Blog

  • 3 Nephi 12:6 — LeGrand Baker — ‘Filled with the Holy Ghost’

    3 Nephi 12:6 — LeGrand Baker — ‘Filled with the Holy Ghost’

    6 And blessed are all they who do hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled with the Holy Ghost

    Righteousness is the Hebrew zedek, and means priesthood and temple correctness: doing the right thing in the right way in the right place, dressed the right way, saying the right words, holding one’s hand the right way, and with the right authority. For a fuller discussion of zedek see Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, first edition, 279-286; second edition (the one in this website under “published books), pages 189-201. This discussion of 3 Nephi 12:6 is also from that book.

    To “hunger and thirst after righteousness [zedek]” is the chief characteristic of the meek—those who remember (or are re-taught by the Spirit) to keep the covenants they made at the Council in Heaven, as we discussed with 3 Nephi 12:5.

    In Hebrew tradition, as Adam and Eve left their Garden home, Satan and his henchmen began to bring their plan into play. They planned to “cast men into great distractions and pains in life, so that their men should be preoccupied with life, and not have time to attend on the Holy Spirit.” {1} But the Lord sent angels to teach Adam about sacrifice and the Savior’s Atonement so that Adam and Eve would know how to come home again. Thereafter, the great desire of the righteous was to find the way to “return to the Garden” where they could regain their garments of light, again enjoy the company of God, and where they could eat freely of the fruit of the tree of life and drink of the waters of life.

    That also became the ultimate promise to the faithful Saints in New Testament times. John the Beloved concludes his Revelation with this vision of the celestial world:

    1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
    2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. …
    6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
    7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son. …

    1 And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.
    2 In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.
    3 And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him:
    4 And they shall see his face; and his name shall be in their foreheads. …

    13 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. …

    16 I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.
    17 And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely (Revelation 21:1-2, 6-7; 22:1-4, 13-14, 16-17).

    Alma understood that the fruit of the tree of life and the waters of life were both the blessing to the righteous and the product of their own righteousness. He said:

    40 And thus, if ye will not nourish the word, looking forward with an eye of faith to the fruit thereof, ye can never pluck of the fruit of the tree of life.
    41 But if ye will nourish the word, yea, nourish the tree as it beginneth to grow, by your faith with great diligence, and with patience, looking forward to the fruit thereof, it shall take root; and behold it shall be a tree springing up unto everlasting life.
    42 And because of your diligence and your faith and your patience with the word in nourishing it, that it may take root in you, behold, by and by ye shall pluck the fruit thereof, which is most precious, which is sweet above all that is sweet, and which is white above all that is white, yea, and pure above all that is pure; and ye shall feast upon this fruit even until ye are filled, that ye hunger not, neither shall ye thirst.
    43 Then, my brethren, ye shall reap the rewards of your faith, and your diligence, and patience, and long-suffering, waiting for the tree to bring forth fruit unto you (Alma 32:40-43).

    The Savior explained how that is so. He first taught it to the people in Jerusalem:

    53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
    54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.
    55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
    56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.
    57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.
    58 This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever (John 6:53-58). {2}

    And he taught it more fully to the Saints in America:

    3 And it came to pass that he brake bread again and blessed it, and gave to the disciples to eat.
    4 And when they had eaten he commanded them that they should break bread, and give unto the multitude.
    5 And when they had given unto the multitude he also gave them wine to drink, and commanded them that they should give unto the multitude.
    6 Now, there had been no bread, neither wine, brought by the disciples, neither by the multitude;
    7 But he truly gave unto them bread to eat, and also wine to drink.
    8 And he said unto them: He that eateth this bread eateth of my body to his soul; and he that drinketh of this wine drinketh of my blood to his soul; and his soul shall never hunger nor thirst, but shall be filled (3 Nephi 20:3-8). {3}

    This doctrine was not unknown to ancient Israel. It is not expressed that explicitly in the psalms we now have, but the understanding is there. Psalm 143 is a prayer. Ancient Israelites prayed with their hands lifted toward heaven (“I stretch forth my hands unto thee”). Recalling the peace of the Council in Heaven (“I remember the days of old; I meditate on all thy works”), its author longs to be there again:

    1 Hear my prayer, O Lord, give ear to my supplications: in thy faithfulness answer me, and in thy righteousness.
    2 And enter not into judgment with thy servant: for in thy sight shall no man living be justified.
    3 For the enemy hath persecuted my soul; he hath smitten my life down to the ground; he hath made me to dwell in darkness, as those that have been long dead.
    4 Therefore is my spirit overwhelmed within me; my heart within me is desolate.
    5 I remember the days of old; I meditate on all thy works;
    I muse on the work of thy hands.
    6 I stretch forth my hands unto thee: my soul thirsteth after thee, as a thirsty land.
    7 Hear me speedily, O Lord: my spirit faileth: hide not thy face from me, lest I be like unto them that go down into the pit.
    8 Cause me to hear thy lovingkindness in the morning; for in thee do I trust: cause me to know the way wherein I should walk; for I lift up my soul unto thee.
    9 Deliver me, O Lord, from mine enemies: I flee unto thee to hide me.
    10 Teach me to do thy will; for thou art my God: thy spirit is good; lead me into the land of uprightness.
    11 Quicken me, O Lord, for thy name’s sake: for thy righteousness’ sake bring my soul out of trouble.
    12 And of thy mercy cut off mine enemies, and destroy all them that afflict my soul: for I am thy servant (Psalm 143:1-12).

    The 63rd Psalm is also a prayer—one that is simply running over with ancient temple imagery:

    1 O God, thou art my God; early will I seek thee: my soul thirsteth for thee, my flesh longeth for thee in a dry and thirsty land, where no water is;
    2 To see thy power and thy glory, so as I have seen thee in the sanctuary.
    3 Because thy lovingkindness is better than life, my lips shall praise thee.
    4 Thus will I bless thee while I live: I will lift up my hands in thy name.
    5 My soul shall be satisfied as with marrow and fatness; and my mouth shall praise thee with joyful lips:
    6 When I remember thee upon my bed, and meditate on thee in the night watches.
    7 Because thou hast been my help, therefore in the shadow of thy wings will I rejoice.
    8 My soul followeth hard after thee: thy right hand upholdeth me.
    9 But those th at seek my soul, to destroy it, shall go into the lower parts of the earth.
    10 They shall fall by the sword: they shall be a portion for foxes.
    11 But the king shall rejoice in God; every one that sweareth by him shall glory: but the mouth of them that speak lies shall be stopped (Psalm 63:1-11).

    The blessing promised in the Beatitudes to “all they who do hunger and thirst after righteousness” is that “they shall be filled with the Holy Ghost.”
    The classic—and probably the best known—LDS statement about the gift of the Holy Ghost was written by one of the Church’s foremost early poets, Parley P. Pratt:

    The gift of the Holy Spirit adapts itself to all these organs or attributes. It quickens all the intellectual faculties, increases, enlarges, expands and purifies all the natural passions and affections; and adapts them, by the gift of wisdom, to their lawful use. It inspires, develops, cultivates and matures all the fine-toned sympathies, joys, tastes, kindred feelings and affections of our nature. It inspires virtue, kindness, goodness, tenderness, gentleness and charity. It develops beauty of person, form and features. It tends to health, vigor, animation and social feeling. It develops and invigorates all the faculties of the physical and intellectual man. It strengthens, invigorates, and gives tone to the nerves. In short, it is, as it were, marrow to the bone, joy to the heart, light to the eyes, music to the ears, and life to the whole being.

    In the presence of such persons, one feels to enjoy the light of their countenances, as the genial rays of a sunbeam. Their very atmosphere diffuses a thrill, a warm glow of pure gladness and sympathy, to the heart and nerves of others who have kindred feelings, or sympathy of spirit. No matter if the parties are strangers, entirely unknown to each other in person or character; no matter if they have never spoken to each other, each will be apt to remark in his own mind, and perhaps exclaim, when referring to the interview—“O what an atmosphere encircles that stranger! How my heart thrilled with pure and holy feelings in his presence! What confidence and sympathy he inspired! His countenance and spirit gave me more assurance, than a thousand written recommendations, or introductory letters.” Such is the gift of the Holy Spirit, and such are its operations, when received through the lawful channel – the divine, eternal Priesthood. {4}

    In the ancient Temple, hungering and thirsting after zedek ultimately focused on the coronation ordinances of sonship.

    As the Holy Ghost comforts, {5} teaches, cleanses (Moroni 6:4), sanctifies (3 Nephi 27:20), and empowers us to transcend the sorrows of this world, its empowerment may imply a restoration and maturation of the garment of light. That seems consistent with the Lord’s words to the Prophet Joseph.

    33 For whoso is faithful unto the obtaining these two priesthoods of which I have spoken, and the magnifying their calling, are sanctified by the Spirit unto the renewing of their bodies.
    34 They become the sons of Moses and of Aaron and the seed of Abraham, and the church and kingdom, and the elect of God.
    35 And also all they who receive this priesthood receive me, saith the Lord;
    36 For he that receiveth my servants receiveth me;
    37 And he that receiveth me receiveth my Father;
    38 And he that receiveth my Father receiveth my Father’s kingdom; therefore all that my Father hath shall be given unto him.
    39 And this is according to the oath and covenant which belongeth to the priesthood.
    40 Therefore, all those who receive the priesthood, receive this oath and covenant of my Father, which he cannot break, neither can it be moved (D&C 84:33-40).

    To “be filled with the Holy Ghost” is ultimately to fulfill the command to “receive the Holy Ghost.” It is the necessary prerequisite to accomplishing the next step in the Savior’s outline in the Beatitudes.

    —————————————
    ENDNOTES

    {1} Hypostasis of the Archons, trans. Bullard, 29, lines 7-11.

    {2} See Matthew 26:26-28. Mark 14:22-24, 1 Corinthians 11:24-25, Moroni 4-5, 3 Nephi 18:1-11. It is interesting that Mormon does not mention that Jesus also ate and drank with his disciples. His apparently not doing so may reflect what he told his apostles in Jerusalem: “Verily I say unto you, I will drink no more of the fruit of the vine, until that day that I drink it new in the kingdom of God” (Mark 14:25).

    {3} According to a number of sources, some early Christians thought of the cross as a tree of life, and that the Savior’s body was the fruit of that tree, and his blood was the waters of life. See Griggs, “Tree of Life,” 29. The Gospel of Philip says the cross was made of olive wood, in The Nag Hammadi Library in English, ed. James M. Robinson,153.

    {4} Parley P. Pratt, Key to the Science of Theology (Liverpool, F.D. Richards & London, L.D.S. Book Depot,1855), 98-99.

    {5} For a discussion of two Comforters, see Smith, Teachings of the Prophet, 149.

    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

  • 3 Nephi 12:5 & Psalm 25 — LeGrand Baker — Covenants made at the Council in Heaven

    3 Nephi 12:5 & Psalm 25 — LeGrand Baker — Covenants made at the Council in Heaven

    5 And blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth (3 Nephi 12:5).

    The Savior’s words “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth” are lifted almost verbatim from the psalms. He is quoting Psalm 37:11, “The meek shall inherit the earth: and shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace.” Psalm 25 greatly amplifies the meaning of “meek.” The psalm expands the blessings of meekness — and therefore the meaning of the Savior’s Beatitude — to the promise of an eternal family. It promises that not just the meek, but also the children of the meek, will inherit the earth. It is also in this psalm that we learn that the meek are those who keep their eternal covenants they made at the Council in Heaven (it actually says that) and are therefore meek before God.

    In the Doctrine and Covenants, the Lord explained that the earth was created so “the poor and the meek of the earth shall inherit it” in its glorified, celestial state:

    17 And the redemption of the soul is through him that quickeneth all things, in whose bosom it is decreed that the poor and the meek of the earth shall inherit it.
    18 Therefore, it must needs be sanctified from all unrighteousness, that it may be prepared for the celestial glory.
    19 For after it hath filled the measure of its creation, it shall be crowned with glory, even with the presence of God the Father;
    20 That bodies who are of the celestial kingdom may possess it forever and ever; for, for this intent was it made and created, and for this intent are they sanctified (D&C 88:17-20).

    Thus, the words “meek” and “poor” identify those who will inherit the celestial glory. That use of “poor” is consistent with the Savior’s words, “Yea, blessed are the poor in spirit who come unto me, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” That use of “meek” is also consistent with the way the word is used elsewhere in the scriptures, as in Isaiah 61 where the prophet wrote that the Lord was anointed “to preach good tidings to the meek.” Joseph F. Smith quoted that verse, and added that among those to whom the Lord preached were “the noble and great ones who were chosen in the beginning to be rulers in the Church of God” (D&C 138:42, 55).

    Meekness is not timidity; it is power. It is the power to do or say what the Lord tells one to do or say, without fear, boastfulness, belligerence, or contention but with humility, kindness, charity, and resolve. One of the best examples of meekness in the Book of Mormon is Abinadi, standing defiantly before King Noah while delivering the Lord’s message to him and his priests. In this case “meekness” is descriptive of the prophet’s attitude toward God (and probably toward Alma), but not of his attitude toward King Noah and his priests when he defies them to touch him until he has delivered his message.

    The following is a slightly edited version of the discussions of “meek” found in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, second edition.

    My dear friend Jim Cannon describes meekness as the ability to accept offence without being offended. That is a wise perspective, and it works well in many scriptures. However there is another meaning of “meek” that makes it one of the most significant words in the subtextual language of the scriptures. It is one of those “code words” that was never intended to be a code word, because that meaning of “meekness” is clearly explained in the Psalms.

    Psalm 25 is an intensely personal statement. The speaker may have been a single individual, or the psalm may have been sung by everyone in the congregation. The individual who sings it in the ancient temple drama is so very human that whether the psalm were sung by one person or the entire congregation would not change the personal nature of the hymn. The Lord’s statement, “For my soul delighteth in the song of the heart; yea, the song of the righteous is a prayer unto me, and it shall be answered with a blessing upon their heads” (D&C 25:12), can be true whether one is singing alone, with a congregation, or just listening.

    Most other scriptures that tell about the Council in Heaven make it seem very distant and detached because the accounts are about supermen like Abraham, Isaiah, or Lehi. Psalm 25 is not just about the king, but it is about Everyman. It seems to bring the Council home to the fireside where its covenants are a central part of ordinary daily lives. It is a prayer in which one lifts one’s soul (not just one’s hands) as an evidence of one’s worthiness. In the prayer, the person unabashedly exposes his inner Self, making himself vulnerable to all those who can know the meaning of his words. He is one who has unbounded faith in the Lord—one who knows he had made some very serious covenants in the Council—and one who is trying to keep those covenants while muddling through the dreariness that is life in this lonely, dark world. In the Book of Mormon, Nephi’s psalm in 2 Nephi 4 is so much like Psalm 25 that one wonders if Nephi may have been reflection on its meaning when he wrote his own.

    The Meek in Psalm 25

    1 Unto thee, O Lord, do I lift up my soul.
    2 O my God, I trust in thee: let me not be ashamed

    One would be ashamed if one had borne testimony of God’s covenant, but God didn’t keep them. The next lines suggest that the covenant he was asking God to keep is the promise that God would make a way for the psalmist to keep his own covenants:

    let not mine enemies triumph over me

    “Triumph,” in the context of this psalm, suggests that they would be able to prevent him from keeping those covenants:

    3 Yea, let none that wait on thee be ashamed: let them be ashamed which transgress without cause

    The word “wait” appears three times in this psalm. Each is translated from the same Hebrew word that means to anticipate, “to look for eagerly.” {1} The shame mentioned would only come if the Lord did not appear and the person who waits is disappointed. The blessings of waiting on the Lord is taught by Isaiah, where he writes:

    31 But they that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and they shall walk, and not faint (Isaiah 40:31).

    That the psalmist had that same idea in mind is clearly demonstrated by his next phrase, where his words “ways” and “paths” have the same encoded connotation.

    4 Shew me thy ways, O Lord; teach me thy paths.
    5 Lead me in thy truth, and teach me for thou art the God of my salvation; on thee do I wait all the day.

    Psalm 25 is set in the context of our premortal covenants, and the next verse contains a word that brings those covenants into a deeply personal friendship/relationship. The word is translated “lovingkindnesses” and is from the Hebrew word hesed. {2} The Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament shows the power of that friendship/relationship:

    We may venture the conjecture that even in cases where the context does not suggest such mutuality it is nevertheless implicit, because we are dealing with the closest of human bonds. {3}

    An explanation and clarification of their phrase, “dealing with the closest of human bonds,” is found in a new edition of Strong’s Concordance:

    hesed, unfailing love, loyal love, devotion. kindness, often based on a prior relationship, especially a covenant relationship. {4}

    Even though the hesed relationship described in this psalm is between the king who speaks the words, and Jehovah to whom he addresses them, it must be remembered that in the Israelite temple drama the king represented every man in the congregation. Therefore, the hesed relationship described here also evokes the terms of the covenant between Jehovah and each worthy man. That being so, it follows that this same hesed relationship also exists as an eternal, fraternal bond of each man with Jehovah, perhaps with their prophet/king, and most certainly each other. Consideration of the this-worldly continuation of those fraternal relationships brings us back to Peter’s assurance that “brotherly kindness” (philadelphia) is prerequisite to making one’s calling and election sure (2 Peter 1:1-11).

    6 Remember, O Lord, thy tender mercies and thy lovingkindnesses [hesed, plural]; for they have been ever of old.

    Here is another example of where the phrase “of old” is a reference to the Council. {5} The prayer bears testimony that he knows that his and Jehovah’s hesed relationship is now even as it was in the beginning, at the Council in Heaven, and remains forever—unchanged:

    7 Remember not the sins of my youth, nor my transgressions: according to thy mercy [hesed] remember thou me for thy goodness’ sake, O Lord.

    It is apparent that the author of this psalm had an almost boundless knowledge of the whole plan of salvation, yet is burdened by his own human frailties as he asks the Lord to remember their former hesed relationship. Nephi’s psalm echoes a similar lament:

    17 Nevertheless, notwithstanding the great goodness of the Lord, in showing me his great and marvelous works, my heart exclaimeth: O wretched man that I am! Yea, my heart sorroweth because of my flesh; my soul grieveth because of mine iniquities.
    18 I am encompassed about, because of the temptations and the sins which do so easily beset me.
    19 And when I desire to rejoice, my heart groaneth because of my sins; nevertheless, I know in whom I have trusted (2 Nephi 4:17-19).

    The 25th Psalm continues:

    8 Good and upright is the Lord: therefore will he teach sinners in the way

    Here again, “the way” is the frequently used code in the psalms that refers to the sequence of the ordinances and covenants, and connotes the “way” or “path” by which one climbs the “mountain” that is symbolic of the Jerusalem Temple Mount, and/or the “way” one conducts his life after leaving the Temple. The generic “in the way” implies the introductory ideas taught to the initiate there. There is a subtle, but very real difference between teaching “sinners in the way,” and teaching the meek “his way,” as appears in the next verse. “Sinners,” apparently, are people who have yet to be taught to understand—adults who were repenting, or young adults who typically had been so absorbed in growing up in this world that their premortal covenants were not only lost from memory but also from seeming importance. As they mature such “sinners” must be taught “in the way”—the generic principles that have universal application. Then in “his way, as the focus of the prayer moves forward and the singer recounts his own spiritual maturation:

    9 The meek will he guide in judgment:

    In these words, we begin to understand the meaning of “meek.” That he will led them in judgment evinces that the singer has learned, and is still learning, to judge righteously. That represents the essence of the powers of both priesthood and kingship. The qualities of that judgment are described in the next verse and are enshrined in the Savior’s words, “Blessed are the merciful for they shall obtain mercy.”

    and the meek will he teach his way

    The person who sings this prayer is no longer taught in the generic “the way,” but is taught God’s way. He has learned how to judge with “mercy and truth,” and therefore can be taught what he otherwise could not know:

    10 All the paths of the Lord are mercy [hesed] and truth unto such as keep his covenant and his testimonies

    In the phrase, “the paths of the Lord are mercy and truth,” “mercy” is hesed and emphasize that covenant friendship relationship; “truth” is that criteria upon which the judgment is made.

    “Covenant,” is another reference to the covenants made at the Council, see sode in v. 14.

    Scholars are not quite sure what “testimonies” mean. But it seems to be a physical testimony (a pistis {6}) of God’s covenants with man. In the Old Testament, the Ark of the Covenant is frequently called the Ark of the Testimony, {7} and Johnson suggested that our verse is a reference to an embroidered copy of the Ten Commandments the king wore on his person. {8} So verse ten might read, “All the paths of the Lord are mercy and truth unto such as keep his covenant and his commandments.”

    If that is correct, it appears the meek are those who keep the covenants they made at the Council (and that they re-made here), and also keep the commandments they receive in this world. One gets the same idea from psalms where the “testimony” is related to the experience on Sinai: “He spake unto them in the cloudy pillar: they kept his testimonies, and the ordinance that he gave them” (Psalm 99:7). Keeping the commandments associated with the testimony seems to be a kind of authorization or ratification on the part of men and women, so that God can bless them according to those covenants:

    11 For thy name’s sake, O Lord, pardon mine iniquity; for it is great.

    “For thy name’s sake” is another instance of the covenant-name’s being used to represent the covenant itself. The meaning of that phrase would remain almost the same if the word were changed so it read: “For thy covenant’s sake.”

    It is significant that at this point in this psalm that celebrates man’s eternal success, there is an expression of one’s total dependence upon the principle of repentance and the Savior’s Atonement:

    12 What man is he that feareth the Lord? him shall he teach in the way that he shall choose

    That reads: “What man is he that feareth [honor, respect, love, ‘humility’ as that word is understood in Ether 12] the Lord? him [the man] shall he [the Lord] teach in the way [same temple codeword as path] that he [the Lord] shall choose.”

    That is different from “in the way.” This is no longer the generic teachings, ordinances, and covenants taught to “sinners.” Rather, it is the “way” the Lord “shall choose”—it is individually a teaching from the Spirit, designed to enable one to fulfill the covenantal assignments made at the Council:

    13 His [the person’s] soul shall dwell at ease; and his seed shall inherit the earth

    This is the promise of eternal family. Here is the covenant that the children of the meek, rather than just the meek themselves, shall inherit the earth. As discussed above, the new name given to the dead in the coronation passage of Isaiah 61 is another example of the Old Testament teachings of eternal increase.

    14 The secret [sode] of the Lord is with them that fear him; and he will shew them his covenant.

    This verse is the key to understanding the entire psalm because it transports all of the hesed relationships mentioned earlier back to their origins in the Council in Heaven. The word “secret” is translated from the Hebrew word sode, so the verse reads, “The secret [sode] of the Lord is with them that fear him [“Fear” means respect, honor, revere, but there is also a very strong connotation of love and admiration associated with love]. The verse says: Those who honor the Lord will know the secrets of the Council; and the Lord will show them [the meek] his [the Lord’s] covenant. That is, he will show them the covenants they made with him at the Council. Such information is an ultimate empowerment. One can not know where he is going unless he knows where he as been and what purpose he has in the journey.

    As we have already observed, a sode experience is when an individual has a vision in which he is returned to the Council in Heaven to be re-taught about the assignment he received, and to re-affirm the covenants he made there. But, as the scriptures make clear, the Lord need not take Everyman back to the Council in order to teach each his premortal covenants—that was what the New Year festival temple drama was for; and of course, among other things, that is what the Holy Ghost is for.

    The whole meaning of the 25th psalm is focused on that single verse. Indeed, the whole meaning of the New Year festival drama may also do so. Those words define the “meek” and put everything else in the 25th Psalm into its proper context. Verse 14 fits well with the ideas in verse 10 where one learned, “All the paths [codeword] of the Lord are mercy [being a righteous judge] and truth [knowledge things as they were, are, and will be] unto such as keep his covenant [the covenant made at the Council].”

    The meek, then, are those who keep the covenants they made at the Council in Heaven. In that definition, the ordinary meaning of the word “meek” is not lost, but in these contexts, “meekness” has only to do with one’s being meek before the Lord, and has nothing whatever to do with being meek before men. Thus it was written of the prophet who defied Pharaoh and defeated all the armies of Egypt, “Now the man Moses was very meek, above all the men which were upon the face of the earth” (Numbers 12:3). What that meant was explained by the Lord to Miriam and Aaron, in the next few verses. The King James Version gives a somewhat muddled translation of that explanation, but the Tanakh makes that explanation very clear:

    The Lord came down in a pillar of cloud, stopped at the entrance of the Tent, and called out, “Aaron and Miriam!” The two of them came forward; and He said, “Hear these My words: When a prophet of the Lord arises among you, I make Myself known to him in a vision, I speak with him in a dream. Not so with My servant Moses; he is trusted throughout My household. With him I speak mouth to mouth, plainly and not in riddles, and he beholds the likeness of the Lord. How then did you not shrink from speaking against My servant Moses!” {9}

    The important statement is that Moses “is trusted throughout My household.” The “household” of God would be the same as the “household” of a king. That is, it would consist of not only his immediate family but also his official entourage—the inner circle of his counselors and court leaders. In the case of God, his “household” would be the members of the Council in Heaven. So the Lord’s statement that Moses “is trusted throughout My household” is a reference to the fact that Moses was originally called—and is presently sustained—by the other members of the Council. The statement that “Moses was very meek, above all the men,” simply means he kept with care and rectitude the covenants he made with God.

    One of the best examples in the Book of Mormon of a prophet who was truly meek is Abinadi standing before King Noah, defiantly asserting that Noah cannot have the power to kill him until after the prophet has delivered the message the Lord has sent him to deliver! {10}

    To return to Psalm 25; the verse we are discussing reads:

    14 The secret of the Lord is with them that fear him; and will shew them his covenant.

    That verse posits that the sode—the secret decisions of the Heavenly Council, made, sanctioned, and sealed by covenant in the presence of the Lord—is made known to those who honor him because the Lord would show them what that covenant was. That was done in generic form during the festival temple drama. Thereafter, by the power of the Holy Ghost each individual could be led to understand the intent of the specific covenant he had made. Then he might know what to do and how to live to fulfill that covenant.

    An excellent illustration is the story of Jean Wunderlich. {11} At the end of World War II, he was called to be the first post-war mission president in West Germany. His assignment would be to find the remnants of the Saints there and help them come together and make the church a viable organization again. After receiving the call, he and his wife traveled to Salt Lake City where he was to be set apart by President David O. McKay. When they entered the prophet’s office, President McKay stood, came from behind his desk, welcomed his guests, and invited them to sit down. Jean’s wife sat in a chair by the door. Jean sat in a chair that the prophet had moved to the center of the room.

    President McKay placed his hands on Jean’s head and began to give him a blessing. Here, Jean stopped his narrative, his eyes lit up, and he said, “When the prophet has his hands on your head, you listen—and I was listening!” However, Jean said that President McKay had spoken only a few sentences when he gave a command that introduced Jean into the most powerful spiritual experience of his life. He saw a beautiful light, and other things which he did not describe. Jean said he again became aware of the prophet and the room, only when the blessing was finished, and he felt President McKay’s hands lift from his head. Baker recalls, “Jean said that was the most significant experience of his whole life, and his telling me became one of the most significant conversations of mine. He said he was not telling me a story, he was giving me a gift. The gift he gave me was the words of the command which the prophet spoke, which initiated Jean’s profound experience. Those words were these: ‘Be true to the Law of your own Being.’”

    Jean commented that in LDS theology “law” has an eternal connotation, and the command to be true to that law suggests that one might also apostatize from it—that one may be at variance with who and what one really is. As Jean understood it, “the law of one’s own being” is simply what one IS—the individual personalities we each have developed and nurtured from the beginnings of our premortal cognizance.

    He suggested that sin is simply one’s being in violation of the eternal law that is one’s Self—defying the law of one’s own being. He said that there are some things which none of us can do without doing violence to our Selves, such as stealing, blaspheming, and hurting other people. These generic sins are all covered by the basic commandments. But there are also things that are specific sins to only one individual, and are not sins to everyone else. He said he believed that a chief function of the Holy Ghost is to help one bring one’s earthly life into perfect accord with that law.

    The phrase “law of one’s own being” is not found in the scriptures, but the concept is there, and the word “law” is used in connection with that concept. to understand its origin, objective, and primary consequences—its relationship to the preliminaries of one’s foreordination; its relationship to one’s keeping the laws and commandments of the Lord while we were intelligences, then spirits, now in this life, and again in the next. It appears that is what the psalmist meant when he wrote:

    14 The secret of the Lord is with them that fear him; and will shew them his covenant.

    During the presentation of the festival temple drama, for each individual the basic covenants were the same, but for each the individual meaning was specific, and the expanse of those covenants was among the biggest ideas one’s mind could reach around. It was probably in response to the bigness of the idea, that the next line recalls the Lord’s covenants of invulnerability, and expresses thanks for the fulfillment of those covenants:

    15 Mine eyes are ever toward the Lord for he shall pluck my feet out of the net.

    The “net” would be the people or other obstacles that seek to entangle one’s feet to prevent one from “walking” in the “way” and from keeping one’s covenants. Those impediments are very real, and once again, in this psalm which is a celebration of the blessings of eternal life, one is brought face to face with the difficulty of just muddling through this lonely, dark world.

    We have wandered so far in our discussion of the 25th Psalm, that it seems a good idea to read it again without all the interruptions, and also to add the concluding verses which evoke the promises of the covenant of invulnerability. The Psalm reads in full:

    1 Unto thee, O Lord, do I lift up my soul.
    2 O my God, I trust in thee: let me not be ashamed, let not mine enemies triumph over me.
    3 Yea, let none that wait on thee be ashamed: let them be ashamed which transgress without cause.
    4 Shew me thy ways, O Lord; teach me thy paths.
    5 Lead me in thy truth, and teach me: for thou art the God of my salvation; on thee do I wait all the day.
    6 Remember, O Lord, thy tender mercies and thy lovingkindnesses [hesed]; for they have been ever of old.
    7 Remember not the sins of my youth, nor my transgressions: according to thy mercy [hesed] remember thou me for thy goodness’ sake, O Lord.
    8 Good and upright is the Lord: therefore will he teach sinners in the way.
    9 The meek will he guide in judgment: and the meek will he teach his way.
    10 All the paths of the Lord are mercy [hesed] and truth unto such as keep his covenant and his testimonies.
    11 For thy name’s sake, O Lord, pardon mine iniquity; for it is great.
    12 What man is he that feareth the Lord? him shall he teach in the way that he shall choose.
    13 His soul shall dwell at ease; and his seed shall inherit the earth.
    14 The secret [sode]of the Lord is with them that fear him; and he will shew them his covenant.
    15 Mine eyes are ever toward the Lord; for he shall pluck my feet out of the net.
    16 Turn thee unto me, and have mercy upon me; for I am desolate and afflicted.
    17 The troubles of my heart are enlarged: O bring thou me out of my distresses.
    18 Look upon mine affliction and my pain; and forgive all my sins.
    19 Consider mine enemies; for they are many; and they hate me with cruel hatred.
    20 O keep my soul, and deliver me: let me not be ashamed; for I put my trust in thee.
    21 Let integrity and uprightness preserve me; for I wait on thee.
    22 Redeem Israel, O God, out of all his troubles (Psalm 25:1-22).

    The final three verses return the audience to the place where the psalm began. It is a prayer for strength to retain one’s integrity, so that the Lord can keep his part of the covenant.————————————-

    ENDNOTES

    {1} Strong 6960.

    {2} Katherine Doob Sakenfeld of Princeton University Seminary wrote a dissertation on “hesed” in which she argued that it meant “to do what is expected of one.” With regard to the covenant, God does what is expected (keep his covenant promises); man should also maintain “hesed” (keep his covenant promises).
    Katherine Doob Sakenfeld, The Meaning of Hesed in the Hebrew Bible: A New Inquiry (Missoula, Montana; Scholars Press for the Harvard Semitic Museum, 1978).

    {3} G. Johannes Botterweck and Helmer Ringgren, eds., trans. Davod E. Green, Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, 15 vols. (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1986), article about hesed, 5:45-48). The Greek equivalent is Philadelphia, fraternal love, as explained in fn 905, p. 680.

    {4} John R. Kohlenberger III and James A. Swanson, The Strongest Strong’s, Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2001), Hebrew dictionary # 2617.

    {5} Examples of scriptures that use the phrase “of old” as reference to events in the Council in Heaven are: Deuteronomy 32:7-8; Psalms 25:6-7, 68:32-33, 93:1-2, 102:24-25, Micah 5:2 is another example. The most convincing modern example is this statement in the 76th section of the Doctrine and Covenants: “And to them will I reveal all mysteries, yea, all the hidden mysteries of my kingdom from days of old.” (D&C 76:6) When the Prophet Joseph wrote a poetic version of his vision, he made its meaning even more clear.

    I’ll surely reveal all my myst’ries to them—
    The great hidden myst’ries in my kingdom stor’d;
    From the council in Kolob, to time on the earth, (Joseph Smith, “A Vision,” in Times and Seasons, February 1, 1843.)

    {6} See the chapter called, “Meaning of Faith—pistis.”

    {7} Examples are: Exodus 25:16, Numbers 7:89, and Joshua 4:16.

    {8} Johnson, Sacral Kingship, 23-24.

    {9} Tanakh, Numbers 12:5-8.

    {10}“Touch me not, for God shall smite you if ye lay your hands upon me, for I have not delivered the message which the Lord sent me to deliver; neither have I told you that which ye requested that I should tell; therefore, God will not suffer that I shall be destroyed at this time” (Mosiah 13:3).

    {11} The story is as LeGrand Baker remembers Jean told it to him. Jean died several years ago so we cannot ask him to check the details.

    {12} Many of these scriptures also emphasize free agency: D&C 88:28-33, 93:29-38; 2 Nephi 2:11-30, 9:14-16, 26:10; Alma 13:3, 40:24-26, Alma 42:7; Moses 4:3-4; Moroni 7:15-17; Ether 12:27-35; Moroni 10:32-33; 2 Ne. 10:23-24 Abraham 3:22-28. At the funeral of Jedediah M. Grant, Heber C. Kimball reported: “He said that after he came back [from the spirit world] he could look upon his family and see the spirit that was in them, and the darkness that was in them; and that he conversed with them about the Gospel, and what they should do, and they replied, ‘Well, brother Grant, perhaps it is so, and perhaps it is not,’ and said that was the state of this people, to a great extent, for many are full of darkness and will not believe me.” (Journal of Discourses 4:136).

    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

  • 3 Nephi 12:4 & Isaiah 61:1-11 – LeGrand Baker – Temple rites for the dead

    3 Nephi 12:4 & Isaiah 61:1-11 – LeGrand Baker – Temple rites for the dead

    This Beatitude is a paraphrase from Isaiah 61.  

    This post is in three parts. They are:
    3 Nephi 12:4 & Isaiah 61:4-11 – LeGrand Baker – Sealing rites for the dead
    3 Nephi 12:4 & Isaiah 61:3 – LeGrand Baker – washing, anointing, and clothing in ancient Israel
    3 Nephi 12:4 – And again, blessed are all they that mourn, for they shall be comforted.

    ——————————

    3 Nephi 12:4 (& Isaiah 61:1-2) – And again, blessed are all they that mourn, for they shall be comforted.

    Isaiah 61 is deeply encoded, and, as is true elsewhere in the scriptures, the code is the ancient Israelite temple rites. If one knows the temple, then one knows the code. If not, the encoded message simply is not there. I would like to point out some of the key phrases so that it can more easily be read as a temple text by those who know how to read it that way. When one can read its code, this chapter of Isaiah becomes one of the most interesting and complete temple texts in the scriptures.

    This chapter in Isaiah was very important to the Savior. He also quoted it on another occasion.

    17 And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written,
    18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, [Isaiah says “to the captives”]
    19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord. [those phrases come from Isaiah 61:1-2]
    20 And he closed the book, and he gave it again to the minister, and sat down. And the eyes of all them that were in the synagogue were fastened on him.
    21 And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears (Luke 4:17-21).

    In his vision of the redemption of the dead, President Joseph F. Smith also quotes from that chapter. D&C 138 is the testimony that everyone will have a full opportunity to receive the gospel before the final judgement. his report of his vision of the redemption of the dead, President Joseph F. Smith twice quoted from Isaiah 61.

    30 But behold, from among the righteous, he organized his forces and appointed messengers, clothed with power and authority, and commissioned them to go forth and carry the light of the gospel to them that were in darkness, even to all the spirits of men; and thus was the gospel preached to the dead.
    31 And the chosen messengers went forth to declare the acceptable day of the Lord and proclaim liberty to the captives who were bound, even unto all who would repent of their sins and receive the gospel (D&C 138:30-31).

    When he identified those who were there to welcome the Savior to paradise, he introduced the prophet Isaiah by quoting from the first verse of Isaiah 61:

    42 And Isaiah, who declared by prophecy that the Redeemer was anointed to bind up the broken-hearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that were bound, were also there (D&C 138:42).

    From these contexts, we may safely infer that the “prisoners” here are those in the “spirit prison” who did not receive the gospel while they lived in mortality. That also sets the stage for understanding that chapter of Isaiah as being about the salvation of the dead. This does not imply that vicarious ordinances for the dead were performed in Solomon’s temple, but only that Isaiah knew that they would be valid after the Savior’s resurrection.

    There is another place in the Old Testament that discuss salvation for the dead. It is in the the last third of Psalm 22. A discussion of that psalm is found in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, the chapter called “Act 2, Scene 7: Jehovah Conquers Death and Hell. ”

    There is a careful discussion of the first three verses of Isaiah 61:1-3  in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, the chapter called “The Coronation Ceremony in Isaiah 61.” The full text of the book is available on this website under “published works.” In the following paragraphs, I shall summarize the information about those verses, then give a more complete analysis of the rest of the Isaiah chapter.

    – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

    Isaiah 61:1

    1 The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the Lord hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound;

    – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

    Isaiah begins by recalling the Savior’s anointing at the Council in Heaven:

    The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the Lord hath anointed me

    The “me” here is identified in D&C 138:42 as “the Redeemer.” I am aware of four accounts of the Savior’s being anointed. This one and the quote in D&C 138. Another is Peter’s testimony that when Jesus was baptized “God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power” (Acts 10:37-38). The other is Psalm 45 which takes place in the council in heaven. (For a discussion thoses verses in Psalm 45 see Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, “The prince does obeisance to Jehovah,” page 201 in the hardback edition and page 207 in the paperback. The full text of the paperback can be found on this website under “Published Books.”)

    Since Isaiah’s statement is already in past tense, I believe he is talking about the anointing in Psalms that takes place in the council in heaven.

    – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

    to preach good tidings unto the meek

    The meek are defined in Psalm 25 as those who keep their premortal covenants. In D&C 138 we learn that those to whom Jesus personally visited in the spirit world were those who made covenants in the council in heaven and kept them in this world.

    36 Thus was it made known that our Redeemer spent his time during his sojourn in the world of spirits, instructing and preparing the faithful spirits of the prophets who had testified of him in the flesh;
    38 Among the great and mighty ones who were assembled in this vast congregation of the righteous were Father Adam, the Ancient of Days and father of all,
    39 And our glorious Mother Eve, with many of her faithful daughters who had lived through the ages and worshiped the true and living God. [lists many others by name, then adds:]
    55 I observed that they were also among the noble and great ones who were chosen in the beginning to be rulers in the Church of God.
    – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

    he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted,

    “Bind” means the same thing in Hebrew as it does in English — to tie up. The temple word that means to tie people together is “seal.” Given the context of this verse and the entire chapter, “to seal up” is an appropriate way to understand “bind” and “bound” in this verse. D&C 138 says they already felt they were in bondage because they did not have a physical body. Now, after they are sealed to each other, that lack can be rectified.

    50 For the dead had looked upon the long absence of their spirits from their bodies as a bondage.
    51 These the Lord taught, and gave them power to come forth, after his resurrection from the dead, to enter into his Father’s kingdom, there to be crowned with immortality and eternal life (D&C 138:50-51)

    The Savior told the Nephites that their sacrifice must be a broken heart and contrite spirit. So the “brokenhearted” would be those who have performed that sacrifice. (For a discussion of a “broken heart” as a sacrifice see “3 Nephi 12:3 — LeGrand Baker — poor in spirit” on this section of the website.)

    The word “sacrifice” means “to make holy.” To make one’s Self holy gives it another meaning as well. Gary A. Anderson has observed:

    When the lamenter has received an assurance of divine assistance or has experienced divine deliverance, he must offer either praise or a selamim sacrifice. Just as the sacrifice is identified as means of demonstrating joy before the Lord (so Deut 12:11-12 and passim), so also for praise.   [Gary A. Anderson, A Time to Mourn, A Time to Dance, The Expression of Grief and Joy in Israelite Religion (University Park, Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991), 42]

    – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
    to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound;

    When we read this, we read “prison” as the “spirit prison,” the place where the dead wait until they have heard and accepted the gospel and its vicarious ordinances. Margaret Dee Bratcher read the Hebrew differently, and added an interesting insight to the translation. She wrote:

    To proclaim liberty to the captives and release to the prisoners” … Some difficulty exists in the translation of the phrase “release to the prisoners.” The Hebrew word translated “release” appears everywhere else in the Old Testament with the meaning “the opening of blind eyes.    (Bratcher,  “Salvation Achieved: Isaiah 61:1-7; 62:1-7; 65: 17-66:2.” Review & Expositor, 88, 2 [1991]: 177-87. 178.)

    If this is the meaning of “comfort” as the Savior understood it, then the idea so teaching the spirits in prison and doing vicarious ordinances in their behalf is precisely consistent with the that meaning of the word.

    ==========================================

    3 Nephi 12:4 & Isaiah 61:3 – LeGrand Baker – washing, anointing, and clothing in ancient Israel
    It is important to remember that these ancient temple rites were participatory ordinances. In the drama the king represented every man and the queen every woman in the congregation. So when the king is washed, symbolically the people are washed. Also when he is anointed, clothed, crowned, and given a new name. Even though this chapter is a prophecy about a temple drama that would be performed for the dead, it is the only place in the scriptures where one finds all of the rites of the entire royal enthronement ceremony. The consecration of Aaron is almost complete, except it lacks a new name (Exodus 28-29).

    (Isaiah 61:3 is more fully analyzed in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord (1st edition, pages 469-515 and 2nd edition, pages 341-372. Except for direct quotes, the present short version has almost no footnotes to identify the sources of the ideas. However, there are lots of footnotes as well as much more text in the book. It is in this website in the section called “Published Books.” It is downloadable without cost.)

    Isaiah 61:3 

    3 To appoint unto them that mourn in Zion, to give unto them beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, the garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness; that they might be called trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord, that he might be glorified.

    “to give unto them beauty instead of ashes”

    The denotation of the Hebrew word translated as “beauty” is the beauty of a hat or turban, rather than a direct reference to the hat itself. The connotation is the glory of a crown. Some translations accept the connotation and use a words “diadem” or “crown,” rather than the more literal “beauty” as is found in the King James Version. In either case, the meaning is that the ashes were removed and then replaced by a crown. The removal of the ashes necessarily implies a ceremonial washing. The ashes would have been those of a red heifer, and the washing a ceremonial cleansing from sin.

    In ancient Israel, putting a mixture of water and the ashes of a red heifer on one’s head was a formal purification rite. A red heifer was sacrificed once each year and its ashes were kept to be used in an ordinance that made a person ritually clean. In Isaiah 61 it was used in preparation for other ordinances that would follow. Instructions for the preparation and use of the ashes are given in Numbers 19:5-6.

    Just as the sacred anointing oil was perfumed with a recipe that could not be legally duplicated, so there was also a sacred recipe for the ashes of the red heifer. The ashes contained “cedar wood, and hyssop, and scarlet” that were burned with the heifer.

    Cedar is a fragrant smelling wood. Hyssop is a small bush, a branch of which was used for daubing the lintels of the Israelite homes in the first Passover (Exodus 12:22). It was also used in the ritualistic cleansing of lepers (Leviticus 14). Scarlet was “a highly prized brilliant red color obtained from female bodies of certain insects and used for dying woven fabric, cloth, and leather.”

    The ashes were removed by a ceremonial washing. So, while the word “wash” does not appear here, it is a necessary part of the cleansing rites.

    “the oil of joy instead of mourning”

    Inasmuch as the early scenes of the drama had already shown that the king had been foreordained at the Council in Heaven, this concluding anointing was a re-affirmation of that premortal ordinance. As Borsch believed,

    The ceremony is said to take place in the heavenly realms just as the royal ritual was often described as though it were taking place in heaven. Let us notice, too, that the anointing act here is not associated primarily with cleansing or healing, but rather with a rite like King David’s. It is said that the ceremony makes the pneumatic into a god as well, just like the one above. In other words he will be a royal god (Borsch, Son of Man, 184) .

    Widengren added another meaning to the anointing.

    The same, however, is every man who has been anointed with the oil that has been prepared, so that he has been made a participant of that which is possessed of power, even being worth the royal office or the prophet’s office or the high priest’s office. ( Widengren, “Baptism and Enthronement,” 213-14.)

    The anointing has a double purpose. It is an adoption ceremony, making the king the son and therefore the legitimate earthly heir of Jehovah. That is, he could rule Israel as a representative of Jehovah. If he were not adopted as son, then he would sit on the throne as a usurper. In the same anointing the king or high priest is consecrated to that high office. (There is more about the adoption below in the discussion about the new king-name.)

    “the garment of praise instead of the spirit of heaviness”

    The royal robes of the king are not described in detail in the Old Testament. However, some scholars believe that the descriptions of the High Priestly garments (Exodus 28-29) were originally descriptions of the royal robes, and the miter hat was the crown used by the king in the coronation ceremony. The implication is that the post-exilic editors who re-worked the books of Moses, allotted to the High Priest the royal garments that had once been worn by their kings. Widengren was among those who believed that all of the ceremonial clothing of the High Priest, including the breastplate which held the Urim and Thummim, was an adaptation of the earlier sacral clothing of the king.{1}

    One of the best evidences that these were the garments of the king is this interesting coronation scene described in Zechariah. Joshua was not a priest but was Moses’s successor as ruler of Israel. It reads:

    3 Now Joshua was clothed with filthy garments, and stood before the angel.
    4 And he answered and spake unto those that stood before him, saying, Take away the filthy garments from him. And unto him he said, Behold, I have caused thine iniquity to pass from thee, and I will clothe thee with clean change of raiment.
    5 And I said, Let them set a fair mitre upon his head. So they set a fair mitre upon his head, and clothed him with garments. And the angel of the Lord stood by.
    6 And the angel of the Lord protested unto Joshua, saying:
    7 Thus saith the Lord of hosts; If thou wilt walk in my ways, and if thou wilt keep my charge, then thou shalt also judge my house, and shalt also keep my courts, and I will give thee places to walk among these that stand by (Zechariah 3:1-10).

    The coronation clothing is always described as two separate garments. The sacred clothing attributed to the Aaronic priesthood High Priests consisted of white linen undergarments and outer royal robes. The undergarments were a two part suit—a long sleeved white shirt and breeches “to cover their nakedness” (Exodus 28:42. see also Mosiah 10:5). Above that he wore a solid blue robe with a fringe of alternating golden bells and pomegranates. The pomegranates were made of blue, purple, and scarlet threads—the same colors as in the veil that separated the Holy of Holies from the rest of the Tabernacle (Exodus 28:4-42). Around the waist was a sash, also woven in the same colors as the fringe and the veil. His breastplate was a kind of pouch or pocket in which he placed the Urim and Thummim. It was supported by shoulder straps attached  to an apron called the ephod. His crown was a miter, a flat hat made of fine linen, with a gold plate attached that was worn on his forehead. Engraved on the plate were the words “Holiness to the Lord.”

    This same ritual clothing—or something very much like it—was worn by the early Christians. Paul described the sacral garments as the protective “armor of  God.” (Ephesians 6:10-18. It is also in D&C 27:15-18.)

    The scriptures often speak of the clothing in terms of their meaning rather than of their physical appearance. Thus, the outer one is usually called “majesty,” representing the powers of kingship, and the other “glory,” representing the authority of priesthood (Psalm 45:3-4, Psalm 8:4-6, Job 40:9-14). God’s clothing is similar, except he also has a garment of light. (Psalm 93:1-2,  Psalm 104:1-2).

    The interpretation of Figure 3 in Facsimile No. 2 in the Book of Abraham shows that the clothing given to earthly holders of the Melchizedek Priesthood is symbolic of the clothing worn by God. It reads:

    Fig. 3. Is made to represent God, sitting upon his throne, clothed with power and authority; with a crown of eternal light upon his head; representing also the grand Key-words of the Holy Priesthood, as revealed to Adam in the Garden of Eden, as also to Seth, Noah, Melchizedek, Abraham, and all to whom the Priesthood was revealed.

    Here, the crown is shown as a sun disk, but if it were laid flat, rather than being shown upright, it would be a miter.

    Nibley’s description of the High Priest’s garments—which, if the above quoted scholars are correct, were originally the king’s royal garments—shows their sacred nature:

    The combination of the items that make up the full clothing comes from the description of the high priestly garments at the beginning of Exodus 28. Very recently in Jerusalem, a magnificent book was published based on an attempt to reconstruct the kelîm, the supellectila, the implements and equipment of the temple, and the priestly garments (fig. 17). A section at the end of the book describes them in detail. In this particular passage there is general assemblage, a listing, and then a description of what the articles are.
    “Thou shalt make holy garments for Aaron thy brother,” the Lord tells Moses (cf. Exodus 28:2), lokabod ultip’eret, “both for glory and for magnificence”—to give an impression, to fill one with awe. And the Lord instructed Moses to say to all the people of “thoughtful-mindedness” and intelligence “that they shall do so, and make such garments for Aaron, for holiness, and for his priesthood, to represent his priesthood to me” (cf. Exodus 28:3). “And these are the garments which they shall make; a breastplate, and an ‘epod [the much disputed ephod!], and the mo’il,” a “cloak, a covering, a long garment”; “a kotonet,” the “shirt”; “a tashbe,” a thing elaborately woven in a checkerboard pattern, or something similar; “a mitre,” mi .z ne -p e -t, “a turban,” “a round cap”; “and a girdle” or “sash”; “and these garments they shall make holy for Aaron, thy brother, and for his sons, to serve me in the priesthood” (Exodus 28:4). {2}

    “that they might be called trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord that he might be glorified”

    One is “called” by one’s name. Similarly, here to be “called” is to be given a new name. One finds the same usage in the Beatitudes: “And blessed are all the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God” (3 Nephi 12:9); and in Isaiah: “and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counselor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9:6). A new name is a new covenantal identity. In our verse, it denotes one’s new relationship with God, much as Nibley writes, “In Egyptian initiation rites one puts off his former nature by discarding his name, after which he receives a new name.” Truman Madsen explains,

    In antiquity, several ideas about names recur, among which are the following:
    1. In names, especially divine names, is concentrated divine power.
    2. Through ritual processes one may gain access to these names and take them upon oneself.
    3. These ritual processes are often explicitly temple-related. {3}

    The regal new name given to the enthroned dead in Isaiah 61 is “trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord that he might be glorified.” The meaning of this new name is an echo of the Lord’s words to Moses, “For behold, this is my work and my glory—to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man” (Moses 1:39).

    This new name — new identity — is a promise of eternal lives. “Trees” suggests the tree of life. “Righteousness” is zedek—correctness and propriety in performing and receiving sacred ordinances. “The planting of the Lord” implies eternal increase (trees make fruit, fruit make seeds, seeds make trees, ad infinitum). And the words “that he [God] might be glorified” proclaim that the glory of God is inseparably connected with the continuation of the family (as in Moses 1:39). The importance of the family is again emphasized at the end of chapter 61 where we find “a song of rejoicing” in celebration of the sacred marriage. It is a hymn sung by the bride and groom:

    10 I will greatly rejoice in the Lord, my soul shall be joyful in my God; for he hath clothed me with the garments of salvation, he hath covered me with the robe of righteousness, as a bridegroom decketh himself with ornaments, and as a bride adorneth herself with her jewels (Isaiah 61:10).

    Psalm 2, The Ancient Israelite Royal King-name {4}

    There is always a new name with a new covenant, whether in civil or ecclesiastical affairs. Some covenants in civil affairs are in the form of an oath. After an oath one becomes “sheriff,” “judge,” “senator,” or “Mr. President.” Some covenants are explicit, some are implied. When a bishop or scoutmaster accepts the call to serve, the covenant is implicit, based on an earlier, overriding covenant. He may still be Jake at work, but it is “bishop” at church. In that same way a missionary becomes “elder,” and a stake president becomes “president.”

    The new name is a new identity. The person is different from the person before he received the name-title. Similarly, the long list of titles (names) of the queen of England identify her differently in different legal and ecclesiastical roles.

    No coronation ceremony can be complete with the bestowal of a new name. In ancient Israel, even though the royal new-name that was given to the king during his coronation ceremony in the Feast of Tabernacles temple drama was different from the one given to the dead as is prophesied in Isaiah 61, its promises were no less far-reaching. The ancient Israelite royal new name is found in Psalm 2, which was sung at the time of the king’s anointing near the conclusion of the temple drama, In that psalm, the king’s new name is “son,” denoting that he had been adopted as a son and heir of Jehovah. {5} Psalm 2 reads:

    7 I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me,
    Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.

    The covenant name-title of the king of ancient Israel was “son” — the one formally bestowed on him at the time of his anointing as king. It was the epitome of his name-titles because it represented his having been adopted as a son of God. The implication was that just as the covenant between the house of David and Jehovah was eternal, so the sonship would not terminate with the king’s death. It was that name that established the eternal covenant relationships between the king and God, and by extension, between the people, the king, and God.

    In all of the ceremonies and ordinances of the festival drama, the king was the main actor and represented each person in the audience, as though the play were only about that one person. That would also be true here. Because Psalm 2 represents an ordinance where each person in the audience had just been made a sacral king — not the reigning king, but a son and king in his relationship with Jehovah. Thus, inasmuch as the king had just been adopted as a “son” of God, the same was also true of all of the men in the congregation. What we find in the story of King Benjamin is applicable here. There we read:

    7 And now, because of the covenant which ye have made ye shall be called the children of Christ, his sons, and his daughters; for behold, this day he hath spiritually begotten you; for ye say that your hearts are changed through faith on his name; therefore, ye are born of him and have become his sons and his daughters (Mosiah 5:7).

    ——————————
    ENDNOTES

    {1} Geo Widengren, Geo. The Ascension of the Apostle and the Heavenly Book (Leipzig: Otto Harrassowltz, 1950), 25.
    see also:
    Frederick H. Borsch, The Son of Man in Myth and History, (London: SCM, 1967), 185, 194.
    Ivan Engnell, Studies in Divine Kingship in the Ancient Near East ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1967), 62-63.
    Stephen D. Ricks, “The Garment of Adam in Jewish, Muslim, and Christian Tradition.” InTemples of the Ancient World, edited by Donald W. Parry (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1994), 705-39.
    Stephrn D. Ricks and John J. Sroka. “King, Coronation, and Temple: Enthronement Ceremonies in History.” In Temples of the Ancient World, edited by Donald W. Parry. 236-71 (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1994), 254-57.
    Geo Widengren, “King and Covenant.” Journal of Semitic Studies (2: 1, Jan. 1957), 1-32), 21.

    {2} Nibley, “Sacred Vestments,” In Temple and Cosmos: Beyond This Ignorant Present,edited by Don E. Norton (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and FARMS, 1992), 97-98.
    The book Nibley refers to is: Moshe Levine, The Tabernacle: Its Structure and Utensils (Tel Aviv, Israel: Melechet Hamishkan), 1989.

    {3} Madsen, “Putting on the Names,” in By Study and Also by Faith, 1:458.

    {4} For an extended discussion of Psalm 2 and the royal new name see Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, First edition, pages 499- 516, second edition, pages 360-72.

    {5} Gerald Cook summed up the work of many scholars regarding the meaning of “son” in this psalm.. “The Israelite King as Son of God.” Zeitschrift fur die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 73 (1961): 202-25.

    =======================================

    3 Nephi 12:4 & Isaiah 61:4-11 – LeGrand Baker – Sealing rites for the dead

    The first two verses of Isaiah 61 are a promise to the dead that the ordinances and covenants performed in their behalf by the living will be valid. Verse 3 is an enthronement ceremony where the ordinances of washing, clothing, anointing, crowning, and giving a new name are all mentioned. The remainder of the chapter walks us through the ancient Israelite temple rites. It is deeply encoded, and I suppose that is the reason it appears to have been preserved completely intact. The code is the ancient temple rites, and if approached from that point of view, the obscurity of the code melts into a beautiful harmony.

    The voice we hear at the beginning of Isaiah 61 is that of Jehovah. We know that because when Joseph F. Smith paraphrased the first verse in D&C 138:42, he wrote that “the Redeemer was anointed to bind up the broken-hearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives,” and the Isaiah original tells us the same thing, but in the first person, “The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the Lord hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek (Isaiah 61:1).” Therefore, it is apparent that Isaiah was speaking the words of the Savior, just as the Prophet Joseph did in many of the revelations recorded in the Doctrine and Covenants.

    After verse 3, the voice does not change, but the audience does. In verses 1-3, Jehovah is talking about a promised enthronement of sacral kings and priests among the dead. But beginning with verse 4, he is talking to the dead. So when he addresses “you” he is speaking to the dead who will hear the gospel; and when he mentions “they,” “strangers,” “sons of the alien,” “Gentiles,” and “their seed” all these are designations for the living who will act in behalf of the dead. That is made clear in verse 9 where we are told that “they” are Israel, that is, “they” are you and I.

    9 And their seed shall be known among the Gentiles, and their offspring among the people: all that see them shall acknowledge them, that they are the seed which the Lord hath blessed.

    “The seed which the Lord hath blessed” is the family of Israel who have the gospel and who will do the temple work for the dead. Now, returning to verse 4.

    4 And they [the living] shall build the old wastes, they [the living] shall raise up the former desolations, and they shall repair the waste cities, the desolations of many generations [of the dead].

    A “city” can be the buildings, the inhabitants, or both. There is little point in repairing the buildings “of many generations,” but if it is a reference to the people who lived in those cities, then it is an intelligible reference to family history and ordinance work for the dead. Isaiah uses the same kind of language in his prophecy about Joseph Smith and the restoration. It reads:

    8 Thus saith the Lord: In an acceptable time have I heard thee, O isles of the sea, and in a day of salvation have I helped thee; and I will preserve thee, and give thee my servant for a covenant of the people [the footnote takes us to 2 Nephi 3:11, which is a reference to the Prophet Joseph Smith], to establish the earth, to cause to inherit the desolate heritages;
    9 That thou mayest say to the prisoners [same “prisoners” as in Isaiah 61]: Go forth; to them that sit in darkness: Show yourselves. They shall feed in the ways, and their pastures shall be in all high places [sacred spaces].
    10 They shall not hunger nor thirst, neither shall the heat nor the sun smite them; for he that hath mercy on them shall lead them, even by the springs of water [waters of life] shall he guide them.
    11 And I will make all my mountains [temples] a way, and my highways shall be exalted (1 Nephi 21:8-11)

    Similarly, in Isaiah 61, that great prophet uses the same imagery to identify those who will to temple work for the dead. Isaiah now tells how that will be accomplished:

    5 And strangers shall stand and feed your flocks, and the sons of the alien shall be your plowmen and your vinedressers.

    This is a beautiful verse but deeply encoded.

    5 And strangers [the living] shall stand

    One stands to make a covenant. If “stand” is a code word, then the reason the “strangers” are standing is to make a covenant in behalf of the dead. An example of standing to make covenants is this story in the Old Testament.

    3 And the king stood by a pillar, and made a covenant before the Lord, to walk after the Lord, and to keep his commandments and his testimonies and his statutes with all their heart and all their soul, to perform the words of this covenant that were written in this book. And all the people stood to the covenant (2 Kings 23:1-3) .

    and feed your [the dead’s] flocks

    “Flocks” can refer to a congregation of people as well as to sheep, just as in the 23rd Psalm.

    and the sons of the alien [the living] shall be your [the dead’s] plowmen and your vinedressers.

    In ancient Israel the staple crop was wheat, which is the main product of the plowmen; wheat makes bread. Vinedressers care for the vineyard; grapes make wine. So apparently the “flocks” will receive bread and wine.

    6 But ye [the dead] shall be named the Priests of the Lord:

    That’s reasonable. After they accept the gospel they should be given the priesthood.

    men shall call you [the dead] the ministers of our God:

    To minister is to bless and to teach. So after the dead receive the priesthood they are sent on missions to do just that.

    ye [the dead] shall eat the riches of the Gentiles [the living], and in their glory shall ye boast yourselves.

    If one understands “riches” and “glory” to mean the blessings of the gospel, then the meaning of this verse fits perfectly into the next one:

    7 For your shame ye shall have double; and for confusion they shall rejoice in their portion: therefore in their land they shall possess the double: everlasting joy shall be unto them.

    For your shame …. and for confusion

    Read “for” the same way we read it in verse 3: “in place of” or “in exchange for.”

    ye shall have double … they shall possess the double

    The Law of Moses required that the firstborn son be given the birthright, and in acknowledgment of that birthright “by giving him a double portion of all that [his father] hath” (Deuteronomy 21:15-17).

    Therefore, a “double portion” means the same as the “birthright blessings.” In a priesthood and temple settings such as Isaiah 61 and Isaiah 40:1-2 “double” represents the birthright blessings of Abraham. (Perhaps the story of Elisha’s asking Elijah that “a double portion of thy spirit be upon me,” and then his receiving Elijah’s garment of authority is another example [2 Kings 2:8-13]).

    In Isaiah 61:7 Jehovah promises: [In exchange] for your shame, ye [the dead] shall have double [the crowning birthright blessings of Abraham]; and [in place of] confusion they [the living] shall rejoice in their [double] portion: therefore in their land they shall possess the double [birthright]: everlasting [eternal] joy shall be unto them (Isaiah 61:7).

    The Birthright Blessings of Abraham are the covenants the Lord made with Abraham and his family. We find them in Genesis 12 and 13, and they are more fully discussed in the Book of Abraham in the Pearl of Great Price. They are the covenant blessings of family, land, priesthood, gospel, and invulnerability.

    FAMILY

    “I will make of thee a great nation….and in thy seed after thee (that is to say, the literal seed, or the seed of the body) shall all the families of the earth be blessed (Abraham 2:9-11).”
    “And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered (Genesis 13:16).”

    LAND

    “land which I will give unto thy seed after thee for an everlasting possession (Abraham 2:6).”
    “For all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed for ever (Genesis 13:15).”

    PRIESTHOOD

    “shall bear this ministry and Priesthood unto all nations (Abraham 2:9).”

    GOSPEL

    “in thee (that is, in thy Priesthood) and in thy seed (that is, thy Priesthood), for I give unto thee a promise that this right shall continue in thee, and in thy seed after thee (that is to say, the literal seed, or the seed of the body) shall all the families of the earth be blessed, even with the blessings of the Gospel, which are the blessings of salvation, even of life eternal (Abraham 2:11).”

    INVULNERABILITY

    “I will bless them that bless thee, and curse them that curse thee (Abraham 2:11, Genesis 12:3).”

    The prophet Isaiah used the codeword “double” in the same way in Isaiah 40:1-2. The verses report an event at the Council in Heaven where God (Elohim) speaks to the Council (the word ye is plural). If one reads “comfort” the same as in Isaiah 61:2-3, that is, to mean the power to transcend sorrow through the administration of the coronation ceremony, then the first two verses in Isaiah 40 take on enormous meaning. The verses read:

    1 Comfort ye, comfort ye my people, saith your God.
    2 Speak ye comfortably to Jerusalem, and cry unto her, that her warfare is accomplished, that her iniquity is pardoned: for she hath received of the Lord’s hand double for all her sins (Isaiah 40:1-2).

    The key is in the last bit: The reason why her iniquity is pardoned is because she has received from the Lord’s hand, the birthright blessings of Abraham in exchange for all her sins.

    8 For I the Lord love judgment, I hate robbery for burnt offering; and I will direct their [the living] work in truth, and I will make an everlasting covenant with them [the living].

    For I the Lord love judgment, I hate robbery for burnt offering

    The key to this intriguing sentence is the “burnt offering.” The Savior’s Atonement brought an end to burnt offerings. Besides that, the dead could hardly make such offerings any more—the animals where they are, are also already dead. So that eliminates a good part of what the verse might mean. For the living, there is one offering that is acceptable before the Lord. It is a broken heart and contrite spirit (3 Nephi 9:19-20). Any counterfeit of that is like robbing the Lord. The dead people are now instructed that they must make the same sacrifice as the living. (For a discussion of “a broken heart and contrite spirit” as a sacrifice see Baker and Ricks, Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord (2011 edition), 620-25.)

    and I will direct their [the living’s] work in truth

    This work that the Lord will direct is family history. There are innumerable individuals who have dedicated their time and resources to doing genealogical research. They can and do testify that the Lord does “direct their word in truth.”

    and I will make an everlasting covenant with them [the living].

    In the context of the next verse, the covenant God will make with the living is the Abrahamic Covenant summed up in a single phrase: the sealing power. It is the overarching umbrella under whose definition all of the other ordinances and covenants can comfortably fit. It is the everlasting covenant that seals together all those who inherit the celestial glory and thereby validates all over covenants.

    Up to this point in the chapter Jehovah has been speaking. But now the voice changes and we hear a hymn of praise sung by the dead man who, with his bride, has been dressed and prepared for a wedding.

    10 I will greatly rejoice in the Lord, my soul shall be joyful in my God; for he hath clothed me with the garments of salvation, he hath covered me with the robe of righteousness, as a bridegroom decketh himself with ornaments, and as a bride adorneth herself with her jewels.

    The final verse is the conclusion, not only of the chapter but also of the Lord’s promise to the dead. It is a promise of the resurrection. For just as a seemingly dead seed is placed in the ground to become a living plant, so the dead body is placed in the ground to rise again an eternally living being.

    11 For as the earth bringeth forth her bud, and as the garden causeth the things that are sown in it to spring forth; so the Lord God will cause righteousness and praise to spring forth before all the nations.

    ———————————————————-

    Now, let me show you how precise this description of the ancient Israelite temple drama is: Read the entire chapter and you will almost be able to see it performed on a stage.

    1 The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the Lord hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound;
    2 To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord, and the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn;
    3 To appoint unto them that mourn in Zion, to give unto them beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, the garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness; that they might be called trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord, that he might be glorified.
    4 And they shall build the old wastes, they shall raise up the former desolations, and they shall repair the waste cities, the desolations of many generations.
    5 And strangers shall stand and feed your flocks, and the sons of the alien shall be your plowmen and your vinedressers.
    6 But ye shall be named the Priests of the Lord: men shall call you the Ministers of our God: ye shall eat the riches of the Gentiles, and in their glory shall ye boast yourselves.
    7 For your shame ye shall have double; and for confusion they shall rejoice in their portion: therefore in their land they shall possess the double: everlasting joy shall be unto them.
    8 For I the Lord love judgment, I hate robbery for burnt offering; and I will direct their work in truth, and I will make an everlasting covenant with them.
    9 And their seed shall be known among the Gentiles, and their offspring among the people: all that see them shall acknowledge them, that they are the seed which the Lord hath blessed.
    10 I will greatly rejoice in the Lord, my soul shall be joyful in my God; for he hath clothed me with the garments of salvation, he hath covered me with the robe of righteousness, as a bridegroom decketh himself with ornaments, and as a bride adorneth herself with her jewels.
    11 For as the earth bringeth forth her bud, and as the garden causeth the things that are sown in it to spring forth; so the Lord God will cause righteousness and praise to spring forth before all the nations (Isaiah 61:1-11).

    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

  • 3 Nephi 12:3 — LeGrand Baker — The ancient endowment in a single verse

    3 Nephi 12:3 — LeGrand Baker — The ancient endowment in a single verse

    3 Yea, blessed are the poor in spirit who come unto me, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven (3 Nephi 12:3).

    We are making two changes in the Book of Mormon Project. First, I will no longer be sending weekly emails, but will post the comments directly on the web. Second, We will no longer keep to the Sunday even schedule. If you wish to be notified when I post a new comment, please “subscribe” using the lower box on the right hand side of the homepage.  

    In chapter that introduces the Beatitudes in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, we point out that the word “blessed” would better be translated as “enjoying the state of the gods.”

    This Beatitude is easier to understand if one reads it backwards to discover first its object and then its method. The object is: “for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” That does not say they shall be citizens of the kingdom, it says it is “theirs”—they shall own it. People who own kingdoms are called priests and kings. So, implicitly, the beatitude says, “Blessed are the poor in spirit who come unto me, for they are the priests and sacral kings of the kingdom of heaven.”{1}

    To “come unto me” means precisely what the words say. It is not about just doing good things, it means one must go to the place where he is. The entire purpose of the drama of the New Year festival was to bring one behind the veil that separated the Holy of Holies from the rest of the world. Understood symbolically, the phrase “come unto me” happened when one had passed beyond the veil and entered the Holy of Holies of Solomon’s Temple—God’s earthly throne room—to be in the presence of Jehovah. Taken quite literally it meant one must come to the place where Christ is.{2}

    Implicitly then, the Beatitude says, “Blessed are the poor in spirit who came through the veil of the ancient temple to the place where they may meet God, for they are the priests and kings of the kingdom of heaven.”

    The question now is “Who are the ‘poor in spirit’?”

    Commentators on Matthew’s text insist the phrase has nothing to do with being impoverished. “Poor” does not mean lacking either spirit, spirituality, or worldly goods. There is nothing about poverty that precludes one’s coming to Christ. Similarly, there is nothing about emotional, spiritual, or worldly poverty that qualifies one to come to the place where the Savior is, or to be anointed to become a king or queen, unless that “poverty” is acquired in righteousness and according to eternal law. The “poor in spirit” are not spiritually impoverished, but “those living in uprightness, or ‘perfection.’”{3}

    The only kind of poverty that fits those criterion is acquired through sacrifice. “Sacrifice” does not mean to lose something or to give it up; rather, it means to make it sacred—to set it apart. Throughout the scriptures—even while animal sacrifices were still performed under the Law of Moses—the sacrifice the Lord declared to be most acceptable was that of a broken heart and a contrite spirit. The Savior explained the meaning of this Beatitude a few moments later when he said:

    19 And behold, I have given you the law and the commandments of my Father, that ye shall believe in me, and that ye shall repent of your sins, and come unto me with a broken heart and a contrite spirit. Behold, ye have the commandments before you, and the law is fulfilled.
    20 Therefore come unto me and be ye saved; for verily I say unto you, that except ye shall keep my commandments, which I have commanded you at this time, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven (3 Nephi 12:19-20).

    Earlier, when the Lord spoke to the Nephites out of the darkness, he explained that a broken heart and a contrite spirit is the acceptable sacrifice:

    18 I am the light and the life of the world. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end.
    19 And ye shall offer up unto me no more the shedding of blood; yea, your sacrifices and your burnt offerings shall be done away, for I will accept none of your sacrifices and your burnt offerings.
    20 And ye shall offer for a sacrifice unto me a broken heart and a contrite spirit. And whoso cometh unto me with a broken heart and a contrite spirit, him will I baptize with fire and with the Holy Ghost (3 Nephi 9:18-20a).

    The Psalmist had promised:

    34 The Lord is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart; and saveth such as be of a contrite spirit (Psalm 34:18).

    16 For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give it: thou delightest not in burnt offering.
    17 The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise (Psalm 51:16-17).

    The Lord reiterated the same principle to the Prophet Joseph:{4}

    59 Thou shalt offer a sacrifice unto the Lord thy God in righteousness [zedek], even that of a broken heart and a contrite spirit (D&C 59:8).

    It is apparent that the phrase “poor in spirit” is a reference to those who have made the sacrifice of a broken heart and a contrite spirit in the context of the ordinances of the ancient temple, and in preparation to entering the Lord’s presence there, and becoming priests and kings of the kingdom of heaven. Thus, one way of reading this Beatitude might be, “Blessed are those who make the sacrifice, who come to where I am, for they are the sacral kings of the kingdom of heaven.”

    In the Beatitudes, the Savior will repeat the phrase “theirs is the kingdom of heaven” again. That repetition leads one to believe that the use of the phrase here in verse three represents the ancient tradition of first anointing one to become king, then later actually anointing him as king, which apparently is represented as occurring later on in verse 10.{5}

    ———————————–

    ENDNOTES

    {1} While many of the Beatitudes are clearly quotes or paraphrases from specific Old Testament sources, others cannot be identified as such—probably because our scriptures are not complete. Verse 3 is an example of that. The phrase “kingdom of heaven” does not appear in our Old Testament. Yet we know it was familiar to the Nephites because it is often found in the Old Testament portion of the Book of Mormon. An example is:

    37 And I say unto you again that he cannot save them in their sins; for I cannot deny his word, and he hath said that no unclean thing can inherit the kingdom of heaven; therefore, how can ye be saved, except ye inherit the kingdom of heaven? Therefore, ye cannot be saved in your sins. (Alma 11:37)

    {2} David A. Bednar, “Clean Hands and a Pure Heart.” Ensign 37, 11 (November 2007), 80-83.

    {3} Albright and Mann did with “poor in spirit” the same sort of thing they did with “fortunate.” They translated it as “humble in spirit,” then in the footnote they suggested an altogether different and more powerful meaning: they wrote that it meant “Those living in uprightness, or ‘perfection.’” That idea is remarkably close to enjoying “the state of the gods.” ( Albright and Mann, Anchor Bible, Matthew, 45-46.)

    {4} See also D&C 35:15; 56:17-20; 88:17-19. Twice Isaiah equates the poor and the meek with those who will embrace the gospel (Isaiah 11:1-7, 12; 29:18-19).

    {5} For a discussion of the practice of anointing one to become king, then later as king, see the section in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, called, “The Mortal World,” the chapter called, “Act 2, Scene 2: Anointed to Become King.”

    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

  • 3 Nephi 12:2 — LeGrand Baker — The Beatitudes and the Temple

    3 Nephi 12:2 — LeGrand Baker — The Beatitudes and the Temple

    The Beatitudes—as written in 3 Nephi—are among the most complete and succinct statements of the ideas—not the events, but the ideas—of the Feast of Tabernacles temple drama that one can find anywhere in the scriptures. Most of the Beatitudes are very short quotes or paraphrases from the Psalms or from Isaiah. It is apparent that the Savior quoted these passages in order to evoke his listeners’ memories of the entire passage to which he was referring. His speaking the Beatitudes would have only taken about three minutes. For his audience it must have been an overwhelming experience to hear the Savior run through that sequence of ideas so quickly—while their minds were filled to overflowing with the full intent of those passages of scripture. As the Spirit conveyed the message to his listeners, their minds would have been flooded with a quick succession of infinitely powerful ideas.

    In Who Shall Ascend into the hill of the Lord, Stephen and I discussed each of the
    Beatitudes. I shall use that as we go through them in the next several weeks, but I also want to add things that are not written there. Here is a brief overview of what they say. I will make no attempt to justify the conclusions here, but will simply say that on page 431 of the Book of Mormon one finds everything one needs to know in this lifetime to gain eternal life. One can say the same thing about the temple endowment. However in both cases, one has to know and do a lot of living and learning in order to know what is there. (I’m still working on it! ) The overview is as follows:

    Follow the Brethren:

    2 And again, more blessed are they who shall believe in your words because that ye shall testify that ye have seen me, and that ye know that I am.

    First principles and ordinances:

    2 Yea, blessed are they who shall believe in your words, and come down into the depths of humility and be baptized, for they shall be visited with fire and with the Holy Ghost, and shall receive a remission of their sins.

    Endowment for the living:

    3 Yea, blessed are the poor in spirit who come unto me, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

    Endowment for the dead:

    4 And again, blessed are all they that mourn, for they shall be comforted.

    Keep eternal covenants:

    5 And blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.

    Priesthood and temple correctness:

    6 And blessed are all they who do hunger and thirst after righteousness,

    “Filled” with the Holy Ghost:

    for they shall be filled with the Holy Ghost.

    How to be a sacral king and a priest:

    7 And blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy.

    Zion will see God:

    8 And blessed are all the pure in heart, for they shall see God.

    Peacemakers:

    9 And blessed are all the peacemakers, for they shall be called [new name-title] the children of God.

    Persecution and second coronation:

    10 And blessed are all they who are persecuted for my name’s sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
    11 And blessed are ye when men shall revile you and persecute, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake;
    12 For ye shall have great joy and be exceedingly glad, for great shall be your reward in heaven; for so persecuted they the prophets who were before you.

    Responsibility: Missionary work:

    13 Verily, verily, I say unto you, I give unto you to be the salt of the earth; but if the salt shall lose its savor wherewith shall the earth be salted? The salt shall be thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out and to be trodden under foot of men.

    Responsibility: Menorah in the temple:

    14 Verily, verily, I say unto you, I give unto you to be the light of this people. A city that is set on a hill cannot be hid.
    15 Behold, do men light a candle and put it under a bushel? Nay, but on a candlestick, and it giveth light to all that are in the house;
    16 Therefore let your light so shine before this people, that they may see your good works and glorify your Father who is in heaven (3 Nephi 12:1-16).

    Each of those assertions will require a good deal of explaining, but I think that as I deal with them one at a time, you will conclude, as I have, that the Beatitudes really do encapsulate all that we must do in this life and the next of obtain eternal life.

    One cannot readily find those idea in Matthew 5. One of the reasons is that each of the verses in Matthew begin with a new idea introduced by the word “blessed.” Consequently many scholars believe that they are simply an editor’s gathering of some of Jesus’s sayings. However, in the Book of Mormon, they begin with the conjunction “and,” creating one long sentence that can easily be seen as a sequence. The word “blessed” is itself an assertion of the importance of the sequence and the power of its conclusion.

    One of the most interesting examples of Joseph Smith’s statement, “We believe the Bible to be the word of God so far as it is translated correctly,” is found in the Anchor Bible’s very scholarly where a whole volume or more is devoted to each biblical book. The book of Matthew, which contains many quotes from the Old Testament, has two author/translators, W. F. Albright, a distinguished Old Testament scholar, and C. S. Mann, an equally distinguished New Testament scholar. This is the way they translated the Beatitudes:

    3 Fortunate are the humble in spirit, for theirs is the Kingdom of heaven. 4 Fortunate are those who mourn, for they shall be consoled. 5 Fortunate are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth. 6 Fortunate are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall he satisfied. 7 Fortunate are the merciful, [and so on].

    In a footnote, they explain why they chose the word fortunate:

    3.Fortunate. The word in Greek was used in classical times [to mean] of the state of the gods in contrast to men. The usual English “blessed” has more and more come to have liturgical or ecclesiastical overtones, and we have chosen “fortunate” as being the best translation available to us. {W. F. Albright and C. S. Mann, The Anchor Bible, Matthew (Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1971), 45.}

    Third Nephi uses the same language as the King James Version: “Blessed are all the meek for they shall inherit the earth.” It does not jar its first-time readers with language that stretches their understanding too far. It is important that Joseph used the same word in the Book of Mormon that is in the King James Matthew, because it lets us compare the Bible and the Book of Mormon with confidence and know that the Book of Mormon carries the same understanding as the Bible. It is also important that these two scholars have clarified what the Bible actually says—and therefore what the Savior said to the people at Bountiful. The thing that is so interesting about the clarification in their footnote is that these world-class scholars knew what the Greek word means—“in the state of the gods”—but they did not believe Jesus could have meant that, so they came up with a watered-down word—“fortunate” —because that made more sense to them. Then, consistent with their training as scholars, they put the real meaning in a footnote, leaving LDS readers of the Book of Mormon free to pursue the limits of the meaning if they wish to, but without imposing it on them:
    The Beatitudes—as written in 3 Nephi—are among the most complete and succinct statements of the ideas—not the events, but the ideas—of the Feast of Tabernacles temple drama that one can find anywhere in the scriptures. Most of the Beatitudes are very short quotes or paraphrases from the Psalms or from Isaiah. It is apparent that the Savior quoted these passages in order to evoke his listeners’ memories of the entire passage to which he was referring. His speaking the Beatitudes would have only taken about three minutes. For his audience it must have been an overwhelming experience to hear the Savior run through that sequence of ideas so quickly—while their minds were filled to overflowing with the full intent of those passages of scripture. As the Spirit conveyed the message to his listeners, their minds would have been flooded with a quick succession of infinitely powerful ideas.

    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

  • 3 Nephi 12:1 – LeGrand Baker – Beatitudes, an Introduction

    3 Nephi 12:1 – LeGrand Baker – Beatitudes, an Introduction

    There are few passages in the Bible that can be applied to more diverse human experiences than the Beatitudes, and consequently there are few scriptures more universally appreciated, or more often quoted. Everyone loves the Beatitudes because every one can interpret them in their own way, and can find solace in that interpretation. Strangely enough, one of the reasons that is true is because the biblical Beatitudes have been edited at some point in their history to make their meanings more ambiguous than they were when Christ originally spoke them. We can say that with certainty because a more accurate version is found in the Book of Mormon.

    On first reading, the Beatitudes in Third Nephi seem to be substantially the same as those in the Bible. But on closer examination, one finds nuances of meaning which the Matthew version does not give. Even though the Book of Mormon adds considerably to the original meaning of the Beatitudes, the multi-faceted truths they contain also remain, and their beauty as individual statements of consolation is not diminished.

    It is occasionally true that seemingly casual remarks by Mormon are not only very important to understand what is happening – providing a context in which one can place the teachings of the prophets – and of subtext of the Book of Mormon. Mormon’s introduction to the Beatitudes is one of those.

    And it came to pass that when Jesus had spoken these words unto Nephi, and to those who had been called, (now the number of them who had been called, and received power and authority to baptize, was twelve), and he stretched forth his hand unto the multitude, and cried unto them, saying: (3 Nephi 12:1)

    It is very significant that Jesus had been speaking to the Twelve about their relationships with himself and his Father, but now he speaks to the entire “multitude.” In only those few words, Mormon has given us the same message that the blessings of sacral kingship and priesthood are not reserved exclusively to the leaders, but are available to all the Saints.

    The point here is that even though Jesus had been giving specific instructions to the Twelve, when he reviewed the entire enthronement/endowment coronation ceremonies, he now addressed the entire multitude.

    As Stephen Ricks and I discussed in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, the Beatitudes are a complete summary of the covenants and ordinances connected with the ancient Israelite temple drama and coronation rites. Because I believe the Beatitudes in the Book of Mormon focus of the powers and responsibilities of kingship, sonship, and priesthood. The following explanation of the nature of kingship in pre-exilic Old Testament and in the Book of Mormon is a necessary introduction to understanding the Beatitudes in that way.
    KINGSHIP AND PRIESTHOOD IN ANCIENT ISRAEL

    It is significant in light of Mormon’s introduction in Third Nephi, that some Old Testament scholars have observed that the king’s coronation ceremony was probably much more than just the enthronement of the king. Some scholars believe that while the people were watching the ceremonies in which the king participated, symbolically each of them was participating in those same ceremonies as well. So the covenants between Jehovah and the king were also covenants between Jehovah and his people.

    What is more, it is clear from the outset that the king is both dependent upon and responsible to Yahweh for the right exercise of his power; for his subjects, whatever their status in society, are one and all Yahweh’s people. {Aubrey R. Johnson, Sacral Kingship in Ancient Israel, Cardiff, University of Wales Press, 1967, p. 8.}

    Several scholars who have written most extensively about the nature of Israelite kingship, have suggested that the coronation of the earthly king was both real and symbolic. It was real in that the king really was enthroned. It was symbolic because all the people who watched the drama were also initiated into the mysteries of kingship and priesthood, and, vicariously as they watched, where also made sons and daughters of God. The implications stemming from the notion that ordinary men and women who watched the ceremonies were also participating in the ordinances and covenants, goes far beyond the notion of a vague universal royalty, for the king of Israel was the adopted son and heir of Jehovah. So if the people were being engaged in participatory rites, in which they also were made sacral kings and queens – then they also were also made covenant sons and daughters – children and heirs – of God.

    The Book of Mormon substantiates their findings about the nature of the pre-exilic Israelite religion – not only in the stories of King Benjamin and of Abinadi, who expressly addresses the question of how one may become a child of God – but throughout the entire book, especially in the teachings of the Saviour in Third Nephi.

    The distinguished biblical scholar Sigmund Mowinckel was the first to point out that the king’s anointing was an “endowment of the Spirit.” His use of the word “endowment” was appropriate. An endowment is a gift which grows in value with time. For example, when BYU receives an endowment of money, it invests the principle and spends only the accrued interest. Thus the original gift remains permanently intact while the interest provides a perpetual source of income to support university programs or scholarships. Mowinckel is using the word “endowment” in that same way – a perpetual and ever increasing gift. He wrote:

    [The king’s] anointing was related to his endowment with the spirit. The later tradition says explicitly that when David was anointed, ‘the spirit of Yahweh leaped upon him’.
    In virtue of his endowment with the divine spirit, the king is filled with superhuman power. He receives ‘a new heart’; he is changed into a new man (1 Sam. x, 6, 9)….He receives a new disposition expressed, according to oriental custom, in giving to him a new name which indicates his new, intimate relationship with the god who has chosen him, and whom he represents.
    Through his anointing and endowment with the divine spirit, the king also receives superhuman wisdom. {Sigmund Mowinckel, He that Cometh (New York: Abingdon Press, 1954), 66. For a related discussion on the power of new covenant names see, Hermann Gunkel, (Michael D. Rutter, trans.) The Folktale in the Old Testament (Sheffield, England, Almond Press, 1987), 87.}

    Other scholars have gone further, and have recognized this Old Testament concept that during the kingship endowment/coronation rites, the men and women in the audience may well have made the same covenants and symbolically performed all the ordinances as the king, queen, and others who participated on the stage or in the throne-room in the ceremonies. Again, there is actually more concrete evidence of that in the Book of Mormon than there is in the Old Testament, but even so, several biblical scholars have affirmed that this was the Israelite practice during the period when Solomon’s Temple was in use. The most obvious expression of that principle is the underlying theme of the entire Old Testament – not just the king, but the entire nation of Israel were “chosen,” and the choosing was an was by covenant. The power of the covenant was ultimately made visible in both the royal authority of the king and the covenant relationship between the king, the people, and Jehovah.

    Even though there is little remaining evidence of this egalitarianism of the kingship, priesthood, and salvation rites remaining in the Old Testament, one may have a glimpse at what appears to be part of those ceremonies in pre-exilic times in the 23rd chapter of Second Kings. The people had come to the temple where king Josiah read from what was purported to be a newly discovered manuscript of the Law. At the conclusion of his reading:

    3 And the king stood by a pillar, and made a covenant before the Lord, to walk after the Lord, and to keep his commandments and his testimonies and his statutes with all their heart and all their soul, to perform the words of this covenant that were written in this book. And all the people stood to the covenant (2 Kings 23:3).

    This is not evidence that the people also made all of the other covenants that the king may have made during the ceremonies, but it is evidence that on that occasion they made at least one – that evidence not only precludes the argument that they made none, but it also opens the likelihood that they made others as well.

    It is apparent to some scholars that the ancient Israelites temple drama and coronation rites of the king were enacted because it was important that the people be able to participate. They were an indispensable part of the ceremonies. And their covenants were as important as the king’s because the covenant between the king and Jehovah was sustained by a similar covenant between the people, the king and Jehovah. The kingship represented as much a blessing as a power, for the people of Israel were an “elect” and “chosen” people. Mowinckel explains:

    But election is bound up with the making of the covenant, which is maybe the most important innovation on the basis of the historical orientation of Yahwesm [worship of Jehovah]. The idea in itself is not new….To Israel after the time of Moses, ‘covenant’ means the historical covenant which Yahweh in his goodness ‘granted’ to his elected people. {Sigmund Mowinckel, translated by A.P. Thomas, The Psalms in Israel’s Worship, 2 Vols.(Nashville, Abingdon, 1962), vol. 1: 155.}

    The King’s authority was not only political and ecclesiastical, it was apparently a legitimate priesthood power as well. Mowinckel and others have suggested that the king’s Melchizedek priesthood came through the religious leaders of the Jebusites in Jerusalem after David took that city from them and made it his own. Writing of David and Solomon as the nation’s religious leaders, Mowinckel observed,

    This transition becomes still more easily comprehensible if, as certain things indicate, David’s new priest in Jerusalem, Zadok, was descended from the ancient race of priest kings, of whom Melchizedek was a representative. David and his successors were professedly ‘priests’ after the order of Melchizedek (‘for the sake of Melchizedek’), as we hear in Ps. 110. {Sigmund Mowinckel, translated by A.P. Thomas, The Psalms in Israel’s Worship, 2 Vols.(Nashville, Abingdon, 1962), vol. 1:133.}

    Thus the coronation rites re-affirmed the king as the personification and upholder of the Law, the epitome of justice and mercy, and the ultimate earthly priesthood authority. In one or all of those roles, throughout the coronation ceremonies, the king was the focal point of all of the temple activities. That does not imply that he was exclusively the focal point, but rather that his person represented the connecting place between the events on earth and the events in heaven, as Gordon C. Thomasson, observes:

    Every people required connection with the divine, and that connection was embodied in the king….It was in his presence or on his person that the most sacred rituals and the highest mysteries had to be performed, and the divine king became the gnostic par excellence, holding the knowledge, power, and authority upon which the welfare and salvation of his subjects depended.” {Gordon C. Thomasson, “Togetherness Is Sharing an Umbrella: Divine Kingship, the Gnosis, and Religious Syncretism,” in John M. Lundquist and Stephen D. Ricks, eds., By Study and Also By Faith, 2 vols. Deseret Book Company, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1990, vol. 1. p. 533-534.}

    KINGSHIP AND PRIESTHOOD IN THE BOOK OF MORMON

    Not long after Lehi’s colony arrived in America, the Nephites built a temple which was as nearly like Solomon’s as they could make it. Nephi, Jacob had seen God, and that requires one’s having the Melchizedek priesthood. Therefore, we cannot doubt that they had the necessary Melchizedek priesthood authority to conduct proper temple services, and there is no reason to suppose that the rites and ordinances they conducted were different from those of the Temple in Jerusalem (see Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord for a discussion of those kingship rites). The Israelite temple rites centered around the person of the king. So the Nephites needed a king as much for religious as for temporal purposes. Therefore, it was necessary that at about the same time the Nephites built their temple they also insisted that Nephi become their king.

    In 3 Nephi, the Savior establishes a new government with himself as King. We have described his coronation in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord. As a part of the coronation ceremony he gage a lecture. (3 Nephi 12-14) The beginning of that sermon (the Beatitudes) is a temple text that summarizes the steps to exaltation. The remainder of the sermon is also a temple text. It addresses many of the same principles as the Beatitudes, except it gives practical instruction about how to do what the Beatitudes say must be done.

    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

  • 3 Nephi 11:28-41 – LeGrand Baker – doctrines of the Kingdom

    3 Nephi 11:28-41 – LeGrand Baker – doctrines of the Kingdom

    These verses are the only place in 3 Nephi where the Savior actually says “this is my doctrine,” and then spells out what his doctrines are.

    Elsewhere (3 Nephi 27:13-21), the Savior defines the “gospel” as being about the Atonement, faith, repentance, baptism, keeping our covenants, and enduring to the end. but this has a somewhat different flavor from that.

    It is significant that the “doctrine,” as he defines it here, was for the ears of the Twelve and was not spoken to the entire congregation. At the beginning on the next chapter, he teaches all the people the Beatitudes and the sermon at the temple, but this definition of “doctrine” is only for the Twelve. That being so, it is reasonable to see this statement of doctrine as the principles that undergird all the others. Then, what he taught to the congregation as an elaboration on those principles.

    It is also significant that Mormon entrusted us with the instruction the Savior gave to the twelve disciples. That fact alone suggests we ought to take these “doctrines” seriously as the foundation of our own understanding as well.

    Before the Savior expounded the particulars of the doctrine, he made two important points. First, he introduces his discussion with the injunction (v. 25), “there shall be no disputations among you … concerning the points of my doctrine.” I suppose that is another way of saying it is as it is and there is no room for changes or compromises.

    The second point, after making it clear that his “doctrine” is not to be tampered with, he expanded that principle even further by saying the first doctrine he defines is that “anger… should be done away (v. 30).” Later on, when he addresses the entire congregation he explains that angry and contentious people cannot be where he is (12:21-26).

    After those preliminaries (immutability of the doctrine and unacceptability of anger) he says: “Behold, verily, verily, I say unto you, I will declare unto you my doctrine And this is my doctrine, and it is the doctrine which the Father hath given unto me” (v. 31-32).

    and I bear record of the Father, and the Father beareth record of me, and the Holy Ghost beareth record of the Father and me (v. 32).

    For the men to whom Jesus was speaking, this reference is to an event of earlier that very day, when they heard the voice of the father declare, “Behold my Beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased, in whom I have glorified my name—hear ye him” (3 Nephi 11:7)

    As for us, we have the testimony of all those witnesses who heard the testimony of the Father as recorded in 3 Nephi and in the New Testament (Matthew 17:5, Mark 9:7, Luke 9:35, John 1:32). In addition, we have John’s testimony that the Savior versified his Father’s testimony (John 5:36-38, John 8:17-19). We also have the more immediate testimony of the Prophet Joseph Smith (JS -History 1:17).

    Whether you and I have actually heard that voice is beside the point. For, as the Savior said, “the Holy Ghost beareth record of the Father and me” (v. 32). The testimonies of multiple witnesses leaves us without excuse. As we contemplate the gravity of that, we remember Moroni’s warning:

    27 And I exhort you to remember these things; for the time speedily cometh that ye shall know that I lie not, for ye shall see me at the bar of God; and the Lord God will say unto you: Did I not declare my words unto you, which were written by this man, like as one crying from the dead, yea, even as one speaking out of the dust? (Moroni 10:27).

    As we consider what the Savior next said to the twelve Nephite disciples, we should also remember the covenantal relationship between the Savior, his Father, and ourselves as it was explained to us by Moroni:

    32 Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness, and love God [the Father] with all your might, mind and strength, then is his [the Father’s] grace sufficient for you, that by his [the Father’s] grace ye may be perfect in Christ; and if by the grace of God [the Father] ye are perfect in Christ, ye can in nowise deny the power of God [the Father].
    33 And again, if ye by the grace of God [the Father] are perfect in Christ, and deny not his power, then are ye sanctified in Christ by the grace of God [the Father], through the shedding of the blood of Christ, which is in the covenant of the Father unto the remission of your sins, that ye become holy, without spot (Moroni 10:32-33).

    That phrase, “which is in the covenant of the Father unto the remission of your sins,” teaches us that the Savior is the personification, the evidence, and the fulfillment of the Father’s covenant that we may “become holy, without spot.” With that understanding, we can more clearly understand the Savior’s words:

    32 …and I bear record that the Father commandeth all men, everywhere, to repent and believe in me.
    33 And whoso believeth in me, and is baptized, the same shall be saved; and they are they who shall inherit the kingdom of God.
    34 And whoso believeth not in me, and is not baptized, shall be damned.
    35 Verily, verily, I say unto you, that this is my doctrine, and I bear record of it from the Father; and whoso believeth in me believeth in the Father also; and unto him will the Father bear record of me, for he [the Father] will visit him with fire and with the Holy Ghost.[Later, when the Savior speaks to the entire congregation, he will elaborate on that principle.]
    36 And thus will the Father bear record of me, and the Holy Ghost will bear record unto him of the Father and me; for the Father, and I, and the Holy Ghost are one (3 Nephi 11:32-36).

    The Savior’s charge to the Twelve that they must repent pushes the concept to its furthest limit. He said,

    37 And again I say unto you, ye must repent, and become as a little child, and be baptized in my name, [that baptism would occur on the following day (3 Nephi 19:11-12)] or ye can in nowise receive these things [“these things” are the testimonies he has just promised them].

    In this verse the sequence is: (1) repent, (2) become as a little child, and (3) be baptized (4) in order to “receive these things.” The next verse is quite different:

    38 And again I say unto you, ye must repent, and be baptized in my name, and become as a little child, or ye can in nowise inherit the kingdom of God.

    That sequence is: (1) repent, (2) be baptized in my name, and (3) become as a little child, (4) in order to “inherit the kingdom of God.” After giving these instructions to the Twelve, the Savior explained both baptisms to the entire congregation. He said:

    1 …Blessed are ye if ye shall give heed unto the words of these twelve whom I have chosen from among you to minister unto you, and to be your servants; and unto them I have given power that they may baptize you with water; and after that ye are baptized with water, behold, I will baptize you with fire and with the Holy Ghost…(3 Nephi 12:1).

    His instruction that one must “become as a little child” precedes the first baptism but follows the second one. The classic scriptural definition of what that means is from King Benjamin when he said:

    19 For the natural man is an enemy to God, and has been from the fall of Adam, and will be, forever and ever, unless he yields to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, and putteth off the natural man and becometh a saint through the atonement of Christ the Lord, and becometh as a child, submissive, meek, humble, patient, full of love, willing to submit to all things which the Lord seeth fit to inflict upon him, even as a child doth submit to his father (Mosiah 3:19).

    I believe there is an additional (not a different) way to understand it as well. I have told this story before, but for me, the subject matter virtually requires that I tell it again.

    One day, more than 20 years ago, I dropped in on my daughter Dawn and her family. Little two-year-old Chelsea was in the tub having a bath. She heard my voice and came running into the living room to meet me. “Grandpa,” she shouted, all dripping wet, holding out her arms, wanting to be picked up and hugged. As I held her, wetness and all, I understood what it means to be like a little child in the Kingdom of God. The little girl in my arms was completely, simply, Chelsea. She needed no clothing to define who she was. At that moment she was only herself; trusting, but not noticing she trusted; vulnerable, but unaware of her vulnerability because it did not concern her; loving and finding fulfillment and identity in the moment of her giving her love. In her unabashed dripping-wetness Chelsea was wholly free to be herself–to express her love–to BE the expression of her love.

    I suppose we are all like that. When we are stripped of all the masks and facades of the artificial needs and fears by which we define our Selves, then we may kneel naked, vulnerable, and unashamed before our loving Heavenly Father. When one is childlike in that nakedness, he is free. He knows and loves the voice of Him by whom he walks. Nothing can bribe him because in his Saviour all of his needs are satisfied. Nothing can threaten him because in the arms of his Saviour he can find no fear. He may not have all the information he needs all the time, but his Friend has, and one can always ask when one does not know. When one is naked in that way, one may begin to know as he is known and see as he is seen. Only when one is comfortable with that kind of nakedness may he be clothed in a “robe of righteousness” and become one who may “inherit the kingdom of God.”

    I suspect when that happens, the question of one’s obedience will become moot because the question of his motive will have no practical meaning. Obedience will simply be one of the fruits of love, and his absolute obedience the simple expression of his absolute freedom.

    The Savior concluded his instructions to the Twelve with these words:

    39 Verily, verily, I say unto you, that this is my doctrine, and whoso buildeth upon this buildeth upon my rock, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against them.
    40 And whoso shall declare more or less than this, and establish it for my doctrine, the same cometh of evil, and is not built upon my rock; but he buildeth upon a sandy foundation, and the gates of hell stand open to receive such when the floods come and the winds beat upon them(3 Nephi 11:39-40).

    The Savior himself is that Rock, as Helaman explained to his sons:

    12 And now, my sons, remember, remember that it is upon the rock of our Redeemer, who is Christ, the Son of God, that ye must build your foundation; that when the devil shall send forth his mighty winds, yea, his shafts in the whirlwind, yea, when all his hail and his mighty storm shall beat upon you, it shall have no power over you to drag you down to the gulf of misery and endless wo, because of the rock upon which ye are built, which is a sure foundation, a foundation whereon if men build they cannot fall (Helaman 5:12).

    Having enumerated these doctrines to the Twelve, the Savior then gave them this charge:

    41 Therefore, go forth unto this people, and declare the words which I have spoken, unto the ends of the earth (3 Nephi 11:41).

    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

  • 3 Nephi 11:13-15 — LeGrand Baker — His hands and his feet

    3 Nephi 11:13-15 — LeGrand Baker — His hands and his feet

    13 And it came to pass that the Lord spake unto them saying:
    14 Arise and come forth unto me, that ye may thrust your hands into my side, and also that ye may feel the prints of the nails in my hands and in my feet, that ye may know that I am the God of Israel, and the God of the whole earth, and have been slain for the sins of the world.
    15 And it came to pass that the multitude went forth, and thrust their hands into his side, and did feel the prints of the nails in his hands and in his feet; and this they did do, going forth one by one until they had all gone forth, and did see with their eyes and did feel with their hands, and did know of a surety and did bear record, that it was he, of whom it was written by the prophets, that should come.
    16 And when they had all gone forth and had witnessed for themselves, they did cry out with one accord, saying:
    17 Hosanna! Blessed be the name of the Most High God! And they did fall down at the feet of Jesus, and did worship him.
    18 And it came to pass that he spake unto Nephi (for Nephi was among the multitude) and he commanded him that he should come forth.
    19 And Nephi arose and went forth, and bowed himself before the Lord and did kiss his feet.
    20 And the Lord commanded him that he should arise. And he arose and stood before him.

    An intriguing question is: What is the meaning behind the importance of touching the prints of the nails on the Savior’s hands and feet? The authors of the gospels did not mention the nails when they told us of his crucifixion, rather, they only say “they crucified him” (Matthew 27:35, Mark 15:24-25, Luke 23:33, John 19:18).

    The most vivid description of his agony on the cross is found in the prophecy that is the 25th Psalm. He quoted it before he died. The psalm begins, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” and includes the words, “they pierced my hands and my feet (Psalms 22:1, 16). Even though the gospels do not describe the way the Savior was crucified, both Luke and John cite the nail prints as confirming evidence of the resurrection.

    There are several accounts that show that those who truly knew that Jesus is the resurrected Christ not only saw with their eyes, felt his love in the depths of their souls, but also touched the identifying marks on his feet and/or his hands. The first to do so were “Mary Magdalene and the other Mary” who had come to the sepulcher early.

    9 And as they went to tell his disciples, behold, Jesus met them, saying, All hail. And they came and held him by the feet, and worshipped him (Matthew 28:1-9).

    Luke’s account of the Apostles seeing Jesus contains the same elements.

    38 And he said unto them, Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?
    39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.
    40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet (Luke 24:32-44).

    From a brilliant paper by Stephen D. Ricks, and RoseAnn Benson, {1} we learn that those experiences were an integral part of a covenant-defining relationship between the Savior and the persons who saw, felt, and knew. In the paper, they report that Herbert Huffmon “demonstrated that the Hebrew word yada, ‘to know,’ bore an additional meaning—‘to enter into a binding agreement’—a meaning that has parallels in Old Testament covenant language and ancient Near Eastern treaty terminology.”{2}

    Their paper shows that an intimate knowledge of God presupposes a covenant. An example is when the Lord reminded Jeremiah of their premortal covenant:

    4 Then the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
    5 Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.
    (Jeremiah 1:4-5).

    The story of the brother of Jared is another example. Note the covenantal relationship established through questions and answers and then it is confirmed when the brother of Jared sees Jehovah. Then the Savior extends an invitation to the covenants to others as well:

    10 And he answered: Nay; Lord, show thyself unto me.
    11 And the Lord said unto him: Believest thou the words which I shall speak?
    12 And he answered: Yea, Lord, I know that thou speakest the truth, for thou art a God of truth, and canst not lie.
    13 And when he had said these words, behold, the Lord showed himself unto him, and said: Because thou knowest these things ye are redeemed from the fall; therefore ye are brought back into my presence; therefore I show myself unto you.
    14 Behold, I am he who was prepared from the foundation of the world to redeem my people. Behold, I am Jesus Christ. I am the Father and the Son. In me shall all mankind have life, and that eternally, even they who shall believe on my name; and they shall become my sons and my daughters (Ether 3:10-14).

    Just as “to know” the Savior presupposes a saving covenant, so to-not-know precludes the blessings of that covenant. It was true even in Jesus’s lifetime that one could know about Jesus and not know him in the sense of covenant. John explained that if someone was simply curious about the miracles Jesus performed but did not seek to know that Jesus is divine, then they got their curiosity satisfied but nothing more. He wrote:

    23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did.
    24 But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men,
    25 And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man (John 2:23-25).

    The LDS Bible footnote at “commit” says, Jesus did not “entrust” himself to them. That is, he did not let them know who he really was. There is not even an implied covenant associated with their simply being curios. Neither can there be an assumed covenant by those who only claim to know. One cannot presume the rights and powers of the covenant without having met its requirements. The Savior is very explicit about that. He said,

    22 Many will say to me in that day: Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name, and in thy name have cast out devils, and in thy name done many wonderful works?
    23 And then will I profess unto them: I never knew you; depart from me, ye that work iniquity (3 Nephi 14:22-23).

    Ricks and Benson point out that covenant requires that both parties know each other. They write:

    Mutual recognition of an exclusive relationship. The Book of Mormon emphasizes the importance of mutual knowing, clearly linking eternal blessings or cursings to recognizing God as one’s exclusive Lord.{3}

    For the apostles in Jerusalem, mutual recognition meant seeing, and feeling. John’s accounts of the Apostles’ first seeing the resurrected Christ emphasizes the importance of that tangible testimony. He reports that in the first instance only ten of the apostles were present.

    19 Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.
    20 And when he had so said, he shewed unto them his hands and his side. Then were the disciples glad, when they saw the Lord (John 20:19-20).

    The marks of the Savior’s crucifixion were the ultimate testimony that he is the resurrected Christ. The importance of that is found in the story of Thomas that follows in the next verses—but not in the story as it is usually told. The fact is, “Doubting Thomas” never doubted and John never intended to say that he did. Earlier, John reported that when Jesus said he was going to return to Jerusalem, and the others urged him not to go, it was Thomas who said to his fellow disciples, “Let us also go, that we may die with him (John 11:16).” Because such devotion calls into question the very notion that Thomas was so faithless that he refused to believe the testimony of his fellow apostles, it requires a new look at the story of “Doubting Thomas.”

    That Thomas’s experience was a necessary part of his covenant with the Savior is shown by the words spoken by the resurrected Christ. The story as told in the King James Bible is this:

    26 And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them: then came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, Peace be unto you.
    27 Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.
    28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God (John 20:26-28).

    It is my opinion that this is one of the most ill-understood stories in the scriptures. History is written and interpreted by people who have access to only the evidence that happened to survive. In the case of this story of Thomas, John the Beloved was present, and was an eye witness to the events, so his testimony is valid. However, what has not survived for the general reader is the meaning of the words that the Savior used. Let me explain:

    As Stephen Ricks and I discussed in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, the Greek word pistis, which is translated as “faith,” was not a religious term in New Testament times, but was a commercial and diplomatic term that denoted making and keeping contracts, covenants, and treaties. In about the second century, apostate Christians lost the covenants along with their terms and the ordinances by which they were administered. Thereafter, pistis or “faith” came to mean belief without the validation of a covenant, or put more simply, the word “faith” came to mean a belief without any substantiating evidence, just as it does in most of Christianity today.

    In the story of Thomas, the Savior uses two words that are derived from pistis:

    Apistos, translated “faithless” in John 20:27, does not mean one who does not believe, but it means one who has not entered into the covenant.

    Pistos is translated as “believing” in John 20:27 and as “faithful” in Ephesians 1:1. It means one who keeps the terms of his covenants. So in both John and Ephesians it refers to covenant keepers, rather than simply believers.

    Given those definitions, we might loosely translate John 20:27 like this:

    27 Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not without the covenant of knowing, but being faithful to the covenant.

    (I am very grateful to Stephen Ricks for helping me understand that.)

    If that is what the Savior really said, the next question has to be “What did he mean?”

    For Latter-day Saints, that answer is not hard to find. An apostle is one who bears a special witness of the Savior. When Christ appeared to the other Apostles, Thomas was not present. Therefore, Thomas did not have the evidence, and could not keep the apostolic covenant to bear that special and sure witness. This conversation that John records between the Savior and Thomas is simply correcting that problem.

    When the Savior came to the Nephite in Bountiful, there were 2,500 people present at the temple that day—men, women, and children (3 Nephi 17:25). That is important for the perpetuation of the witnesses of the covenant. The mature men and women who were present would grow old and die. Eventually, so would the young men and the teenagers. And finally the little children would grow old. Their lifetimes would span three or four generations of people who had seen with their eyes, felt with their hands, rejoiced with their souls, and bore testimony that they knew and had experienced the reality of the resurrected Savior. Their first-hand testimonies helped sustain a righteous Nephite culture for many, many years. Of those people, the Savior himself testified:

    30 And now, behold, my joy is great, even unto fulness, because of you, and also this generation; yea, and even the Father rejoiceth, and also all the holy angels, because of you and this generation; for none of them are lost.
    31 Behold, I would that ye should understand; for I mean them who are now alive of this generation; and none of them are lost; and in them I have fulness of joy (3 Nephi 27:30-31).

    For those who were at the temple, their knowing Christ as he knew them set them apart in something like same unique way (but not with the same authority) as the eleven apostles at Jerusalem who also saw, and felt, and knew, and testified. {4}

    On his first day at the Bountiful Temple, the Savior established a new government and his experience there can be recognized as the ancient Israelite coronation ceremony. This seems to be the conclusion of their covenant of mutual recognition when the Savior is enthroned as king and the people “did cry out with one accord, saying: Hosanna! Blessed be the name of the Most High God! And they did fall down at the feet of Jesus, and did worship him (3 Nephi 11:16-15).”

    What follows next is an even more intimate covenant of mutual recognition between just the Savior and one of the Twelve. The Savior commanded Nephi to come to him.

    19 And Nephi arose and went forth, and bowed himself before the Lord and did kiss his feet.
    20 And the Lord commanded him that he should arise. And he arose and stood before him.

    The Savior, who had just been enthroned as king, then gave Nephi priesthood authority to act in his behalf. The record does not say so, but in the context of subsequent events it is apparent that this authority was equivalent to making Nephi president of the church and of the theocratic government that the Savior was in process of establishing.

    In Doctrine and Covenants section 76 there are two separate passages that describe the Celestial glory. The first (v.50-70) tells about the quality of the persons who inherit the Celestial kingdon. The second (v. 92-97) describes “the glory of the celestial, which excels in all things—where God, even the Father, reigns upon his throne forever and ever.” There we find the ultimate expression of the covenant of knowing — of “mutual recognition.” It says:

    94 They who dwell in his presence are the church of the Firstborn; and they see as they are seen, and know as they are known, having received of his fulness and of his grace;
    95 And he makes them equal in power, and in might, and in dominion.

    That phrase, “they see as they are seen, and know as they are known,” describes a more intimate relationship than anything we can experience in this life.

    —————————————-

    The Savior’s Nephite coronation ceremony is described in our book, Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord: {5}

    The scene that followed might most easily be visualized as it would have occurred at the conclusion of the drama’s coronation ceremony: as follows during the festival ceremony, the great doors of the temple were swung open, the veil before the Holy of Holies was pulled back, and the king was brought into the sacred chamber. The king—the adopted son and legal heir of Jehovah—sat upon the golden throne with his feet “established” in the Ark as his footstool. {5a} While sitting there, he gave a lecture in which he taught his people the meaning of the Law.
    The Savior’s real coronation was probably like that. The Nephite Temples were built after the pattern of Solomon’s Temple, {5b} so, as in Jerusalem, its Holy of Holies contained Jehovah’s throne, for “the throne in the sanctuary is considered as the image of the divine throne.” {5c}
    In Mormon’s account, this was not the dress rehearsal as it had been during the festival temple drama. The King was really Jehovah, the Eternal Priest and King of Israel. He had come to his temple. The Holy of Holies was his throne room. In it was his own throne. It is likely that the people who were present would have understood that what they were witnessing was the true enthronement—the reality for which the conclusion of the New Year’s festival drama was only a preparatory enactment.
    When the Savior came to the Temple at Bountiful, we may suppose that he would have done precisely what the people would have expected him to do, that is, the veil before the Holy of Holies would have been pulled back, and their King—Jehovah-Messiah-the resurrected Savior—would have gone into the Holy of Holies and sat upon his own throne. If the room were arranged like the one in Solomon’s Temple, the throne would have been elevated above the floor, and there would have been a footstool there, a sacred box akin to the Ark of the Covenant, containing emblems of priesthood and kingship—perhaps the sword of Laban, the Liahona, the small plates, and other sacred symbols of divine authority. When the Savior sat upon his throne, his feet would have been “established” upon that footstool and his priesthood and kingship would have been acknowledged.
    It was probably perfectly silent in the temple, but running through the minds of some may have been the words appropriate to this time during the temple drama:

    6 Sing praises to God, sing praises:
    sing praises unto our King, sing praises.
    7 For God is the King of all the earth:
    sing ye praises with understanding.
    8 God reigneth over the heathen:
    God sitteth upon the throne of his holiness.
    9 The princes of the people are gathered together, even
    the people of the God of Abraham:
    for the shields of the earth belong unto God: he is
    greatly exalted (Psalm 47:6-9).

    There the people came. One by one they came before the Savior, knelt before him, embraced by the overwhelming power of his love; they would have looked up through the brilliant light that is an expression of his love and that defines him as God—and into his smiling eyes. Each one touching his hands and his side.
    Looking upon him, they saw a man—real and tangible as themselves—yet his person was wholly different from their own. He was white beyond anything they could imagine or describe. The whiteness was not a quality of his exterior, but of himself. He was pure light, there was no darkness in him, therefore, he was not full of light, but he was light. He was not full of truth, but rather the personification of truth. He was not the expression of love; he was the fulfillment of love, which is truth and light. For that reason, darkness could not be where he was but by definition must have fled from his presence. Therefore all that were within his presence must have become pure as he was pure.
    They were clean—not because they were innately clean—but because he had forgiven them of all their past sins and had accepted only their present repentant, humble Selves into his presence. Therefore, they understood that they were clean. In that came the greater understanding that if they were to remain clean they must forgive as they had been forgiven. They must acknowledge that which was good in others and permit them to leave behind their sins, as each one of them had been permitted to leave behind his own sins when he came into the presence of the Savior.
    As they knelt before him and held his hands in theirs, they realized that they could not comprehend such unbounded magnificence. They looked down at his hands and sought to comprehend him; they realized that he is the pure embodiment of truth and light and love. They were filled to overflowing with his love, and they were not afraid.
    As they knelt before him, perhaps each one, like Nephi, “bowed himself before the Lord and did kiss his feet.” As they held his feet in their hands—washing them with their tears, then caressing his feet with their fingers—their fingertips would have reached back to the place where the nail had been driven through his heels and into the wood of the cross. {5d} As each individual knelt there, within the unspeakable power of his love, their joy and their tears bore testimony to their souls that he is real—their fingers which touched the wounds testified that he is the resurrected God. Before leaving, some might tenderly wipe his feet with their own hair—feeling that to use anything else would be inappropriate.
    Later, the memory of it would fill their souls with wonderment, for their finite minds could comprehend neither his glory nor the joy they felt in his presence. And their greatest desire was to be forever where he is.
    Isaiah’s words, “How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth peace; that bringeth good tidings of good, that publisheth salvation; that saith unto Zion, Thy God reigneth!” (Isaiah 52:7) call to mind that scene.
    —————————————-

    ENDNOTES

    {1} Stephen D. Ricks, and RoseAnn Benson — “Treaties and Covenants: Ancient Near Eastern Legal Terminology in the Book of Mormon,” Journal of Book of Mormon Studies (Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, 2005), Volume – 14, Issue – 1, Pages: 48-61, 128–29.

    ( To find the article, Google: “ricks benson covenant book of mormon” )

    {2} They cite Herbert B. Huffmon, “The Treaty Background of Hebrew YADA,” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 181 (February 1966): 31.

    {3} Sorry I can’t give you a page number. I took the article off of the internet and it doesn’t give hard copy publication page numbers.

    {4} Ricks and Benson show that mutual recognition is an essential part of “knowing” as it relates to covenant and treaty making the ancient Near East and the Book of Mormon.

    {5} Baker and Ricks, Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, 2nd edition, 635-38.

    {5a} For a discussion of the Ark of the Covenant as a footstool, see Sarna, Exploring Exodus, 210-11.

    {5b} 2 Nephi 5:16, Alma 16:13.

    {5c} Wensinck, Ideas of the Western, 55.
    {5d} “In 1968, the bones of a crucified man were found at Giv’at ha-Mivtar just north of Jerusalem. These belonged to a man about 26 years old and 167 cm (5′ 5 ½”) tall. The heel bones (calcanea) were still fixed together by a nail. An examination showed that the nail had first been hammered through a piece of Pistacia or Acacia wood and then through both heel bones before entering the cross made of olive wood. The lower leg bones were broken. There was the mark of a nail on one of the lower right arm bones (radius.)
    “The nails were probably put through a plaque of wood to stop them tearing through the flesh. The weight of the body would have pulled the arm nails up the forearm to the wrist. The legs were broken against the side of the cross. All the weight of the victim’s body would be on the arms causing death by suffocation.” Peter Connolly, A History of the Jewish People in the Times of Jesus from Herod the Great to Masada (New York: Peter Bedrick, 1983), 51.

    See also illustration on page 48 of: Jodi Magness, “What did Jesus’ Tomb Look Like?” Biblical Archaeology Review 32, 1 (January/February, 2006): 38-49, 70.

    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

  • 3 Nephi 11:11 – LeGrand Baker – relationship of the Father and the Son

    3 Nephi 11:11 – LeGrand Baker – relationship of the Father and the Son

    3 Nephi 11:10-11
    10 Behold, I am Jesus Christ, whom the prophets testified shall come into the world.
    11 And behold, I am the light and the life of the world; and I have drunk out of that bitter cup which the Father hath given me, and have glorified the Father in taking upon me the sins of the world, in the which I have suffered the will of the Father in all things from the beginning.

    Here the Savior places the atonement in the context of his being the ‘light and life of the world.’

    Last week we read scriptures that showed that the Savior is the personification of light, life, truth, and love. In these verses, it is in that context that he places his atonement. Sometimes we oversimplify the Savior’s greatness by saying that he was kind enough that he volenteered to perform the Atonement. What I believe he is saying here is that because he created all things and gave life to all things, only he could recreate (resurrect) and give new life (redeem) to all things.

    In describing the Atonement, the resurrected Christ also teaches us about he relationship with his Heavenly Father. He says:

    11 And behold, I am the light and the life of the world;
    and I have drunk out of that bitter cup which the Father hath given me,
    and have glorified the Father in taking upon me the sins of the world,
    in the which I have suffered the will of the Father in all things
    from the beginning.

    In his conclusion of the Book of Mormon, Moroni emphasizes the role of the Father in the Saviors Atonement. He writes:

    32 Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness, and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his grace sufficient for you, that by his grace ye may be perfect in Christ; and if by the grace of God ye are perfect in Christ, ye can in nowise deny the power of God.
    33 And again, if ye by the grace of God are perfect in Christ, and deny not his power, then are ye sanctified in Christ by the grace of God, through the shedding of the blood of Christ, which is in the covenant of the Father unto the remission of your sins, that ye become holy, without spot (Moroni 10:32-33).

    The Savior is the substance, the evidence, the validity, and the fulfillment of the Father’s covenant, and, according to the Savior’s own words, has been such “in all things from the beginning.”

    Paul reached back to the beginning when he reminded us:

    11 In whom [the Father] also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated [foreordained] according to the purpose of him [the Father] who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will:
    12 That we should be to the praise of his [the Father’s] glory, who [the Father] first trusted in Christ.
    13 In whom [the Savior] ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom [the Savior] also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
    14 Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his [the Father’s] glory (Ephesians 1:11-14).

    If we can use modern technology to discover the meaning of the scriptures, then powerful telescopes are only beginning to teach us the meaning of this one:

    31 And behold, the glory of the Lord was upon Moses, so that Moses stood in the presence of God, and talked with him face to face. And the Lord God said unto Moses: For mine own purpose have I made these things. Here is wisdom and it remaineth in me.
    32 And by the word of my power, have I created them, which is mine Only Begotten Son, who is full of grace and truth.
    33 And worlds without number have I created; and I also created them for mine own purpose; and by the Son I created them, which is mine Only Begotten (Moses 1:31-33).

    Of all the worlds in the universe, this little earth on which we live was chosen to be the altar on which the sacrifice of the Savior’s Atonement was performed. But the Father’s trust in his Only Begotten Son extended far beyond the limits of this earth and its population. The power of the Savior’s Atonement was not limited to the inhabitants of this world. Just as it could reach back in time to save Adam and Abraham in our world, so did it reach back in the eons of time to save the inhabitants of other worlds. The Prophet Joseph taught that in poem called The Vision:

    Hosanna, for ever! They open’d anon,
    And the glory of God shone around where I was;
    And there was the Son at the Father’s right hand,
    In a fulness of glory and holy applause.

    I beheld round the throne holy angels and hosts,
    And sanctified beings from worlds that have been,
    In holiness worshipping God and the Lamb,
    For ever and ever. Amen and amen.

    And now after all of the proofs made of him,
    By witnesses truly, by whom he was known,
    This is mine, last of all, that he lives; yea, he lives!
    And sits at the right hand of God on his throne.

    And I heard a great voice bearing record from heav’n,
    He’s the Saviour and only begotten of God;
    By him, of him, and through him, the worlds were all made,
    Even all that careen in the heavens so broad.

    Whose inhabitants, too, from the first to the last,
    Are sav’d by the very same Saviour of ours;
    And, of course, are begotten God’s daughters and sons
    By the very same truths and the very same powers.
    The Prophet Joseph Smith, “A Vision,”Times and Seasons, February 1, 1843. Italics added.)

    Apostle John Taylor was then in New York assisting immigrant Mormons get off the ships and on to trains that would take them part way to Utah. While there, he published a newspaper, called The Mormon. This is one of his last editorials in the newspaper.

    Lady-whence comest thou? Thine origin? What art thou doing here? Whither art thou going, and what is thy destiny? Declare unto me if thou hast understanding? Knowest thou not, that thou art a spark of Deity, struck from the fire of his eternal blaze, and brought forth in the midst of eternal burning?
    Knowest thou not that eternities ago, thy spirit, pure and holy, dwelt in thy Heavenly Father’s bosom, and in his presence, and with thy mother, one of the Queens of heaven, surrounded by thy brother and sister spirts in the spirit world, among the Gods. That as thy spirit beheld the scenes transpiring there, and thou growing in intelligence, thou sawest worlds upon worlds organized and peopled with thy kindred spirits, took upon them tabernacles, died, were resurrected, and received their exaltation on the redeemed worlds they once dwelt upon. (John Taylor, “Origin, Object, and Destiny of Women,” an editorial published in The Mormon, New York, New York, August 29, 1857. The full editorial can be found on my website under “favorite quotes.”)

    Alma explained that the Savior’s Atonement is “infinite and eternal”(Alma 34:10). The Savior’s Atonement that was performed on this little earth reached back through the eons of time to exalt other peoples on other worlds. This gives a whole new meaning to other statements in the Doctrine and Covenants:

    1 Hear, O ye heavens, and give ear, O earth, and rejoice ye inhabitants thereof, for the Lord is God, and beside him there is no Savior.
    2 Great is his wisdom, marvelous are his ways, and the extent of his doings none can find out.
    3 His purposes fail not, neither are there any who can stay his hand.
    4 From eternity to eternity he is the same, and his years never fail.
    5 For thus saith the Lord—I, the Lord, am merciful and gracious unto those who fear me, and delight to honor those who serve me in righteousness and in truth unto the en (D&C 76:1-5) d.

    17 By these things we know that there is a God in heaven, who is infinite and eternal, from everlasting to everlasting the same unchangeable God, the framer of heaven and earth, and all things which are in them (D&C 20:17).

    The relationship between the Savior and his Father is a theme that runs throughout the scriptures. The conversation between the Savior, his Father, and Nephi is a splendid example. Here is just a bit of that conversation:

    10 And he [Jesus] said unto the children of men: Follow thou me. Wherefore, my beloved brethren, can we follow Jesus save we shall be willing to keep the commandments of the Father?
    11 And the Father said: Repent ye, repent ye, and be baptized in the name of my Beloved Son.
    12 And also, the voice of the Son came unto me, saying: He that is baptized in my name, to him will the Father give the Holy Ghost, like unto me; wherefore, follow me, and do the things which ye have seen me do (2 Nephi 31:10-12).

    During Jesus life on earth he repeatedly gave credit to his Father. He taught what his Father told him to teach (John 15:14-17).

    He gave credit for the success of the Atonement to his Father’s support. He said: \

    18 Which suffering caused myself, even God, the greatest of all, to tremble because of pain, and to bleed at every pore, and to suffer both body and spirit—and would that I might not drink the bitter cup, and shrink—
    19 Nevertheless, glory be to the Father, and I partook and finished my preparations unto the children of men (D&C 19:18-19).

    We learn more details about from Luke. In the Garden Jesus prayed,

    42 Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done.
    43 And there appeared an angel unto him from heaven, strengthening him.
    44 And being in an agony he prayed more earnestly: and his sweat was as it were great drops of blood falling down to the ground (Luke 22:42-44).

    If the Atonement were for this earth only, then I suppose that angel might have been Adam or one of the Prophets. But, given the infinite and eternal reach of what the Savior was suffering, it is my considered opinion that the “angel” could have been none other than his Father to whom he was praying for sustenance.

    The Savior’s prayer in our behalf also focuses on the final authority of his Father. He says:

    3 Listen to him who is the advocate with the Father, who is pleading your cause before him—
    4 Saying: Father, behold the sufferings and death of him who did no sin, in whom thou wast well pleased; behold the blood of thy Son which was shed, the blood of him whom thou gavest that thyself might be glorified;
    5 Wherefore, Father, spare these my brethren that believe on my name, that they may come unto me and have everlasting life (D&C 45:3-5).

    The relationship of the Savior and his Father is so intimate that he frequently said he and his Father are One. That oneness is complicated in our minds because one of the name-titles of Jehovah is “the Father (as in Mosiah 15:1-7. see analysis in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, first edition, 708-09; second edition, 500-01.)

    In D&C 93:2-5 there is a clear differentiation between “the Father” (Jehovah) and “my Father” (Elohim), but after that the distinction has to be understood by the context.

    1 Verily, thus saith the Lord:…
    3 And that I am in the Father, and the Father in me, and the Father and I are one—
    4 The Father because he gave me of his fulness, and the Son because I was in the world and made flesh my tabernacle, and dwelt among the sons of men.
    5 I was in the world and received of my Father, and the works of him were plainly manifest. …

    11 And I, John, bear record that I beheld his glory, as the glory of the Only Begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth, even the Spirit of truth, which came and dwelt in the flesh, and dwelt among us. …
    16 And I, John, bear record that he received a fulness of the glory of the Father;
    17 And he received all power, both in heaven and on earth, and the glory of the Father was with him, for he dwelt in him.
    18 And it shall come to pass, that if you are faithful you shall receive the fulness of the record of John.
    19 I give unto you these sayings that you may understand and know how to worship, and know what you worship, that you may come unto the Father in my name, and in due time receive of his fulness.
    20 For if you keep my commandments you shall receive of his fulness, and be glorified in me as I am in the Father; therefore, I say unto you, you shall receive grace for grace.
    21 And now, verily I say unto you, I was in the beginning with the Father, and am the Firstborn (D&C 93:1-21).

    That oneness might best be understood as hased (unfailing love based on a prior covenant). The reason I suggest that is because the Savior invites us to join them in that same covenant based love/friendship. He said:

    2 I am Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who was crucified for the sins of the world, even as many as will believe on my name, that they may become the sons of God, even one in me as I am one in the Father, as the Father is one in me, that we may be one (D&C 35:2).

    He says it more explicitly in the magnificent prayer in John 17:

    1 These words spake Jesus, and lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, Father, the hour is come; glorify thy Son, that thy Son also may glorify thee:
    2 As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him.
    3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.
    4 I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.
    5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was.
    6 I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: thine they were, and thou gavest them me; and they have kept thy word. …

    10 And all mine are thine, and thine are mine; and I am glorified in them.
    11 And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are. …

    20 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word;
    21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.
    22 And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one (John 17:1-22).

    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

  • 3 Nephi 11:11– LeGrand Baker — Light and Life

    3 Nephi 11:11– LeGrand Baker — Light and Life

    3 Nephi 11:11
    10 Behold, I am Jesus Christ, whom the prophets testified shall come into the world.
    11 And behold, I am the light and the life of the world;

    Sometimes I wonder, when I hear someone describe the Savior as “our Elder Brother” if they think of Christ as simply “like us only better.” It may be significant that the Savior never describes himself that way.

    Sometimes we overlook some of the most profound and significant ideas in the scriptures because they are presented to us so frequently that they don’t seem unique, and other times because the words seem simple and we don’t stop to ask what they mean. Human language can be an intangible prison. It is a prison if we let it confine our thinking to what we already know. The phrase, “I am the light and the life of the world” may be overlooked because we have read it so many times or because our definition of those words restricts their meanings and we never ask what the Savior intended when he used those two words together.

    That is the phrase with which the Savior most frequently introduces himself, so it would probably be a good for us to try to get some sense of what he meant. Examples are: 3 Nephi 9:15-21; Ether 4:8-19; D&C 10:64-70, 11:28-30, 12:7-9,34:1-4, 39:1-4, 45:7-9.

    The more closely one reads the scriptures, the more it is apparent that “light” and “life” are not metaphors. Rather, they are nouns that name absolute reality.

    It appears that love, light, and truth are equivalents—they come from God and are expressions of his glory. The conclusion that they are actually the same thing is easy to come by. Truth is knowledge of eternal reality—“of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come.” That is, truth is knowledge of all reality in sacred time and space. The Savior is the Spirit of Truth, and “he comprehended all things, that he might be in all and through all things, the light of truth; Which truth shineth. This is the light of Christ …which light proceedeth forth from the presence of God to fill the immensity of space” (D&C 88:7-12, 93:24-26). Thus, both truth and light permeate and sustain everything in the universe. The fact that God’s love is also everywhere is a given that needs no proof. Since his light, truth, and love are everywhere and in every individual, they either occupy the same space at the same time, or else they are the same thing. If the latter is correct, then the differences we perceive are simply ways we have of describing the multiple effects of the power of his godliness. Joy is the product of truth/light/love. It is most meaningful when it is shared. The more we recognize and assimilate the truth/light/love of others, the greater the joy we and they experience (Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, 2nd edition, 565).

    When we recognize that light, love, and truth are equivalents, then other scriptures take on much greater meaning.

    In section 88 the Savior defines his light. That definition includes, but is not limited to, the photons our eyes can detect, the spectrums of light our eyes cannot detect, the heat and life giving energy that comes from the sun, and much more. Speaking of the Savior the revelation says:

    D&C 88:1-17
    6 He that ascended up on high, as also he descended below all things, in that he comprehended all things, that he might be in all and through all things, the light of truth;
    7 Which truth shineth. This is the light of Christ. As also he is in the sun, and the light of the sun, and the power thereof by which it was made.
    8 As also he is in the moon, and is the light of the moon, and the power thereof by which it was made;
    9 As also the light of the stars, and the power thereof by which they were made;
    10 And the earth also, and the power thereof, even the earth upon which you stand.

    In addition to being both the light and power of our visible world, the revelation also says it is the light that gives us the capacity to learn and understand what we learn:

    11 And the light which shineth, which giveth you light, is through him who enlighteneth your eyes, which is the same light that quickeneth your understandings;

    Now we are told that the Savior’s light is both the source of life and “the law by which all things are governed.”

    12 Which light proceedeth forth from the presence of God [shechinah] to fill the immensity of space—
    13 The light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed, even the power of God who sitteth upon his throne, who is in the bosom of eternity, who is in the midst of all things.

    There we have three concepts coming together to create a unity that we can sort of understand. However, no mere human can wrap his mind around its infinite enormity. The concepts are:
    “to fill the immensity of space,” “all things,” and “in the bosom of eternity.”

    That definition of light is the introduction to the next part of the revelation which begins:

    14 Now, verily I say unto you, that through the redemption which is made for you is brought to pass the resurrection from the dead (D&C 88:14)

    That same relationship (light, life, resurrection) was taught to Alma by Abinadi, who explained:

    7 And if Christ had not risen from the dead, or have broken the bands of death that the grave should have no victory, and that death should have no sting, there could have been no resurrection.
    8 But there is a resurrection, therefore the grave hath no victory, and the sting of death is swallowed up in Christ.
    9 He is the light and the life of the world; yea, a light that is endless, that can never be darkened; yea, and also a life which is endless, that there can be no more death.
    10 Even this mortal shall put on immortality, and this corruption shall put on incorruption, and shall be brought to stand before the bar of God, to be judged of him according to their works whether they be good or whether they be evil—
    11 If they be good, to the resurrection of endless life and happiness; and if they be evil, to the resurrection of endless damnation, being delivered up to the devil, who hath subjected them, which is damnation (Mosiah 16:7-11).

    John literally uses light and life interchangeably. In one place he equates life with light. He writes, “In him was life; and the life was the light of men [John 1:4]; and in another place he reverses that when he quotes the Savior as saying that the light is life:

    12 Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life (John 8:12).

    In the Book of Mormon, Mormon explains to us what Ammon was teaching the Lamanite king. In doing so he ties those ideas nicely together showing that their product is joy.

    6 Now, this was what Ammon desired, for he knew that king Lamoni was under the power of God; he knew that the dark veil of unbelief was being cast away from his mind, and the light which did light up his mind, which was the light of the glory of God, which was a marvelous light of his goodness—yea, this light had infused such joy into his soul, the cloud of darkness having been dispelled, and that the light of everlasting life was lit up in his soul, yea, he knew that this had overcome his natural frame, and he was carried away in God (Alma 19:6).

    A few chapters later Mormon again shows the relationship of the light, life, and joy, when he writes:

    14 And thus we see the great call of diligence of men to labor in the vineyards of the Lord; and thus we see the great reason of sorrow, and also of rejoicing—sorrow because of death and destruction among men, and joy because of the light of Christ unto life (Alma 28:14).

    Now the formula becomes more complicated as Alma equates light and life, with “the word of truth.”

    9 And now, my son, I have told you this that ye may learn wisdom, that ye may learn of me that there is no other way or means whereby man can be saved, only in and through Christ. Behold, he is the life and the light of the world. Behold, he is the word of truth and righteousness (Alma 38:9) .

    The Savior said the same thing, only more explicitly. He described himself as the law (which can be understood as an fusion of priesthood power, truth and gospel) and the source of eternal life:

    9 Behold, I am the law, and the light. Look unto me, and endure to the end, and ye shall live; for unto him that endureth to the end will I give eternal life (3 Nephi 15:9).

    The Lord defines truth as the “knowledge of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come.” That is, truth is knowledge of reality in sacred time. He then tells that he is the very personification of truth, that he has “all truth.” The revelation reads

    26 The Spirit of truth is of God. I am the Spirit of truth, and John bore record of me, saying: He received a fulness of truth, yea, even of all truth (D&C 93:24-26).

    That he received “a fullness of truth” is expressed in the New Testament as he is “full of grace and truth (John 1:14).”

    Truth can either be described as what God knows or what God speaks. The implications of that are described in Moses where the Father is quoted as saying:

    32 And by the word of my power, have I created them, which is mine Only Begotten Son, who is full of grace and truth.
    33 And worlds without number have I created; and I also created them for mine own purpose; and by the Son I created them, which is mine Only Begotten (Moses 1:31-33).

    There, the word of God’s power is personified as the “Only Begotten Son.” Doctrine and Covenants 84 gathers these ideas into equivalents, so that it is impossible to understand one outside the context of the others.

    45 For the word of the Lord is truth, and whatsoever is truth is light, and whatsoever is light is Spirit, even the Spirit of Jesus Christ.
    46 And the Spirit giveth light to every man that cometh into the world; and the Spirit enlighteneth every man through the world, that hearkeneth to the voice of the Spirit.(D&C 84:1-60.)

    If we are to even begin to understand what the Savior means when he identifies himself as “the light and the life of the world,” we must take literally John’s testimony as it is given us in the Prophet Joseph’s inspired version of the Bible:

    1 In the beginning was the gospel [word of truth = light = life = love] preached through the Son. And the gospel was the word, and the word was with the Son, and the Son was with God, and the Son was of God.
    2 The same was in the beginning with God.
    3 All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made which was made.
    4 In him was the gospel [truth], and the gospel was the life, and the life was the light of men;
    5 And the light shineth in the world, and the world perceiveth it not (JST John 1:1-5).

    From our perspective, there are some beautiful words in the psalms that seem to says it all:

    9 For with thee is the fountain of life: in thy light shall we see light.
    10 O continue thy lovingkindness [hesed] unto them that know thee; and thy righteousness to the upright in heart (Psalms 36:9-10).

    The Savior is the universal, and for us, the eternal source of truth, light, life, and love. His gospel (including the ordinances and covenants associated with its teachings) is the way we may fully appreciate and participate in the blessings of truth, light, and eternal life and love. But, as Alma points out, because he is the source of life, if we seek to find it any other place we find only death and darkness.

    25 And then shall the righteous shine forth in the kingdom of God.
    26 But behold, an awful death cometh upon the wicked; for they die as to things pertaining to things of righteousness; for they are unclean, and no unclean thing can inherit the kingdom of God; but they are cast out, and consigned to partake of the fruits of their labors or their works, which have been evil; and they drink the dregs of a bitter cup (Alma 40:25-26).

     <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><