The millennium will be the third world, and that world will end when the earth dies. See Joseph Smith History 1:55, which identifies the world with the wicked people who dwell on the earth.

    2.   Satan was Lucifer (light-bearer), who was an angel of great authority in the presence of God. He rebelled against God, seeking honor, glory and power independent of God. Because of that rebellion, he and his followers were cast away from the throne of God and were sent down to this earth. Their work here is to thwart the work of God by encouraging hate, anger, selfishness and disobedience to God on the part of mankind. (Moses 4:1–4)

    3.   Adam and Eve were born to the gods as children and sent to this earth. They had two bodies, one spiritual, the other of flesh and bone. The spiritual body consisted of three parts: heart, the sensor of truth and right and the decision maker; mind, the power of understanding and perception; and body, the power to move and act on spiritual material. The fleshly tabernacle also had a heart, which pumped spirit to the body; a brain, which coordinated the mind with the tabernacle of flesh; and the fleshy tabernacle, with which to interact with the coarse material of this earth.

    When they were put into the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve had celestial bodies. But their eyes were not yet open. They did not understand good and evil in general. They knew not to partake of the forbidden fruit, but had been given to choose for themselves. Thus God had given them a tiny bit of agency. (Moses 7:32)

    4.   Satan worked on that tiny bit of agency and convinced Eve that her own desire for knowledge was better than Father’s commandment. So she asserted her own will and defied Father. Then she convinced Adam that he must follow, which he did. Then the eyes of their understanding were opened in that each of them now could see that every opportunity to act could be seen as good (God’s will) or evil (anything else). With that new knowledge and using the power to choose for themselves which Father had given them, they became subject to their own wills, being able to and having to choose for themselves between good and evil in everything which they did. (Alma 12:31)

    5.   Adam and Eve had been told that if they partook of the forbidden fruit they would immediately die. When they partook, they did die, spiritually, and in that very day. This spiritual death was to be cut off from Father, no longer to be able to see him and converse with him directly. The opening of the eyes of their understanding was matched by the closing of the eyes of their spirit bodies. Their flesh became telestial, corrupt. This telestial flesh became a veil, the veil which stopped all of their spiritual senses. Their spirits were yet alive, but walled up in the corrupt tabernacle which now had blood in the veins instead of spirit matter. Thus they could no longer see and communicate with the spiritual existences around them at will as they had done. (D&C 29:36–41)

    6.   The blood which now coursed through the bodies of Adam and Eve gave them the opportunity to die.

    7.   The physical universe which we see with our natural eyes is created after the pattern of the spiritual universe. The spiritual universe is prior in time, and governs and controls the physical universe. (Moses 3:7; D&C 29:30–36)

    8.   To see the physical kingdoms of the universe, large and small, operating in their times and seasons and order is to see God moving in his majesty and power. (D&C 88:4)

    9.   One important fundamental of righteousness is to acknowledge the hand of God in all things, both spiritual and natural. (D&C 59:21)

    10. Could the universe or this earth be improved upon? No, for they have been created (organized) by a perfect, omniscient and omnipotent being for the purpose of blessing His children.

    Lesson Five: The Gospel

    1.   The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the good news of life and salvation sent to the natural man. It itself is a short message, consisting of perhaps ten ideas which can be said in about one breath. The gospel is compatible with all truth; indeed, it embraces all truth and light in the universe. Those ten ideas are as follows, given in an expanded version.

    2.   First, that Jesus Christ is the Son of God the Father, is himself a God, and is heir to all that the Father has. He was Jehovah, the god of the Old Testament, whose name means “will be.” The god who would be was born of Mary in the land of Jerusalem of the seed of Abraham, but is literally the only Begotten Son of God the Father in the flesh. He came into the world to do the Father’s will, which he did, leading first a sinless life and then giving up his perfect and potentially unending mortal life that he might ransom the souls and bodies of all mankind.

    3.   Secondly, it was the Father’s will that he be lifted up upon the cross. This is symbolic of his working out of the atonement for the sins of all mankind. Having lived a sinless life, he had no sin to his charge, and having a divine heritage, he never would have had to die. But it was the Father’s will that he personally and voluntarily takes upon himself to suffer the debt of justice due for each and every sin that had been or ever would be committed by any human being on this earth. The debt of justice is a suffering equal in pain to whatever pain had been inflicted on everyone affected by the original sinning of the sin being compensated for. This also includes righting the wrong and restoring to those hurt the opportunities and blessings they had been deprived of by the original sinning of that sin in question. The Savior could suffer for our sins because he had none of his own to pay for. He can right the wrongs because he is the Eternal God of Heaven and Earth, and has all power over all things to accomplish all things for the salvation of mankind. A third aspect of the atonement is that the Savior seized the keys of death and hell from Satan, which Satan had gained at the occasion of the Fall of Adam, thus making possible both the opening of the gates of hell, the prison doors, to make possible the preaching of the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the souls in prison, and the resurrection from the grave of every soul who had once received a mortal body on earth.

    4.   Thirdly, it is the Father’s will that after our Savior had paid the debt and made salvation possible for every human being, that every human being be required to stand before the Savior to account for the opportunity each will have had to repent of his sins an to be forgiven through the atoning blood of Christ. Our Savior is the keeper of the gate to the heavens, and he employs no servant there. What the Savior will want each person to witness is whether that person’s actions have been good, that is to say Godly, or evil, that is to say, in defiance of God. Apparently no one will have to say much, because what everyone did, thought and desired in their probation will be publicly manifest for all to see. Each person judged will agree with his own judgment and proclaim the wisdom, mercy and greatness of God.

    5.   There is a five-fold way for each human being to prepare for the great day of judgment. This five-fold way is the pattern for one’s entire life and also for each specific decision.

    The first of the five-fold ways is to put one’s trust, one’s faith in Jesus Christ. When a person hears the Gospel taught by authorized servants and confirmed by the power of the Holy Spirit, one knows that one should rely wholly and solely on the merits of the Savior for all of his needs for light and truth. To receive revelation from God is to be invited to enter into the straight and narrow way. To put one’s whole trust in that revelation is to exercise faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, which is the only faith that saves.

    6.   The second part of the five-fold path is to repent. Under the direction of the Holy Spirit, that is to say through faith in Jesus Christ, each of us must undertake to go through our heart, mind, strength and might and order all of it according to the truth and light which the Savior sends to us. This is a lifetime project, but it is incumbent upon those who have received some portion of direction to live up to that direction before doing anything else. That is godly repentance.

    7.   The third part of the five-fold path is to enter into covenant with the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, to become completely faithful in all things. Specifically, we promise to take upon ourselves the name of Jesus Christ, to proclaim that name and never to be ashamed of it before any man; to keep all of the commandments which he gives to us personally; and to remember him always. These promises lead to all of the higher ordinances of the Gospel of Jesus Christ and have perfection of the person as their goal.

    8.   The fourth part of the five-fold path is to actually receive the Holy Ghost. No one can get to this point without having received something from the Holy Ghost already. Knowing what that spirit is and what it does for us, we must now take that spirit as our constant companion, knowing that as we are faithful, it will show us all things that we should do. This is our life-line, the rod of iron that enables us to stay in the narrow way of righteousness through the mists of darkness.

    9.   The fifth part of the five-fold way is to endure to the end. The end is life eternal, to become as Christ himself is in heart, might, mind and strength. This is truly a counsel of perfection, reaching for the stars with a grasp wherein the grace of God fully complements all we can do to suffice unto attaining to the end.

    10. The power and pertinence of that five-fold message are matched by a solemn warning that enduring to the end is important. For if one does not endure to the end, one will be hewn down and cast into the fire with no further opportunity to repent, to change, to inherit eternal life.

    11. Finally, there is the promise to match the warning: He who will repent, be sanctified by the Holy Ghost and will endure to the end through this five-fold process will enter into the kingdom of God and will be fully acceptable to the Father. That is the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

    12. The message of the Father to all mankind is that we should hear his Beloved Son, in whom he is well pleased. The Son gives us his Gospel, the good news as to how we can overcome the Fall of Adam and be restored to the presence of the Father as beloved sons and daughters. That Gospel is not the only way to love God, but it is the only way to love God fully and to become as God is.

    13. When God’s children live the Gospel of Jesus Christ in any numbers, they are given the privilege of instituting a celestial society on the earth. That society is called, “Zion.”

    Lesson Six: The Savior

    1.   Our Savior has over four hundred name-titles (counting all the variations). Each of these is significant of some special aspect of his mission. Some of the principal name-titles he bears are the following:

    ·    Christ: Anointed One, the one whom Father has commissioned.

    ·    Messiah: The Hebrew version of the title, “Christ”.

    ·    Redeemer: The one who saves men from the Fall.

    ·    Savior: The one who saves men from their sins.

    ·    Jehovah: The god of the Old Testament who became Jesus.

    ·    Jesus: The Anglicized form of the Greek representation of the Hebrew “Joshua”, which was the Savior’s given name in mortality.

    ·    Master: The leader to whom we look.

    ·    Lord: The ruler or president over the faithful.

    ·    Rabbi: The Hebrew for “teacher.”

    ·    Only Begotten: The only human on earth ever directly begotten by God the Father.

    ·    Son of Man: Son of Man of Holiness, God the Father being Man of Holiness.

    ·    Alpha and Omega: The one who begins all things and also ends them.

    ·    Great I Am: The fully existing one.

    ·    Mighty One of Israel: Abraham’s God, who is almighty and specially remembers the children of Abraham.

    ·    Good Shepherd: He who leads us into life eternal.

    ·    Fountain of Righteousness: The only source of righteousness for the inhabitants of this earth.

    ·    The Way: He is the perfect example of the only way back to the Father.

    ·    The Truth: He is the source of all truth for mankind.

    ·    The Life: He is the giver of all forms of life.

    ·    The Light of the World: His light brings hope for righteousness and peace to all mankind.

    ·    The Door: No one can get into heaven except through Him.

    2.   The merits of Him who is mighty to save:

    ·    He is the authorized representative of our Father in Heaven.

    ·    He knows all things.

    ·    He can do anything which can be done.

    ·    He is perfect; no selfishness of any kind.

    ·    He is love: His love blesses every human being.

    ·    He is long-suffering: He lets us work out our salvation.

    ·    He is mindful: He maintains a constant vigilance over all his creations, and no thought, feeling, desire, action or problem of any of His creations escapes his attention.

    ·    He is in control: Nothing in heaven or earth happens except by his instruction, permission or allowance.

    ·    He saves: He can perfect and exalt any human being who desires to be saved.

    3.   As Christ (Messiah, the Anointed One), our Savior has a specific mission to perform in behalf of the Father. We will break it into parts for understanding, with the understanding that in reality this mission is all one piece, each part being a necessary part of the single whole.

    a.   Firstborn of the Father: His role was to accept the Father’s will as the plan for salvation of all mankind.

    b.   Jehovah: His role was to create the heavens and the earth (and many other earths and heavens like this one) and all things that in them are. This creation includes the Fall, and is ongoing, even now.

    c.   Lord God: His role after the Fall was to be the light of the world, thus to control how much knowledge, truth and wisdom every man has or can get. Thus, the Savior is in control of the life, breath, accomplishments and failures of every being. (Of course every being has agency; the Savior’s control is what enables that agency to be a reality.)

    d.   Son of God: Being born of Mary, from her gaining a body of flesh and bone and blood, and being sired by our Father in Heaven, he gained power to be perfect and to live forever. He lived a perfect life, explicitly obeying His Father in all things he said and did.

    e.   Savior: He atoned for the sins of all mankind, suffering the wrath of Almighty God for them, that they might not need to. And he voluntarily gave up his opportunity to be a mortal forever in order to seize the keys of death that all men might be resurrected from the grave.

    f.    Judge: All men go immediately to his presence when they die and are assigned to prison or paradise, as is expedient. But only those who go to paradise see him and know that they have gone back to his presence when they die.

    g.   Advocate: When all preparations are complete, each person is resurrected and stands before the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost to receive a final (eternal) judgment. The Savior there pleads the case of every soul who was willing to hear His voice and repent through the Holy Spirit.

    h.   Father: The Savior is father in the patriarchal lineage to all of the righteous for the remainder of eternity. With them he shares all that His Father has given Him, and they become equal with Him to all eternity. Those who were not completely righteous become the servants to him and his righteous children, and they willingly, gladly serve the Savior and his righteous children to all eternity (exception: the sons of Perdition).

    4.   The Atonement:

    God’s law is righteousness. He only commands or instructs or entices men to do that which is righteous. The spokesman for that law is Christ. To obey that law with one’s body is the beginning of faith. To obey fully is to love God (obey Him) with all of one’s heart, might, mind and strength. Whatsoever any person does that is not of faith is sin.

    Sin, being transgression of God’s law, knowingly or unknowingly, always inflicts evil on those whom it affects (opposite to the blessings which faith begets). The Father is acutely mindful of the blessings and evils which men visit upon one another, and he cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance. Every sin must be compensated for by 1) a suffering equal to the suffering caused by the sin, and 2) a restoration to the person(s) sinned against by the blessing(s) they would have had, had the perpetrator not sinned.

    Our Savior did not sin once during mortality. Because of this He could take upon Himself the suffering due for the sins of every other human being. This he did, suffering he wrath of his Father or all the sins of mankind, past, present and future, in that last twenty-four-hour period of his life. Only a God could suffer that much. But the Savior persevered, difficult though it was, and finished his preparations to the children of men. This specific act of suffering was the atonement. The Hebrew form of this concept means, “to cover.” The Greek form means, “drastic change.” The English form means, “to reconcile.”

    Lesson Seven: Faith in Jesus Christ

    1.   A principle is a general rule, a universal. In the Gospel of Jesus Christ there is but one rule or law. All other principles are but explications, portions or facets of the one general rule. (D&C 132:4–13)

    2.   The name of the one law is: Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Other wordings to describe the law are:

    a.   Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy might, mind and strength; and in the name of Jesus Christ shalt thou serve him. (D&C 59:5)

    b.   One must love, hear and obey Jesus Christ, making every sacrifice necessary to do so. (D&C 97:8)

    3.   There is no shortage of faith in the world, for every person lives by faith. Each must do so because we know nothing about the future (we only guess). Every person puts his faith and trust for the future in something or somebody.

    4.   Characteristics of faith in Christ:

    a.   Type: Relationship to Christ.

    b.   Similar: Trust, obedience, love for, belief in.

    c.   Contrary: Unbelief, distrust, disobedience, disdain for, ignoring.

    d.   Prerequisite: Personal revelation from Jesus Christ.

    e.   Constituents: Love for, trust in, obedience by sacrifice.

    f.    Perfection: To live by every word that proceeds forth from His mouth, with a firm mind in every form of godliness.

    g.   Counterfeit: To confess with the mouth, but not to believe or obey.

    h.   Complement: Fear.

    i.    Opposite: actively work against Christ by the power of Satan.

    j.    Celestial faith: To love and obey God will all of my heart, might, mind and strength.

    k.   Terrestrial faith: To believe and obey God when he speaks to me.

    l.    Telestial faith: To obey God when I am threatened.

    m.  Perdition: To pretend to obey God, but secretly to work against him.

    5.   Key scriptures on faith:

    a.   Hab. 2:4 The just shall live by faith

    b.   Matt. 9:22 Thy faith hath made thee whole

    c.   Matt. 9:29 According to thy faith, be it unto you

    d.   Matt. 21:21 If ye have faith, and doubt not

    e.   Luke 22:32 I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not

    f.    Rom. 10:17 Faith cometh by the hearing of the word

    g.   Rom. 14:23 Whatsoever is not of faith is of sin

    h.   2 Cor. 5:7 For we walk by faith, not sight

    i.    Gal. 2:6 Be justified by the faith of Christ

    j.    Gal. 3:12 The law is not of faith

    k.   Eph. 2:8 By grace are ye saved through faith; it is the gift of God

    l.    Eph. 4:13 We all come in a unity of the faith

    m.  Eph. 6:16 Above all, taking the shield of faith

    n.   Heb. 11:1 Faith is the substance of things hoped for

    o.   Heb. 11:6 Without faith it is impossible to please God

    p.   Heb. 12:2 The author and finisher of our faith

    q.   Jas. 1:6 Let him ask in faith, nothing wavering

    r.    Jas. 2:14 Even so, faith, if it hath not works, is dead

    s.    1 Pet. 1:7 Through the trial of your faith

    t.    2 Pet. 1:7 Add to your faith, virtue

    u.   2 Nephi 31:19 Christ with unshaken faith in him

    v.   Mosiah 8:18 That man through faith might work might miracles

    w.  Hel. 3:35 Wax firmer in the faith of Christ

    x.   Eth. 3:19 He had faith no longer

    y.   Moro. 7:39 Of strong faith and a firm mind

    z.   D&C 8:10 Without faith you can do nothing

    aa. D&C 63:9 Faith cometh not by signs

    bb. D&C 104:55 All the properties are mine or else your faith is vain

    6.   Key Questions:

    a.   How is faith related to knowledge? One must have a personal knowledge of God’s command, then do it, not knowing that God will bless us, but believing that he will.

    b.   Who needs faith in Christ? All who have sinned and are accountable.

    c.   Will faith ever be done away? Some faith is replaced by knowledge. But faith is the principle by which the gods interrelate. It is an eternal principle.

    d.   What can faith accomplish? Faith is the power to lay hold of every good thing, including enduring to the end.

    e.   What is it to be faithful? It is to endure to the end, until I have the heart, might, mind and strength of Christ.

    Lesson Eight: Obedience and Sacrifice

    1.   Obedience and sacrifice are part of faith in Jesus Christ. When one who has not had faith desires to begin to do so, the beginning of faith is to obey the commandments of God. That obedience must be sincere. It must not be just a business deal with God: I’ll do this for you if you will do that for me. The obedience must be that of a humble child before his father, who, having sinned, now earnestly seeks to walk in the way of his father. The measure of the sincerity of that obedience is the sacrifices one is willing to make to obey the Father.

    2.   Obedience is of the strength, the body. Sacrifice is of the strength and of the might. Before we can obey, we must learn the Father’s will; this is the involvement of our mind. We understand the instruction of God with our mind, obey with our bodies, and give up whatever of our might (money, time, property, influence) that is necessary to fulfill obedience. This is part of faith, a substantial beginning to faith. It lacks only the pure love of Christ to make it a complete faith. But most of us can learn and gain that pure love that completes faith only through obedience and sacrifice.

    3.   The word obey derives from the Latin obedire, which comes from ob + audire, to give ear. The Greek is hupakouo, to hear under. The Hebrew is shama, to hearken, to hear.

    a.   Celestial obedience is to hear and recognize the voice of God and do exactly as he instructs, and to do it immediately.

    b.   Terrestrial obedience is to obey God only after we fully understand why we are being told to do something.

    c.   Telestial obedience is to obey God only when we feel like doing so.

    d.   Perdition obedience is to obey God only when forced to do so.

    e.   Constituents: Understand the revelation from God, and act accordingly.

    f.    Counterfeit: To obey God’s instruction only when and as Satan prompts us to do so. This is not obedience to God.

    g.   Opposite: Obedience to Satan.

    h.   Complement: To do only as we desire to do.

    i.    Similar: Faith in Jesus Christ, to hearken, to serve.

    j.    Contrary: Refuse to hear; to disdain, disobey and ignore.

    k.   Positive example: Adam offering sacrifice after being cast out.

    l.    Negative example: Jonah trying to run away from his mission call.

    4.   The difference understanding obedience should make:

    a.   Heart: I should desire to obey God in all things, no matter the cost.

    b.   Mind: I must strive to identify the voice of God unerringly and to understand all that he would have me do.

    c.   Strength: I must discipline my body to do God’s will in all things.

    d.   Might: I must never count the cost; I will serve and obey no matter what the cost, knowing that eventually the cost is all that I have.

    5.   Key scriptures on obedience:

    a.   Rom. 5:19 So by the obedience of one

    b.   Rom. 16:26 To all nations for the obedience of faith

    c.   Heb. 5:8 Yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered

    d.   Isa. 1:19 If ye be willing and obedient, ye shall eat

    e.   Deut. 27:10 Obey the voice of the Lord, thy God

    f.    1 Sam. 15:2 To obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than

    g.   Acts 5:29 Ought to obey God rather than men

    h.   Rom. 6:16 His servants ye are to whom you obey

    i.    Heb. 5:9 Salvation unto all them that obey

    j.    1 Pet. 1:22 Purified your souls in obeying the truth

    k.   D&C 105:6 Chastened until they learn obedience

    l.    D&C 130:19 Through his diligence and obedience

    m.  Moses 5:8 Be obedient unto the ends of your lives

    n.   Moses 5:11 God giveth unto all the obedient

    o.   1 Neph. 4:18 I did obey the voice of the Spirit

    p.   Jac. 4:6 And the very trees obey us

    q.   D&C 42:2 Hearken and hear and obey

    6.   The word sacrifice comes from the Latin sacra, holy and ficeo, to make or to do: to make holy.

    7.   To sacrifice is to put oneself into the path of holiness by obeying the voice of God and by giving up all that he requires us to give up to perfect that obedience. There is no sacrifice without obedience.

    a.   Celestial sacrifice: To obey the Lord unto giving up all he requires.

    b.   Terrestrial sacrifice: To sacrifice unto the Lord when it seems right (to our own mind) to do so.

    c.   Telestial sacrifice: To sacrifice when we feel moved (by our own desires) to sacrifice unto the Lord.

    d.   Perdition sacrifice: To sacrifice only as Satan instructs us to do.

    e.   Genus of sacrifice: Quality of obedience.

    f.    Similar: Diligence, promptness, carefulness.

    g.   Contrary: Loose, undependable, careless, shallow.

    h.   Perfection: To lay down one’s life.

    i.    Opposite: To cling to all we have and are.

    j.    Counterfeit: To sacrifice only as Satan commands.

    k.   Prerequisite: Obedience.

    l.    Constituents: Something owned that is precious to us. Giving up that something precious to be abused.

    m.  Positive example: The Savior gave up his infinite mortality.

    n.   Negative example: The rich young man would not give away his wealth.

    8.   Difference understanding sacrifice should make:

    a.   Heart: I must hold nothing more dear than obedience to God.

    b.   Mind: I must learn what sacrifices he would have me make.

    c.   Strength: I must perform the sacrifices he instructs.

    d.   Might: I must suffer any loss necessary, possibly all I have.

    9.   Key Question: What is the most important sacrifice which all persons must make: To have a broken heart (to give up all pride or supposition that I somehow am “worthy” of being saved), and to have a contrite spirit (to be willing to suffer with Christ, to give up everything of this world, if necessary, as he did).

    10. Key scriptures:

    a.   Exo. 5:8 Let us go and sacrifice to our God

    b.   Exo. 12:27 It is the sacrifice of the Lord’s Passover

    c.   The physical universe which we see with our natural eyes is created after the pattern of the spiritual universe. The spiritual universe is prior in time, and governs and controls the physical universe. (Moses 3:7; D&C 29:30–36)

    d.   Prov. 15:8 Sacrifice of the wicked is an abomination

    e.   Daniel 12:11 The daily sacrifice shall be taken away

    f.    Hos. 6:6 For I desire mercy, and not sacrifice

    g.   Plus: Mal. 1:8; Rom. 12:1; Heb. 11:4; 2 Neph. 2:7; Alma 26:32, 34:10; D&C 59:8, 64:23, 97:8

    Lesson Nine: Gospel Principles (Continued)

    1.   Hope is the righteous expectation of receiving the blessings which the Father has to give to us.

    2.   “Hope” comes from the Anglo-Saxon hopa; Ger. hoffa.

    3.   Hope is an attitude of heart and mind; the mind understands a possibility which the heart then desires. If the person works intelligently to achieve that possibility, then hope is justified.

    4.   Gospel hope is to understand the way of holiness, to desire it and the place to which it leads, and to enter into it. Only then, through one’s faithful obedience to God, can one have a hope in Christ.

    a.   Celestial hope is righteous expectation of eternal life.

    b.   Terrestrial hope is the expectation of a just reward.

    c.   Telestial hope is wishing that things would be better.

    d.   Perdition hope is the desire both to sin and to receive the blessings of God.

    e.   Opposite: Doubt.

    f.    Complement: Wonder.

    g.   Counterfeit: Wish.

    h.   Positive example: Lehi had a hope in Christ.

    i.    Negative example: Laman had no hope in Christ.

    5.   Difference this concept should make in my life:

    a.   Heart: I trust completely in the Lord’s love and providence because I love Him.

    b.   Mind: I believe that the future is assured because I understand and accept the ways of God.

    c.   Strength: I serve God with all of my strength because I have hope.

    d.   Might: I perfect my stewardship to become a celestial kingdom stewardship because I have hope: I trust that God will be with me and sustain me.

    6.   Key Scriptures:

    a.   Joel 3:16 The Lord will be the hope of His people

    b.   Heb. 6:19 Which hope we have as an anchor of the soul

    c.   2 Neph. 31:20 A perfect brightness of hope

    d.   Alma 32:21 If ye have faith, ye hope for things

    e.   Ether 12:4 With surety hope for a better world

    7.   Charity is the pure love of Christ, caring for Him and for His righteousness above all else unto the perfect fulfilling of all of his instructions.

    8.   How does one obtain this pure love? This love does not occur naturally. It is a gift of God to all who seek it through mighty prayer, repentance from all sinning and striving to be faith full.

    9.   “Charity” comes from the Latin caritas, which derives from carus, dear.

    a.   Celestial love is charity, God’s pure love reflected back to him and to our neighbors (which includes our enemies).

    b.   Terrestrial love is loyal love for family and friends.

    c.   Telestial love is whimsical affection.

    d.   Perdition love is love for self and self alone.

    e.   The genus of charity is relationships with others. Similar are to like, esteem, venerate, honor, eulogize.

    f.    Contrary are to despise, ignore, vilify, deprecate.

    g.   Opposite: Hatred for Christ and neighbor.

    h.   Complement: Selfishness.

    i.    Prerequisites: Receiving the pure love from Christ, plus faith on our part.

    j.    Constituents: Love grows through faith in Christ until it is perfected in charity.

    k.   Counterfeit: Fawning.

    l.    Positive example: Nephi loved so purely that he could perform miracles.

    m.  Negative example: Laman and Lemuel could not love their father, their brothers, nor their God, though they were served, blessed, protected and preserved by them.

    10. Key Scriptures:

    a.   1 Cor 13 (Whole chapter)

    b.   Moroni 7:44 If he have not charity he is nothing

    c.   John 13:34 A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love

    d.   John 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments

    e.   D&C 121:41 By meekness and love unfeigned

    11. Repentance is to turn from whatever we have been doing to the way of Christ, to love and serve Him with all of our heart, might, mind, and strength.

    12. “Repent” derives from the Fr. repentir, from the L. poenitentia, to regret. The Greek is metanoia, to change one’s mind. The Hebrew has two forms, one meaning to sigh, the other to return.

    a.   Celestial repentance is to replace every sin with faith in Jesus Christ.

    b.   Terrestrial repentance is to have remorse, resolve, replacement and restitution.

    c.   Telestial repentance is to say, “I’m sorry.”

    d.   Perdition repentance is to repent celestially, then to repent of that repentance (to turn back to sinning deliberately.)

    e.   Prerequisites: Desire to change, knowing how and to what to change.

    f.    Opposite: To turn to evil.

    g.   Complement: Hard-heartedness.

    h.   Counterfeit: To say one has repented, but to continue sinning in secret. (Confess but not forsake.)

    i.    Positive example: Cornelius fully accepted the way of Christ.

    j.    Negative example: Ananias and Sapphira said they were faithful, but were not.

    13. When is it too late to repent? When one has denied the Holy Ghost; when one has shed innocent blood; after mortal death (LDS persons who understand the Gospel cannot repent to celestial salvation except in this life); when one has so little life left that he cannot establish new habits of righteousness (there can be no deathbed repentance).

    14. When is repentance complete? Only when one has become as the Savior in heart, might, mind and strength.

    15. What restitution is required for the law of Moses? One for one. For the law of Christ (the Gospel): four for one. (See D&C 98)

    16. Key Scriptures:

    a.   Alma 5:49 They must all repent and be born again.

    b.   D&C 19:4 Every man must repent or suffer.

    c.   + 2 Cor. 7:10; Heb. 6:4–6; 1 Ne. 14:5; Jac. 3:3.

    Lesson Ten: Gospel Principles (Concluded)

    1.   Justice is required of men by God, for God is just, and for men to be godly they must be just. The word “justice” comes from the Latin justus, just, which derives from jus, right or law.

    2.   To be just or to achieve justice is to do what is right according to the law. To do what is right according to human law is an approximation of real justice, for neither the laws themselves nor the interpretations and procedures by which men pursue justice are perfect. True Justice is thus to obey God’s law according to his instructions. It is to be upright, square, to measure up to what God requires. The opposite of justice is to default on one’s obligations.

    3.   God requires that a man make only appropriate promises, then keep those promises exactly. This includes the careful discharge of stewardships, the honoring of others, the full payment of debts. Terrestrial justice is to restore one for one for a wrong done, a tooth for a tooth. Celestial justice requires that a wrongdoer restore four times the hurt caused.

    4.   In the New and Everlasting Covenant, every person promises to obey every instruction which God gives them. Thus to be just, a person must live by every word which proceeds forth out of the mouth of God. Perhaps the most important thing a person can do is just to have an eye single to the glory of God.

    5.   God commands all men to be merciful. The word mercy comes from the Latin mercedem, which means reward or fee. Also derived from that root are the words merchant and mercenary, both involving the payment of money.

    6.   To be merciful is to pay the debts of others, either those owed directly to ourselves or those owed to others. God commands every man to pay his own debts if he can, thus to be just, but also commands us to be merciful towards others, even as He is. Thus to refuse to be merciful when God so instructs is to decline to be just.

    7.   No man can pay the debt for his own sins, for that takes a being of infinite power to correct the wrongs that we have done which have infinite consequences. Thus we all depend on God for mercy. But God requires of us that we forgive all men their trespasses against us before he will forgive us.

    8.   The justice of God requires that every man recognize the source of all of the good things which he has, which source is God himself. The formal manner of making that recognition is to consecrate all that one has to God.

    9.   The word consecrate comes from the Latin consecrare, to devote as sacred. To consecrate is to dedicate someone to the service of God, or to dedicate and use something in the service of God. It is required of every just servant of God that he consecrate everything he has to the service of God. That means that he will use his strength, his mind, his talents, his property only to serve the God of Heaven. In this serving of the God of Heaven, he will pay his debts to the world, but will never willingly use anything which he controls for an evil purpose.

    10. One who has consecrated all to the Lord must use all that he has to promote good in the world according to God’s instruction, and to report back to God exactly what he has done in fulfilling those instructions. Thus to use one’s goods and to report back in a cycle which begins on earth and extends into eternity is to fulfill the principle of stewardship.

    11. The word stewardship comes from old English stig, of uncertain meaning, and ward, keeper. The word was used to designated one who controls the domestic affairs of a household or a special officer of a royal household.

    12. To be a steward is to acknowledge God as the owner of all that we are and have, including our own bodies, and to strive to please Him in all that we do with His property. The only way to please Him is to act in faith in Jesus Christ, which is to obey his law, which is to be just.

    13. To Keep the commandments of God is not a power which men have naturally. Thus the natural man, he who is without God and Christ in the world, can only sin continually. But God sends His love into the world to save every man out of the world who desires to be saved. This salvation comes by teaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ and administering the ordinances to all who sincerely obey it. The power which enables men to keep the commandments of God is the constant companionship of the Holy Ghost, which no natural man can have. But to all those who are willing to come to Christ as little children, repenting of their sins and sincerely desiring to keep every commandment which God gives them, God gives the unspeakable gift of the Holy Ghost. But this holy person cannot dwell in an unclean vessel. So any person who needs the Gospel because they have sinned and is unclean must also be cleansed by the blood of Christ, through the atonement, before that constant companionship can come. That cleansing does come after one has made the covenant of baptism and at the moment one receives the Holy Ghost according to the command given in the ordinance of confirmation into the church, when it is said to us, “Receive the Holy Ghost”. That necessary cleansing is called in the scriptures sanctification.

    14. The word sanctification comes from the Latin sacra, sacred or holy, and from ficare, to do or to make. Thus sanctification means to make holy. In the gospel of Jesus Christ, sanctification means to make holy. In the gospel of Jesus Christ, sanctification is the making of something whole or holy by the power of God for the sake of a subsequent special service to God. That service is the living of a faithful, just, merciful, consecrated life of stewardship under Christ. That sanctification is achieved by God forgiving all the past sins of the repentant person who has forgiven others their trespasses.

    15. The desired result of mortality in the Gospel of Jesus Chris is to attain to the habits, the character, the religion of Jesus Christ, to take upon ourselves the divine nature, which is to rise to the measure of the fulness of the stature of Christ. This change can be made only by those who are sanctified. The change itself is called justification.

    16. The word justification comes from the Latin and means to make just. Gospel justification is not only making the deeds of a man just, but making him just, one who will do no sin. He abides every law (commandment) of God, and thus is lawful, Just. The counterfeit of gospel justification is being excused for breaking the law while remaining unable to keep the law. This counterfeit may be asserted by the self, and is then known as self-justification. Or it may be asserted by an earthly judge as a way of suspending a punishment. But real gospel justification is rising in strength and the gifts of God unto keeping every law, thus becoming a truly just person.

    Lesson Eleven: The Saving Ordinances

    1.   The saving ordinances are those necessary to exaltation. They are also called the New and Everlasting Covenant. The specific ordinances of that covenant are baptism, laying on of hands for the bestowing of the Gift of the Holy Ghost, ordination to the Melchizedek Priesthood, the temple endowment, and temple sealing.

    2.   Baptism is the beginning of the covenant with God. To be eligible for this ordinance one must be accountable, have heard, understood and accepted the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ, must have exercised faith in Jesus Christ unto repentance from all sinning (of which the person is aware), and repentance unto the requesting of baptism. This worthiness is to be ascertained and attested by the person who controls the records, for a baptism is official only when recorded by the person who has the authority to do so.

    3.   Baptism is administered by one having authority from the record keeper, who has authority from God. The candidate enters the water with the person performing the ordinance and is completely immersed in and then brought forth from the water. This process serves as a symbol of the death and resurrection of the Savior. It also represents the death of the old, unrepentant person, the candidate was who then arises out of the water into a new life, a new creature being remade in the image of Christ. Two competent witnesses must attest the correctness of the administration of this ordinance.

    4.   The purpose of this ordinance is for the candidate to make a covenant with God through this immersion in which he or she promises (1) to take upon themselves the name of Jesus Christ (willing to be known by all men as His servant), (2) to keep all the instructions he or she receives from the Savior, and (3) to remember the Savior (and this covenant) always. This covenant is not of force unless the candidate truly makes those promises. The ordinance cannot be recognized unless it is immediately followed by the next ordinance, the laying on of hands, for only then can the promises be kept.

    5.   The laying on of hands for the Gift of the Holy Ghost is performed by someone who is authorized to do so by he who controls the records. The administrator must hold the Melchizedek priesthood. The essence of the ordinance is to pronounce that the person is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and to command him or her to receive the Holy Ghost. The purpose of this ordinance is to bestow the opportunity for the constant companionship of the Holy Ghost on the person. Through that companionship he or she will have access to the knowledge and power necessary to know and keep the general and personal commandments of Jesus Christ to him or her.

    6.   Those who enjoy and treasure the companionship of the Holy Spirit will be obedient, and as they are obedient, they are told more and more of what to do. The ultimate and ideal condition is to walk, talk, think and feel under the constant influence of this divine being. That is the basic preparation for being able to abide the presence of the Son and the Father, which is eternal life.

    7.   Ordination to the Melchizedek Priesthood is administered to one who has been faithful in keeping the covenant of baptism and faithful in yielding to the influence of the Holy Spirit (those two are one and the same thing, said in different ways.) The recipient promises to use the power of God righteously: to do whatever God instructs the bearer to do, and to do it as he is instructed to do it. This is the covenant of the priesthood. The oath of the priesthood is God’s promise to share all that he has with those who prove faithful to their priesthood covenants during their probation.

    8.   Every bearer has potentially the full power of the Melchizedek Priesthood as an elder. But that power is manifest only as authorized. Specific authorization may come with ordination to an office other than elder, such as seventy, high priest, or patriarch. A priesthood bearer is fully authorized only when (1) he is acting in the authority to which he has been ordained, (2) to which he has specifically been set apart, and (3) for which he is acting under specific instructions from the Holy Spirit (D&C 68:2–4). A Melchizedek Priesthood bearer who is thus fully authorized speaks the mind and will of the Lord and has the power of God unto salvation. Ordinations to this priesthood are eternal in nature.

    9.   The purpose of the temple endowment is to give further priesthood knowledge, power and authority to the recipient. It is a special gift from God to complement the Gift of the Holy Ghost. It gives the worthy recipient knowledge and power to overcome the world while in the flesh and to pass to the celestial kingdom in the next world. Much of the endowment is highly symbolic. It may be understood only by one who enjoys the companionship of the Holy Spirit born out of faithful obedience to Jesus Christ through that same Holy Spirit. There are specific covenants and promises which a person must make to complete the receiving of the endowment. The promises are sacred, and must not be spoken of outside the temple, but are all embraced in the idea that we should love the Lord, our God, with all of our heart, might, mind and strength, and serve Him in the name of Jesus Christ (D&C 59:5). Anyone who is willing to do that will have no surprises nor discomfiture with any of the covenants or promises made in the temple. The temple is not a place one goes as a test of his faith, but as a reward for his past faith and an empowering of greater faithfulness in the future.

    10. The temple sealing is marriage in the New and Everlasting Covenant and the binding of children to their sealed parents. The ordinance is permissive, not compulsory. It permits the formation of an eternal union which God will honor if the participants forge and prove an eternal bond of love in righteousness. But no one is required to maintain any association or binding which is against his or her will or desires. This temple sealing is the official ordination and setting apart of a couple to be authorized mother and father before God. No one else can or does have that authority (ability and authority must not be confused). All other forms of marriage that human beings have participated in must be repented of and replaced by this sealing to have any force or existence beyond the grave. (D&C 132).

    11. These saving ordinances are earthly ordinances and can only be performed on earth in the flesh. Thus this mortality is the unique access to the celestial blessings in eternity. Faithfulness in mortality on the part of the human family is the only possible means of becoming as the Father is and sharing all He has. Faithful children may perform these ordinances on earth and in the flesh for their departed ancestors, but if no one were faithful on earth while in the flesh, there could not be any blessing in eternity for anyone, including the righteous (Malachi 4:5–6).

    12. The details of the New and Everlasting Covenant are the most important piece of information in this world. But that information is useless without the power and authority to administer the ordinances.

    Lesson Twelve: Other Ordinances

    1.   The Blessing of Little Children

    Purpose: To assist and protect children until they come to the age of accountability.

    Procedure: The child is given a name which is to be used on the records of the church and such blessing as the person who is mouth is inspired to give.

    Priesthood: The Melchizedek Priesthood is necessary.

    Note: Many children are prayed for, not blessed, in the attempt to perform this ordinance.

    2.   Administering to the sick

    Purpose: To keep the adversary from cutting the person’s mission short. The healing is not given simply to relieve the person, but so that they can do the Lord’s work. In other words, healing is not done so that the person can continue to sin, but so that he or she can to the work of righteousness.

    Procedure: Normal: Two persons perform. One anoints with consecrated oil. The second seals the anointing and pronounces whatever blessings are given to him to say by the Holy Spirit.

    Exceptions: One person may anoint and seal and bless in one operation. One person may lay hands and bless without using consecrated oil. A worthy sister may, for members of her family, anoint with consecrated oil and pray for the person to be blessed. In an emergency situation a priesthood bearer can administer to himself if and as he is instructed by the Holy Spirit.

    Priesthood: The Melchizedek Priesthood is necessary.

    Note: If the person is healed, he or she is also forgiven of his or her sins.

    3.   Blessing

    Purpose: To increase the flow of divine blessings to the recipient. These may be blessings of comfort, knowledge, strength, courage, etc., according to the need of the recipient.

    Procedure: Any person may request a blessing for a special concern, and any priesthood leader may initiate a blessing for someone in his stewardship. If both parties agree that a blessing from the Lord is desirable, then hands are laid on and the mind and will of the Lord is spoken.

    Priesthood: The Melchizedek Priesthood is necessary.

    Note: much evil can be done in attempting to perform this ordinance outside of priesthood stewardship boundaries.

    4.   Patriarchal Blessing

    Purpose: To provide a personal revelation to the recipient which designates his or her lineage in Israel and such other blessings as are important to administer by the Holy Spirit.

    Procedure: Upon receiving the proper recommendation from one’s Bishop (and Stake President, in some cases), the person presents himself or herself to the patriarch designated by agreement between the person receiving the blessing and the person making the recommendation. The patriarch then administers that blessing which is given through him by revelation.

    Priesthood: The administrator must be an ordained patriarch.

    Note: Fathers may give patriarchal blessings which may be recorded by the family, but they will not be recorded by the church as the ordained patriarch’s blessings are.

    5.   Cursing

    Purpose: To bring the person to his senses so that he will be encouraged to repent. All cursings from the Lord are actually blessings.

    Procedure: The person administering the curse must be acting in his priesthood stewardship and say and do only that which the Lord instructs.

    Priesthood: The Melchizedek Priesthood is required.

    Note: The administrator must take no delight in the curse.

    6.   Excommunication

    Purpose: This is a form of curse. It is administered to release the person from his or her covenants, to cut him off from the companionship of the Holy Spirit, and to deliver the person into the power of Satan. All this is done in the hope that the person will be brought to repent.

    Procedure: An official church court must be convened, to which the person involved must be invited. A high council court must try a bearer of the Melchizedek Priesthood. A Bishop’s court may try any other person who is a member, and may also disfellowship a bearer of the Melchizedek Priesthood. Witnesses are heard, and the charges against the person must be established either by the person’s own testimony, or in the mouths of two or more witnesses. After the evidence has been heard, the presiding authority renders the verdict of the Lord (received through prayer, from the Holy Spirit). If the verdict is upheld by the other members of the court (the Bishop’s counselors, or the counselors and high council of the Stake President), then the verdict is rendered to the person concerned with whatever counsel to encourage him or her to repent that seems appropriate. It is the recording of this ordinance which makes it official. Priesthood: The person administering this ordinance must be the presiding high priest over the person concerned.

    7.   Consecration.

    Purpose: To set somebody or something apart for the work of the Lord. This is an occasion for the administration of the blessings which will make the performance of that work possible. Examples: Consecration of oil; dedication of a home, a chapel, a temple, or a grave; the setting apart of a person to a special calling.

    Procedure: The person who performs the ordinance does and says those things which are given to him to do by the Holy Spirit.

    Priesthood: The person performing must either have stewardship authority over whoever or whatever is being consecrated, or have a specific delegation of authority to do so from the proper steward.

    8.   The Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper.

    Purpose: To enable a person to renew all of his or her own covenants with the Lord, and to thereby regain the companionship of the Holy Spirit.

    Procedure: The emblems (bread and wine, or bread and water) are consecrated and passed to worthy members of the Church. The sacramental prayers of consecration recapitulate the covenant of baptism. To be worthy to partake, one must be earnestly striving to keep one’s covenants. The emblems represent the flesh and blood of the Savior and may become the flesh and blood of the Savior.

    Priesthood: The administrator must hold the office of Priest in the Aaronic Priesthood, but may be assisted by Teachers or Deacons.

    Note: To partake of the sacrament unworthily, not intending to honor one’s covenants, is to invite Satan, disease and death into one’s life.

    Lesson Thirteen: Priesthood

    1.   Priesthood is the power and authority to represent God. It is the power of God himself, given to man to use correctly. To receive the priesthood is to enter into an apprenticeship training to become a god by learning to do all things under the tutelage of God.

    2.   There are two basic kinds of power in the universe. One is push power, such as the power of a lever, a jack or an explosion; this kind takes a small amount of physical push power, such as muscle power, and multiplies it through mechanical or chemical means. The second kind of power is word power, the ability to control and direct things by speaking to them. Priesthood power is this second kind of power.

    3.   The life of a Latter-day Saint is supposed to be the learning of the ability to do all things by priesthood power instead of push power (which is compulsion). The more righteous a person is, the more successful he or she will be in using priesthood power to accomplish the work of his or her stewardship. To most LDS persons, it seems easier and faster to use push power to get things done, so priesthood power is perhaps wished for, but is not employed except in an emergency when there is no other hope.

    4.   In actual practice, a righteous person under the influence of the Holy Spirit will simply do whatever he or she is instructed to do by that Spirit, and in the manner instructed. When doing the work of God, the how of doing is always at least as important as the what of doing. This means that some things will be done by push power, and some by priesthood power. But the long-term trend will be to increase the usage of priesthood power and to decrease the use of push power.

    5.   The instruction for using priesthood power is as follows:

    … the rights of the priesthood are inseparably connected with the powers of heaven, and that the powers of heaven cannot be controlled nor handled only upon the principles of righteousness. That they may be conferred upon us, it is true; but when we undertake to cover our sins, or to gratify our pride, our vain ambition, or to exercise control or dominion or compulsion upon the souls of the children of men in any degree of unrighteousness, behold, the heavens withdraw themselves; the spirit of the Lord is grieved; and when it is withdrawn, Amen to the priesthood or the authority of that man. Behold, ere he is aware, he is left unto himself, to kick against the pricks, to persecute the saints, and to fight against God. We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion. Hence, many are called, but few are chosen. No power or influence can or ought to be maintained by virtue of the priesthood, only by persuasion, by long-suffering, by gentleness and meekness, and by love unfeigned; By kindness, and pure knowledge, which shall greatly enlarge the soul without hypocrisy, and without guile—Reproving betimes with sharpness, when moved upon by the Holy Ghost; and then showing forth afterward an increase of love toward him whom thou hast reproved, lest he esteem thee to be his enemy; That he may know that thy faithfulness is stronger than the cords of death. Let thy bowels also be full of charity towards all men, and to the household of faith, and let virtue garnish thy thoughts unceasingly; then shall thy confidence wax strong in the presence of God; and the doctrine of the priesthood distill upon they soul as the dews from heaven. The Holy Ghost shall be thy constant companion, and thy scepter an unchanging scepter of righteousness and truth; and thy dominion shall be an everlasting dominion, and without compulsory means it shall flow unto thee forever and ever. (D&C 121:36–46)

    6.   The pattern of the world is to use force and compulsion, especially on other persons, in the satisfying of one’s personal needs (some form of slavery), and the use of force and compulsion to manage one’s stewardship (political or business arrangements which depend upon the use of force).

    The pattern of the saint is to use his own physical power to satisfy his own personal needs (to labor with his own hands), and to use the power of the priesthood (persuasion) to manage his stewardship.

    Why does the saint insist upon supplying his personal needs by the labor of his own hands?

    7.   How is the power of the priesthood to be used in:

    a.   Education

    b.   Farming

    c.   Manufacturing

    d.   Law

    e.   Medicine

    f.    Police work

    g.   Building

    h.   Scientific research

    i.    Scholarly work

    j.    Politics

    k.   Raising a family

    l.    Bonding a husband and wife

    Lesson Fourteen: Marriage

    1.   The marriage companionship is the unit of exaltation. “Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord.” (1 Cor. 11:11)

    2.   God ordained marriage as a holy ordinance pertaining to the Melchizedek Priesthood. Many ignore the Lord, choosing to marry in their own way, as they please. “Noah called upon the children of men, that they should repent, but they hearkened not unto his words. And also, after they had heard him, they came up before him saying, Behold, we are the sons of God, and have we not taken unto ourselves the daughter of men? and are we not eating and drinking and marrying and given in marriage? and our wives bear unto us children, and the same are mighty men, which are like unto men of old, men of great renown.” (Genesis 8:8–9, JST)

    3.   Temple marriage is the setting apart of a man and a woman to the priesthood offices of husband and wife, father and mother. If that couple honors all of their covenants and thus enjoys the constant companionship of the Holy Ghost through faithful obedience, they will have the full power of God and of eternity to assist them in forging a new priesthood unit, to become gods.

    4.   The covenants and keys of the endowment are special helps to assist that couple to live lives so faithful that they inherit all the blessings God has to give and to escape the penalties for unfaithfulness.

    5.   Having all the prerequisites, the couple may set about to become as one in heart, might, mind and strength. This can be done only as each of them first loves the Lord their God with all of his and her individual heart, might, mind and strength.

    6.   To become one in heart is first to become pure in heart, unmixed with any selfishness. No one can become pure on his or her own, and no one comes that way. But anyone can become pure in heart by partaking of the New and Everlasting Covenant and then imploring the Lord, patiently and with tears, until He grants through His grace that the person’s nature, his or her desires, can be changed. It takes long imploring so that each can first prove to the Lord that he or she desires to be pure in heart, more than anything else, including continued mortal life itself. This is essentially a dying, a ceasing to exist of the person we were, which was good and evil (selfishness) mixed together. When each becomes pure, each is as the Lord Jesus Christ. Being one with Him, then each is also one with his or her spouse. They then share a special pure love for each other and a pure love for all others.

    7.   As a couple becomes one in heart, they necessarily must also be becoming one in mind. Being one in heart greatly facilitates becoming one in mind. To be one in mind is to have exactly the same knowledge and beliefs. This is achieved by having common experience, sharing individual experiences through communication, working through the scriptures together, facing problems together and learning from such experience. The key is for each to come to have the mind of Christ, for then will they see eye to eye with each other. They will have the mind of Christ according to their sincere repentance from all sin, and through humbly seeing to know both the gospel and the mysteries through the help of the Holy Spirit. One object of study, searching and prayer should be the temple ceremonies themselves. They may not be discussed outside the temple, but a husband and wife may go to the temple, study the ceremonies diligently, then compare notes and impressions while yet in the temple. Their goal should be complete agreement about religion, education, art, politics, scientific theories, history, current events, and the future. As each acquires the mind of the Savior, the two will become one with each other.

    8.   The two must become one in strength. They must learn to work together, sharing the burdens and harvests, setbacks and rewards. Each must adjust eating, sleeping and hygiene habits unto what the Lord would do until they are in perfect harmony. Through commanded sexual union they will form a common gene pool from which the Lord may draw special combinations of bodies for the spirits he desires to send into the world. As each learns to work hard, intelligently, and spiritually on the appropriate tasks in the Lord, which they can do fully only in the Lord, then they will grow together and literally become one flesh, one strength. They will learn, do, perceive, be pleased by, abhor and seek the same things. While it is true that sometimes their work will be complementary (she may be cooking while he repairs the roof) they will work so cooperatively that each learns to do virtually all that the other does so that each can fill the other’s place if needed.

    9.   They become one in might in that they have all things in common. All that they own is the Lord’s property, and they are stewards. As companions and as a presidency they counsel on all matters. Neither is ever surprised by what the other does, for they have first become one in heart, mind and strength, thus making it natural and fully possible to be one in administering their money, their property, their political influence, their social benefactions. As they are one with the Lord as to how to govern their might, even so will they then be one with each other.

    10. Above all other helps that a husband and wife need to become one, there are four helps that stand out above all the rest, and all are of God. The great help for the hearts to become one is the love of God. The Father’s perfect example in an ever available blessing of love shows each husband and wife just how each must feel. When we are filled with that love and can return that same love back to God, then we can show that love for our spouse. The great help for our minds is the truths which come to us through the Holy Spirit. As we cherish that Spirit and the truths it brings, our whole souls become filled with truth, and as husband and wife we can rejoice in the truths we share as one. The great help we have for our strength is that our bodies are literally the bodies of the gods. We are genetically of the race of the gods and can inherit the full potential of that heritage in our flesh as we as a couple are properly united in strength. The great help we enjoy as to might is the Holy Priesthood. By making the priesthood the basis of how we relate to all persons, problems and things, doing all things as the Lord has shown us he would do and has done, we truly can fulfill our apprenticeship.

    11. There is no other success in this world which compares with the forging of an eternal bond of love between a husband and wife. Raising a family is important, but that will never be a complete success unless the marriage is eternally bonded. There is no scientific breakthrough, no artistic excellence, no triumph on the battlefield, no political contribution, no service rendered which can compare with the importance of the welding together of a man and a woman in the New and Everlasting Covenant. If that possibility were to fail, all the eternal work of the gods fails. Where it succeeds, the work of godliness is assured to all eternity.

    Lesson Fifteen: Israel

    1.   The most important thing to associate with the name “Israel”, is the covenant, the New and Everlasting Covenant, the covenant God made with Abraham and with the fathers before him. Israel is the people of the covenant. The children of Israel are the heirs of the covenant, having the potential to become the Children of Christ. One must become part of the House of Israel before he can become part of the House of Christ.

    2.   The blessings of Abraham came to Abraham because he partook of and was fully faithful to the New and Everlasting Covenant. That is to say, he was fully obedient to the Lord in all things, and thus was called the Friend of God.

    Those blessings are:

    a.   The hand of Jehovah, the Almighty, would be over Abraham and his posterity.

    b.   To become a great nation.

    c.   To receive blessing above measure.

    d.   To have his name great among all nations.

    e.   He and his seed to be a blessing to all nations by taking the covenant to them.

    f.    All who accept the covenant will become Abraham’s seed and rise up and call him blessed.

    g.   God will bless those who bless him and curse those who curse him.

    h.   The right of the Holy Priesthood will continue in Abraham’s seed forever. (The above from Abraham 2:8–11)

    i.    To be a father of many nations.

    j.    To receive a new name.

    k.   To be exceedingly fruitful; to have posterity as the sands of the seashore or the stars in heaven.

    l.    Kings should be among his seed.

    m.  God would specially follow and be a God unto his seed forever.

    n.   To receive a promised land for an everlasting inheritance. (Items 9–14 from Genesis 17: 8–13, Inspired Version.)

    3.   Sarai, wife of Abraham, is partaker of all of Abraham’s blessings with him, for they are one in the New and Everlasting Covenant. Some of the specifics are reiterated as the “blessings of Sarah” (Genesis 17:21–22, JST):

    a.   She would receive a new name.

    b.   God would bless her.

    c.   She would have posterity.

    d.   She would be the mother of nations.

    e.   Kings and people would be of her.

    4.   The token of the covenant God made with Abraham was circumcision. From the time of Abraham until after the death of the Savior, all blood and convert Israel was circumcised. But many who were circumcised either rejected or could not enter into the ordinances of the New and Everlasting Covenant, which was what brought the blessings listed above to Abraham and Sarah. Therefore in the time of the Apostles of the Savior, circumcision was done away as the token of the Abrahamic blessings of Abraham. Judaism, an apostate form of Christianity, could not deliver either the covenants nor the blessings of Abraham. Thus circumcision remains the token of Judaism.

    5.   The blessings of Abraham are thus the heritage both of blood Israel (Abraham’s literal seed) and spiritual Israel (those who receive the Holy Priesthood through the New and Everlasting Covenant). But only those who are faithful to Jesus Christ inherit.

    6.   Those who do inherit are specially blessed above all other persons on earth. As heirs of God through Christ and Abraham, they have the potential to enjoy the powers of God (called the “gifts of the Spirit”) in mortality. Through those powers they can do mighty works and miracles. The life of the Prophet Joseph Smith is a measure of the difference that heritage can make.

    7.   The heritage of Israel is a spiritual but also a physical heritage. There is a gene for faith in Jesus Christ. To be faithful, one must either inherit that gene from Abraham or acquire it by being born again of water and the spirit in the New and Everlasting Covenant.

    8.   To have the physical gene of faith by either heritage sets one apart from the rest of the world. The heritage of the New and Everlasting Covenant requires that one spend the remainder of his and her life in the service of Christ. Part of that requirement is to bear children: not just one’s own children, but God’s children and Abraham’s children. Children are not a convenience, not a nicety in the New and Everlasting Covenant. They are a necessity required by the covenant. The faithful therefore do not attempt to limit the number of children they bear except as they are expressly directed by God Himself. The passing on of the gene of faith is as much a part of the living of the covenant as is paying a full tithing or consecrating all of one’s talents. To stint on any of the requirements is not to serve and love God with all of one’s heart, might, mind and strength.

    9.   Israel is given a promised land as a place in which to partake of the new and Everlasting Covenant and through it to love, serve and know God. The scattering of Israel is primarily the removal of the privilege of partaking of the New and Everlasting Covenant. Secondarily, Israel may also be sent away from its promised land. Either scattering takes place only because of wickedness on the part of those who have the right to the covenant.

    10. The gathering of Israel is the opportunity to return to the New and Everlasting Covenant. Israel is gathered by the preaching of the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ. If Israelites are gathered physically, that is primarily to partake of the temple ordinances to receive the fullness of the New and Everlasting Covenant. Wherever a temple is built, there is a promised land. If the people of that land receive the covenant and live by it, they will make that place into a holy land.

    11. But Israel is not always faithful. 1 Nephi 11:34–36:

    “And after he was slain I saw the multitudes of the earth, that they were gathered together to fight against the apostles of the Lamb; for thus were the twelve called by the angel of the Lord.

    And the multitude of the earth was gathered together: and I beheld that they were in a large and spacious building which my father saw. And the angel of the Lord spake unto me again, saying: Behold the world and the wisdom thereof; yea, behold the house of Israel hath gathered together to fight against the twelve apostles of the Lamb. …”

    Lesson Sixteen: Overcoming the World

    1.   Our challenge and probation in this world is to see if we will do all things which the Lord our God commands us to do. (Abraham 3:25) Each person is sufficiently instructed that he or she knows good from evil. Good is what God commands through the Light of Christ. Evil is what Satan encourages. Overcoming the world is to learn to choose only the will of God (the good) over our own selfish desires, which is the evil that Satan encourages.

    2.   Our mortal opportunity presents us with many challenges and predicaments. Each is an occasion to exercise faith in Jesus Christ, thus to choose the good over evil. Every time we choose the good, we grow towards the stature of Jesus Christ. Every time we choose the evil, we shrivel towards the likeness of Satan. By rejecting Satan and evil in choosing good, we have our opportunity to prove ourselves true and faithful to God in all things.

    3.   Want (poverty) is an occasion to choose to value what we have and make the most of it. If we develop our talents and use our time to produce good things, we grow and at the same time lessen our poverty. But we may also choose evil by complaining that others have more than we do and by trying to get something for nothing (as in stealing, overcharging, underpaying, etc.)

    4.   Illness is an occasion to thank the Father for all of the parts of us that don’t hurt and strive to set our lives in order before him so that we no longer need to be ill. Or we may choose evil in complaining, exaggerating our woe, being nasty to others because we are in pain, seeking worldly remedies for a cure.

    5.   To have enemies is an occasion to love them, to pray for them, and to do good for them. Or we may endlessly tell others how terrible they are, seek to be nasty to them as they are nasty to us, and undermine them in any way we think we can get away with.

    6.   To live in a neighborhood is an opportunity to love those close by in acts of thoughtfulness, generosity and kindness, sharing their burdens and joys with them. Or we may impose on them, criticize them, encroach on them, ignore them, and rejoice in their misfortunes.

    7.   To live in a ward is the opportunity to support the priesthood authority over us by our faith, prayers, and diligent carrying out of callings, rejoicing with and serving our brothers and sisters in the Gospel. Or we may sit back and point out how it really should be done, use our callings for personal aggrandizement, flaunt our superiority over the less well-endowed members, undermine the priesthood, see ourselves as God’s gift to those struggling imbeciles.

    8.   To have a prophet at the head of the church is the opportunity to treasure every word that comes from him, to pray for him, to support fully by doing what he instructs us to do. Or we may choose evil by deciding to ignore him, or think he is very old and senile, complain that he is really quite narrow in his views of the world’s problems, and see him as rigid and unfeeling, a man carried away by power and authority.

    9.   To be a husband or wife is to have the opportunity to cooperate fully with someone, twenty-four-hours a day, in the Lord; the opportunity to have a close, close neighbor to learn to love fully and deeply, a great preparation for learning to love our children the same way. Or we may thrust the burden of cooperating on our partner, use our partner as a punching bag to vent our frustrations, be selfish and demanding, pout and punish him or her, and harp on his or her shortcomings.

    10. To have an automobile is a great advantage to care for a stewardship, to use it with care and thanksgiving, to have it convey us comfortably to those places where we need to be to fulfill our errand before the Lord, to show that we are courteous and law-abiding. Or we may use it to show off, to invest time and money which should be spent elsewhere, to have it convey us for pleasure alone, to drive dangerously and recklessly for thrills, to intimidate others who offend us by their driving mistakes.

    11. We have a home as a shelter in which to live as a family, in love and cooperation, where order and peace and love may abound, where the word of the Lord is sought and treasured, where good literature and music and art are savored, where friends may come to share our joys with us, a place where family and genealogy are honored. Or our home can be a place of contention, a dwelling place for evil spirits; it can be a mess, a monument to sloth and procrastination; it can be a convenience store only, where people pass one another as little as possible enroute to their favorite pleasure.

    12. Mealtime can be an occasion for sharing love, stimulating intelligent conversation, and enjoying beautifully prepared nourishing food. Or mealtime can be an occasion for individual snacks on junk food, critical sibling and spouse rivalry, and the celebration of animosity.

    13. Family prayer can be an occasion wherein the concerns of each member of the family are tenderly addressed and the will and help of the Father are sought in cooperative humility. Or it can be a burden which someone feels we have to do and everyone else wants to get over as possible to get on with his or her selfish projects.

    14. Growing a garden is an occasion to worship God and the marvelous and productive earth He has given us, to produce a space of beauty, order and productivity, a means of providing the very best nourishment for one’s family while getting needed exercise, to celebrate the success of tender know-how horticulture. Or a garden can be a place of weeds and neglect, or failure and frustration, of too little and too late in a halfhearted attempt to fulfill someone else’s desire.

    15. Accident or calamity is the occasion for implementing previously well-prepared contingency plans, to minimize suffering while demonstrating faith and intelligence, to show that priesthood power and righteousness are the great allies in times of trouble. Or we may go into a state of shock, hiding ill-preparation behind a facade of uncontrollable emotion, complaining about the idiocy and dementedness of others, or loud breast-beating to draw sympathy, all the while only making the situation worse instead of helping.

    16. While the examples could be multiplied many times, the pattern is clear. Every situation of daily life is a situation of challenge, an opportunity to choose good over evil, an opportunity to further the work of God or to abet Satan. It is not mainly in the grand events of history that souls are won and lost. Rather, it is in the decisions of simple everyday life that we prove our allegiance to the Father.

    Lesson Seventeen: Putting It All Together

    1.   Everything that has been said so far about Gospel Essentials is but preparation to live it. Knowledge of these matters without living them is worse than ignorance, for to know these things and not to live them is to stand condemned. So how do we put it all together to live it?

    2.   The key to living the gospel is not mysterious or abstract. Rather, it is simple and obvious: it is simply a matter of what we desire. If we desire to live the Restored Gospel, heaven comes to our aid and there is nothing in heaven or earth which can stop us. On the other hand, if we desire not to live the Restored Gospel, nothing in heaven or earth can force us to, for God will not force us, nor will he let anyone else do so.

    3.   This simple solution is complicated by the fact that usually our desires are mixed. Usually a member of the Church genuinely desires to live the gospel, but also desires other things. So what do we do when we are torn in different directions by a desire to be social, to have political clout, to have health at any cost, to be independently wealthy, to travel first class to see the world, to live in a fine home, to have prosperous children and grandchildren,—and still be true to Jesus Christ?

    4.   Again there is a simple solution: have an eye single to the glory of God. Then we shall reap the promise: “If, therefore, thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.” (3 Nephi 13:22) To have one’s eye single is to desire nothing of ourselves except to fulfill the work and plan of the Father. It would be outrageous to give complete and unquestioning allegiance to any man. But God is not a man as men are. Man of Holiness is our Father’s name. This is he who is perfect, complete in righteousness, who lives not for himself, but only lives to bring to pass the happiness of others. To know that he is worthy of such allegiance, we must try Him. Have you tried not desiring anything but the will of the Father? For a minute? For an hour? For a day? Only he who has tried knows very much about light. Only he who has tried knows that this is the key to the water that one drinks and never thirsts again.

    5.   So what is the key to making our desires single to the glory of God? Again, the answer is straightforward: pray. Pray always, about everything, in every circumstance, that the Kingdom of God may come, that the will of God might be done on earth as it is in heaven. And if no one else will, it is enough that I, alone, might strive to be full of faith in God, so full that I can let go of everything which I personally desire in this world. That leaves only the will of the Father to be desired.

    6.   But how to pray so that such a marvelous end might be achieved? Again, we are not ignorant. We know that the beginning of spiritual life is to have the Holy Spirit with us, bringing messages from the Son and the Father. To recognize that Holy Spirit, never to confuse it with the evil spirit, is our challenge. If there are at least some times and places where we can identify that Holy Spirit for sure, then we have sufficient beginning. Then what must we do? We must pray and pray in the name of Jesus Christ until we come to a circumstance wherein we know and are sure that the Holy Spirit is directing us. This moment of light is our window on eternity. If at that moment we will simply do what it is that we know we have been instructed by God to do, we set in motion the eternal cosmos in our behalf. By obedience to what we know is the Holy Spirit, we qualify for more of that same influence. If when it comes again, and we are sure of it, we are again faithful to it, then we will again add to our opportunity to have that influence with us. Eventually, through our faithfulness, that influence will become so great that it will begin to tell us how to pray: the exact feelings to have, ideas to treasure, and words to say. When we thus learn how to pray, we pray truly, after the manner of Jesus, rather than after the manner of men.

    7.   Thus, if by that holy path, we can learn to pray truly, in the order of prayer of the Savior, then we have entered into that path of Holiness that leads to the purification of our desires. When our desires are pure, every other good thing will follow, for then our faith will be full, complete, perfect.

    8.   Prayer is an exercise which we perform often in public. But true prayer is not learned and not perfected in public. Prayer is learned and perfected only when one is alone. “But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut the door, pray unto the Father who is in secret; and the Father, who seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.” (3 Nephi 13:6) There in secret, with no posturing, we experiment and try until we know the Holy Spirit and how to pray.

    9.   True prayer is that which one feels, thinks and says when guided in the exactitude of those things by God: Father, Son, or Holy Ghost. “That which of God is light, and he that receiveth light, and continueth in God, receiveth more light; and that light groweth brighter and brighter until the perfect day. And again, verily I say unto you, and I say it that you may know the truth, that you may chase darkness from among you; He that is ordained of God and sent forth, the same is appointed to be the greatest, notwithstanding he is the least and the servant of all. Wherefore, he is possessor of all things; for all things are subject to him, both in heaven and on earth, the life and the light, the Spirit and the power, sent forth by the will of the Father through Jesus Christ, his Son. But no man is possessor of all things except he be purified and cleansed from all sin. And if ye are purified and cleansed from all sin, ye shall ask whatsoever you will in the name of Jesus and it shall be done. But know this, it shall be given you what ye shall ask: …” (D&C 50: 24–30)

    10. Where and when should we pray? Everywhere, and at all times, according to Amulek. (Alma 34:17–27) Why? For one thing, so we can learn how to do it correctly. Why not practice constantly? If that is the key to living the Restored Gospel, why not learn to do it as perfectly as possible and as soon as possible?

    11. Thus learning to fulfill the New and Everlasting Covenant can be done only by doing, by measuring up to the promises we have made with God. With man, this is impossible. But with God, all these things are possible unto him whose heart is pure, who, through mighty prayer, has overcome the world and has laid all that he is and has at the feet of the Savior.

    12. Is this not life, that eternal life of mind, heart and posterity which is the heritage of those who are the children of Christ?

    Lesson Eighteen: Worthiness

    1.   To be worthy is to be good. None but God is good (completely; Matt. 19:17). Therefore, none but God is worthy. We are all unprofitable servants (Mosiah 2:21).

    2.   To be invited to go to the House of the Lord, the temple, is to be invited to approach the Celestial Kingdom and the presence of the Father. In our present state we could not endure him, for no unclean thing can enter into his presence. Only through the power of the ordinances of the Melchizedek Priesthood can we be transformed enough to be able to stand in His presence. “This greater priesthood administereth the gospel and holdeth the key of the mysteries of the kingdom, even the key of the knowledge of God. Therefore, in the ordinances thereof, the power of godliness is manifest. And without the ordinances thereof, and the authority of the priesthood, the power of God is not manifest unto men in the flesh; For without this no man can see the face of God, even the Father, and live. Now this Moses plainly taught to the children of Israel in the wilderness, and sought diligently to sanctify his people that they might behold the face of God; But they hardened their hearts and could not endure his presence; therefore, the Lord in his wrath, for his anger was kindled against them, swore that they should not enter into his rest while in the wilderness, which rest is the glory of his presence. Therefore, he took Moses out of their midst, and the Holy Priesthood also.” (D&C 84:19–25)

    3.   Not having the priesthood after the order of Melchizedek, the children of Israel were cut off from the temple ordinances, and thus from the presence of God. They were then given a lesser opportunity, the Law of Moses, as a schoolmaster to bring their faith up to par where they could partake of the New and Everlasting Covenant without damning themselves. The essence of the law of Moses is found in the Ten Commandments. These are the terrestrial requirements which prepare the heart, might, mind and strength of a person to then go on to love God will all of one’s heart, might, mind and strength as required in the New and Everlasting Covenant. The basic preparation for receiving the Restored Gospel, the Melchizedek Priesthood and the temple covenants is to be faithful in keeping the Ten Commandments.

    4.   “Thou shalt have no other gods before me.” Do we worship other gods? Some people worship money, some power, some pleasure, some their own ego. The requirement is that we carefully search our hearts and minds to be sure that we worship only the true and living God.

    5.   “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself unto them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.” Having rejected other Gods, we must also reject their ways, customs and commandments, serving and obeying only the true and living God. We must examine ourselves to eliminate every trace of the worship of false gods.

    6.   “Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless what taketh his name in vain.” Do we treasure the names of God, making them sacred and holy, using them with great care and only when surely appropriate? The names of God are keys. If the keys are misused or mangled, they will not work in their necessary places in the ordinances of the New and Everlasting Covenant.

    7.   “Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, not thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.” Do we indeed work hard six days a week to provide for the needs of those who depend upon us? And do we then reverence the Lord’s day, making it very special, a time to remember Him in ordinances and in doing his work? Remembering the sabbath faithfully is a significant mark of true Israel.

    8.   “Honor thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.” Do we esteem and honor our parents, not finding fault with them (though faults there may be)? Do we care for them in their old age? Do we honor all that they have done to help us? Do we speak well of them?

    9.   “Thou shalt not kill.” Is life sacred and holy to us because it is the handiwork of God? Would we rather be killed than to kill (unless the Lord commands otherwise)? Do we think twice about killing animals, trees and plants, unborn children?

    10. “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” Are we chaste and noble in our sexual relations and practices, in every thing, in every way?

    11. “Thou shalt not steal.” Are we scrupulously careful never to take that which is not ours, and to return that which we find that belongs to our neighbor? Do we refrain from stealing time as well as substance? Do we pay enough for everything we purchase? Do we refrain from extortion or gouging when we sell something?

    12. “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.” We may not always know the whole truth, but when we speak, are we careful not to misrepresent what we do know? Is our word as good as our bond? Are we trustworthy in all things?

    13. “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbor’s.” Are we content with the blessings which the Lord has given us, or will give us through our own honest labor?

    14. Those Ten Commandments spell out our general preparation. We must also relate properly to the Savior’s kingdom in this dispensation: Do we know that the president of the Church truly represents the Savior? Do we know that only he has all of the keys necessary? Do we think anyone else is worthy of our allegiance? Are we willing to support the Church and Kingdom? Do we evidence that by paying a full tithing? Do we abide the precepts of the Word of Wisdom? And are we ready to go on to perfection while upholding the Church of Jesus Christ?

    15. These things make us ready. Not worthy; but rather, then able to grow to become as our Savior is.

  • Communication: A Systems Concept, 1986

    February 1986

    Question: What is the most useful unit on which to focus as the basic unit of human communication?

    Static system: A non-functioning sub-system consisting only of stationary parts and their relationships.

    Communication in a static system: unobstructed contiguity of parts of a static system. Unit: discrete situations of unobstructed contiguity.

    + e.g.: The kitchen communicates with the dining room in this house.

    – e.g.: Tunnel A does not communicate with tunnel B.

    Dynamic system: A static sub-system having moving or effective parts, having input, internal process and output.

    Communication in a dynamic system: The effect that one or more parts of a dynamic system have upon one or more other parts of the system. Unit: Effective force applied through time: foot-pounds of work.

    + e.g.: This thermostat communicates “turn on” and “turn off” signals to the furnace.

    – e.g.: Because the power is off the thermostat cannot communicate with the furnace.

    Agent system: A dynamic sub-system of which at least one agent is a dynamic part. (Agent: a dynamic system the output of which is not more than partly determined by input to that system.)

    Communication in an agent system: The attempt of an agent to effect a desired change in the universe by performing an act (input to the rest-of-the-universe-sub-system by an agent in order to change its output). Unit of agent communication: Assertion+: the output of an agent which becomes input to the universe-system (the all-but-this-agent subsystem of the universe).

    Assertion: The intentional act of an agent who acts to create a change in the universe. Assertion is the vehicle of message. It is a sentence, an exclamation, or any non-verbal intentional act. Assertions are physical and ostensive. Messages are mental only.

    Message: The interpretation of any assertion in which the following operations are performed by an agent on the occasion of observing an assertion in context:

    1. The asserter’s intent is hypothesized.
    2. There is a propositional decoding of the assertion.
    3. There is an attribution of strength (support, + or –) for that assertion.
    4. There is an estimate of the impact or result on the universe of that assertion occasion (present result and probable future results).

    Propositional decoding: Interpretation of the assertion into a concatenation of the concepts of the observer which the observer deems to be an adequate translation of the assertion from some physical language into his own concept language. The observer’s own concept language is not language specific in relation to the public languages of the human community.

    Analogy: An assertion might be likened unto the shooting of an arrow (indeed, the shooting of an arrow by an agent is always an assertion). Message components:

    1. The target and intended effect of the shooting of the arrow.
    2. The specific nature of the arrow projected at the target.
    3. The force imparted to the arrow in its projection.
    4. The actual and probable future effects of the arrow as judged at the time when its force is spent.

    Messages are constructed (created) attributions concerning as asserter and the asserter’s assertion by a participant in the assertion experience context. They should be ex post facto reconstructions of past events (hear or experience first, judge later). They may truly or falsely portray the assertion in context. True message portrayal: One-to-one correspondence between actual assertion and assertion context as judged by a perfect (unbiased) and omniscient observer.

    False message portrayal: erroneous constructive portrayal of an assertion and its assertion context as judged by a perfect (unbiased) and omniscient observer.

    Messages are always private mental constructions. To express those private mental constructions in any overt way is to assert, to make an assertion, which is to try to create a change in the universe by doing work (dynamic communication). Assertion is the dynamic communication of an agent, therefore is also agent communication.

    Meaning: The total message a person creates for a given assertion. Meaning is always attributed (never inherent), and is always use-context specific. Words and sentences in mention context have no meaning. This is to say that though there are meanings-in-general (meanings that represent statistical modes of historic use-contexts), there are no general meanings (necessary or correct meanings) for words or sentences. Words in mention-context only have potential meanings, and that potentiality is infinite in theory but limited in practice.

    Thesis: Assertion-in-use-context is the basic unit of communication.

    Support

    Successful assertion is always an assertion-in-use-context unit. Understanding or correct apprehension of meaning is always mental reconstruction by a participant in that context of an assertion-in-use-context (hereafter referred to by the acronym “aiuc”).

    Aiuc vs. phoneme character: An isolated phoneme/character can be made to mean anything because it means nothing.

    Aiuc vs. morpheme/word: An isolated morpheme/word has typical meanings but there is no way to know apart from context which typical or which atypical use is intended.

    Aiuc vs. phrase: Phrase has all of the problems of morpheme/word.

    Aiuc vs. sentence: Sentences in use are assertions, but not all assertions are sentences. Sentences in mention have only potential, not actual meaning. (Except that sentences in mention are actually cases of sentences in use and the user may indeed intend them to have a particular meaning, and the observer may indeed insist that his “meaning” attribution is appropriate. But there is nothing to which two observers who disagree could refer to settle their dispute. Aiuc always has something more than personal opinion to which persons can refer to help settle disagreements.)

    Aiuc vs. proposition: as usually construed, propositions are taken so narrowly as to eliminate much meaningful human communication. As construed here, propositions are only part of the necessary complete unit of meaning.

    Aiuc vs. message: Message is always the subjective reaction of a context participant. That message may improve or deteriorate through time relative to a given aiuc. The aiuc is the object of interpretation, and needs to be as fixed and as objective as possible to facilitate progressively better interpretations.

    Aiuc vs. meaning: Meaning is the whole point of contention. To decide what is the most felicitous unit for communication is to say what is the basic unit of meaning. To settle on meaning over aiuc would be to beg the question.

    Other points which favor aiuc as the basic unit of communication:

    1. This use of aiuc is continuous with common sense; we know that meaning can best be determined only in use-context.
    2. The use of aiuc allows as objective or behavioral a target for interpretation as possible, yet supplies a sufficiently rich situation to enable us often to come to agreement as to interpretation.
    3. This use of aiuc is metaphysically parsimonious, not necessitating the ad hoc invention of such creatures as “deep structure”, “objective referents”, or platonic categories.
    4. The use of aiuc recognizes agency, both in the asserter and in the attributor of meaning. Agent communication is thus not forced into a mechanistic reductionism.
    5. The use of aiuc facilitates consideration of non-verbal languages and non-language actions as part of the actual human communication phenomenon.
    6. This construal of aiuc helps to prevent hubris in the human species by reminding us that there is no human voice that is final and authoritative, about anything, and that every assertion is a species of bearing personal testimony.

    QED!

  • Letter to Wendy (Fictional), 1985

    Provo, Utah
    10 Dec 1985

    Dear Wendy,

    Thanks for your letter describing the family get-together. I’m sorry we could not be there; we will try next Thanksgiving.

    You asked me to explain what is happening in the Church Education System. Since why it happened is as instructive as what has come to pass, let me give you both in brief compass.

    Looking back, it is difficult to imagine the rapidity with which change has transformed the Church. The beginning was inauspicious. It was the quiet announcement in the Welfare Session of April Conference 1978 that the time had come to implement the law of consecration. It is safe to say that the Church Education System would be impoverished and threadbare were it not for that step. True, it took several years to see any noticeable difference; but that difference is so plain now that it is our principal missionary opening. For as the more faithful members of the Church came forward and deeded over all of their property to the Church and then assumed roles as the Lord’s stewards, it was as though a new race of people came into being—thousands of families began to be like President Kimball had been. They were so full of spiritual power that it showed in every act, in every word. They radiated the love the prophets have always idealized, because they had made the Savior truly the center of their lives. The healings, the prophecies, the miracles, controlling fire and the weather are well known. Less well known but amply manifest is the kindness, the willingness to share, the complete unselfishness of these superhuman souls.

    But it was in their work that the biggest harvest was realized. Whether missionary labors, auto repair, school teaching, farming or what have you, everything they touched turned to spiritual gold. They invented new and better ways of doing things (some seemed so simple after they had shown the way) because they did what they did only to transmit the Savior’s love to their fellowmen, seeking no reward for themselves, even wincing under thanks.

    So that was the engine that made the power possible for all the other changes to take place. It took some time for it to dawn on me that this—the law of consecration—was the little stone which Nebuchadnezzar and Daniel saw cut out of the mountain without hands. It was cut out with hearts and is this very day rolling forth, breaking in pieces and consuming with love the kingdoms of this world. Indeed there is mighty opposition, the hate and persecution you describe was inevitable. But the work of the Savior will not be deterred.

    The second great change followed naturally from the first. It was a change little talked about but truly revolutionary in import. The faithful members stopped talking about the Gospel as a thing, a what. In fact, they almost stopped talking about the Gospel, period. Not that the Gospel message was less important. It was that the message was less important: too sacred to say much about, but urgent in its need to be employed. So the Gospel became a “how.” It became the way one taught a child or tamed a horse or grew a garden. It was the way one solved an engineering problem or perfected a welfare distribution system or negotiated with those bent on destroying the kingdom.

    The crowning evidence of this change is reflected in our missionary work. We now speak little of theology or precepts. We concentrate on teaching the people other things, on helping them with their problems. They are so astounded by the solutions and the obvious power of the missionaries that they ask to know the Gospel. The story of Ammon of old has become the norm rather than the exception.

    The key to this is the power the missionaries have to discern the hearts of the people. As they address their fears and wounds, a wonderful solvent of faith releases their hearers from the chains of their fathers, and the Holy Spirit becomes delicious to them.

    Some see only the power involved. They are awed, and like Simon wish to buy the gift. The missionaries tell them that the price is a pure heart, which cuts some to the quick; they actually and readily repent, because they did not know that purity of heart was anything but a myth until they saw it in action. Then the idea was so powerful that they were overcome just as King Lamoni was. But the hard-core simonists just became angry. Like the silversmiths of Ephesus, they try to incite mobs against us.

    The third change was the demise of the concept of teaching. True, “teaching” is not completely dead, but in the Church it is feebly gasping out its days. The emphasis now is upon learning. Each person is honored as a learner. Instead of modeling great teachers, we model great students, and those who achieve great learning and ability are rewarded not by others, but by the good they can then do for others. Teaching itself is not longer an ego-trip, the erstwhile teacher is now a facilitator who works unobtrusively to help each learner maximize effort. People learn what they are ready for now, not what the teacher feels like dispensing. They learn at their own rate, and according to their own ability. The aural learners have aural exposure, the motor learners move, etc.

    The secret of this revolution is that we finally took section 50 to heart, and realized that it is the pattern for all learning, not just learning the Gospel. When both learner and facilitator are moved by the Holy Spirit and consumed by the love of the Savior, can you imagine the result? Seeing through algebra in an afternoon, learning a language in a week, comprehending the principles of communication in one apt demonstration! It boggles the mind. Even those who are not “speedy” don’t feel badly. They rejoice so in the attention and love manifested towards them and they so appreciate the Spirit that they progress with delight. There are no “dumbbells” anymore and, interestingly, almost every soul is an above average learner in some facet of development.

    So good riddance to the days of put-down teaching, “spread-them-out” grading on the curve, and limited quotas for programs. Facilitators are brothers and sisters, not lords and masters, and a good spiritual time is had by all.

    You can probably guess the nature of the next great change. It is that everyone in the Church who is faithful becomes a facilitator. To be such is such a superb way to bless and honor those whom they love, that one could not stand to be without it. How do you learn to be a facilitator if there are no “teachers” anymore? Very simply if not easily. One simply finds or selects a good facilitator and starts to imitate them. That works because the essence of facilitation is showing forth love for the learners, thus releasing them from their fears, hurts, doubts and anxieties, which releases their spiritual learning potential. Facilitation turns out to be mainly the teaching of a soul with the pure love of Christ. It is communicating in a Gospel way, not about the Gospel, but using it. It is faith, hope, charity, justice, mercy, sacrifice and consecration all wrapped up in handshakes, carefully chosen words, abstemious example, gentle cheerfulness, boundless courage and sure direction.

    The other part of the facilitation is the skills and information which the learner desires to acquire. If the facilitator is learned, the desire is simply met. If the facilitator does not have what is desired, that “what” becomes to facilitators desire also, and the two of them search eagerly, gladly, confidently, for the result. For they know that “when two or three are gathered together in my name, there will I be also.” And there is nothing that the Savior or his servants don’t know.

    The fifth change follows as the night the day. If every adult member of the Church has learned to be a facilitator, what do they spend their time doing? Facilitating, of course. Every time two Latter-day Saints get together their actions are two-fold: they get busy on some project to improve something, and one is facilitating the learning of the other (sometimes they reverse roles on different skills.) My how the work gets done. My how able everyone becomes. With one heart and one mind they pursue the words of righteousness and the poor become rich in every way. (Sounds heavenly, aye? That of course is because it is. This is the day for which Isaiah longed.)

    Well now, with that background, the Church Education System should make more sense. Let’s begin with the missionaries.

    A few years ago the Church started calling “educational” missionaries, just as they had called building and health missionaries previously. But a marvelous thing happened. The “educational” missionaries who had learned to be facilitators very quickly were baptizing as many or more than the proselyting missionaries. As the authorities of the Church examined what the best proselyting missionaries were doing and what the facilitators were doing, they found that the methodology of both was identical: they “showed the Gospel in their actions rather than trying to teach it at first. They simply addressed themselves to the needs of whoever is was they were talking to, striving to bless them in their spiritual, emotional, intellectual or physical problems, whatever the need. They had spiritual power to deliver help because they had consecrated all, especially their hearts, to the Savior. They did not try to distinguish “golden” from other contacts. They simply tried to help each person they met. But there were a couple of basic rules: they would not give money, and they would not do for someone what that person could be taught to do for himself.

    The upshot was that all missionaries became facilitators and all facilitators became missionaries. That is why we have the interesting double pattern of missionary effort in the Church. Young people fill missions early (late teens) then return home, marry, finish their education, spend thirty years working and raising their families, then they retire and take up residence somewhere in the world as facilitators. Some are young enough that their families go with them. The norm now at BYU is to retire at age 55 and become unpaid facilitators. Military retirees also go on “remainder-of-days” missions instead of seeking a second career.

    The backup for these facilitators is the mission or stake library. In the early part of this decade the Church began to put resources into curriculum development, many millions of dollars. That effort was matched by technical advances which made economical delivery feasible. So the result is that any facilitator can go to a stake or mission center and either check out or send for a carefully constructed and sequenced learning package whereby one can learn to do every honorable thing or to understand any subject known to man and to be able to have it conveyed in a choice of media. When you couple that human and technical triumph with the spiritual resources the missionaries have, you can see what an overwhelming educational force that is. Ignorance and inability flee as the hoarfrost before the sun.

    The result of this missionary-facilitator-educational push is that areas of the world are tending to even out enormously. The poor people in the world are no longer the despised peons. They are the stable middle class which sustains the commerce and culture of much of the continent. In a few years millions of people in the world have jumped from the stone age to the twenty-first century. The hapless in every nation now have hope, for there plainly is a way.

    All of this has brought about interesting changes in the institutions of the church. Because of the melding of the missionary-facilitator roles and skills the mission training center were merged with the nearby CES institutions. In one of two years of college every young person, converts included, learns to be a facilitator, and thus is ready for missionary service. When they return, they are helpful as student instructors. In fact, they faculty of BYU has been reduced by half (they were sent on missions) and the difference is made up by student returned missionary facilitators.

    As all of this was happening, the church schools lost their accreditation. To rise to the occasion, the church schools simply abandoned the whole idea of credit (which derives from credo—I believe) and replaced it with ability, I can do. Transcripts now state simply what the graduate can do. This plays havoc with transfer of credit, but that backfired on the enemies of the Church also. Because of the high quality of CES education almost no one transfers out. And because CES graduates are so able, they have no trouble getting into graduate schools or into jobs. But most of them go neither into graduate schools or “jobs,” the majority become independent professionals who contract out their services.

    So that is why the Mission Training Center at BYU was merged with BYU. BYU became an MTC, and when the campuses in Mexico City, London, Sao Paulo, Hamilton and Orlando were built, they were constructed with a dual purpose in mind: a missionary learning center for the young people of the church and having the temple and temple marriage as the center of all learning.

    Which brings me full circle. All of this power was unleashed by the glad entering into formal consecration by the more faithful members of the Church. Because of that faithfulness, the Savior provided the spiritual and temporal resources to make all of this a glowing reality rather than the vapid dream it would have remained otherwise.

    By their fruits shall ye know them. Does all this convince you that that leap of faith, to consecrate all, is worth it? I give you my witness in the Savior that this not only leads to Life: It is Living.

    Love,
    Chuck

  • Radical Utility—A Theory of Language, 1985

    March 1985

    Principle of radical utility: Usefulness shapes and controls the nature of every language in every aspect.

    Language is a technology, by far the most important technology known to man. As with all technology, it is thus an instrument of power, enabling men better to fulfill their desires. The three principal human uses of language are: 1) to share with others; 2) to control others; and 3) to fill up time (phatic use of language).

    Language: A set of phonetic, (graphic), (physical), morphemic, syntactic and discourse patterns which are conventions of a given culture used socially to facilitate the fulfillment of desire by the participants in the culture.

    Parameters necessary to a language:

    1.   A community of persons who have a common desire and therefore a need or opportunity to cooperate.

    2.   A common physical context (to provide primitive definitions by ostensive means).

    3.   A culture: a common set of values, beliefs about the universe, and appropriate actions (to delimit communication).

    4.   A set of signals. (Phonemes, letters, gestures, etc.)

    5.   A defining procedure. A means of associating signals with elements of the physical context to provide potential meanings for those signals.

    6.   A lexicon. A set of defined signals (typical words associated with typical meanings).

    7.   A syntax. A set of typical patterns of word and sentence formation used to control meaning.

    8.   A rhetoric. A set of typical patterns of sentence concatenation used to form conversations and speeches in order to control communication.

    Natural language: Any language currently learned by any population as a mother tongue.

    Artificial language: Any language specially constructed to meet the needs of an artificially contrived group of persons. All dead languages are artificial languages.

    Meaning: The message components which are the basis of sending and receiving of communication. Words have only potential meaning. Only messages have meaning. All messages have expectation as to what will happen next.

    Grammar: The rules for producing typical patterns of syntax in sentences in language use.

    Rhetoric: The patterns of sentence usage which characterize typical and expert use of language in actual discourse.

    Other principles of language:

    1.   Principle of indeterminacy: There are no correct or incorrect semantic usages, syntactic structures or discourse patterns. Language may come to be used in any way at any time by any person. There are no formal constraints as to what might be effective use of language.

    2.   Principle of nominalism: Meaning does not inhere in any symbol. Dictionaries give typical potential meanings of a word, not actual meanings. Actual meanings exist only in the minds of speakers and hearers in actual contextual use of words. (Words used have meaning; words mentioned do not.)

    3.   Principle of typicality: For a given language and a given time/place/culture there is a pattern of typical phonetic, semantic, syntactic and discourse usage, the mastery of which makes one a full-fledged member of that language community. Typicality maximizes the utility of language for ordinary purposes.

    4.   Principle of atypicality: Mastery of the typical patterns of a language makes it possible to employ language atypically with great power. In every society there is a reservoir of unfulfilled desire. An individual who says new things in a new ways to channel (or harness) that unfulfilled desire assumes a leadership role. The atypical usage must be very close to typicality (thus the leader must have mastered typical usage) but enough different that hearers generate new hope for the fulfillment of unfulfilled desire. Atypicality includes creativity in science, art, literature, politics, etc. Too great an atypicality causes incredulity in hearers. Atypicality which increases one’s social influence is expert use of a language.

    5.   Principle of parsimony: When language is used for sharing or control, efficiency is important. Thus these uses of language tend to represent a minimum use of energy (words and structures) to accomplish the desire of the speaker. In the phatic use of language inefficiency is important and thus parsimony does not here obtain.

    6.   Principle of ellipsis: No speaker does or can express all that he means in any finite discourse. The meaning of any utterance is ultimately the total universe of the speaker.

    7.   Principle of entropy: There is always a loss of information in the process of sending a message. The receiver cannot reconstruct all that the sender intends.

    8.   The principle of integrality: Every assertion and discourse has three essential parts: A feeling component, and informational component, and an action component. These three factors are always present for both speaker and hearer. In some situations the feeling and action components tend to be repressed, but they are nevertheless present. This integrality of language usage arises out of the integrality of the human being. Every conscious human being is at any given moment feeling something, thinking something, and doing something. The purpose of language use is to affect that integrality in others.

    9.   The principle of attraction: The community using a given language grows (in relation to rival languages) in proportion to the relatively greater utility of that language.

    10. The principle of generality: The more widespread and the greater the number of language experiences a population has in common, the more widespread will be the patterns of atypicality.

    11. The principle of diversity: The more a sub-population desires to separate itself from a community, the more non-typical become its language patterns. Non-typical patterns are used when there is a need to:

    • a.   Discourse in a specialized way about recondite matters (jargon).
    • b.   Prevent the general population from understanding or penetrating an “in” group (dialect).

    12. The principle of admittance: The entre into any social group is to master the typical language patterns of that group.

    13. The principle of accession: The key by which to acquire the total culture of any group is to master its typical language patterns.

    14. The principle of stability: Typicality in a language is strengthened by faithful usage and by expert use of atypicality.

    15. The principle of metamorphosis: Non-typical use is the engine of change in language. All natural languages drift.

    Factors which work for the metamorphosis of typicality in a language:

    • 1.   New environmental experiences.
    • 2.   Desire for exclusivity.
    • 3.   Desire for novelty.
    • 4.   Influential persons who speak non-typically.
    • 5.   Social interaction with other cultures.
    • 6.   Preponderance of spoken over written use of the language.

    Factors which work for the stability of typicality in a language:

    • 1.   Constant physical environment.
    • 2.   Desire for inclusivity.
    • 3.   Appreciation for ancestors/conventions/traditions.
    • 4.   Influential persons who speak typically or atypically.
    • 5.   A written literature which is highly honored and widely read.

    Signals (codings) used by a language vary on a scale from totally referential to very presentational.

    1. Totally referential:Binary codes Alphabets
    2. Moderately referentialGlyphs Pictographs
    3. Moderately representational:Pantomime Pictures Graphs Onomatopoeia
    4. Very representational:Drama/Movies/Television Role playing

    Referential coding maximizes efficiency in communication. Representational coding maximizes efficacy in communication.

    Naming (coding) in a language may be random or rational.

    Rational coding:

    • 1.   May assign related names to related referents.
    • 2.   May assign names based on descriptions from a foreign lexicon.

    Random coding occurs by historical accident.

    Defining: The process of:

    • 1.   Pairing a given word or phrase with successive potential meanings as does a dictionary.
    • 2.   Pairing a given word or phrase with another indicator of the precise class or concept which a user has intended when the original use has failed. Only the user can define the meaning.

    There are four standard means of defining:

    • 1.   Ostension: Pointing to a representation of the meaning in the physical environment.
    • 2.   Synonomy: Using another word or phrase having the same meaning.
    • 3.   Denotation: A verbal pointing to a referent which represents the meaning intended.
    • 4.   Connotation: Using a genus (the larger class to which a class belongs) and a differentia (those properties which individuate the thing being defined from other members of the genus).

    Linguistic production: The creation and delivery of discourse by a self and its body.

    Levels of linguistic production:

    1.   Basic level: The arena of the imagination surrounded by the imagined universe of the self. Within that arena, certain alternatives have come to the attention of the self which it does not presently enjoy, such as an idea it desires to entertain, a sensation it desires to have the body deliver, etc. Using the basic desires of the self, the volition (will) of the self chooses a particular potential to seek to make real. (A particular desire becomes the focus of the attention of the self.)         

    2.   Strategy level: Still in the arena of the imagination, the self creates an intent and a plan to fulfill the desire; this intent is:

    • a.   A feeling (a strength of desire) and a goal.
    • b.   An action hypothesis (a proposal to affect the universe in order to get it to fulfill the desire).
    • c.   An image of what the expected result would be if that plan for affecting the universe were implemented.

    3.   Tactics level: Still in the arena of the imagination, the self creates a specific assertion (to implement the action proposal of 2b above) which it proposes to launch into the universe to fulfill its intent (desire) and which it believes will actually produce the desired result. Several hypotheses may be considered, the one deemed most useful in the value parameters of the self being the one selected.

    4.   Logistics level: Using speech habits already established, the self encodes sentence(s) and plans a discourse to implement the assertion(s) selected at the previous level.

    5.   Implementation level: Using body habits already established, the self enphones the sentence(s) encoded at the previous level.

    6.   Anticipation stage: The self alerts itself to notice, through sensation, what reaction the universe has to the action it has launched.

    Levels of linguistic interpretation (the complement of production):

    1.   Detection of a signal or signal complex from a source deemed to be an agent; delivered to the self in sensation.

    2.   Recognition of the signal pattern; identification of the words, phrases, sentences.

    3.   Creation of a hypothesis of sentence interpretation, a hypothetical assertion attributed to the speaker.

    4.   Creation of a message hypothesis concerning what the speaker is doing

    • a.   A hypothetical intention for the speaker.
    • b.   A hypothetical action being performed by the speaker.
    • c.   A hypothesis as to what is expected next, either in the context or of the interpreting self.

    5.   An understanding of how the speaker’s action and intentions relate to the universe, including what options that creates for the hearer.

    6.   A reaction of pleasure or displeasure at what the speaker has done.

  • Theory of Communication, 1985

    March 1985

    1. Definition: Communication: The effect or relationship one being has on or with another.

    Kinds:

    • Static:  One thing contiguous with another.
    • Dynamic: One thing affecting (making changes) in another being.

    Static communication is always reciprocal. Dynamic communication may or may not be reciprocal.

    Intentional communication=agentive communication.

    2. Definition:  Human communication: One human being affecting the body of another human being.

    Kinds of active human communication:

    • Visual affect
    • Auditory affect
    • Substance affect
    •        Taste
    •        Smell
    •        Chemical
    •        Solid object
    •        Addition or deprivation of heat
    • Kinetic communication (hitting, pushing, etc.)

    Prominent myth about human communication: Human communication is the exchange of ideas.

    This is a myth because we humans can only directly affect another person’s body, not their mind.

    3. Spiritual communication: One being affecting another being by non-physical means.

    Principal kinds:

    • Good: Radiating the good spirit, thus influencing other beings to do godly (righteous) things.
    • Evil: Radiating the evil spirit, thus influencing other beings to do evil (selfish) things.

    Postulate: Human beings are always spiritual beings and always under the influence of at least one other spirit, either the spirit of God or the spirit of Satan. Each human being radiates to others either a good or an evil spiritual influence.

    4. Communication between human beings is always a combination of human communication and spiritual communication. (The effect of spiritual communication gives rise to the myth of transfer of ideas.)

    5. Agent communication always has specific parts:

    •       a1. Sender intention: what the sender desires to accomplish.
    •       b1. Sender main idea: the mental image which prompts the sender’s action.
    •       c1. Sender assertion: the physical action launched by the sender to affect the target of communication.
    •       d1. Sender affect: the net result of what the sender accomplished in asserting.
    •       a2. Receiver intention: what the receiver desires to achieve as a response to what the receiver believes the sender intends.
    •       b2. Receiver main idea: what the receiver thinks as a result of what the receiver thinks the sender had as a main idea.
    •       c2. Receiver assessment: the urgency or importance or strength which the receiver places on the communication from the sender in light of what the receiver knows and imagines.
    •       d2. Receiver affect: the specific response of the receiver to the sender’s communication.

    6. Postulates of communication:

    • a.   To exist is to communicate. Not to affect anything nor to be affected by anything is not to exist. All real beings communicate with something other than themselves.
    • b.   How a being communicates defines its being, since anything exists only in communicating.
    • c.   In a given situation, one being may not act, but only be acted upon by another. But to be a being, it must be potentially able to act. If it is never able to act for itself, it is not a separate being but only a part of the being which acts upon it.
    • d.   The effects of communication upon agents are effects only of accident. Ordinary human communication never does or can change a hearer-agent’s essence.
    • e.   An agent being has two potentials, one good, the other evil. The choices and actions (the communications) of the agent fix upon that agent one of the two potentials. Thus the agent partly creates himself or herself.
    • f.    Salvation is communication from the Savior to an agent who has consistently chosen good over evil, inasmuch as he or she was able to do so, to make the person wholly good (holy).
    • g.   Communication is always an entropic process. More is sent than is ever received.

    7. Total Communication: takes place when two beings interact so completely that they become as one being.

    8. Ways to achieve total communication:

    • a.   Communicated in every way.
    • b.   Communicate about everything.
    • c.   Communicate in every environment.
    • d.   Be redundant.
    • e.   Communicate only good (unselfishness).

    Exercises for communication

    1.   Why is no human communication intelligible? Because it acts only on the body of the recipient.

    2.   When is there too much communication? In a physical fight.

    3.   When is there too little communication? When someone needs help, and none is given.

    4.   What is the connection between communication and reality? Reality is what is communicated.

    5.   What is the connection between communication and morality? All communication either helps or hinders the recipient.

    6.   What are examples of total communication? God exalting one of his children.

    7.   How does one communicate love? One being blesses another, leaving them better off afterward.

    8.   Devise a strategy for communicating to any other person your concept of faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Be an example of living by faith in Jesus Christ.

  • Theory of Self, 1985

    CCR March 1985 Theory 12

    (Note: This theory is constructed from the perspective of an omniscient observer. Since the author is not an omniscient observer, it represents his hypothesis as to what an omniscient observer would say about the following subjects.)

    Self: A normal conscious human being considered as semi-attached to his/her body, and to some degree an independent agent.

    Body: A personal material intermediary between a self and its universe.

    Universe: Everything a self believes to exist outside its body.

    Only three kinds of things exist for the self: 1) One’s self, 2) One’s body, and 3) One’s “other”: the universe. This is the egocentric predicament.

    The basic functions of a self are volition, feeling, thinking and acting.

    • Volition is the choices of the self for feeling, thinking and acting.
    • Feeling is value placed on ideas, which value 1) stimulates thinking, and 2) generates emotions in the body. Feeling and emotion increase the power of the self to act.
    • Thinking is the creation and ordering of ideas.
    • Acting is deporting the body relative to the universe.

    A self is a will, a volition. Aspects of a well-furnished self:

    1. A set of desires. Used for:
            Preferring: Selection among alternative concepts in the realm of the ideal (“other things being equal”).
            Choosing: Selection among percepts or alternatives believed by the self to represent real alternatives believed by the self to represent real alternatives of the universe.
            Feeling: Value intensity attached to preferences or choices accompanied by emotions in the body.
    2. An imagination: an arena for creation and processing of concepts, percepts, constructs, and assertions including a construct of the universe (the latter being a taxonomized [chunked, with each category named] construct constructed by the self which is believed to be a good representation of the real truth about the universe. This image is created and is continuously repaired and amended in accordance with the preferences and choices of the self as the self interacts with the universe through its body).
    3. A logic processor. Concepts are related in whatever systems of order the self has mastered and finds expedient to use.
    4. A language processor in which assertions are encoded and signals are decoded using whatever systems of code which the self has mastered.
    5. An action processor in which choices are made for deporting the body of the self, these choices then being triggered into motion.
    6. A memory bank in which are stored:
      • Beliefs about the true universe (past, present and future).
      • Hypotheses under consideration and on the shelf.
      • All concepts ever created by the self.
      • All assertions ever created by the self.
      • A lexicon of codes.
      • A repertoire of systems of order.
    7. Sets of habits of the self created by consistent patterns of choice for:
      • Preferring, choosing and feeling.
      • Thinking, including imagining, believing/disbelieving, memorizing, forgetting, etc.
      • Patterns of acting (deporting one’s body to relate to the universe to fulfill the desires of the self).

    Thinking: Creating and processing ideas in the self.

    Processes of thinking:

    1. Sensing: Receiving ideas from one’s body. Product: Sensation
    2. Conceiving: Creating and acting upon ideas in the imagination. Product: Concept.
    3. Perceiving: Interpretation of sensation by pairing a sensation with a similar concept. Product: Percept.
    4. Desiring: Placing a value on an idea by pairing it with a concept member of a value continuum. Product: Desideratum.
    5. Constructing: Creating possible selves, bodies or universes by concatenating concepts (repeated pairing). Product: Construct.
    6. Asserting: Creating hypotheses about self, body or the universe by pairing concepts in a relationship of prediction. Product: Assertion.
    7. Believing: Pairing a construct or assertion with a concept on a real-unreal continuum.

    Principal constructs created by the self:

    1. The self. (Structure and functions)
    2. The body. (Structure and functions)
    3. The universe. (The present structure and functions)
      God
      Other selves.
      The past.
      The present.

    Basic capacities and concepts of the self:

    Root capacities:

    1. Ability to abstract patterns from ideas.
    2. Ability to differentiate similar patterns from dissimilar patterns.
    3. Ability to distinguish contiguous patterns from non-contiguous patterns.
    4. Short-term memory (seven items or less).
    5. Long-term memory.

    Concept Development: (“®“ = “yields”):

    1. Cognition of a pattern. (Stored in short-term memory.)
    2. Repeated recognition of pattern ® an essence, type, class, substance (stored in long-term memory.)
    3. Dissimilarity of recognized pattern ® an accident (a quality).
    4. Recognition of patterns of accidents ® qualities
    5. An essence + context ® (dissimilar background) ® existence
    6. Essence 1 + Essence 1 + common context ® number (quantity established on the basis of contiguity/noncontiguity).
    7. Number + Number ® patterned relations of numbers
    8. Patterned relations of numbers + imagination ® arithmetic, other systems of order, including different concepts of space (established on basis of contiguity/noncontiguity).
    9. Essences + space ® structure (a type of essence).
    10. ( [Essence 1 + context 1) + (Essence 1 + context 2]) ® (possibility of) change (time). (Other changes also contribute.)
    11. (Structure 1 + space 1 + time 1) + (Structure 1 + space 2 + time 2) ® function 1 (locomotion).
    12. (Structure 1 + space 1 + time 1) + (Structure 2 + space 1 + time 2) ® function 2 (metaphysics).
    13. (Structure 1 + accident 1 + time 1) + Structure 1 + accident 2 + time 2) ® function 3 (action).
    14. ((Structure 1 + function (1v2v3)) ® (Change of function (1v2v3) of structure 2) in a recognized pattern ® cause

    Summary: Basic kinds of concepts:

    1. Patterns established on basis of similarity/dissimilarity and contiguity/non-contiguity
    2. Essences (substances, classes, types)
    3. Accidents (qualities)
    4. Structures
    5. Functions
    6. Relationships
    7. Spaces
    8. Times
    9. Causes

    Concepts are classes used in the imagination of the self.

    True: That property possessed by a construct or assertion wherein it is held by its creator self to represent correctly the universe created by the self. May or may not be based on evidence.

    Really true: That property possessed by a construct or assertion wherein it represents correctly the universe as seen by the omniscient observer.

    Individuation: Determination of the uniqueness of an idea.

    • A concept is individuated when it represents a single, unique property or when it represents the unique intersection of a set of properties (is dissimilar to all other essences or concept patterns).
    • A percept is individuated when it is clearly differentiated from its perceptual context by figure/ground comparison.
    • A construct is individuated by the uniqueness of its attributed structure and function.
    • An assertion is individuated by the unique intersection of ideas created by the predicated pairing.

    Existence: That property of a concept, percept, or construction wherein it is deemed by its creator to have been successfully individuated in the creator’s mind. To be thought is to exist.

    Really existing: That property of a concept, percept or construct wherein its nature as individuated by its creator is seen by the omniscient observer to be correctly and sufficiently individuated.

    Real: That property of concepts, percepts or constructs wherein its imagined referents in the universe are believed by the creator of those concepts, percepts or constructs actually to be instantiated in the real universe.

    Really real: That property of concepts, percepts or constructs wherein its imagined referents are real to the omniscient observer.

    Assertions are of three types, each with several subtypes:

    1. Disclosure: The characterization of self.

      • Exclamations: Wow!
      • Valuations: That is a good lad.
      • Preferences: Quiche is the greatest.
      • Choices: I’ll have the sirloin.
      • Plans: I’m getting up at five in the morning.
      • Intentions: Someday I’ll get around to doing genealogy.

    2. Directive: Attempting to control the actions of others.

      • Commands: Stop!
      • Questions: What time is it?
      • Definitions: Escargot means snail.
      • Maxims: A stitch in time saves nine.
      • Art forms: Devices to attract and hold the attention.

    3. Description: Portrayal of the nature of the body or of the universe. (For the intent of constraining the beliefs of other selves.)

      • Fact: Identification of a present phenomenon (percept). This is an albatross.
      • Law: An inductive generalization about a body of perceived or reported facts. Albatrosses lay eggs.
      • Theory: The creation or non-perceptual constructs as mechanisms to explain and deduce the laws and facts of an area of inquiry. Albatrosses lay eggs because they are descendants of reptiles. (Naturalistic theory construction.)
    • Principle: The adduction of fundamental postulates to guide theory construction in an area of inquiry. All life forms are differentiated descendants of simple life forms. (Naturalistic principle adduction. The desires of the self control which theories are constructed and which principles are adduced. Theistic or other principles and theories could be used to accomplish the same logical ends.)

    Structure of assertions

    All assertions consist of:

    1. A single class (concept or construct) which is the subject class: Adult geese.
    2. Another single class (concept or construct) to serve as predicate, with which the subject is paired: Creatures which mate for life.
    3. A specified relationship of predication asserted to hold between the two classes. The parameters of predication are:
    • Specification of a class relation: inclusion, exclusion, coextension.
    • Specification of which members of the subject class are asserted to have said class relation to the predicate: all, none, some, three, etc.: All who can find a mate.
    • Specification of the time frame during which the said predication is asserted to hold: Beginning when geese came to be real, ending when geese cease to be real.
    • Specification of the area or volume of space in which the said predication is asserted to hold: The planet Earth.

    Finished example: Since geese came to exist on the earth and until they cease to exist, all adult geese which can find mates, mate for life.

    Note on assertions: The sentence above is not an assertion because assertions exist only in the self and are ideas only. A well-formed assertion is the most careful, exact and defensible idea that a given person can form. An assertion is of value as it aids the self in thinking or as it helps the self to accomplish a specific objective when that assertion is encoded and launched into the universe.

  • Testimony, 1985

    January 1985

    1.   Human beings have two parts or aspects:

    • a.   Outer: The physical body, which deals with earth and nature, other humans, human artifacts.
    • b.   Inner: Thoughts, feelings and desires; the good, the holy, the beautiful; the bad, the evil, the ugly.

    Import: Each realm is very important: to neglect either is to fail as a human being.

    2.   There are two kinds of human knowledge (belief) which correspond to the two aspects of man.

    Public, physical knowledge, guided by:Inner, personal knowledge, derived from:
    Authority: What learned people say.What happens when I yield to what is holy to me.
    Reason: Ideas which are self-consistent.What happens when I yield to what is evil to me.
    Observation: What I personally sense.What happens when I yield to my self-desires.
    Pragmatics: What works in the realm of sense.What happens when I just let things happen.

    3.   When one has proved to be a responsible person and thinker in the everyday world, one is better prepared to make judgments in relation to the truth or falsity of religious hypotheses.

    Problem: Are the Restored Gospel, Church and Priesthood of Jesus Christ true? Does the holy in my life assure me of the truthfulness of the Restored Gospel, and does the Holy Spirit guide and comfort me as I attempt to live it?

    4.   I can gather two kinds of knowledge to test that possibility. Examples:

    Public, physical knowledge:Inner, personal knowledge:
    Authority: Hearing the testimonies of reliable, trustworthy persons whom I know.Prayer: expressions of gratitude, requests and answers.
    Reason: completeness and consistency of the understanding of human life in the Restored Gospel.Promptings: Faith and its results.
    Observation: The existence of the Book of Mormon. The order and complexity of the universe.Insight: Interpretations and understandings.
    Pragmatics: Fulfilling of prophecy. Success of the believers; consequences of sin.Gifts of the Spirit: Warnings, powers, blessings.
    • Import: Public knowledge can never force one to believe the Restored Gospel. Example: Laman and Lemuel.
    • Since the Restored Gospel is essentially about inner things, only inner knowledge can establish its truthfulness.
    • Import: Inner knowledge comes only as I experiment with inner things. I experiment only as I desire to do so. Therefore I gain the evidence that makes a testimony possible only as I desire to do so.

    5.   Question: Can I talk myself into a testimony? Answer: Can I talk myself into believing I have eaten when I have not? As I can test and prove things in physical knowledge, I can test and prove things in inner knowledge if I am willing to perform the necessary test and to make careful accounting of the results.

    6.   Physical, public evidence can greatly strengthen inner, personal knowledge of the truth of the Restored Gospel. Inner, personal knowledge can be likened to the warp of woven cloth. Public knowledge becomes the woof which when tightly woven into a strong warp, adds strength and substance to a testimony.

    7.   Qualities of testimony: Strong: Base for great faith and sacrifice. Weak: Cannot stand opposition. Sure: Sufficient evidence to surmount reasonable doubt: Daily contact with the enlarging and beneficent power of the Holy Spirit (Alma’s test). Unsure: Not enough experiments performed (faith) to be sure of the dependability of God. Present: Cooperation with the Holy Spirit today. Past: Memory of sure cooperation with the Holy Spirit, but no present cooperation.

    8.   Summary and Conclusions:

    • a.   The essence of testimony is present, inner experience with the Holy Spirit. Public, physical knowledge about the Restored Gospel is helpful but only when tightly woven into daily cooperation with the Holy Spirit.
    • b.   Inner experience, evidence, comes only through faith (after initial witness of the Holy Spirit). Doing!
    • c.   If a person hungers and thirsts after righteousness, he or she will perform the inner experiments necessary to gain a sure testimony of the Restored Gospel. Lacking that desire, no one can gain sure and lasting evidence.
    • d.   A testimony is always an inner, personal, non-transferable thing, a selected summary of the inner experiments of the person. Witness may be born, but the evidence cannot be transferred.
    • e.   Any person who has a sure testimony of the workings of the Holy Spirit through the laws and ordinances of the Restored Gospel can also endure to a sure knowledge of the Son and of the Father, if he or she so desires in faith.
  • Principles of Interpreting Scripture, 1984

    December 1984

    The following principles are important in learning to interpret the scriptures of the Restored Gospel.

    1. The fullness of the scriptures is the key to knowledge.

    The scriptures do not bring knowledge of themselves, for they are only sets of inkblots on paper. But as those inkblots are examined prayerfully in the name of the Savior, that study becomes an occasion for revelation from the Father through the Holy Ghost. Those revelations are the word of God, which is His law. Willing, heartfelt obedience to that law is faith in Jesus Christ. As a person lives by that faith, a person gains knowledge of the being and ways of God. The fulness of the scriptures provides all a person needs to ponder to get enough revelation to begin the process of knowing God. Thus the fulness of the scriptures is the key to knowledge. (Luke 11:53, JST Version)

    2. There is a parallelism between things physical and things spiritual. All things physical have a spiritual counterpart.

    Whenever the scriptures tell a story or mention a physical object, whatever is being discussed physically has a spiritual counterpart which should be sought. For instance, the ark which Noah built to save the animals and righteous souls from the great flood is a representation of the new and everlasting covenant of God which will save every righteous soul from the flood of evil which is called in the scriptures “the world”. Every so-called temporal commandment has a spiritual counterpart and purpose. For instance, the word of wisdom as given in D&C 89 is a representation of the wisdom of God which will save every person spiritually, even as the temporal commandments help a person physically. (D&C 29)

    3. It is the spiritual side of existence which governs and drives the physical side, not vice versa.

    It is sometimes tempting to think that physical things govern themselves, that the physical universe is a great clock which just ticks on with all of its gears meshing. A fundamental contrary truth of the scriptures is that everything physical is governed by the spiritual order of existence. For instance, it is natural to assume when a storm comes that it is simply the natural play of atmospheric physics at work. While indeed there are aspects of atmospheric physics at work, all is governed and controlled by the hand of God. Thus there never was a storm which did not accomplish exactly that which God wanted it to perform and commanded it to perform. To please God, we must recognize His hand in all things. (D&C 59)

    4. We should liken the scriptures unto ourselves.

    The real fruit of all scripture is to help each individual to receive and to be faithful to the present revelations of God as they are received by that person at a given moment. The value of reading the scriptures is, then, to inquire of the Lord constantly as to how what we are reading applies to our present situation and predicaments. Knowing the scriptures does not of itself save us in any way. But making application of the scriptures to our daily lives in this manner is the very thing which will save us if we are faithful unto those revelations. (1 Nephi 19:43)

    This principle is a species of a more general principle which would have us liken all things unto ourselves. Whenever we see anyone speaking or acting, we should ask ourselves what we would and should do as covenant servants of the Savior in that situation. Whenever we see a problem to be solved, we should ask how that problem could best be solved in the Savior’s way. Since the formation of a Christlike character is our most important and most precious accomplishment in this world, and since that character is formed basically by making correct decisions, likening all things to ourselves and making Christlike decisions in all things greatly increases the density of our character forming decisions in daily life. Thus likening all things to ourselves hastens the process of taking upon ourselves the divine nature and prepares us for making correct decisions when those decisions are our own stewardship reality.

    The scriptures are especially helpful in the process of likening all things to ourselves because there we see in addition to the usual worldly mistakes of men the godly acts of good men. To be constantly in the presence of holy persons would be a great advantage in learning to make correct decisions in this life. While most of us may not actually live daily with a prophet of God, we can live in our imagination with the prophets of the scriptures and burn into our souls the values, beliefs and action patterns of those godly men.

  • A Perspective on Priesthood, 1984

    6 November 1984

    Let us imagine together the following scenario:

    1.   The focus of priesthood activity in the LDS Church is doing, not just knowing: acting, not speaking.

    2.   Persons holding the Melchizedek Priesthood participate in quorum meetings according to their activities:

    • a.   Some focus on perfecting the saints (home teaching). This effort to strengthen every member of the Church and to establish Zion would replace what is now called the Elder’s Quorum meeting. Instead of having a doctrinal lesson each week, emphasis would be placed on learning how to do superb home teaching. Practice sessions on various skills would be appropriate. This group’s part in ward social and welfare activities would be planned, and previous performance would be reviewed. Care and nurturing of junior (Aaronic Priesthood) companions in home teaching would be stressed. High Priests, Seventy, and Elders whose calling and interest is in this labor attend and participate in this weekly priesthood session.
    • b.   Others focus on teaching the Restored Gospel to non-members (missionary work) as the weekly meeting of the Seventies group in each ward. The meeting activity is preparing prospective full-time and part-time missionaries, organizing proselyting activities in the ward and stake. It may include studying the language, customs and beliefs of some far people of the world (as preparation of both young missionaries and older couples to reside in and do missionary labor in that area of the world. High Priests, Seventy and Elders whose calling and interest is in this labor attend and participate in this weekly priesthood session.
    • c.   Others focus on redemption of the dead in a meeting which replaces the weekly meeting of the High Priests group in each ward. Practical instruction in genealogical research, the organizing of research projects, the implementation of the extraction program, and concern for meaningful participation in temple ordinances are the focus of attention. The conducting of temple preparation sequences for persons anticipating going to the temple for the first time is a responsibility of this group. High Priests, Seventy and Elders whose calling and interest is in this labor should attend and participate in this weekly priesthood session.

    3.   Ordination to the Melchizedek Priesthood is contingent upon both the worthiness of the individual and upon an expressed and affirmed pledge to be fully active and devoted to these three priesthood activities for the remainder of his mortal life.

    4.   In annual interviews with his Bishop, each holder of the Melchizedek Priesthood negotiates with the Bishop his calling in the ward or stake as related to the priesthood group with which he will associate and labor with his heart, might, mind and strength for the coming year.

    5.   In subsequent annual interviews (after ordination and assignment of labor) temple recommends are issued only to those persons who, in addition to other worthiness, had been found to be active, diligent and faithful both in fulfilling their formal callings and in fulfilling their agreed upon participation in one of the three priesthood functions.

    6.   It is anticipated that every faithful bearer of the Melchizedek Priesthood would move through each of the three activities of the priesthood in the normal course of events. Young elders might first be assigned to meet with the Seventy in preparation for their missions. Upon returning home from their missions, their assignment might be to the Elders, to prepare for their marriages and in participating in the work of converting and strengthening the members of the ward through home teaching. When appropriate, each would be assigned to the High Priests to first work out his own four-generation program, then to participate with others of his own family or group on research and temple work. As appropriate, reassignment to the Elders or Seventy after serving with the High Priests is ordinary.

    7.   The solid foundation upon which this work of the Melchizedek Priesthood is based is the accomplishments of each young man in his experience as a bearer of the Aaronic Priesthood. In addition to learning to perform his part in the ordinances of the Aaronic Priesthood, each young man works in the program jointly drawn up and agreed upon by the young man himself, his parents, and the Aaronic Priesthood leadership of the ward. The focus of this program is to assure that by the time he is of age to be considered for receiving the Melchizedek Priesthood, he has (a) learned to perform faithfully and well in the work and ordinances of the Aaronic Priesthood; (b) has learned to work hard, skillfully and well in some aspect of the physical subduing of the earth (to the point that he could earn a livelihood by this skill, if necessary); and (c) that he is preparing adequately and intelligently for his life’s work (which may or may not be the same as (b) above). Being ordained to the Aaronic Priesthood is contingent upon worthiness and upon a willingness to learn to be a person who works hard, intelligently and skillfully. Being then ordained to the Melchizedek Priesthood is then predicated upon worthiness which includes demonstrated ability to work hard, intelligently and skillfully.

    8.   The Sunday School activity in each ward is changed from a program in which the students were more or less passive observers and consumers to a program in which each student is assigned to make preparations outside of the class to become responsible for a working knowledge of the scriptures and basic doctrines of the Church. Because this Sunday School program is effective, priesthood meeting time need no longer be used as a second Sunday School session. Thus the work of the priesthood can be the focus of priesthood meeting time.

  • A Taxonomy of Intellectual Processes, 1984

    30 March 1984

    Introduction

    This taxonomy is a structure of concepts which is intended to serve as a directory of the basic processes of the human intellect. In the account which follows there is an attempt to provide sufficient description of each element of the taxonomy so that the reader may understand the principles which individuate each element as well as the structure of identities which relate them to each other. It is hoped that the taxonomy is sufficiently exhaustive and definitive to be useful for many purposes.

    The main divisions of human intellectual process are assumed to be three in number, corresponding to the human functions of willing, thinking and acting. The most fundamental of these categories is here taken to be the volitional, that process by which a human being expresses his desires. Volition is taken to be the independent variable in the human system. The second category is that of thinking, the processes by which the will creates and manipulates ideas. Thinking is divided into three main areas: imagination, basic thinking and advanced thinking. The third category of intellectual processes is that of acting, corresponding to the volitional body functions of the human being. Fundamental to this work is the assumption that the human being is always functioning in all three ways when conscious: willing, thinking and acting are always in process in the human being, and always as a triad. Though acting may be suppressed at times, it is here assumed that the impulse to act is always part of any willing-thinking process.

    To facilitate understanding of this taxonomy, two separate devices are employed. This first is a one-page summary (the last page of this work), frequent reference to which may assist the reader to grasp the gestalt of the taxonomy. The second is a narrative description of the categories and subcategories which is intended to provide detail and to suggest other interrelationships not immediately apparent on the one-page summary.

    Imagination: The creation of concept patterns in the mind.

    Imagination is here seen as the process of forming ideas. The general term “idea” will seldom be used in this work because of its ambiguity. The notion of concept will be employed in its place. To the term concept are attributed the following properties:

    1. There is an image, form or structure associated with each concept.
    2. Concepts are creative constructions of the human mind.
    3. There is an essentially infinite number of variations of concepts possible.
    4. Concepts may be elemental or of a complexity exceeding that of the universe.

    We begin with imagination because of the fundamental role which concepts are seen to play in mentation. While the Lockean apparatus of tabula rasa is not here assumed, it does seem apparent that the human mind is first stimulated largely by sensation and that as sensations are repeated and become familiar, they become the occasion of perception.

    Perception is defined as the identification of a present sensation as something familiar, something which previous experience has stimulated the mind to coalesce into at least a rudimentary concept. Perception seems to begin as a reflexive and automatic human activity. It also seems to eventuate in a process which may be deliberately and creatively controlled by an intelligent adult. For the adult, perception seems to be the conscious assignment of a sensation to a concept more or less also consciously shaped in previous mentation. Perception is thus recognition.

    The raw material of perception is always sensation. That sensation may be painful, pleasurable or simply informational. It may come through any sensory mechanism, of which at least twenty-five have been identified in the human body. Attention may focus on a sensation according to the will of the person, or may be ignored as are the overwhelming number of daily sensations. There is for each individual a pain/pleasure threshold which when exceeded, supervenes into the consciousness and cannot be ignored. But no sensation is self-interpreting, self-meaningful. For sensation to become perception it must be received into the concept matrix.

    Conception is the process of forming types or categories in the imagination. Every concept is a general notion. Perception seems to be the basis of the initial concepts one has, yet we do not seem to perceive until we have concepts into which to receive and by which to interpret sense data.

    The question of the possibility of inherent concepts is pertinent. It does seem that there are some universal or nearly universal concepts or concept relations, such as up-good and down-bad. The presence of such universal patterns does not necessitate the conclusion that concept patterns are neurologically inherited, but it does cause us to take the question seriously.

    In all of the intellectual process hereafter described, concept is taken to be the basic unit of intellection, the sine qua non of intellectual process. Two generalizations are asserted:

    1. All human mental life is a processing of concepts.
    2. Concepts replace percepts as soon as possible and wherever possible.

    The evidence for the latter generalization is found in each person. Concept is the realm of power, control, familiarity, and creativity. Percept is the area of the unknown, of danger, of challenge, of effort. To prefer concept over precept when given a choice is for most persons simply the path of least effort and least challenge, as is the basis of the unwillingness to learn observed in many persons.

    Volition: The exercise of will in creating and using concepts.

    The first category of volition is that of imagination, that is treated in the previous section. Imagination came before volition in this taxonomy because a concept base is necessary before the human will can operate. This is to say, there must be alternatives before any choosing can be done. Imagination is placed as the first category under volition to emphasize that ultimately both the concepts and the percepts one entertains are very much under his control. That control is total for concepts and begins to approach totality for percepts according to the degree of power or control one has over his physical environment.

    Attending, the second category under volition, is the process of focusing the attention on one rather than other concepts (including percepts). Most attending is a function of will, the exception being that noted above of physically overwhelming percepts. In a perceptual situation, the number of foci options may be as high as 1×105 for each separate moment. This number registers the number of sensorily discriminable particulars upon which attention could potentially focus in any natural setting such as a forest landscape. The number of potential foci for conception at any given moment is usually far greater than in the perceptual realm. Were it not for the ability to focus attention, we probably would drown mentally under the overwhelming magnitude of the number of concepts in our mental system which would crowd our consciousness.

    Preferring is the third item under volition. To prefer is to select one concept over another or others for some use such as contemplation or action. To prefer is different from attending in that whereas attending to a series of concepts means to examine each one successively, preferring is to take one of that series and judge it to be the best for a use or activity which is then initiated. For example, we have a concept we wish to express in a line of poetry. We have at our command a series of (concepts of) symbols which are candidates to represent what we wish to say in the poem. We first successively attend to a paired comparison of the concept which we wish to express with each symbol of the representational series. Then we prefer the one which we feel best expresses what we wish to say while meeting the formal requirements of meter, rhyme, etc., in the code sequence (poem line) which we are building.

    Choosing, the fourth of volition, is similar to preferring in that we first attend to a series of concepts (at least two items) and then select one for action. It is differentiated from preferring in that candidates for choosing are here always concepts which are percepts (concepts having an immediate sensory matching correlate), while preferring is always an operation upon a series of non-perceived (at the moment) concepts. Thus concepts which have no physical referent or correlative can only be preferred, while those which may have a referent is sensorily present. The reason for employing this distinction between preferring and choosing is that when we prefer, we always know exactly what it is that we are selecting because we control our own concepts completely. This is knowing one’s own mind. But in choosing we are always selecting a referent in the external world as a focus for physical action. We choose what we think we know because of the concept we have which makes perception of that referent possible; but we never know referents in the real world so thoroughly that we never run any risk. This is to say that our concept of the referent is never the exact counterpart of the referent. Therefore choosing involves a risk of dealing with the unknown which preferring does not.

    The fifth type of volition is remembering. Remembering is preferring retrieval links which then serve as tethers for concepts which we wish to be able to recall at will. When ideas are attended to which are very interesting to the person, remembering links are formed automatically. But a person can remember anything he wishes to be able to recall at will, interesting or not, by the deliberate formation of retrieval links. This conscious remembering is a key factor in learning, which is discussed below.

    Recalling is the sixth volitional intellectual process. Recall is to employ the retrieval links formed in remembering and to bring to the focus of attention some desired concept which is not there. In computer language, to remember is to “save” and to recall is to “load”.

    The seventh process is that of forgetting. Since the human mind does not erase in the same manner as one can erase memory in a computer, forgetting takes the form of neglecting to form retrieval links or of interest or deliberate remembering. Forgetting is a defense mechanism. If we could not forget anything, then our retrieval links would often bring back more than we care to recall. Sometimes we desire not to be responsible for doing something, so we deliberately forget. Since folklore has it that we cannot be held responsible for that which we have forgotten, forgetting becomes a basis for self-justification. The view here maintained is that all forgetting is deliberate, and act of preference. That preferring may be active, a deliberate blocking, or passive, not forming retrieval links, but is nevertheless in the arena of preference in either case.

    The eighth volitional process is that of feeling. Feeling is an emotional state. We assume here faute de mieux that an emotional state is at least in part an endocrine reaction of the human body. But it is also assumed that the power to generate and to negate such emotional states is entirely within the volitional power of any person who wishes to gain that control. Many persons succumb to the folklore that feeling is something that “happens” to a person, for which he is not responsible. The refutation of that latter position is found in the persons who seek and gain total control over their emotional states. Naturally those who have control are more positive witnesses for the volitional position than those who do not have control of their emotions.

    The ninth volitional intellectual process is that of thinking. Thinking is defined as the creating and processing of concepts. Thus thinking is a generic term which covers all intellectual processes. It is mentioned here as part of a triad: feeling, thinking and acting, which triad are the three things which human beings do. Preferring is here seen as the fundamental mode of thinking. As we prefer, we think, then feel, then act.

    Tenth and final in the volitional processes is then the category of acting. Acting is an intellectual process because it is learned and controlled through concepts. The forming and implementing of action sequences is a process in which the mind plays a pivotal role. The major forms of action will be discussed below, though not in the detail with which thinking is dealt with.

    Basic Thinking: The relating of concepts.

    Assertion is the initial type of basic thinking. It is the combining of two or more concepts by means of an appropriate copula and with sufficient quantification that we are making a statement about something. Traditional usage has called this type of formulation a “proposition”; that terminology is not used here because of unwanted connotations. Assertions, like meanings exist only in the mind, and are meaning complexes. When encoded they are represented by sentences. We communicate sentences, but the assertion intended by the encoder and the assertion created by the decoder always exist in the private province of the mind; we have no means of knowing that the two ever are identical. An example of a sentence which represents an assertion is to take the symbols “characteristic”, “color”, “green” and “chlorophyl” and combine them: “The characteristic color of chlorophyl is green.” Such statements may then be used as premises.

    Identification is the second process of basic thinking. It is preferring to treat two concepts as if they were the same. Sameness is a matter of degree, so identification may be merely the assertion of vague similarity, or it might range to the assertion of absolute one-to-one correspondence. Whether we identify two concepts as being identical or not depends upon the use which we wish to make of them. For purposes of housing, clothing and transporting we identify the different manifestations of one of our children as being the same person; but for purposes of nourishment, discipline and encouragement it pays to take the manifestations of that same child as being a slightly different person in each case.

    Supposing two concepts to be different is the third type of basic thinking. We shall call this the process of individuating. It is the complement of the process of individuating. It is the complement of the process of identifying, and the two are nearly always used in conjunction with each other, much as one always uses the two blades of a scissors together to do the cutting that is desired. Individuation is a matter of preference and of degree just as is identification.

    Deduction is the fourth representative of the category of basic thinking. Deduction is defined as the deriving of necessary conclusions from given premises in accordance with given rules. The rules specify what parameters the premises must contain and the sequence of inference involved. For example, the rules of the categorical syllogism are the definitions of the terms involved (middle, major, minor, distribution, quality and quantity) and the five rules which govern distribution, quality and quantity.

    The fifth type of basic thinking is induction, which is preferring to identify the concept which represents the sample of some population as a sufficient concept to represent the whole of that population. Thus if we perceive a line segment to be straight; or if a person has dealt with us honestly in the past that he will also deal honestly in the future. We also sometimes assume that a thing which we perceive to exist at one time and then again at a later time also continued to exist even at those times in between our observations when we did not perceive it. Thus by extrapolation and interpolation we fill in the blanks in our concept of existence created by the interstices related to our perceptual experience.

    Adduction is the sixth type, and is defined as the process of supplying premises from which a given conclusion may validly be deduced. When we theorize or explain, we are usually adducing. There are always an infinite number of potential premises which logically satisfy the need to adduce, which is why we are seldom at a loss when the need arises to explain or to justify something. Adduction is the proper opposite to deduction rather than induction, which is sometimes mistakenly given that role.

    The seventh category of basic thinking process is analysis, which is the task of breaking the concept down into constituent parts. Some concepts are simple and cannot be analyzed, but most are complex and can be processed by this means. Analysis may be partial or exhaustive, and the mode of analysis will vary according to the purpose the analyzer has in mind. For example, a soil may be analyzed for its chemical composition, and each can be done to designate the major constituents only or can be exhaustive, and the mode of analysis will vary according to the purpose the analyzer has in mind. For example, a soil may be analyzed as to its physical particles (sand, silt, clays) or it can be analyzed for its chemical composition, and each can be done to designate the major constituents only or can be exhaustive. The elements of a complex concept may be percepts when discovered, but always function as concepts in the part-to-part and part-to-whole relationships which it is the purpose of analysis to establish.

    Abstraction is the eighth type of basic thinking. It takes the products of analysis and attends to one or more of them, ignoring the remainder of the constituents. Abstraction is purposive, creative and arbitrary. We abstract plots from novels, patterns of worship from cultures, essences from wholes. In the manner of speaking here employed, abstraction is always a conceptual process. When we perform this process in a perceptual realm by a physical operation, we speak of extraction rather than abstraction. Abstraction is a specialized form of attending.

    The final and ninth type of basic thinking designated here is that of naming. Naming is the process of relating a concept to another which has a physical counterpart which serves as a symbol. Naming is the joining of two concepts in the mind, such as the number which comes after six and the idea of seven. We do this so that we may refer to the number which comes after six by the word “seven,” supposing seven to be the counterpart of “seven.” The question always is, is not the number which comes after six nothing but seven? At any rate, we use “seven” to represent seven, and thus have named at least it, and perhaps we may assume identity between seven and the number which comes after six.

    Admitting that the line which separates basic thinking from advanced thinking is perhaps more one of accident than essence, we now proceed to examine those more complex combinations of thinking processes.

    Advanced thinking: Creating/processing concepts in a learned sequence.

    The first type of advanced thinking is that of learning. Learning finds its ancestry in remembering, which in turn traces back to preferring. We learn that which we wish to learn. Learning is preferring thinking/feeling/acting sequences until they are habitual. The desired state of learning important things is that they be “over-learned,” learned so well that once the habit is triggered one need not think about how the sequence is executed. One knows it so well that it is performed automatically. There is an inherent capacity in human beings to learn which is manifest differentially. Some excel in languages, others in controlling their emotions, others in physical skills. While nearly everyone can master the rudiments of most activities, that is to say, learn something about nearly anything that can be learned, the learning attainments of humans vary vastly both because of desire and because of differential talent. A factor of learning often not in the person’s control is that which is available to be learned. Nevertheless, it is a good maxim that any person with sufficient desire can learn virtually anything he can conceive of learning.

    The second category of advanced thinking is that of taxonomizing, which is the creation of systems of categories having an internal structure which relates the associated categories in some logical or useful manner. Thus we create taxonomies of foods so that we may have understanding of what is offered to us and that which we might choose to fulfill the desire to nourish ourselves. We create taxonomies of people out of things we have learned about individuals and types of persons we have met. We acquire taxonomies with the language we learn, finding ready-made systems of persons, places and things which we then amend through our own experience and creativity. Creativity itself is taxonomizing, the invention of concept systems to satisfy some need. The concept we have in our minds of the reality of the physical universe is a taxonomy which we have partly been given and have partly created. The whole of the future of the universe or any of its parts is an additional but closely related taxonomy, as is our idea of the past. Virtually every intellectual endeavor we engage in involves either the creation or use of taxonomies, or both. Integral to these taxonomies are the laws and theories we have about everything. When we take a trip in our minds, we move from category to category withing our taxonomy of geography. When we mentally invent a new way to skin a cat, we are creating are creating a new taxonomy of action process. When we play a piece on the piano, we are following a taxonomy created by the composer of the piece, and the rendition we created is itself a taxonomy of sounds and relationships of sounds. Every language is a taxonomy of symbols; its grammatical rules are the generalizations about the categories of symbols and symbol associations. We use taxonomies whenever we identify anything or use anything or think of anything in relation to the things which are like it. Indeed, all thinking processes are related into a whole by the process of taxonomizing. Taxonomies are concept systems, and every system-concept is a taxonomy.

    The third type of advanced thinking is that of comprehending, which is contemplating a concept in a nexus of related concepts. We shall subdivide comprehending into knowing, understanding, measuring and judging, and treat each of those subtypes separately.

    Knowing is defined as perceiving something thoroughly using many related percepts and concepts. Thus when we desire to know something we examine it very carefully, taking many perceptual “shots” or pictures of it through every sensory mechanism which is appropriate to the circumstance. While gaining this mass of observations we are comparing what we sense with other things previously experienced, and make decisions about sameness and difference. We try to guess what it will do next or be next, what produced it, etc. When our observations seem to bring nothing new and our questions are satisfied, we then say we know. Knowledge is a relative thing, for the familiarity which allows one person to say he knows might be only the beginning of an investigation for another person. Sure knowledge is perhaps a thing which eludes human beings; we seem to approach it only asymptotically. We cannot be sure because our observations and understandings of anything are always theory-laden in that we assume things we do not and cannot know to be true in the process of gaining the familiarity which enables us to say that we know. Knowledge is thus a common-sense category, not having social standardization or precision. Science would claim to be that standardization, but it has not been accepted as such by the majority of human beings as yet.

    Understanding is the process of contemplating a concept in relation to the other concepts with which it is most closely related. We understand things by before and after, by cause and effect, by desire and action, all being general complexes by which we develop the ability to relate other concepts to the one we wish to more fully comprehend. Understanding need not be vertical. Supposing one understands when one does not is still understanding, however lamentable and misleading that may be. Like knowing, understanding is a matter of degree. Complete, true understanding is a thing which we also approach only asymptotically.

    Measuring is identifying a percept or concept with one of the standard series. By “standard” is meant a set of differentiations which are in common use in a society, such as the metric system, color designations, monetary units, etc. If we are dealing with a perceived piece of lumber, we measure it against the standards which have been set for the lumber. If we are not skilled, we will need to measure the dimensions of the piece to determine that it is a 2×4 and not a 2×6. If we are skilled, we simply measure the perception of the piece against the concept array we have in our minds and designate its dimensions. When we attempt to measure that which is only a concept, not a percept, the matter becomes less sure because we cannot now resort to physical measurement as a backup to mental measurement. For instance, there is no physical test which we can use to determine if person X is an honest man. We have in our minds a series which extends perhaps from being painfully honest to being a pathological liar. Any measurement we make depends upon first abstracting from a great many experiences with person X the typical action he performs, then we identify that typical action with some member of the honesty series. Needless to say, mental measurements may indeed be accurate but tend to be more subjective than do physical measurements, which is the reason scientists insist upon physical measurements. Mental measurement falls in the realm of common sense, uncommon though it often is.

    Judging is the identifying of a percept or concept with satisfaction or non-satisfaction of preferred criteria. The criteria involved might be single or very complex, public or private. We might judge whether or not we have enough gasoline in our tank after measuring it. Or we might judge whether the automobile we drive is satisfactory or not, taking many factors into account. We may judge that an election was fair according to the legally established requirements, or we might judge that the election fully satisfied our own personal preferences. One judgment we often attempt but also often fail at is judging whether or not something will satisfy the personal preferences of another person. We are experts on our own preferences, since we each create our own, but we are all guessers at envisioning just what will satisfy others. Successful guessers in this area of judgment have a special advantage in love, war, business and politics.

    Comprehending is constituted, then, of these four special activities: careful perception, correlation with related concepts, identification with members of standard series of concepts, and identification with satisfaction or nonsatisfaction of preference. These constitute the qualitative, effective, quantitative and purposive aspects of understanding, which may roughly be correlated with the four factors of formal, efficient, material and final causes in the taxonomy of comprehending proposed by Aristotle.

    The next and fourth area of advanced thinking is that of translating, which will be subdivided into encoding and decoding. Translation is the enterprise of relating codes to concepts and has the two main types which will be explicated.

    Encoding is choosing a code sequence to represent a concept sequence. It is the formulation of a message. A message is a code sequence created to represent an assertion or set of assertions in the mind of a sender. The essential factors which the sender must consider in encoding are the language(s) familiar to the intended receiver, the codes familiar to the receiver, and the understanding or worldview of the receiver. Language controls the possible interpretations which may be made by the receiver. Usually the speaker or sender must guess at the precise nature of all three of these factors for a given target person. Again, good guessers are favored. Good guessers usually have made a preliminary test of the situation by experimenting with trivial messages to determine reaction, proceeding with progressively more complex and/or more important messages until the sender’s purpose is fulfilled or confusion in the mind of the receiver is irresolvable (which is failure of translation).

    Decoding is the creation of a concept sequence to represent a given code sequence. The receiver must make some assumptions about the speaker such as the speaker’s purpose, language, main assertion, understanding, and the relevance of what is said. Each assumption must remain a guess, but can be an educated guess if the receiver has had previous experience and/or communication with the sender. The receiver must decode each code sequence into an assertion, then must abstract the principal thrust of the message and make judgments as to just how important, veridical, useful and representative that message is.

    Since neither encoding nor decoding is an exact process, the business of translation is always experimental. For an enterprise which is not in control we do remarkably well, but the part of wisdom no doubt is always to remember the fallibility of the process.

    The fifth process of advanced thinking is that of scholarship. This process has been created because there are many things of interest to human beings which cannot be known (perceived surely or even at all), such as the past. Scholarship is the process of fabricating a reasonable account of something not now perceived (such as the past) by taking accounts of the past, preferably those created at the time by an eye witnesses of the past event which they depict (primary sources) or those created at some other time and means by someone else (secondary sources), adding information from scientific study of objects now present which were also present in the past event, then creating a taxonomy of actors, causes, events and outcomes to satisfy the questions which one might reasonably ask about the past. Such a process is always guesswork, but they are educated guesses and uneducated ones. An educated guess may prove in the light of evidence discovered later to be good or bad, as may educated guesses; but the preponderance of experience is that educated guesses are more often vindicated than are their uneducated counterparts such as hearsay, tale and supposition.

    The sixth process in this area is science. Whereas scholarship has the problem of fabricating reliable accounts about that which is not now observed, science is the process of fabricating reliable accounts about what we do observe. Science has several separate tasks. First, to produce reliable identifications of presently sensed objects and events with established taxonomies of the objects and events of the world: this is the enterprise of establishing scientific facts. Secondly, there is need to abstract from collections of facts certain features which can then be inductively established as the typical objects and events which can serve as reliable bases for accurate prediction of future observations. It may be seen as the creation of taxonomies. Thirdly, there is need to create general accounts of how object and events relate to and are explained by things which are not observable, such as the past, the future, the very large, the very small, etc. such accounts are known as theory, or visions of the whole, which consist of a taxonomy of concepts, part of which are imaginary, part of which correlate with past and with predicted observations, and all of which form a rational (consistent) whole.

    There are special criteria which govern the acceptability of assertions about scientific facts, laws and theories. These form a series which is time related, beginning with the need to be self-consistent and lately adding the requirement to be entirely naturalistic. The specifics of these culture related aspects of science must be treated elsewhere. It is sufficient to note that they are definite strictures within which the enterprise of scientific thinking must operate.

    The seventh form of advanced thinking is philosophy. Philosophy is the process of creating intellectual processes for solving intellectual problems and the processing of intellectual problems for which no standard process has been established. For example, science is the child of philosophy, created out of the need to have definitive, reliable information about the world. As philosophy has found ways to deal with successive subject matters which are definitive and reliable, such areas have successively moved from the domain of philosophy to the domain of science. Psychology did this at the beginning of the twentieth century; linguistics moved at mid-century. The leftover problems which do not admit of ready and systematic solution remain in the province of philosophy. Philosophy is thus the domain of trying to answer the most difficult and enduring questions which human beings have learned to ask.

    Religion is the eighth and final form of advanced thinking. This endeavor is the conscious and deliberate task of creating and maintaining one’s personal habits of thinking/feeling/acting in accordance with one’s educated preferences. And educated preference is one relative to which a person has had sufficient experience to know what sort of thing it is that he desires, or he has sufficient understanding of something that his choices are at least rational within the options he understands. Religion is the enterprise of character building, which is always a do-it-yourself project. It operates by judging satisfaction or dissatisfaction with present habits and the satisfactions which their implementation yields. When one is dissatisfied, one searches out a new possibility for thinking/feeling/acting and implements it. If the result is so gratifying that the person is satisfied, then the person deliberately learns this behavior. When the behavior is learned, its implementation is triggered by some stimulus or consciously produced signal. The person thereafter enjoys the ability to do that thing and to receive the rewards which flow from it as long as his preferences remain the same and as long as the environment which returns the satisfaction he desires continues to deliver that fulfillment which he so cherishes. Dissatisfaction is thus the root of religious conversion or change, and satisfaction is the root of religious observance of what one has learned to think/feel/do.

    There are a great many other candidates for inclusion in the category of advanced thinking. The supposition here maintained is that the present taxonomy contains all of those candidates as subdivisions of the present taxonomy.

    Acting: Preferring is to carry out through one’s body a learned concept sequence. (Also known as art and as communication.)

    A person acts to make a difference, to have an effect upon his environment, ostensibly to change it so that it will afford him satisfactions which he deems will not be forthcoming otherwise. This acting with deliberate intent is art, the process of art. This art may be artless, that is to say unskilled, but yet be art because of the deliberate intent. Since artless art seldom is satisfying, persons learn to become skilled at doing what they do so that they will gain the fulfillment of their desires.

    This art or acting may also be termed communication under the definition that to communicate with something is to affect it. All acting is done to affect something, as is all artistic processing, as is all communicating. These broad definitions or art and communication enable us to identify three things that are essentially the same but are not seen so to be in the minds of many people.

    We shall divide the general category of act into only two main types, those of acting through codes and those of acting through physical force.

    Action through the use of physical force we shall call technology. The development of effective sequences of the application of force is a creative activity which falls under the head of taxonomizing. The process of tanning a hide, for instance, is a series of steps which must be carefully laid out in proper sequence with proper quality control and action alternatives at each step. To create this action sequence in the mind is the task of taxonomy; to assure its perpetuity is to learn it; to perform it well is to acquire the thinking/feeling/acting habits which enable one to succeed in actual performance, which is religion; to trigger the action sequence to perform at a specific time and place on specific material is technology.

    There is a multitude of technology patterns which human beings employ. Employment of each is an intellectual process because one must carefully measure the environment to determine the exact time, place and expenditure of effort which will achieve the desired end. Technology requires coordinated use of many if not most of the intellectual processes of this taxonomy.

    The second general category of acting is that of code communication, which is the delivery of encoded messages. This form of acting may also be called a technology in the parlance of general usage, but not so in this taxonomy, for here technology is limited to those communications which involve some application of physical force, a discernable push which derives from muscular effort, as in the driving of a nail or the flipping of a switch.

    Code communication is almost always multichannelled; it is the employment of two or more codes at once. Thus a person says one thing with his words, sends a contrary message by his body motions, and may demonstrate a third message by the pattern of his subsequent choices. Paying attention to all of the encodations involved is to focus on total communication, as contrasted with simple attention paid to a person’s words.

    Because of its importance, we shall subdivide code communication into three subcategories and elaborate upon each of them.

    The first subcategory of coded communication is disclosure. Disclosure is the sending of messages relative to one’s feelings, beliefs, and desires. In general, this is the domain of all of those things internal to a person which can only be understood if the person himself discloses them, hence the name. Besides the usual problem of interpreting the code correctly, disclosure adds the special burden of often being incorrect, not being a true reflection of how a person really feels. This is sometimes true even when the person honestly desires to tell what is going on inside himself.

    The second subcategory is that of directive. Directive is communication of commands with the intent of causing action on the part of others who receive the encodation. Other examples of this type of discourse are questions, definitions and art forms of the so-called “fine arts,” each of which is designed both to command attention and to cause some action in the thinking/feeling/ acting syndromes of the person receiving the communication.

    The third subcategory is that of description. A description is an assertion which purports to convey to the hearer the actual state of the reality of something in the universe. Its purpose is not only to inform but to command assent. Included in this type are four main divisions which correspond to the divisions of scientific discourse: factual assertions (the identification of a present sensory phenomenon relative to an established taxonomy); law assertions (the establishment of reliable inductive generalizations about the facts which have been observed); theoretical assertions (the hypothesizing of creative fictions to account for the laws and facts which have been established in an area of thought); and principles, (which are the initial and unprovable premises upon which the hypothesizing of theorization builds).

    (We note in passing that there are two basic uses of coded communication. The first is to transmit information to a person while doing the utmost possible not to coerce that person. This will here be called persuasion. Persuasion is limited to disclosure code assertions. The second mode of coded communication is to attempt to coerce the hearer. This is done by issuing directives or descriptions as if one had authority to do so. Speaking as if one has authority we shall denominate as “dominion.” If one truly has authority, then the use of dominion seems appropriate. We also note in passing that virtually all of the authority known in this world comes by the use of technology, the deliberate employment of physical force. The development of networks of technology by which to gain dominion over other people seems to be the principle preference of many human beings, the search for money, class, title and certification being witness to this artful enterprise.)

    The taxonomy of intellectual processes is thus complete. The taxonomy is useful if it enables a person to expand his understanding of the whole and/or the parts of the intellectual processes employed by mankind. The taxonomy is valid if it truly represents all of the processes so employed and if it so subdivides them in a manner which facilitates identification, description and the use of the processes without doing violence to any of them by forcing them into categories where they have unlike companion categories.

    The Taxonomy of Intellectual Processes

    Imagination: The creation of concept patterns in the mind.

    • Perception: Use of immediate sensation to create a concept pattern.
    • Conception: Creation of new concepts by recombination of old ones.

    Volition: The exercise of will in creating and using concepts.

    • Imagination: The creation of concept patterns in the mind.
    • Attending: Focus of consciousness on a concept or concept complex.
    • Preferring: Selection of one concept over another.
    • Choosing: Selection of one percept over another.
    • Remembering: Preferring retrieval links to bring concepts to focus.
    • Recalling: Preferring retrieval links to bring concepts into focus.
    • Forgetting: Erasing or blocking of retrieval links.
    • Feeling: Generation of and dwelling in an emotional state.
    • Thinking: Creation and processing of concepts.
    • Acting: Preferring to carry out in one’s body a learned concept sequence.

    Basic thinking: The relating of concepts.

    • Assertion: Combining two or more concepts into a statement or premise.
    • Identification: Asserting that two concept patterns are alike.
    • Individuation: Asserting that two concept patterns are different.
    • Deduction: Drawing necessary conclusions from given premises.
    • Induction: Assuming the whole to be like the part.
    • Adduction: Supplying premises for a given conclusion.
    • Analysis: Breaking a concept into its constituent concepts.
    • Abstraction: Focus on some constituent concepts, ignoring the remainder.
    • Naming: Assigning a code to represent a concept.

    Advanced thinking: Creating/processing concepts in a learned sequence.

    • Learning: Preferring thinking/feeling/acting/ sequences until habitual.
    •             Taxonomizing: Creation of concept systems.
    •             Comprehending: Contemplating a concept in a nexus of related concepts.
    •                         Knowing: Perceive thoroughly using many related percepts and concepts.
    •                         Understanding: Focus on a concept in the nexus of related concepts.
    •                         Measuring: Identifying a percept/concept with one of a standard series.
    •                         Judging: Identifying a percept/concept with one of a preferred series.
    • Translating: Relating codes to concepts.
    •             Encoding: Choosing a code sequence to represent a concept sequence.
    •             Decoding: Creating a concept sequence to represent a code sequence.

    Scholarship: Encoding a creative synthesis of one’s decodings.

    Science: Encoding a creative synthesis of decodings and percepts/concepts.

    Philosophy: Creation of intellectual processes and processing of problems.

    Religion: Creating/maintaining personal habits of thinking/feeling/acting.

    Acting: Preferring to carry out in one’s body a learned concept sequence.

    (Also known as: art, communication.)

    • Technology: Use of physical force to affect one’s environment.
    • Coded communication: Delivery to another of an encoded assertion.
    •             Disclosure: Communication of one’s feelings, beliefs or desires.
    •             Directive: Communication of commands to cause action.
    •             Description: Communication of assertions to control belief in others.